Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 19(1): 104, 2022 09 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36171602

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brain-computer interfaces (BCI), initially designed to bypass the peripheral motor system to externally control movement using brain signals, are additionally being utilized for motor rehabilitation in stroke and other neurological disorders. Also called neurofeedback training, multiple approaches have been developed to link motor-related cortical signals to assistive robotic or electrical stimulation devices during active motor training with variable, but mostly positive, functional outcomes reported. Our specific research question for this scoping review was: for persons with non-progressive neurological injuries who have the potential to improve voluntary motor control, which mobile BCI-based neurofeedback methods demonstrate or are associated with improved motor outcomes for Neurorehabilitation applications? METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases with all steps from study selection to data extraction performed independently by at least 2 individuals. Search terms included: brain machine or computer interfaces, neurofeedback and motor; however, only studies requiring a motor attempt, versus motor imagery, were retained. Data extraction included participant characteristics, study design details and motor outcomes. RESULTS: From 5109 papers, 139 full texts were reviewed with 23 unique studies identified. All utilized EEG and, except for one, were on the stroke population. The most commonly reported functional outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA; n = 13) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT; n = 6) which were then utilized to assess effectiveness, evaluate design features, and correlate with training doses. Statistically and functionally significant pre-to post training changes were seen in FMA, but not ARAT. Results did not differ between robotic and electrical stimulation feedback paradigms. Notably, FMA outcomes were positively correlated with training dose. CONCLUSION: This review on BCI-based neurofeedback training confirms previous findings of effectiveness in improving motor outcomes with some evidence of enhanced neuroplasticity in adults with stroke. Associative learning paradigms have emerged more recently which may be particularly feasible and effective methods for Neurorehabilitation. More clinical trials in pediatric and adult neurorehabilitation to refine methods and doses and to compare to other evidence-based training strategies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Brain-Computer Interfaces , Neurofeedback , Neurological Rehabilitation , Stroke , Adult , Child , Electroencephalography/methods , Humans
2.
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot ; 2022: 1-5, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36176143

ABSTRACT

Brain computer interface (BCI) systems were initially developed to replace lost function; however, they are being increasingly utilized in rehabilitation to restore motor functioning after brain injury. In such BCI-mediated neurofeedback training (BCI-NFT), the brain-state associated with movement attempt or intention is used to activate an external device which assists the movement while providing sensory feedback to enhance neuroplasticity. A critical element in the success of BCI-NFT is accurate timing of the feedback within the active period of the brain state. The overarching goal of this work was to develop a reliable deep learning model that can predict motion before its onset, and thereby deliver the sensory stimuli in a timely manner for BCI-NFT applications. To this end, the main objective of the current study was to design and evaluate a Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP-NN). Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCP) during planning and execution of ankle dorsiflexion was used to train the model to classify dorsiflexion planning vs. rest. The accuracy and reliability of the model was evaluated offline using data from eight healthy individuals (age: 26.3 ± 7.6 years). First, we evaluated three different epoching strategies for defining our 2 classes, to identify the one which best discriminated rest from dorsiflexion. The best model accuracy for predicting ankle dorsiflexion from EEG before movement execution was 84.7%. Second, the effect of various spatial filters on the model accuracy was evaluated, demonstrating that the spatial filtering had minimal effect on model accuracy and reliability.


Subject(s)
Brain-Computer Interfaces , Neurofeedback , Adolescent , Adult , Ankle , Electroencephalography , Humans , Movement/physiology , Neural Networks, Computer , Neurofeedback/physiology , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL