ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) is a presumed risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Olpasiran is a small interfering RNA that reduces lipoprotein(a) synthesis in the liver. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial involving patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a lipoprotein(a) concentration of more than 150 nmol per liter. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four doses of olpasiran (10 mg every 12 weeks, 75 mg every 12 weeks, 225 mg every 12 weeks, or 225 mg every 24 weeks) or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously. The primary end point was the percent change in the lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to week 36 (reported as the placebo-adjusted mean percent change). Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Among the 281 enrolled patients, the median concentration of lipoprotein(a) at baseline was 260.3 nmol per liter, and the median concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 67.5 mg per deciliter. At baseline, 88% of the patients were taking statin therapy, 52% were taking ezetimibe, and 23% were taking a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. At 36 weeks, the lipoprotein(a) concentration had increased by a mean of 3.6% in the placebo group, whereas olpasiran therapy had significantly and substantially reduced the lipoprotein(a) concentration in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in placebo-adjusted mean percent changes of -70.5% with the 10-mg dose, -97.4% with the 75-mg dose, -101.1% with the 225-mg dose administered every 12 weeks, and -100.5% with the 225-mg dose administered every 24 weeks (P<0.001 for all comparisons with baseline). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar across the trial groups. The most common olpasiran-related adverse events were injection-site reactions, primarily pain. CONCLUSIONS: Olpasiran therapy significantly reduced lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Longer and larger trials will be necessary to determine the effect of olpasiran therapy on cardiovascular disease. (Funded by Amgen; OCEAN[a]-DOSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04270760.).
Subject(s)
Anticholesteremic Agents , Atherosclerosis , Hypercholesterolemia , Lipoprotein(a) , RNA, Small Interfering , Humans , Anticholesteremic Agents/administration & dosage , Anticholesteremic Agents/adverse effects , Anticholesteremic Agents/pharmacology , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Lipoprotein(a)/analysis , Lipoprotein(a)/antagonists & inhibitors , RNA, Small Interfering/administration & dosage , RNA, Small Interfering/adverse effects , RNA, Small Interfering/pharmacology , RNA, Small Interfering/therapeutic use , Liver/drug effects , Liver/metabolism , PCSK9 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Ezetimibe/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Approximately 90 days of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) spreading originally from Wuhan, China, and across the globe has led to a widespread chain of events with imminent threats to the fragile relationship between community health and economic health. Despite near hourly reporting on this crisis, there has been no regular, updated, or accurate reporting of hospitalizations for COVID-19. It is known that many test-positive individuals may not develop symptoms or have a mild self-limited viral syndrome consisting of fever, malaise, dry cough, and constitutional symptoms. However some individuals develop a more fulminant syndrome including viral pneumonia, respiratory failure requiring oxygen, acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation, and in substantial fractions leading to death attributable to COVID-19. The pandemic is evolving in a clustered, non-inform fashion resulting in many hospitals with preparedness but few or no cases, and others that are completely overwhelmed. Thus, a considerable risk of spread when personal protection equipment becomes exhausted and a large fraction of mortality in those not offered mechanical ventilation are both attributable to a crisis due to maldistribution of resources. The pandemic is amenable to self-reporting through a mobile phone application that could obtain critical information on suspected cases and report on the results of self testing and actions taken. The only method to understand the clustering and the immediate hospital resource needs is mandatory, uniform, daily reporting of hospital censuses of COVID-19 cases admitted to hospital wards and intensive care units. Current reports of hospitalizations are delayed, uncertain, and wholly inadequate. This paper urges all the relevant stakeholders to take up self-reporting and reporting of hospitalizations of COVID-19 as an urgent task in combating this devastating pandemic.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Resources/supply & distribution , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Mandatory Reporting , Mobile Applications/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Self Report/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To summarize the four recent sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) trials: Dapagliflozin Effect on CardiovascuLAR Events (DECLARE-TIMI 58), CANagliflozin CardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program, Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients-Removing Excess Glucose (EMPA-REG OUTCOME), Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE), and explore the potential determinants for their cardiovascular, renal, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: The composite renal outcome event rates per 1000 patient-years for drug and placebo, as well as the corresponding relative risk reductions, were 3.7, 7.0, 47%; 5.5, 9.0, 40%; 6.3, 11.5, 46%; 43.2, 61.2, 30% for DECLARE-TIMI 58, CANVAS, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, and CREDENCE, respectively (event definitions varied across trials). The major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event rates per 1000 patient-years for drug and placebo, as well as the corresponding relative risk reductions, were 22.6, 24.2, 7%; 26.9, 31.5, 14%; 37.4, 43.9, 14%; 38.7, 48.7, 20% for DECLARE-TIMI 58, CANVAS, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, and CREDENCE, respectively. DECLARE-TIMI 58 had the fewest cardiorenal events and CREDENCE the most. These differences were presumably due to varying inclusion criteria resulting in DECLARE-TIMI 58 having the best baseline renal filtration function and CREDENCE the worst (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate 85.2, 76.5, 74, 56.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 for DECLARE-TIMI 58, CANVAS, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, and CREDENCE, respectively). Additionally, CREDENCE had considerably higher rates of albuminuria (median urinary albumin-creatinine ratios (UACR) were 927, 12.3, and 13.1 mg/g for CREDENCE, CANVAS, and DECLARE-TIMI 58, respectively; EMPA-REG OUTCOME had 59.4% UACR < 30, 28.6% UACR > 30-300, 11.0% UACR > 300 mg/g). CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin have internally and externally consistent and biologically plausible class effects on cardiorenal outcomes. Baseline renal filtration function and degree of albuminuria are the most significant indicators of risk for both CV and renal events. Thus, these two factors also anticipate the greatest clinical benefit for SGLT2i.
Subject(s)
Benzhydryl Compounds/therapeutic use , Canagliflozin/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetic Nephropathies/drug therapy , Glucosides/therapeutic use , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Benzhydryl Compounds/adverse effects , Canagliflozin/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Cardiovascular System/drug effects , Cardiovascular System/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Diabetic Nephropathies/mortality , Diabetic Nephropathies/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Glucosides/adverse effects , Humans , Kidney/drug effects , Kidney/physiopathology , Protective Factors , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), has been shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients who are receiving statin therapy. Larger and longer-term studies are needed to establish safety and efficacy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial involving 2341 patients at high risk for cardiovascular events who had LDL cholesterol levels of 70 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) or more and were receiving treatment with statins at the maximum tolerated dose (the highest dose associated with an acceptable side-effect profile), with or without other lipid-lowering therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive alirocumab (150 mg) or placebo as a 1-ml subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks for 78 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage change in calculated LDL cholesterol level from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: At week 24, the difference between the alirocumab and placebo groups in the mean percentage change from baseline in calculated LDL cholesterol level was -62 percentage points (P<0.001); the treatment effect remained consistent over a period of 78 weeks. The alirocumab group, as compared with the placebo group, had higher rates of injection-site reactions (5.9% vs. 4.2%), myalgia (5.4% vs. 2.9%), neurocognitive events (1.2% vs. 0.5%), and ophthalmologic events (2.9% vs. 1.9%). In a post hoc analysis, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization) was lower with alirocumab than with placebo (1.7% vs. 3.3%; hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.90; nominal P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Over a period of 78 weeks, alirocumab, when added to statin therapy at the maximum tolerated dose, significantly reduced LDL cholesterol levels. In a post hoc analysis, there was evidence of a reduction in the rate of cardiovascular events with alirocumab. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; ODYSSEY LONG TERM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01507831.).
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Anticholesteremic Agents/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/blood , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
In this systematic review, we sought to summarize the 3 recent sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) trials (Dapagliflozin Effect on CardiovasculAR Events (DECLARE-TIMI 58), Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program, and Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes (EMPA-REG OUTCOME)) and to explore the potential causes for their different results. We found that the major adverse cardiovascular event rates per 1000 patient-years for drug and placebo, as well as the corresponding relative risk reductions, were 22.6, 24.2, 7%; 26.9, 31.5, 14%; 37.4, 43.9, 14% for DECLARE-TIMI 58, CANVAS, and EMPA-REG OUTCOME, respectively. DECLARETIMI 58 had the fewest cardiorenal events (across treatment and control arms) and EMPA-REG OUTCOME the most. DECLARE-TIMI 58 used alternative inclusion criterion for baseline renal function (creatinine clearance ⧠60 mL/min) compared to the other trials (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 bodysurface area). Therefore, the DECLARE-TIMI 58 study cohort had higher eGFR (mean eGFR 85.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to 76.5 and 74 in CANVAS and EMPAREG OUTCOME, respectively); this may have caused the difference in results. Additionally contributing to the high event rate in EMPA-REG OUTCOME was the requirement of prior confirmed cardiovascular disease (CVD), resulting in 99.2% of patients with CVD compared to only 65.6% and 40.6% in CANVAS and DECLARE-TIMI 58, respectively (which did not require CVD). In conclusion, there is a need for large-scale studies of SGLT2i with matching inclusion/exclusion criteria and appropriate endpoints to ensure a truly direct comparison of the drugs.
Subject(s)
Benzhydryl Compounds/therapeutic use , Canagliflozin/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Glucosides/therapeutic use , Kidney Diseases/physiopathology , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Benzhydryl Compounds/adverse effects , Biomarkers , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Canagliflozin/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cause of Death , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Glucosides/adverse effects , Health Status , Humans , Kidney Diseases/diagnosis , Kidney Diseases/mortality , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Risk Factors , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2/drug effects , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2/metabolism , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The appropriate use criteria (AUC) has become an integral part of the cardiologist's daily practice and have evolved greatly since their inception over a decade ago. However, as health care costs continue to rise, the AUC has come to play an even more pivotal role in the way medicine-specifically cardiology-is practiced today. This editorial describes two opposing viewpoints commonly held by practicing clinicians of the AUC. Written from the perspective of two fellows-in-training looking ahead at the challenges and opportunities of clinical practice (under the auspices of several experienced clinicians and leaders of the American College of Cardiology), this article provides a fresh perspective on the impact AUC has on our patients, clinicians, and the health care system.
Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Clinical Decision-Making , Guideline Adherence/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Cardiology/economics , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Guideline Adherence/economics , Health Care Costs , Humans , Patient Safety/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Risk Assessment , Unnecessary Procedures/standardsSubject(s)
Cholesterol, LDL/biosynthesis , Genetic Therapy , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , PCSK9 Inhibitors , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering/therapeutic use , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Ezetimibe/therapeutic use , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Homozygote , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/drug therapy , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/genetics , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/metabolism , Pilot Projects , Proof of Concept Study , Proprotein Convertase 9/biosynthesis , Proprotein Convertase 9/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/adverse effects , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/pharmacology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disorder associated with life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and increased mortality. Patients at greatest risk for hyperkalemia include those with diabetes and those with impaired renal function in whom a defect in the excretion of renal potassium may already exist. Hyperkalemia is likely to become more common clinically because angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are increasingly being used in higher doses and are thought to confer cardiovascular and renal protection. Until recently, options for treating hyperkalemia were limited to the use of thiazide and loop diuretics and sodium polystyrene sulfonate. Newer options such as sodium zirconium cyclosilicate will allow for the safe and effective treatment of hyperkalemia while maintaining patients on prescribed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Hyperkalemia/drug therapy , Polymers/therapeutic use , Potassium/blood , Silicates/therapeutic use , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Biomarkers/blood , Comorbidity , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Hyperkalemia/blood , Hyperkalemia/epidemiology , Polymers/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Silicates/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Muscle-related statin intolerance is reported by 5% to 20% of patients. OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with muscle symptoms confirmed by statin rechallenge and compare lipid-lowering efficacy for 2 nonstatin therapies, ezetimibe and evolocumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two-stage randomized clinical trial including 511 adult patients with uncontrolled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and history of intolerance to 2 or more statins enrolled in 2013 and 2014 globally. Phase A used a 24-week crossover procedure with atorvastatin or placebo to identify patients having symptoms only with atorvastatin but not placebo. In phase B, after a 2-week washout, patients were randomized to ezetimibe or evolocumab for 24 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Phase A: atorvastatin (20 mg) vs placebo. Phase B: randomization 2:1 to subcutaneous evolocumab (420 mg monthly) or oral ezetimibe (10 mg daily). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Coprimary end points were the mean percent change in LDL-C level from baseline to the mean of weeks 22 and 24 levels and from baseline to week 24 levels. RESULTS: Of the 491 patients who entered phase A (mean age, 60.7 [SD, 10.2] years; 246 women [50.1%]; 170 with coronary heart disease [34.6%]; entry mean LDL-C level, 212.3 [SD, 67.9] mg/dL), muscle symptoms occurred in 209 of 491 (42.6%) while taking atorvastatin but not while taking placebo. Of these, 199 entered phase B, along with 19 who proceeded directly to phase B for elevated creatine kinase (N = 218, with 73 randomized to ezetimibe and 145 to evolocumab; entry mean LDL-C level, 219.9 [SD, 72] mg/dL). For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, LDL-C level with ezetimibe was 183.0 mg/dL; mean percent LDL-C change, -16.7% (95% CI, -20.5% to -12.9%), absolute change, -31.0 mg/dL and with evolocumab was 103.6 mg/dL; mean percent change, -54.5% (95% CI, -57.2% to -51.8%); absolute change, -106.8 mg/dL (P < .001). LDL-C level at week 24 with ezetimibe was 181.5 mg/dL; mean percent change, -16.7% (95% CI, -20.8% to -12.5%); absolute change, -31.2 mg/dL and with evolocumab was 104.1 mg/dL; mean percent change, -52.8% (95% CI, -55.8% to -49.8%); absolute change, -102.9 mg/dL (P < .001). For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, between-group difference in LDL-C was -37.8%; absolute difference, -75.8 mg/dL. For week 24, between-group difference in LDL-C was -36.1%; absolute difference, -71.7 mg/dL. Muscle symptoms were reported in 28.8% of ezetimibe-treated patients and 20.7% of evolocumab-treated patients (log-rank P = .17). Active study drug was stopped for muscle symptoms in 5 of 73 ezetimibe-treated patients (6.8%) and 1 of 145 evolocumab-treated patients (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with statin intolerance related to muscle-related adverse effects, the use of evolocumab compared with ezetimibe resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels after 24 weeks. Further studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01984424.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Ezetimibe/therapeutic use , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Muscular Diseases/prevention & control , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Anticholesteremic Agents/adverse effects , Atorvastatin/adverse effects , Biomarkers/blood , Creatine Kinase/blood , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Ezetimibe/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hypercholesterolemia/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Muscular Diseases/blood , Muscular Diseases/chemically induced , Myalgia/blood , Myalgia/chemically induced , Myalgia/prevention & control , Myositis/blood , Myositis/chemically induced , Myositis/prevention & control , Rhabdomyolysis/blood , Rhabdomyolysis/chemically induced , Rhabdomyolysis/prevention & control , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Hyperkalemia is defined as serum potassium concentrations elevated above the upper limit of normal (> 5.0 mEq/L). It has become more common in cardiovascular practice due to the growing population of patients with chronic kidney disease and the broad application of drugs that modulate renal elimination of potassium by reducing production of angiotensin II (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, direct renin inhibitors, ß-adrenergic receptor antagonists), blocking angiotensin II receptors (angiotensin receptor blockers), or antagonizing the action of aldosterone on mineralocorticoid receptors (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists). The risk of hyperkalemia is a major limiting factor for the use of these disease-modifying drugs in both acute and chronic cardiorenal syndromes. Thus, agents to control the plasma concentration of potassium are needed in the multidrug treatment of cardiorenal disease, including chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and acute kidney injury. Novel oral therapies in development for both acute and extended use in the management of hyperkalemia include patiromer sorbitex calcium and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate. Important biochemical differences between these compounds result in unique product profiles and electrolyte outcomes in patients treated for hyperkalemia. This review highlights the major mechanisms of hyperkalemia and key results from randomized trials in a range of clinical scenarios in patients with, and at risk for, hyperkalemia.
Subject(s)
Hyperkalemia/drug therapy , Hyperkalemia/prevention & control , Polymers/therapeutic use , Polystyrenes/therapeutic use , Potassium/blood , Silicates/therapeutic use , Animals , Biomarkers/blood , Down-Regulation , Humans , Hyperkalemia/blood , Hyperkalemia/diagnosis , Hyperkalemia/etiology , Polymers/adverse effects , Polystyrenes/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Silicates/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Excess adiposity and obesity are the root cause of at least 27 diseases that cause considerable lifelong morbidity and, in many scenarios, eventual cardiovascular mortality. The human body has the ability to increase the number and size of its adipocytes by approximately 10-fold over the course of a lifetime. As fat mass increases, its blood supply, supporting cells, tissue structure, and local and systemic hormonal control also increase. This results in excess adiposity, leading to progressive obesity and the resistance to weight-loss attempts. There have been numerous trials of food diets combined with exercise that, in general, have a 50% dropout rate at 1 year and lead to very modest (â¼5%) reductions in body weight. Thus, many with obesity require interventions beyond casual diet and exercise advice. Meal replacement diets and bariatric surgery offer considerably greater degrees of weight loss, but both can be plagued by weight regain. Because the ability to control food urges has been shown to be a key psychological factor for success, medicinal approaches that work in this domain are attractive adjuncts to diet, exercise, and weight-loss surgery. This article reviews the emerging role of medical therapy in the treatment of excess adiposity with the goal of reducing comorbidities and possibly improving cardiovascular survival.
Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/drug effects , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Bariatric Surgery , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Developed Countries , Obesity/therapy , Risk Reduction Behavior , Adipose Tissue/physiopathology , Adiposity/drug effects , Animals , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Combined Modality Therapy , Diet/adverse effects , Exercise Therapy , Feeding Behavior/drug effects , Humans , Obesity/complications , Obesity/mortality , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/psychology , Patient Compliance , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Weight LossABSTRACT
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death and disability in developed nations, and it is rising rapidly in other parts of the developing world. Levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are directly correlated with atherogenic risk, and statin-based therapy is the most common management for these patients. However, many patients exhibit resistance to and/or adverse effects from statin therapy, and there is a need for adjunctive therapies or statin alternatives for these patients. The recently discovered human protein proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) plays an important role in LDL-C metabolism. PCSK9 promotes LDL receptor (LDL-R) degradation with a consequent reduction in LDL-R density and an increase in LDL-C levels. Consequently, PCSK9 inhibition to reduce LDL-C levels has become a primary focus for drug development. Numerous clinical trials focusing on monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 have demonstrated efficacy equal to or greater than statin therapy for lowering LDL-C levels. Long-term trials are underway to assess safety, tolerability, and ability to reduce ASCVD.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Atherosclerosis/prevention & control , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Proprotein Convertases/antagonists & inhibitors , Serine Proteinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Animals , Atherosclerosis/blood , Atherosclerosis/mortality , Biomarkers/blood , Drug Design , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypercholesterolemia/blood , Hypercholesterolemia/diagnosis , Hypercholesterolemia/mortality , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Proprotein Convertase 9 , Proprotein Convertases/immunology , Proprotein Convertases/metabolism , Serine Endopeptidases/immunology , Serine Endopeptidases/metabolism , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Olpasiran, a small interfering RNA (siRNA), blocks lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) production by preventing translation of apolipoprotein(a) mRNA. In phase 2, higher doses of olpasiran every 12 weeks (Q12W) reduced circulating Lp(a) by >95%. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the timing of return of Lp(a) to baseline after discontinuation of olpasiran, as well as longer-term safety. METHODS: OCEAN(a)-DOSE (Olpasiran Trials of Cardiovascular Events And LipoproteiN[a] Reduction-DOSE Finding Study) was a phase 2, dose-finding trial that enrolled 281 participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and Lp(a) >150 nmol/L to 1 of 4 active doses of olpasiran vs placebo (10 mg, 75 mg, 225 mg Q12W, or an exploratory dose of 225 mg Q24W given subcutaneously). The last dose of olpasiran was administered at week 36; after week 48, there was an extended off-treatment follow-up period for a minimum of 24 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 276 (98.2%) participants entered the off-treatment follow-up period. The median study exposure (treatment combined with off-treatment phases) was 86 weeks (Q1-Q3: 79-99 weeks). For the 75 mg Q12W dose, the off-treatment placebo-adjusted mean percent change from baseline in Lp(a) was -76.2%, -53.0%, -44.0%, and -27.9% at 60, 72, 84, and 96 weeks, respectively (all P < 0.001). The respective off-treatment changes in Lp(a) for the 225 mg Q12W dose were -84.4%, -61.6%, -52.2%, and -36.4% (all P < 0.001). During the extension follow-up phase, no new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Olpasiran is a potent siRNA with prolonged effects on Lp(a) lowering. Participants receiving doses ≥75 mg Q12W sustained a â¼40% to 50% reduction in Lp(a) levels close to 1 year after the last dose. (Olpasiran Trials of Cardiovascular Events And LipoproteiN[a] Reduction-DOSE Finding Study [OCEAN(a)-DOSE]; NCT04270760).
Subject(s)
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Lipoprotein(a) , RNA, Small Interfering , Humans , Lipoprotein(a)/blood , Male , Female , Middle Aged , RNA, Small Interfering/administration & dosage , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind Method , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Atherosclerosis/blood , Dicarboxylic Acids , Fatty AcidsABSTRACT
The spectrum of cardiorenal and metabolic diseases comprises many disorders, including obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), chronic kidney disease (CKD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), dyslipidemias, hypertension, and associated comorbidities such as pulmonary diseases and metabolism dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolism dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASLD and MASH, respectively, formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NAFLD and NASH]). Because cardiorenal and metabolic diseases share pathophysiologic pathways, two or more are often present in the same individual. Findings from recent outcome trials have demonstrated benefits of various treatments across a range of conditions, suggesting a need for practice recommendations that will guide clinicians to better manage complex conditions involving diabetes, cardiorenal, and/or metabolic (DCRM) diseases. To meet this need, we formed an international volunteer task force comprising leading cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians to develop the DCRM 2.0 Practice Recommendations, an updated and expanded revision of a previously published multispecialty consensus on the comprehensive management of persons living with DCRM. The recommendations are presented as 22 separate graphics covering the essentials of management to improve general health, control cardiorenal risk factors, and manage cardiorenal and metabolic comorbidities, leading to improved patient outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Until recently, medical literature and the practice of vascular medicine focused on the cosmetic aspects of venous disease and the advanced stages of venous insufficiency such as painful varicose veins and venous ulcers. The systemic effects of venous insufficiency resulting from a reduction of venous return and increased transit time of blood from the lower extremities that can mimic heart failure are only recently being recognized. This article reviews the diagnosis and treatment options for the patients with venous insufficiency, and increases awareness about the systemic effects of venous disease and its role in the practice of cardiovascular medicine.
Subject(s)
Lower Extremity/blood supply , Venous Insufficiency , Catheter Ablation , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Endovascular Procedures , Hemodynamics , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Phlebography , Predictive Value of Tests , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Venous Insufficiency/complications , Venous Insufficiency/diagnosis , Venous Insufficiency/physiopathology , Venous Insufficiency/therapySubject(s)
Anticholesteremic Agents/supply & distribution , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Health Services Accessibility , PCSK9 Inhibitors , Serine Proteinase Inhibitors/supply & distribution , Serine Proteinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Biomarkers/blood , Clinical Decision-Making , Dyslipidemias/blood , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Dyslipidemias/enzymology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Patient Selection , Proprotein Convertase 9/metabolism , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Excess adiposity and obesity are the root cause of at least 27 diseases that cause considerable lifelong morbidity and, in many scenarios, eventual cardiovascular mortality. The human body has the ability to increase the number and size of its adipocytes by approximately 10-fold over the course of a lifetime. As fat mass increases, its blood supply, supporting cells, tissue structure, and local and systemic hormonal control also increase. This results in excess adiposity, leading to progressive obesity and the resistance to weight-loss attempts. There have been numerous trials of food diets combined with exercise that, in general, have a 50% dropout rate at 1 year and lead to very modest (â¼ 5%) reductions in body weight. Thus, many with obesity require interventions beyond casual diet and exercise advice. Meal replacement diets and bariatric surgery offer considerably greater degrees of weight loss, but both can be plagued by weight regain. Because the ability to control food urges has been shown to be a key psychological factor for success, medicinal approaches that work in this domain are attractive adjuncts to diet, exercise, and weight-loss surgery. This article reviews the emerging role of medical therapy in the treatment of excess adiposity with the goal of reducing comorbidities and possibly improving cardiovascular survival.
Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Bariatric Surgery , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Global Health , Obesity/therapy , Preventive Health Services/methods , Risk Reduction Behavior , Animals , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Diet/adverse effects , Exercise , Humans , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/mortality , Obesity/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Weight LossABSTRACT
Management of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is central to preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and key to reducing the risk of ASCVD events. Current guidelines on the management of blood cholesterol recommend statins as first-line therapy for LDL-C reduction according to an individual's ASCVD risk and baseline LDL-C levels. The addition of nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy to statins to achieve intensive LDL-C lowering is recommended for patients at very high risk of ASCVD events, including patients with familial hypercholesterolemia who have not achieved adequate LDL-C lowering with statins alone. Despite guideline recommendations and clinical trial evidence to support the use of lipid-lowering therapies for ASCVD risk reduction, most patients at high or very high risk do not meet LDL-C thresholds. This review explores the challenges associated with LDL-C lowering in contemporary clinical practice and proposes a framework for rethinking the binary definition of ASCVD, shifting from "primary" versus "secondary" prevention to a "continuum of risk." The approach considers the role of plaque burden and progression in subclinical disease and emphasizes the importance of early risk assessment and treatment for preventing first cardiovascular events. Patients at high risk of ASCVD events who require significant LDL-C lowering should be considered for combination therapies comprising statin and nonstatin agents. Practical guidance for the pharmacological management of elevated LDL-C, both now and in the future, is provided.
Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Humans , Cholesterol, LDL , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cholesterol , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Atherosclerosis/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Factor XI (FXI) inhibition offers the promise of hemostasis-sparing anticoagulation for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events. Abelacimab (MAA868) is a novel fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the catalytic domain and has dual activity against the inactive zymogen Factor XI and the activated FXI. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single dose intravenous and multiple dose subcutaneous administration of abelacimab in healthy volunteers and patients with atrial fibrillation, respectively. PATIENTS/METHODS: In study ANT-003, healthy volunteers were administered single intravenous doses of abelacimab (30-150 mg) or placebo. The ANT-003 study also included a cohort of obese but otherwise healthy subjects. In study ANT-004, patients with atrial fibrillation were administered monthly subcutaneous doses of abelacimab (120 mg and 180 mg), or placebo, for 3 months. Key PK and PD parameters, including activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and free FXI levels, as well as anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed. RESULTS: Following intravenous administration of abelacimab, the terminal elimination half-life ranged from 25 to 30 days. One hour after the start of the intravenous infusion greater than 99% reductions in free FXI levels were observed. Following once monthly subcutaneous administration, marked reductions from baseline in free FXI levels were sustained. Parenteral administration of abelacimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile with no clinically relevant bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous and multiple subcutaneous dose administration of abelacimab were safe and well tolerated. The safety, PK, and PD data from these studies support the clinical development of abelacimab.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Factor XIa , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Blood Coagulation Tests , HumansABSTRACT
Type 2 diabetes (T2D), chronic kidney disease (CKD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and heart failure (HF)-along with their associated risk factors-have overlapping etiologies, and two or more of these conditions frequently occur in the same patient. Many recent cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have demonstrated the benefits of agents originally developed to control T2D, ASCVD, or CKD risk factors, and these agents have transcended their primary indications to confer benefits across a range of conditions. This evolution in CVOT evidence calls for practice recommendations that are not constrained by a single discipline to help clinicians manage patients with complex conditions involving diabetes, cardiorenal, and/or metabolic (DCRM) diseases. The ultimate goal for these recommendations is to be comprehensive yet succinct and easy to follow by the nonexpert-whether a specialist or a primary care clinician. To meet this need, we formed a volunteer task force comprising leading cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians to develop the DCRM Practice Recommendations, a multispecialty consensus on the comprehensive management of the patient with complicated metabolic disease. The task force recommendations are based on strong evidence and incorporate practical guidance that is clinically relevant and simple to implement, with the aim of improving outcomes in patients with DCRM. The recommendations are presented as 18 separate graphics covering lifestyle therapy, patient self-management education, technology for DCRM management, prediabetes, cognitive dysfunction, vaccinations, clinical tests, lipids, hypertension, anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, antihyperglycemic therapy, hypoglycemia, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), ASCVD, HF, CKD, and comorbid HF and CKD, as well as a graphical summary of medications used for DCRM.