Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(7): 945-951, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33900791

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To address high COVID-19 burden in U.S. nursing homes, rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests have been widely distributed in those facilities. However, performance data are lacking, especially in asymptomatic people. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing when used for facility-wide testing during a nursing home outbreak. DESIGN: A prospective evaluation involving 3 facility-wide rounds of testing where paired respiratory specimens were collected to evaluate the performance of the BinaxNOW antigen test compared with virus culture and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Early and late infection were defined using changes in RT-PCR cycle threshold values and prior test results. SETTING: A nursing home with an ongoing SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. PARTICIPANTS: 532 paired specimens collected from 234 available residents and staff. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of positive agreement (PPA) and percentage of negative agreement (PNA) for BinaxNOW compared with RT-PCR and virus culture. RESULTS: BinaxNOW PPA with virus culture, used for detection of replication-competent virus, was 95%. However, the overall PPA of antigen testing with RT-PCR was 69%, and PNA was 98%. When only the first positive test result was analyzed for each participant, PPA of antigen testing with RT-PCR was 82% among 45 symptomatic people and 52% among 343 asymptomatic people. Compared with RT-PCR and virus culture, the BinaxNOW test performed well in early infection (86% and 95%, respectively) and poorly in late infection (51% and no recovered virus, respectively). LIMITATION: Accurate symptom ascertainment was challenging in nursing home residents; test performance may not be representative of testing done by nonlaboratory staff. CONCLUSION: Despite lower positive agreement compared with RT-PCR, antigen test positivity had higher agreement with shedding of replication-competent virus. These results suggest that antigen testing could be a useful tool to rapidly identify contagious people at risk for transmitting SARS-CoV-2 during nascent outbreaks and help reduce COVID-19 burden in nursing homes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Viral/analysis , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Nursing Homes , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 37(4): 298-303, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29189672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Invasive infections from Haemophilus influenzae serotype a (Hia) have been reported with increasing frequency, especially among indigenous populations. However, there are limited population-based studies of clinical severity. We studied invasive Hia infections in Alaska to determine clinical characteristics, mortality and sequelae. METHODS: We defined an invasive Hia infection as the first detection of Hia from a usually sterile site in a child <10 years of age from Alaska. We identified cases using the Alaska Invasive Bacterial Diseases Surveillance System and reviewed medical charts up to 2 years after reported illness. RESULTS: We identified invasive Hia infections in 36 children, 28 (78%) <1 year old, 34 (94%) living in an Alaskan village and 25 (69%) without documented underlying illness. Overlapping clinical presentations included meningitis in 15 children (42%); bacteremia and pneumonia in 10 children (28%); and bone, joint or soft tissue infections in 10 children (22%). In 4 other children, no source of invasive infection was identified. Intensive care was provided for 11 children (31%); 12 children (33%) required surgical intervention. One year after infection, 4 children (11%) had died from Hia, and 5 children (14%) had ongoing neurologic sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive Hia infections in Alaska occurred predominantly in Alaska Native infants in rural communities. Although one-third of children had preexisting conditions, most cases occurred without known comorbidity. Clinical syndromes were frequently severe. One year after infection, 1 in 4 children had either died or had neurologic sequelae. An effective vaccine would prevent significant morbidity and mortality in affected populations.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/pathology , Haemophilus Infections/epidemiology , Haemophilus Infections/pathology , Haemophilus influenzae/classification , Haemophilus influenzae/isolation & purification , Serogroup , Alaska/epidemiology , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Bacteremia/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/microbiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/mortality , Female , Haemophilus Infections/microbiology , Haemophilus Infections/mortality , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Meningitis, Haemophilus/epidemiology , Meningitis, Haemophilus/microbiology , Meningitis, Haemophilus/mortality , Meningitis, Haemophilus/pathology , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/microbiology , Osteoarthritis/mortality , Osteoarthritis/pathology , Population Groups , Retrospective Studies , Rural Population , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Soft Tissue Infections/mortality , Soft Tissue Infections/pathology , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL