Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 3803-3812, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has shown promise in improving the prognosis of individuals with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). However, the factors influencing tumor response and long-term survival in these patients remain unknown. The optimal timing for surgery after the completion of radiotherapy in LA-ESCC remains controversial. Therefore, this study was designed to identify biomarkers and to determine the optimal post-NCRT time-to-surgery (TTS) for patients with LA-ESCC. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with resectable LA-ESCC who underwent NCRT between May 2017 and June 2021. The tumor shrinkage rate was calculated as the difference between the pre- and post-primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) divided by the pre-GTVp. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: We collected data from 248 patients with resectable LA-ESCC who underwent computed tomography (CT) scans before the initiation of treatment. The median follow-up time was 37.7 months. The optimal cutoff of tumor shrinkage was 45%. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, we found a significant association between the tumor shrinkage rate and PFS (p = 0.001). Among the subgroup of patients who responded to treatment, extending the TTS was associated with improved OS (p = 0.037) and PFS (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with resectable LA-ESCC, the tumor shrinkage rate is an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Thus, for responders, prolonging TTS is recommended to obtain a better OS.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagectomy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Time-to-Treatment , Tumor Burden , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Neoadjuvant Therapy/mortality , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Chemoradiotherapy/mortality , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Adult , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(1): 178-191, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751117

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A recurrence-free survival (RFS) prediction model was developed and validated for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in combination with surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 282 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with surgery, constructed three models incorporating pathological factors, investigated the discrimination and calibration of each model, and compared the clinical utility of each model using the net reclassification index (NRI) and the integrated discrimination index (IDI). RESULTS: Multivariable analysis showed that pathologic complete response (pCR) and lymph node tumor regression grading (LN-TRG) (p < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors for RFS. LASSO regression screened six correlates of LN-TRG, vascular invasion, nerve invasion, degree of differentiation, platelet grade, and a total diameter of residual cancer in lymph nodes to build model three, which was consistent in terms of efficacy in the training set and validation set. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves showed that all three models were able to distinguish well between high- and low-risk groups (p < 0.01). The NRI and IDI showed that the clinical utility of model 2 was slightly better than that of model 1 (p > 0.05), and model 3 was significantly better than that of model 2 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical prediction models incorporating LN-TRG factors have high predictive efficacy, can help identify patients at high risk of recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy, and can be used as a supplement to the Ā AJCC/TNM staging system while offering a scientific rationale for early postoperative intervention.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(9): 5706-5716, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833056

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and conventional care in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer, which have not previously been compared. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included prospective PRO data from August 2019 to June 2021. Clinical outcomes included perioperative complications and postoperative length of stay (PLOS). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and esophagus-specific module (QLQ-OES18) preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively. Mixed-effects models were used to longitudinally compare quality of life (QOL) scores between the two modes. RESULTS: Patients undergoing conventional care and ERAS were analyzed (n = 348 and 109, respectively). The ERAS group had fewer overall complications, pneumonia, arrhythmia, and a shorter PLOS than the conventional group, and outperformed the conventional group in five functional QLQ-C30 domains and five symptom QLQ-OES18 domains, including less dysphagia (p < 0.0001), trouble talking (p = 0.0006), and better eating (p < 0.0001). These advantages persisted for 3 months postoperatively. For the cervical circular stapled anastomosis, the initial domains and duration of benefit were reduced in the ERAS group. CONCLUSIONS: The ERAS protocol has significant advantages over conventional care in terms of clinical outcomes, lowering postoperative symptom burden, and improving functional QOL in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. Selection of the optimal technique for cervical anastomosis is a key operative component of ERAS that maintains the symptom domains and duration of the advantages of PROs.


Subject(s)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagectomy , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Postoperative Complications , Quality of Life , Humans , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Esophagectomy/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Aged , Prospective Studies , Prognosis , Length of Stay
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 3794-3802, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38372864

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality rates of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are high in China. The overall survival (OS) of patients with ESCC is related to lymph node (LN) metastasis (LNM). This study aimed to discuss the impact of metastasis in LN stations on the OS of patients with pathologic N1 (pN1) ESCC. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Esophageal Cancer Case Management database of Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute (SCCH-ECCM). Additionally, data of patients with pN1-category ESCC collected between January 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 807 patients were analyzed. The median OS of the patients with one metastatic LN (group 1) was 49.8 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 30.8-68.9 months), whereas the OS of those with two metastatic LNs (group 2) was only 33.3 months (P = 0.0001). Moreover, group 1 did not show a significantly longer OS than group 2.1 (patients with 2 metastatic LNs in 1 LNM station; P = 0.5736), but did show a significantly longer OS than group 2.2 (patients with 2 metastatic LNs in 2 LNM stations; P < 0.0001). After propensity score-matching, the 5-year survival rate for group 1 was 28 %, whereas that for group 2 was 14 % (P = 0.0027). CONCLUSIONS: The OS for the patients with one metastatic LN in one LNM was not significantly longer than for the patients with two metastatic LNs in one LNM station. Patients with one LNM station had a significantly longer OS than those with two LNM stations. Thus, the number of LNM stations is a significant determinant of OS in pN1 ESCC.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Humans , Male , Female , Survival Rate , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Aged , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/secondary , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophagectomy/mortality , Neoplasm Staging
5.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 945, 2024 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients undergo dose reduction or early termination of chemotherapy to reduce chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, which may increase their risk of survival. However, this strategy may result in underdosing patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and survival outcomes in patients with LA-ESCC. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed patients with LA-ESCC (cT2N + M0, cT3-4NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with curative-intent esophagectomy. The patients received 2 courses of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) combination radiotherapy prior to undergoing surgery. During NCRT, RDI was computed, defined as the received dose as a percentage of the standard dose, and the incidence of dose delays was estimated (≥ 7Ā days in any course cycle). The best RDI cutoff value (0.7) was obtained using ROC curve. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, the treatment effect was measured using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 132 patients in this study, divided into RDI < 0.7 and RDI ≥ 0.7 groups using cut-off value of 0.7. RDI grade was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between the groups. There was no evidence that patients with RDI < 0.7 experienced less toxicity or those with RDI ≥ 0.7 resulted in more toxicity. However, patients with RDI < 0.7 who were given reduced doses had a worse overall survival [HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, P = 0.015]. The risk of a lower RDI increased with a longer dose delay time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The RDI below 0.7 for avoiding chemoradiotherapy toxicity administration led to a reduction in the dose intensity of treatment and decreased overall survival.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Female , Male , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Esophagectomy , Adult , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Outcome
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(4): 237, 2024 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38509239

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is characterized by a poor prognosis and high complication rate, resulting in a heavy symptom burden and poor health-related quality of life (QOL). We evaluated longitudinal patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to analyze the correlations between symptoms and QOL and their changing characteristics during postoperative rehabilitation. METHODS: We investigated patients with ESCC who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy at Sichuan Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and December 2019. Longitudinal data of the clinical characteristics and PROs were collected. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL questionnaires were used to assess symptoms and QOL and compare the trajectories of PROs during the investigation. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients with ESCC were enrolled in this study. Regarding QOL, role and emotional functions returned to baseline at 1Ā month after surgery, and cognitive and social functions returned to baseline at 3Ā months after surgery. However, physical function and global QOL did not return to baseline at 1Ā year after surgery. At 7Ā days and 1, 3, 6, and 12Ā months after surgery, the main symptoms of the patients were negatively correlated with physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functions and the overall health status (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with ESCC experience reduced health-related QOL and persisting symptoms after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy, but a recovery trend was observed within 1Ā month. The long-term QOL after esophagectomy is acceptable.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/complications , Quality of Life , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Physical Examination , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Surg Endosc ; 38(7): 3590-3601, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is the first-line approach for esophageal cancer; however, there has recently been a paradigm shift toward robotic esophagectomy (RE). We investigated the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RE compared with those of patients who underwent conventional minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for locally advanced cT3 or cT4 esophageal cancer using a propensity-matched analysis. METHODS: Overall, 342 patients with locally advanced cT3 or cT4 esophageal cancer underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymph node dissection between 2018 and 2022. The propensity-matched analysis was performed to assign the patients to either RE or TE by covariates of histological type, tumor location, and clinical N factor. RESULTS: Overall, 87 patients were recruited in each of the RE and TE groups according to the propensity-matched analysis. The total complication rate and the rates of the three major complications (recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, anastomotic leakage, and pneumonia) were not significantly different between the RE and TE groups. However, the peak C-reactive protein concentration on postoperative day 3, rate of surgical site infection, and intensive care unit length of stay after surgery were significantly shorter in the RE group than in the TE group. No significant differences were observed in the harvested total and mediastinal lymph nodes. The total operation time was significantly longer in the RE group, while the thoracic operation time was shorter in the RE group than in the TE group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the recurrence rate of oncological outcomes after surgery. CONCLUSION: RE may facilitate early recovery after esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymph node dissection and has the same technical feasibility and oncological outcomes as TE.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagectomy , Feasibility Studies , Lymph Node Excision , Propensity Score , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Thoracoscopy , Humans , Esophagectomy/methods , Male , Female , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Thoracoscopy/methods , Aged , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Neoplasm Staging , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
8.
Esophagus ; 21(2): 141-149, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38133841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RLNI) leading to vocal cord paralysis (VCP) is a significant complication following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography (TLUSG) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative to endoscopic examination for evaluating vocal cord function. Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of TLUSG in detecting RLNI by evaluating vocal cord movement after MIE. METHODS: This retrospective study examined 96 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MIE between January 2021 and December 2022, using both TLUSG and endoscopy. RESULTS: VCP was observed in 36 out of 96 patients (37.5%). The incidence of RLNI was significantly higher on the left side than the right (29.2% vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001). Postoperative TLUSG showed a sensitivity and specificity of 88.5% (31/35) and 86.5% (45/52), respectively, with an AUC of 0.869 (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.787-0.952). The percentage agreement between TLUSG and endoscopy in assessing VCP was 87.4% (κ = 0.743). CONCLUSIONS: TLUSG is a highly effective screening tool for VCP, given its high sensitivity and specificity. This can potentially eliminate the need for unnecessary endoscopies in about 80% of patients who have undergone MIE.


Subject(s)
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries , Vocal Cord Paralysis , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/diagnosis , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/epidemiology , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/etiology , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Laryngoscopy/adverse effects , Vocal Cord Paralysis/epidemiology , Vocal Cord Paralysis/etiology , Ultrasonography/adverse effects
9.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(9): 5856-5865, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37227576

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has a high mortality rate in China. The metastatic pattern in the lymph nodes and the value of their dissection on the overall survival of these patients remain controversial. The primary aim of this study was to provide a basis for accurate staging of esophageal cancer and to identify the relationship between esophageal cancer surgery, lymph node dissection, and overall survival rates. METHODS: We utilized our hospital database to retrospectively review the data of 1727 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent R0 esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2017. The lymph nodes were defined according to Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition. The Efficacy Index (EI) was calculated by multiplying the frequency (%) of metastases to a zone and the 5-year survival rate (%) of patients with metastases to that zone, and then dividing by 100. RESULTS: The EI was high in the supraclavicular and mediastinal zones in patients with upper esophageal tumors, and the EI of 101R was 17.39, which was the highest among the lymph node stations. In patients with middle esophageal tumors, the EI was highest in the mediastinal zone, followed by the celiac and supraclavicular zones. Furthermore, the EI was highest in the celiac zone, followed by the mediastinal zones in patients with lower esophageal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The EI of resected lymph nodes was found to vary between stations and was related to the primary location of the tumor.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Survival Rate , Esophagectomy
10.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 1171, 2023 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38037003

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to explore the role of preoperative folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cell (FR+CTC) levels in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC). METHODS: Three ml blood samples were prospectively drawn from ESCC patients, and ligand-targeted polymerase chain reaction (LT-PCR) was used for the quantification of FR+CTCs. Other serum indicators were measured by traditional methods. Clinicopathological characteristics were obtained from the hospital medical record system, DFS and OS data were obtained by follow-up. The correlation between clinico-pathological characteristics, DFS, and OS and FR+CTCs were analyzed, respectively. Risk factors potentially affecting DFS and OS were explored by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: there were no significant correlations between FR+CTCs and patient age, sex, albumin, pre-albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin and CRP/Albumin ratio, tumor size, grade of differentiation, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, perineural invasion/vessel invasion (all P > 0.05). Nevertheless, preoperative FR+CTCs were an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.31-, P = 0.007) and OS (HR 3.37; 95% CI 1.06-, P = 0.04). DFS was significantly shorter for patients with post-operative FR+CTCs ≥ 17.42 FU/3ml compared with patients < 17.42 FU/3ml (P = 0.0012). For OS, it was shorter for patients with FR+CTCs ≥ 17.42 FU/3ml compared with patients < 17.42 FU/3ml, however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: ESCC patients with high FR+CTCs tend to have a worse prognosis. FR+CTCs may monitor the recurrence of cancers in time, accurately assess patient prognosis, and guide clinical decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Ethics Committee (No. SCCHEC-02-2022-050).


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating , Humans , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Albumins , C-Reactive Protein , Folic Acid
11.
Oncologist ; 27(1): e18-e28, 2022 02 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35305102

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, their efficacy in locally advanced resectable ESCC and the potential predictive biomarkers have limited data. METHODS: In this study, locally advanced resectable ESCC patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg, day 1) plus paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, day 1) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min, day 1) in each 3-week cycle for 2 cycles, followed by esophagectomy planned 4-6 weeks after preoperative therapy. The primary endpoints were safety, feasibility, and the major pathological response (MPR) rate; the secondary endpoints were the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Association between molecular signatures/tumor immune microenvironment and treatment response was also explored. RESULTS: Twenty resectable ESCC patients were enrolled. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients (100%), and 4 patients (22.2%) experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs. Sixteen patients underwent surgery without treatment-related surgical delay, and the R0 resection rate was 87.5% (14/16). Among the 16 patients, the MPR rate was 43.8% (7/16) and the pCR rate was 18.8% (3/16). The abundance of CD8+ T cells in surgical specimens increased (P = .0093), accompanied by a decreased proportion of M2-type tumor-associated macrophages (P = .036) in responders upon neoadjuvant therapy. Responders were associated with higher baseline gene expression levels of CXCL5 (P = .03) and lower baseline levels of CCL19 (P = .017) and UMODL1 (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of toripalimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin is safe, feasible, and effective in locally advanced resectable ESCC, indicating its potential as a neoadjuvant treatment for ESCC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04177797.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/pharmacology , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Paclitaxel , Tumor Microenvironment
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(3): 2661-2670, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817693

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients have severe symptom burden after oesophagectomy; however, longitudinal studies of symptom recovery after surgery are scarce. This study used longitudinal patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based symptoms to identify severe symptoms and profile symptom recovery from surgery in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. METHODS: Oesophageal cancer patients (N = 327) underwent oesophagectomy were consecutively included between April 2019 and March 2020. Data were extracted from the Sichuan Cancer Hospital's Esophageal Cancer Case Management Registration Database. Symptom assessment time points were pre-surgery and 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 30, and 90Ā days post-surgery using the Chinese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. And each symptom was rated on an 11-point scale, with 0 being 'not present' and 10 being 'as bad as you can imagine'. The symptom recovery trajectories were profiled using mixed effect models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The most-severe symptoms on day 1 after oesophagectomy were pain, fatigue, dry mouth, disturbed sleep, and distress. The severity of symptoms peaked on day 1 after surgery. The top two symptoms were fatigue (mean: 5.44 [SD 1.88]) and pain (mean: 5.23 [SD 1.29]). Fatigue was more severe 90Ā days after surgery than at baseline (mean: 1.77 [SD 1.47] vs 0.65 [SD 1.05]; P < .0001). Disturbed sleep and distress persisted from pre-surgery to 90Ā days post-surgery; average sleep recovery time was up to 20Ā days, and 50.58% of patients had sleep disturbances 90Ā days post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Early post-operative pain management after oesophagectomy should be considered. Characteristics and intervention strategies of post-operative fatigue, distress, and disturbed sleep in oesophageal cancer patients warrant further studies.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
13.
Ann Surg ; 274(6): e1022-e1029, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31855875

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic impact of pathologic lymph node (LN) status and investigate risk factors of recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There are no large-scale prospective study data regarding ypN status and recurrence after pCR in ESCC patients receiving NCRT. METHODS: The NEOCRTEC5010 trial was a prospective multicenter trial that compared the survival and safety of NCRT plus surgery (S) with S in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The relationships between survival and cN, pN, and ypN status were assessed. Potential prognostic factors in patients with ypN+ and pCR were identified. RESULTS: A total of 389 ESCC patients (NCRT: 182; S: 207) were included. Patients with pN+ in the S group and ypN+ in the NCRT group had decreased overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with pN0 and ypN0 patients, respectively. Partial response at the primary site [hazard ratio (HR), 2.09] and stable disease in the LNs (HR, 3.26) were independent risk factors for lower DFS, but not OS. For patients with pCR, the recurrence rate was 13.9%. Patients with distant LN metastasis had a median OS and DFS of 16.1 months and 14.4 months, respectively. Failure to achieve the median total dose of chemotherapy was a significant risk factor of recurrence and metastasis after pCR (HR, 44.27). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent pathologic LN metastasis after NCRT is a strong poor prognostic factor in ESCC. Additionally, pCR does not guarantee a cure; patients with pCR should undergo an active strategy of surveillance and adjuvant therapy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL