Biomarkers of Coagulation and Inflammation in COVID-19-Associated Ischemic Stroke.

[Figure: see text].

Under Treatment of High-Risk TIA Patients with Clopidogrel-Aspirin in the Emergency Setting.

BACKGROUND: Treating high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces subsequent ischemic stroke risk yet current rates of clopidogrel-aspirin treatment are uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive TIA patients who presented to any of the four emergency departments (ED) of a single urban health system from 1/1/2018-3/1/2020. Medical record review was used to describe the cohort and assess clopidogrel-aspirin treatment. Patient eligibility for clopidogrel-aspirin was determined using relevant criteria from the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trial. Comparisons among eligible patients who received versus did not receive clopidogrel-aspirin were conducted using t-test, chi-squared, and Mann-Whitney as indicated. RESULTS: We identified 248 TIA patients of whom 95 met eligibility criteria for clopidogrel-aspirin treatment. Among these 95 patients, mean age was 69.5 (SD: 12), 68.4% were women, and median ABCD2 score was 5 (IQR: 4-6). A total of 26/95 (27.4%) eligible patients received clopidogrel-aspirin within 24 hours of symptom onset. Appropriate clopidogrel-aspirin use was associated with having a stroke code called upon ED arrival (88.5% vs. 34.8%; P<0.001), being evaluated by a vascular neurologist (88.5% vs. 21.1%; P<0.001), and not presenting to the community ED site wherein only a single patient received clopidogrel-aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: In a multisite, single health system study, nearly three-fourths of high-risk TIA patients eligible for clopidogrel-aspirin treatment did not receive it. Appropriate clopidogrel-aspirin use was highest among patients seen by vascular neurologists and lowest at the community ED, though under treatment was evident at all sites.

Treating High-Risk TIA and Minor Stroke Patients With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with aspirin plus clopidogrel, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), within 24 hours of high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke symptoms to eligible patients is recommended by national guidelines. Whether or not this treatment has been adopted by emergency medicine (EM) physicians is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of EM physicians in the United States. The survey consisted of 13 multiple choice questions regarding physician characteristics, practice settings, and usual approach to TIA and minor stroke treatment. We report participant characteristics and use chi-squared tests to compare between groups. RESULTS: We included 162 participants in the final study analysis. 103 participants (64%) were in practice for >5 years and 96 (59%) were at nonacademic centers; all were EM board-certified or board-eligible. Only 9 (6%) participants reported that they would start DAPT for minor stroke and 8 (5%) reported that they would start DAPT after high-risk TIA. Aspirin alone was the selected treatment by 81 (50%) participants for minor stroke patients who presented within 24 hours of symptom onset and were not candidates for thrombolysis. For minor stroke, 69 (43%) participants indicated that they would defer medical management to consultants or another team. Similarly, 75 (46%) of participants chose aspirin alone to treat high-risk TIA; 74 (46%) reported they would defer medical management after TIA to consultants or another team. CONCLUSION: In a survey of EM physicians, we found that the reported rate of DAPT treatment for eligible patients with high-risk TIA and minor stroke was low.

The effect of race on composite thrombotic events in patients with COVID-19.

COVID-19 associated coagulopathy and mortality related to thrombotic complications have been suggested as biological mediators in racial disparities related to COVID-19. We studied the adjusted prevalence of acute ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and deep venous thrombosis stratified by race in hospitalized patients in one New York City borough during the local COVID-19 surge. The multi-racial cohort included 4299 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 9% of whom were white, 40% black, 41% Hispanic and 10% Asian or other. We found a 6.1% prevalence of composite thrombotic events. There were no significant race-specific differences in thrombotic events when adjusting for basic demographics, socioeconomic factors, medical comorbidities or biomarkers using a stepwise regression model. We therefore found no evidence that the racial disparities related to COVID-19, and specifically thrombotic complications, are caused by biological differences in race.

Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period.

BACKGROUND: Most stroke recovery occurs by 90 days after onset, with proportional recovery models showing an achievement of about 70% of the maximal remaining recovery. Little is known about recovery during the acute stroke period. Moreover, data are described for groups, not for individuals. In this observational cohort study, we describe for the first time the daily changes of acute stroke patients with motor and/or language deficits over the first week after stroke onset. METHODS: Patients were enrolled within 24-72 h after stroke onset with upper extremity hemiparesis, aphasia, or both, and were tested daily until day 7 or discharge with the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke, the Boston Naming Test, and the comprehension domain from the Western Aphasia Battery. Discharge scores, and absolute and proportional changes were examined using t-tests for pairwise comparisons and linear regression to determine relative contributions of initial impairment, lesion volume, and age to recovery over this period. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled: 19 had motor deficits alone, 8 had aphasia alone, and 7 had motor and language deficits. In a group analysis, statistically significant changes in absolute scores were found in the motor (p < 0.001) and comprehension (p < 0.001) domains but not in naming. Day-by-day recovery curves for individual patients displayed wide variation with comparable initial impairment. Proportional recovery calculations revealed that, on average, patients achieved less than 1/3 of their potential recovery by the time of discharge. Multivariate regression showed that the amount of variance accounted for by initial severity, age, and lesion volume in this early time period was not significant for motor or language domains. CONCLUSIONS: Over the first week after stroke onset, recovery of upper extremity hemiparesis and aphasia were not predictable on the basis of initial impairment, lesion volume, or age. In addition, patients only achieved about 1/3 of their remaining possible recovery based on the anticipated 70% proportion found at 90 days. These findings suggest that the complex interaction between poststroke structural repair, regeneration, and functional reorganization during the first week after stroke has yet to be elucidated.