ABSTRACT
Foot and toenail problems are prevalent among older adults. The importance of foot care is often overlooked, however, because the associated problems are often considered to be minor. These "minor" problems often result in unnecessary distress and complications for older adults. This study aims to develop and examine the effects of a foot and toenail care protocol on promoting foot health in older adults. It includes a thorough assessment of foot health, footwear conditions, and specific self-care ability. On the basis of the assessment, an individualized nursing care plan was devised. It has been found that the implementation of the care protocol can help to increase the awareness of nurses and older adults with regard to foot health and that some foot and toenail problems can be identified earlier and better managed.
Subject(s)
Foot , Hygiene , Nails , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , ShoesABSTRACT
Personal and household hygiene measures are important for preventing upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and other infectious diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). An online survey recruited 414 eligible parents in Hong Kong to study their hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) regarding the prevention of URTIs among their children. The average knowledge score was high (10.2/12.0), but some misconceptions were identified. The majority of the participants agreed that good personal hygiene (93.5%) and good environmental hygiene (92.8%) can prevent URTIs. The average score for hand hygiene practices was high (3.78/4.00), but only 56.8% of the parents always performed hand hygiene before touching their mouths, noses, or eyes. In terms of environmental hygiene, only some household items were disinfected with disinfectants (door handles in 69.8% of the households, toilet seats in 60.4% of the households, the floor in 42.8% of the households, dining chairs in 24.2% of the households, and dining tables in 20.5% of the households). A higher knowledge score was associated with parents having tertiary educational levels or above, working as healthcare professionals, living in private residential flats or staff quarters, or having household incomes of HKD 70,000 or above. The results of multiple regression analyses also indicated that parents who were healthcare professionals and with higher household income had a better parental knowledge of hygiene measures after adjusting the attitude score. For hand hygiene, parents who achieved higher attitude scores obtained higher practice scores. Under the fifth wave of the COVID-19 epidemic, there were some misconceptions regarding hygiene among parents. Any health promotion program should target parents regarding taking proper personal and household hygienic measures, especially for those who had relatively lower socio-economic status and/or from a non-healthcare background. Motivating attitudes toward hand hygiene can lead to better practices.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hand Hygiene , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Hygiene , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Infection is common among advanced cancer patients. This study was undertaken to review the pattern of use of antibiotics and to identify potential factors that could affect outcomes after infection. The medical records of all patients with advanced cancer who were enrolled into the palliative care service of a district hospital during the period January, 2002 to July, 2002 were retrospectively reviewed for infections and the use of antibiotics. Among the eligible 87 patients, 17 did not have any infective episode and 70 had at least one infective episode and accounted for a total of 120 episodes. Sixty-eight episodes were associated with survival for >14 days, and 52 episodes were associated with survival of < or =14 days. The most frequent sites of infection were chest (n=63, 52.5%), urinary tract (n=35, 29.2%), and skin/wound (n=6, 5%). Antibiotics were prescribed for 97.5% (n=117) episodes. The use of second-line antibiotics was 16.2% (n=19). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, dyspnea [odds ratio (OR)=2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.1-6.3], antibiotic utilization pattern [empirical therapy (OR=4.8, 95% CI=1.7-13.2) vs. therapy according to antibiotic sensitivity], and route of administration [parenteral route (OR=3.3, 95% CI=1.3-8.2) vs. oral route] were identified as independent determinants affecting survival after infection. Dyspnea was possibly associated with poor prognosis during the treatment of infections in patients with advanced cancer, and antibiotic therapy according to sensitivity was associated with better prognosis. Further studies are encouraged to verify this. The bioethical principles on the use of antibiotics as a life-sustaining treatment should always be followed.