Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
HIV Clin Trials ; 11(1): 28-38, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20400409

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study characterized the pharmacokinetic effects, safety, and antiretroviral activity of three different doses of the nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir, in combination with ritonavir administered twice daily for 28 days, on a number of triple-combination regimens containing a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz or nevirapine) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (abacavir, didanosine, lamivudine, stavudine, and zidovudine) or a three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combination (zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir). METHODS: The study enrolled 208 HIV-1-positive patients who had been on stable antiretroviral treatment for at least 12 weeks prior to study entry and had an HIV-1 RNA load of delta 20,000 copies/mL. The patients were randomized to receive one of three dose combinations of tipranavir and ritonavir (1250/100 mg, 750/100 mg, and 250/200 mg) in addition to their antiretroviral (ARV) regimen for the next 22 days. The effects of twice-daily tipranavir and ritonavir combinations on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of the antiretrovirals were assessed by comparing pharmacokinetic parameters at baseline and after 3 weeks of coadministration. RESULTS: No clinically relevant changes were observed in the Cmin, Cmax, or AUC parameters for nevirapine, efavirenz, lamivudine, stavudine, or didanosine, when coadministered with tipranavir and ritonavir at the dose combinations studied. All three dose combinations of tipranavir and ritonavir decreased the systemic exposure of abacavir (by 35% to 44%) and zidovudine (by 31% to 42%). Consistent with previous tipranavir studies, gastrointestinal adverse events were those most frequently observed. These reactions tended to be mild, with the majority being of Grade 1, and only 8 being of Grade 3 or 4 in intensity. Virologic response improved from 40.4% of participants at baseline with <50 copies/mL to 67.6% at Day 28 of study following addition of tipranavir and ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS: Tipranavir coadministered with ritonavir has been demonstrated to be safe, effective, and pose little potential for clinically meaningful drug interactions when added to the highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens containing nevirapine, efavirenz, lamivudine, stavudine, or didanosine.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1 , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics , Pyrones/pharmacokinetics , Ritonavir/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/methods , Area Under Curve , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Female , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Male , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyrones/administration & dosage , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides , Viral Load/drug effects
2.
Chest ; 144(2): 490-497, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23558890

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Disease progression in COPD is associated with a decline in exercise performance over time. We assessed whether tiotropium might mitigate this by determining its effect on treadmill endurance time (ET) over 2 years. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tiotropium, 18 µg daily, in patients with COPD (FEV1/FVC < 70%; postbronchodilator FEV1 < 65%). The primary end point was ET at 90% of baseline maximum work rate at 96 weeks. Secondary end points were ET at other visits, ET by smoking status, spirometry, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: A total of 519 patients were randomized (tiotropium 260, placebo 259). Mean age was 65 years, 77% were men, 34% were continuing smokers, and mean FEV1 was 1.25 L (44% predicted). Significantly more patients discontinued placebo (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.61 [0.44-0.83]). Baseline ET was 301 s (improvement tiotropium/placebo was 13% overall; P = .009; 18% at 48 weeks, P = .004; 13% at 96 weeks, P = .106). In patients with baseline ET between 2 and 10 min (n = 404), improvement at 96 weeks was 19% (P = .04). Current smokers had higher ET with tiotropium vs placebo (P = .018). FEV1/FVC improved with tiotropium (P < .01). SGRQ total score at 96 weeks improved with tiotropium vs placebo by 4.03 units (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Treadmill ET was numerically greater over 2 years with tiotropium vs placebo. However, the 96-week difference was not statistically significant. Spirometry and health status also improved with tiotropium over 2 years, attesting to the benefits of long-acting bronchodilator therapy. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00525512; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.


Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents/pharmacology , Exercise Test , Physical Endurance/physiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Scopolamine Derivatives/pharmacology , Aged , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Endpoint Determination , Female , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Respiratory Function Tests , Smoking/adverse effects , Tiotropium Bromide
3.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 5: 375-85, 2010 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21103404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because treadmill exercise testing is more representative of daily activity than cycle testing, we developed treadmill protocols to be used in various clinical settings as part of a two-year, multicenter, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trial evaluating the effect of tiotropium on exercise. METHODS: We enrolled 519 COPD patients aged 64.6 ± 8.3 years with a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) of 1.25 ± 0.42 L, 44.3% ± 11.9% predicted. The patients performed symptom-limited treadmill tests where work rate (W) was increased linearly using speed and grade adjustments every minute. On two subsequent visits, they performed constant W tests to exhaustion at 90% of maximum W from the incremental test. RESULTS: Mean incremental test duration was 522 ± 172 seconds (range 20-890), maximum work rate 66 ± 34 watts. For the first and second constant W tests, both at 61 ± 33 watts, mean endurance times were 317 ± 61 seconds and 341 ± 184 seconds, respectively. The mean of two tests had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (P < 0.001). During the second constant W test, 88.2% of subjects stopped exercise because of breathing discomfort; 87.1% for Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Stage II, 88.5% for GOLD Stage III, and 90.2% for GOLD Stage IV. CONCLUSION: The symptom-limited incremental and constant work treadmill protocol was well tolerated and appeared to be representative of the physiologic limitations of COPD.


Subject(s)
Exercise Test , Exercise Tolerance , Lung/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Aged , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Cholinergic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Feasibility Studies , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Germany , Humans , Los Angeles , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Predictive Value of Tests , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Scopolamine Derivatives/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Tiotropium Bromide , Treatment Outcome , Vital Capacity
4.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 49(12): 4903-10, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16304151

ABSTRACT

Loperamide (LOP) is a peripherally acting opioid receptor agonist used for the management of chronic diarrhea through the reduction of gut motility. The lack of central opioid effects is partly due to the efflux activity of the multidrug resistance transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) at the blood-brain barrier. The protease inhibitors are substrates for P-gp and have the potential to cause increased LOP levels in the brain. Because protease inhibitors, including tipranavir (TPV), are often associated with diarrhea, they are commonly used in combination with LOP. The level of respiratory depression, the level of pupil constriction, the pharmacokinetics, and the safety of LOP alone compared with those of LOP-ritonavir (RTV), LOP-TPV, and LOP-TPV-RTV were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study with 24 healthy human immunodeficiency virus type 1-negative adults. Respiratory depression was assessed by determination of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Tipranavir-containing regimens (LOP-TPV and LOP-TPV-RTV) caused decreases in the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity for LOP (51% and 63% decreases, respectively) and its metabolite (72% and 77% decreases, respectively), whereas RTV caused increases in the levels of exposure of LOP (121% increase) and its metabolite (44% increase). In vitro and in vivo data suggest that TPV is a substrate for and an inducer of P-gp activity. The respiratory response to LOP in combination with TPV and/or RTV was not different from that to LOP alone. There was no evidence that LOP had opioid effects in the central nervous system, as measured indirectly by CO2 response curves and pupillary response in the presence of TPV and/or RTV.


Subject(s)
Loperamide/adverse effects , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/etiology , Pyridines/pharmacology , Pyrones/pharmacology , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , Adult , Caco-2 Cells , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Interactions , HIV Protease Inhibitors/administration & dosage , HIV Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , Humans , Loperamide/pharmacology , Sulfonamides
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL