ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Optimal margins for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain controversial in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. We examine the association of positive margins, reoperations, DCIS and age. METHODS: A retrospective study of histopathological reports (4489 patients). Margin positivity was defined as ink on tumor for invasive carcinoma. For DCIS, we applied 2 mm anterior and side margin thresholds, and ink on tumor in the posterior margin. RESULTS: The incidence of positive side margins was 20% in BCS and 5% in mastectomies (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 68% and 14% underwent a reoperation (p < 0.001). After a positive side margin in BCS, the reoperation rates according to age groups were 74% (<49), 69% (50-64), 68% (65-79), and 42% (80+) (p = 0.013). Of BCS patients with invasive carcinoma in the side margin, 73% were reoperated on. A reoperation was performed in 70% of patients with a close (≤1 mm) DCIS side margin, compared to 43% with a wider (1.1-2 mm) margin (p = 0.002). The reoperation rates were 55% in invasive carcinoma with close DCIS, 66% in close extensive intraductal component (EIC), and 83% in close pure DCIS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Individual assessment as opposed to rigid adherence to guidelines was used in the decision on reoperation.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery , Margins of Excision , Mastectomy/methods , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Pathological gross examination of breast carcinoma samples is sometimes laborious. A tissue pre-mapping method could indicate neoplastic areas to the pathologist and enable focused sampling. Differential Mobility Spectrometry (DMS) is a rapid and affordable technology for complex gas mixture analysis. We present an automated tissue laser analysis system for imaging approaches (iATLAS), which utilizes a computer-controlled laser evaporator unit coupled with a DMS gas analyzer. The system is demonstrated in the classification of porcine tissue samples and three human breast carcinomas. Tissue samples from eighteen landrace pigs were classified with the system based on a pre-designed matrix (spatial resolution 1-3 mm). The smoke samples were analyzed with DMS, and tissue classification was performed with several machine learning approaches. Porcine skeletal muscle (n = 1030), adipose tissue (n = 1329), normal breast tissue (n = 258), bone (n = 680), and liver (n = 264) were identified with 86% cross-validation (CV) accuracy with a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. Further, a panel tissue that comprised all five tissue types was applied as an independent validation dataset. In this test, 82% classification accuracy with CNN was achieved. An analogous procedure was applied to demonstrate the feasibility of iATLAS in breast cancer imaging according to 1) macroscopically and 2) microscopically annotated data with 10-fold CV and SVM (radial kernel). We reached a classification accuracy of 94%, specificity of 94%, and sensitivity of 93% with the macroscopically annotated data from three breast cancer specimens. The microscopic annotation was applicable to two specimens. For the first specimen, the classification accuracy was 84% (specificity 88% and sensitivity 77%). For the second, the classification accuracy was 72% (specificity 88% and sensitivity 24%). This study presents a promising method for automated tissue imaging in an animal model and lays foundation for breast cancer imaging.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Breast , Animals , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Ion Mobility Spectrometry , Lasers , Spectrum Analysis , SwineABSTRACT
Pathologic examination of clinical tissue samples is time consuming and often does not involve the comprehensive analysis of the whole specimen. Automated tissue analysis systems have potential to make the workflow of a pathologist more efficient and to support in clinical decision-making. So far, these systems have been based on application of mass spectrometry imaging (MSI). MSI provides high fidelity and the results in tissue identification are promising. However, the high cost and need for maintenance limit the adoption of MSI in the clinical setting. Thus, there is a need for new innovations in the field of pathological tissue imaging. In this study, we show that differential ion mobility spectrometry (DMS) is a viable option in tissue imaging. We demonstrate that a DMS-driven solution performs with up to 92% accuracy in differentiating between two grossly distinct animal tissues. In addition, our model is able to classify the correct tissue with 81% accuracy in an eight-class setting. The DMS-based system is a significant innovation in a field dominated by mass-spectrometry-based solutions. By developing the presented platform further, DMS technology could be a cost-effective and helpful tool for automated pathological analysis.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Ion Mobility Spectrometry/methods , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Molecular Imaging/methods , Automation , Humans , Specimen HandlingABSTRACT
The primary treatment of breast cancer is the surgical removal of the tumor with an adequate healthy tissue margin. An intraoperative method for assessing surgical margins could optimize tumor resection. Differential ion mobility spectrometry (DMS) is applicable for tissue analysis and allows for the differentiation of malignant and benign tissues. However, the number of cancer cells necessary for detection remains unknown. We studied the detection threshold of DMS for cancer cell identification with a widely characterized breast cancer cell line (BT-474) dispersed in a human myoma-based tumor microenvironment mimicking matrix (Myogel). Predetermined, small numbers of cultured BT-474 cells were dispersed into Myogel. Pure Myogel was used as a zero sample. All samples were assessed with a DMS-based custom-built device described as "the automated tissue laser analysis system" (ATLAS). We used machine learning to determine the detection threshold for cancer cell densities by training binary classifiers to distinguish the reference level (zero sample) from single predetermined cancer cell density levels. Each classifier (sLDA, linear SVM, radial SVM, and CNN) was able to detect cell density of 3700 cells µL-1 and above. These results suggest that DMS combined with laser desorption can detect low densities of breast cancer cells, at levels clinically relevant for margin detection, from Myogel samples in vitro.