Diagnosis and management of heart failure from hospital admission to discharge: A practical expert guidance.

Heart failure (HF) has high event rates, mortality, and is challenging to manage in clinical practice. Clinical management is complicated by complex therapeutic strategies in a population with a high prevalence of comorbidity and general frailty. In the last four years, an abundance of research has become available to support multidisciplinary management of heart failure from within the hospital through to discharge and primary care as well as supporting diagnosis and comorbidity management. Within the hospital setting, recent evidence supports sacubitril-valsartan combination in frail, deteriorating or de novo patients with LVEF≤40%. Furthermore, new strategies such as SGLT2 inhibitors and vericiguat provide further benefit for patients with decompensating HF. Studies with tafamidis report major clinical benefits specifically for patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, a remaining underdiagnosed and undertreated disease. New evidence for medical interventions supports his bundle pacing to reduce QRS width and improve haemodynamics as well as ICD defibrillation for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The Mitraclip reduces hospitalisations and mortality in patients with symptomatic, secondary mitral regurgitation and ablation reduces mortality and hospitalisations in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. In end-stage HF, the 2018 French Heart Allocation policy should improve access to heart transplants for stable, ambulatory patients and, mechanical circulatory support should be considered to avoid deteriorating on the waiting list. In the community, new evidence supports that improving discharge education, treatment and patient support improves outcomes. The authors believe that this review fills the gap between the guidelines and clinical practice and provides practical recommendations to improve HF management.

Pharmacological delayed preconditioning against ischaemia-induced ventricular arrhythmias: effect of an adenosine A(1)-receptor agonist.

1. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of the delayed pharmacological preconditioning produced by an adenosine A(1)-receptor agonist (A(1)-DPC) against ventricular arrhythmias induced by ischaemia and reperfusion, compared to those of ischaemia-induced delayed preconditioning (I-DPC). 2. Eighty-nine instrumented conscious rabbits underwent a 2 consecutive days protocol. On day 1, rabbits were randomly divided into four groups: 'Control' (saline, i.v.), 'I-DPC' (six 4-min coronary artery occlusion/4-min reperfusion cycles), 'A(1)-DPC(100)' (N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine, 100 microg kg(-1), i.v.), and 'A(1)-DPC(400)' (N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine, 400 microg kg(-1), i.v.). On day 2, i.e., 24 h later, the incidence and severity of ventricular arrhythmias during a 30-min coronary artery occlusion and subsequent reperfusion were analysed in all animals, using an arrhythmia score. 3. I-DPC, A(1)-DPC(100) and A(1)-DPC(400) significantly reduced the infarct size (34+/-5, 42+/-3 and 43+/-7% of the area at risk, respectively) as compared to Control (55+/-3% of the area at risk). 4. During both ischaemia and reperfusion, neither the incidence nor the severity of ventricular arrhythmias were altered by A(1)-DPC(100), A(1)-DPC(400) or I-DPC as compared to Control. 5. Thus, despite reduction of infarct size induced by delayed preconditioning, A(1)-DPC as well as I-DPC failed to exert any anti-arrhythmic effect in the conscious rabbit model of ischaemia-reperfusion.

[Pathology and dental care in the context of cardiovascular conditions: myths, beliefs and realities]. / Pathologies et soins dentaires dans le cadre des affections cardiovasculaires: mythes, croyances et réalités.

The knowledge regarding the links between dental and cardiac affections are generally based on empirical concepts and lead to unjustified clinical practices. Infectious endocarditis (IE) is the principal cardiac diseases concerned with dental procedures. Although in France, the incidence of IE is stable, the incidence of oral bacteria at the origin of IE is diminishing. The risk of IE and thus the indication of antibioprophylaxis depend upon the subjacent cardiopathy and dental treatment. Antibioprophylaxis has to be very strict in patients with high or moderate risks of IE but is not necessary in low risk patients. In all cases, a good oral and dental hygiene and a regular dentist follow up are the most effective methods of preventing IE. Coronary artery disease and dental affections are associated because they present similar risk factors (i.e. smoking, excessive sugar consumption) and also because inflammation increases the risk of acute coronary syndrome. Today, dental cares are not contraindicated in patients with recent coronary syndrome if precise protocols are followed. Concerning the hemorrhagic risk during dental care in patients treated by anticoagulants and/or antithrombotics, dental cares and extractions are possible if INR or heparinemy are within the therapeutic limits and local haemostasis is meticulous. In addition, aspirin does not require to be stopped before minor dental treatments. Finally a better collaboration between dentists and cardiologists would allow an optimum management of patients with cardiac disease requiring dental cares.

Kinetics of action of salbutamol inhaled from a metered dose inhaler (MDI) and a "Diskhaler".

In a double-blind cross-over study, 12 patients with reversible airways obstruction were treated with 200 micrograms salbutamol base in aerosol or 400 micrograms of powder following methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Salbutamol was inhaled either from a conventional metered dose inhaler (MDI) or from an inhaler (Diskhaler) utilizing the powdered form of the drug. The efficacy of both forms was identical whether assessed in terms of FEV1 or vital capacity. The ratio of the increase in FEV1 or vital capacity after bronchodilatation to the decrease during the prior bronchoconstriction was 1.4, indicating that both FEV1 and vital capacity improved over baseline following bronchodilatation. In six subjects, the onset of action of the powder form was more rapid, and in four the MDI acted more rapidly. In the group as a whole, the mean time constant for the action of salbutamol was identical (3.8 min) for the two forms. It is concluded that salbutamol powder has a similar efficacy and time course of action as the aerosol, probably because both formulations produce similar sized particles of the drug.