Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Publication year range
1.
Virol J ; 10: 229, 2013 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23842430

ABSTRACT

Vaccinia virus protein A33 (A33VACV) plays an important role in protection against orthopoxviruses, and hence is included in experimental multi-subunit smallpox vaccines. In this study we show that single-dose vaccination with recombinant Sindbis virus expressing A33VACV, is sufficient to protect mice against lethal challenge with vaccinia virus WR (VACV-WR) and ectromelia virus (ECTV) but not against cowpox virus (CPXV), a closely related orthopoxvirus. Moreover, a subunit vaccine based on the cowpox virus A33 ortholog (A33CPXV) failed to protect against cowpox and only partially protected mice against VACV-WR challenge. We mapped regions of sequence variation between A33VACV and A33CPXVand analyzed the role of such variations in protection. We identified a single protective region located between residues 104-120 that harbors a putative H-2Kd T cell epitope as well as a B cell epitope - a target for the neutralizing antibody MAb-1G10 that blocks spreading of extracellular virions. Both epitopes in A33CPXV are mutated and predicted to be non-functional. Whereas vaccination with A33VACV did not induce in-vivo CTL activity to the predicted epitope, inhibition of virus spread in-vitro, and protection from lethal VACV challenge pointed to the B cell epitope highlighting the critical role of residue L118 and of adjacent compensatory residues in protection. This epitope's critical role in protection, as well as its modifications within the orthopoxvirus genus should be taken in context with the failure of A33 to protect against CPXV as demonstrated here. These findings should be considered when developing new subunit vaccines and monoclonal antibody based therapeutics against orthopoxviruses, especially variola virus, the etiologic agent of smallpox.


Subject(s)
Cowpox virus/immunology , Ectromelia virus/immunology , Ectromelia, Infectious/prevention & control , Membrane Glycoproteins/immunology , Vaccinia virus/immunology , Vaccinia/prevention & control , Viral Envelope Proteins/immunology , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Adaptive Immunity , Animals , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Carriers , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte/genetics , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte/immunology , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/genetics , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Female , Genetic Variation , Genetic Vectors , Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Sindbis Virus/genetics , Viral Envelope Proteins/genetics , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage
2.
J Infect Dis ; 199(1): 39-48, 2009 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19012492

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Decades after the cessation of smallpox vaccination, the potential of the deliberate release of pathogenic orthopoxviruses has forced a reconsideration of using these extremely efficient human vaccines. Scenarios of sudden biothreats have prompted demand for rapidly protective vaccination. However, the feasibility of short-term vaccination (i.e., vaccination shortly before exposure) with vaccinia virus (VACV) is uncertain. METHODS: We tested the rapid protective capacity of vaccines based on VACV strain Lister (VACV-Lister) and on modified VACV Ankara (MVA) in different mouse models, comparing lethal infections with VACV strain Western Reserve (VACV-WR) or ectromelia virus (ECTV). RESULTS: In contrast to VACV-WR challenge, we found extended incubation periods after ECTV challenge, allowing successful therapeutic immunization with VACV-Lister and MVA when applied 2-3 days after exposure. Rapid protection from respiratory tract ECTV infection was significantly affected by vaccine dose and was associated with occurrence of poxvirus-specific antibodies. Vaccinations in type I interferon receptor-deficient mice were protective, whereas recombination activating gene 1-deficient mice lacking mature T and B cells failed to mount immunity after short-term vaccination, confirming an essential role of adaptive immune responses. CONCLUSIONS: ECTV infection in mice models the course of human smallpox. Our data provide evidence to substantiate historical data on the usefulness of postexposure vaccination with conventional VACV and the new candidate MVA to protect against fatal orthopoxvirus infections.


Subject(s)
Smallpox Vaccine/therapeutic use , Smallpox/immunology , Vaccinia virus/immunology , Animals , Cell Line , Chlorocebus aethiops , Cricetinae , Disease Models, Animal , Disease Progression , Environmental Exposure , HeLa Cells , Humans , Mice , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Smallpox/physiopathology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox Vaccine/genetics , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Vaccinia virus/classification , Vero Cells , Viral Load
3.
Vaccine ; 25(45): 7743-53, 2007 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17928110

ABSTRACT

Since smallpox eradication by the WHO during the 1980s, potency of new vaccines is compared to vaccines that were used during the eradication campaign. In this work we characterize the tail scarification technique in mice as a model for scarification in humans. Similar to humans, mice develop "clinical take" which is dependent on the vaccination dose. Appearance of anti-Vaccinia IgM is followed by IgG antibodies 10 days post scarification and lasting more then 1(1/2) years. Mice with "clinical take" are 100% protected against lethal respiratory challenge (100LD(50)) of Vaccinia WR indicating that the "clinical take" can serve as a correlate of protective immunity. Reducing the vaccination dose and using Cowpox virus as a more virulent strain, enabled us to draw the limit of the vaccine potency in mice. Similar to humans, in revaccinated mice the development of "clinical take" was inversely correlated to the level of pre-existing antibodies. These results indicate that tail scarification of mice can be used as a model for evaluation of smallpox vaccines. High correlation between "clinical take" and protective immunity allows the use of visual inspection to evaluate vaccine potency.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/biosynthesis , Cicatrix/chemically induced , Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Tail/drug effects , Vaccinia virus/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Disease Models, Animal , Lethal Dose 50 , Mice , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Tail/pathology
4.
J Virol ; 78(21): 11980-7, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15479838

ABSTRACT

The tropism of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 for chemokine receptors plays an important role in the transmission of AIDS. Although CXCR4-tropic virus is more cytopathic for T cells, CCR5-tropic strains are transmitted more frequently in humans for reasons that are not understood. Phenotypically immature myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) are preferentially infected by CCR5-tropic virus, in contrast to mature mDCs, which are not susceptible to infection but instead internalize virus into a protected intracellular compartment and enhance the infection of T cells. Here, we define a mechanism to explain preferential transmission of CCR5-tropic viruses based on their interaction with mDCs and sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies. Infected immature mDCs differentiated normally and were found to enhance CCR5-tropic but not CXCR4-tropic virus infection of T cells even in the continuous presence of neutralizing antibodies. Infectious synapses also formed normally in the presence of such antibodies. Infection of immature mDCs by CCR5-tropic virus can therefore establish a pool of infected cells that can efficiently transfer virus at the same time that they protect virus from antibody neutralization. This property of DCs may enhance infection, contribute to immune evasion, and could provide a selective advantage for CCR5-tropic virus transmission.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Dendritic Cells/virology , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV-1/physiology , Receptors, CCR5/physiology , Cell Line, Tumor , Dendritic Cells/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , Humans , Tropism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL