ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (designated as carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension in the United States) provides stable plasma levodopa concentrations and reduces motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease patients through continuous delivery of levodopa via percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy. We report long-term safety and efficacy outcomes from an open-label phase 3 treatment program. METHODS: PD patients (n = 262) who completed a 12-week double-blind study and its 52-week open-label extension or a separate 54-week open-label study were enrolled in this ongoing phase 3 open-label, multinational study (NCT00660673). Safety and efficacy assessments were collected every 6 months. RESULTS: Mean total duration of exposure to levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel was 4.1 years (range, 1.2 to 6.9 years). The overall discontinuation rate was 34% (average annual discontinuation rate, 10%). Although most patients (94%) reported an adverse event, the rate of adverse events decreased over time; 53% experienced a serious adverse event. Of patients in this extension study, 54% required jejunal tube replacement during the study, and 37% required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement. Most patients were on levodopa monotherapy. Patients maintained reductions in "off" time and increases in mean "on" time without dyskinesia from initial levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion to he study end point (P < 0.001; n = 81). Activities of daily living and quality-of-life assessments demonstrated significant improvements that persisted through the study. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term study demonstrates sustained and clinically meaningful benefits from levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced PD patients. Although adverse event rates decreased over time, vigilance is required for device-related complications and adverse events. © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Carbidopa/therapeutic use , Gels/therapeutic use , Intestines/physiology , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Compulsive Behavior/chemically induced , Compulsive Behavior/epidemiology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , International Cooperation , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Polyneuropathies/chemically induced , Polyneuropathies/epidemiology , Weight Loss/drug effectsABSTRACT
Purpose/aim: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA) is an acetylcholine release inhibitor and a neuromuscular blocking agent. The United States prescribing information for abobotulinumtoxinA previously indicated only one dilution for cervical dystonia: 500 U/1 mL. Clinical trial data supporting a larger volume with a 500 U/2 mL dilution would offer clinicians flexibility with injection volume to better meet patient needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 12-week, phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01753310). Adult subjects with a primary diagnosis of cervical dystonia were randomized (2:1) to receive a single injection of either abobotulinumtoxinA, 500 U/2 mL dilution, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was changed from baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale total score at Week 4. RESULTS: A total of 134 subjects (abobotulinumtoxinA, n = 89; placebo, n = 45) were randomized (intent-to-treat population) and 129 (abobotulinumtoxinA, n = 84; placebo, n = 45) completed the Week 4 primary endpoint evaluation (modified intent-to-treat population). In the modified intent-to-treat population, subjects receiving abobotulinumtoxinA experienced significantly greater changes from baseline versus placebo on the primary endpoint (weighted overall treatment difference -8.3, P < 0.001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dysphagia, muscle weakness, neck pain and headache. Overall, TEAEs were consistent with those reported in the abobotulinumtoxinA prescribing information (1 mL dilution) for cervical dystonia patients. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides evidence that a 500 U/2 mL dilution is an effective treatment for cervical dystonia and exhibits a safety profile consistent with the known safety profile of abobotulinumtoxinA.
Subject(s)
Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Torticollis/drug therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rasagiline and pramipexole act to improve striatal dopaminergic transmission in PD via distinct and potentially synergistic mechanisms. We performed a placebo-controlled study to determine whether 2 doses of a novel slow-release, low-dose combination of rasagiline and pramipexole (P2B001) are effective and have a good safety profile in patients with early untreated PD. METHODS: Previously untreated patients with early PD were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily treatment with P2B001 (0.3 mg pramipexole/0.75 mg rasagiline), P2B001 (0.6 mg pramipexole/0.75 mg rasagiline) or placebo in a 12-week multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to final visit in Total-UPDRS score versus placebo. Secondary measures included responder analyses of patients achieving ≥4 UPDRS point reduction, and changes in Parkinson Disease Quality of Life Scale-39 and UPDRS activities of daily living and motor scores. RESULTS: A total of 149 participants were randomized and 136 (91.3%) completed the study. Adjusted mean change from baseline to final visit versus placebo in Total-UPDRS score was -4.67 ± 1.28 points for the P2B001 0.6/0.75 mg group (P = .0004) and -3.84 ± 1.25 points for the 0.3/0.75 mg group (P = .003). Significant benefits were also observed for both doses in the responder analysis (P = .0002 and P = .0001), Parkinson Disease Quality of Life Scale-39 scores (P = .05 and P = .01), and the UPDRS motor (P = .02 and P = .006) and activities of daily living (P = .005 and P = .0004) subscores. Adverse events of P2B001 were comparable to placebo apart from transient nausea and somnolence, which were more common with P2B001 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: P2B001 offers a promising treatment option for patients with early PD with good clinical efficacy and a low risk of adverse events. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Benzothiazoles/therapeutic use , Indans/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Aged , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Pramipexole , Severity of Illness Index , Triethylenemelamine , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Continuous administration of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension) through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy is a treatment option for advanced Parkinson disease (PD) patients with motor fluctuations resistant to standard oral medications. Safety data from 4 prospective studies were integrated to assess the safety of this therapy. METHODS: Safety data from 4 studies were summarized using 2 overlapping data sets, permitting the separation of procedure/device-associated (n = 395) from non-procedure/device adverse events (n = 412). RESULTS: At the data cutoff, median exposure to levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel was 911 days (range, 1-1980 days) with 963 total patient-years of exposure. Procedure/device adverse events occurred in 300 patients (76%), and serious adverse events occurred in 68 (17%); most frequently reported procedure/device adverse events and serious adverse events were complications of device insertion (41% and 8%, respectively) and abdominal pain (36% and 4%, respectively). Non-procedure/device adverse events occurred in 92% (379), with most frequently reported being insomnia (23%) and falls (23%); 42% (171) had non-procedure/device serious adverse events, with most frequently reported being pneumonia (5%) and PD symptoms (2%). Adverse events led to discontinuation in 17% (72), most frequently because of complication of device insertion (2.4%). There were 34 treatment-emergent deaths (8.3%) in the overlapping data sets, 2 of which (0.5%) were considered "possibly related" to the treatment system. CONCLUSION: In the largest collection of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel safety data from prospective clinical studies, procedure/device events were frequently reported and occasionally life threatening. Most non-procedure/device events were typical for levodopa treatment and an elderly population. These factors combined with high treatment efficacy led to a relatively low discontinuation rate in advanced PD patients.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Infusions, Parenteral/adverse effects , Levodopa/adverse effects , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Carbidopa/administration & dosage , Drug Combinations , Female , Gels , Humans , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD) are associated with long-term oral levodopa treatment and linked to pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation. L-dopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is delivered continuously by percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy tube (PEG-J), which reduces L-dopa-plasma-level fluctuations and can translate to reduced motor complications. We present final results of the largest international, prospective, 54-week, open-label LCIG study. PD patients with severe motor fluctuations (>3 h/day "off" time) despite optimized therapy received LCIG monotherapy. Additional PD medications were allowed >28 days post-LCIG initiation. Safety was the primary endpoint measured through adverse events (AEs), device complications, and number of completers. Secondary endpoints included diary-assessed off time, "on" time with/without troublesome dyskinesia, UPDRS, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes. Of 354 enrolled patients, 324 (91.5%) received PEG-J and 272 (76.8%) completed the study. Most AEs were mild/moderate and transient; complication of device insertion (34.9%) was the most common. Twenty-seven (7.6%) patients withdrew because of AEs. Serious AEs occurred in 105 (32.4%), most commonly complication of device insertion (6.5%). Mean daily off time decreased by 4.4 h/65.6% (P < 0.001). On time without troublesome dyskinesia increased by 4.8 h/62.9% (P < 0.001); on time with troublesome dyskinesia decreased by 0.4 h/22.5% (P = 0.023). Improvements persisted from week 4 through study completion. UPDRS and HRQoL outcomes were also improved throughout. In the advanced PD population, LCIG's safety profile consisted primarily of AEs associated with the device/procedure, l-dopa/carbidopa, and advanced PD. LCIG was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinically significant improvements in motor function, daily activities, and HRQoL sustained over 54 weeks.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Carbidopa/therapeutic use , Gels , Intestines/physiology , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Drug Combinations , Female , Gels/therapeutic use , Humans , Intestines/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: There are no treatments available to slow or prevent the progression of Parkinson disease, despite its global prevalence and significant health care burden. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Exploratory Trials in Parkinson Disease program was established to promote discovery of potential therapies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether creatine monohydrate was more effective than placebo in slowing long-term clinical decline in participants with Parkinson disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Long-term Study 1, a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 1:1 randomized efficacy trial. Participants were recruited from 45 investigative sites in the United States and Canada and included 1741 men and women with early (within 5 years of diagnosis) and treated (receiving dopaminergic therapy) Parkinson disease. Participants were enrolled from March 2007 to May 2010 and followed up until September 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to placebo or creatine (10 g/d) monohydrate for a minimum of 5 years (maximum follow-up, 8 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a difference in clinical decline from baseline to 5-year follow-up, compared between the 2 treatment groups using a global statistical test. Clinical status was defined by 5 outcome measures: Modified Rankin Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, PDQ-39 Summary Index, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale, and ambulatory capacity. All outcomes were coded such that higher scores indicated worse outcomes and were analyzed by a global statistical test. Higher summed ranks (range, 5-4775) indicate worse outcomes. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early for futility based on results of a planned interim analysis of participants enrolled at least 5 years prior to the date of the analysis (n = 955). The median follow-up time was 4 years. Of the 955 participants, the mean of the summed ranks for placebo was 2360 (95% CI, 2249-2470) and for creatine was 2414 (95% CI, 2304-2524). The global statistical test yielded t1865.8 = -0.75 (2-sided P = .45). There were no detectable differences (P < .01 to partially adjust for multiple comparisons) in adverse and serious adverse events by body system. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with early and treated Parkinson disease, treatment with creatine monohydrate for at least 5 years, compared with placebo did not improve clinical outcomes. These findings do not support the use of creatine monohydrate in patients with Parkinson disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00449865.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Creatine/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Creatine/adverse effects , Creatine/blood , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Common mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions are large structural variants in the mitochondrial genome that accumulate in metabolically active tissues with age and have been investigated in various diseases. We applied the Splice-Break2 pipeline (designed for high-throughput quantification of mtDNA deletions) to human RNA-Seq datasets and describe the methodological considerations for evaluating common deletions in bulk, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics datasets. A robust evaluation of 1570 samples from 14 RNA-Seq studies showed: (i) the abundance of some common deletions detected in PCR-amplified mtDNA correlates with levels observed in RNA-Seq data; (ii) RNA-Seq library preparation method has a strong effect on deletion detection; (iii) deletions had a significant, positive correlation with age in brain and muscle; (iv) deletions were enriched in cortical grey matter, specifically in layers 3 and 5; and (v) brain regions with dopaminergic neurons (i.e., substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, and caudate nucleus) had remarkable enrichment of common mtDNA deletions.
Subject(s)
Brain , Substantia Nigra , Humans , RNA-Seq , Brain/metabolism , Substantia Nigra/metabolism , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , DNA, Mitochondrial/metabolism , Mitochondria/geneticsABSTRACT
Tremor is a common symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). The underlying pathophysiology of parkinsonian rest tremor is not well understood. Rest tremor is less responsive to dopaminergic therapy than are symptoms of bradykinesia and rigidity. This paper reviews the effects of 1 mg daily oral rasagiline, as monotherapy and as adjunct therapy, on parkinsonian tremor. A literature search of the EMBASE database was conducted to identify relevant articles in English published between 2000 and October, 2012 using the search terms "rasagiline," or "Azilect®," or "Agilect®," and refined using the terms "Parkinson's disease" and "clinical trial." Of 22 identified publications, two large placebo-controlled trials of rasagiline monotherapy (TEMPO and ADAGIO) and two large placebo-controlled trials of rasagiline as adjunctive therapy with levodopa (PRESTO and LARGO) specifically evaluated the effect of rasagiline on tremor using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor examination. Prospective and post-hoc analyses from these phase III studies show rasagiline monotherapy significantly improved tremor symptoms in early PD, independent of disease duration, compared with placebo. In levodopa-treated patients with motor fluctuations who were already receiving optimized dopaminergic treatment, the addition of rasagiline adjunct therapy significantly improved tremor symptoms. Significant improvement was evident as early as 10 weeks from treatment initiation. Tremor symptoms also improved in a subset of patients with severe tremor when rasagiline was added to their existing PD treatment regimen. These data suggest that rasagiline used as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy is effective for reducing tremor severity in patients with PD.
Subject(s)
Indans/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/complications , Tremor/drug therapy , Tremor/etiology , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Sialorrhea is the excessive accumulation of saliva, a prevalent symptom among a number of neurologic conditions in both pediatric and adult patients. Over the years, the management of sialorrhea has evolved and included a variety of interventions, ranging from nonpharmacologic, pharmacologic, and surgical treatment options. The most common option for treatment has been the use of botulinum toxin injections in the management of sialorrhea. While there have been several clinical trials to assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin in the treatment of sialorrhea, the largest randomized control trials to date have been with incobotulinumtoxin (2019) and rimabotulinumtoxin (2020) which show consistent reduction in salivary flow rate and improvement in clinical outcomes with comparable duration of treatment effectiveness. In this update, we review the evolution of treatment and injection methods for sialorrhea among many neurologic diseases. We discuss the challenges in evaluating and measuring efficacy in clinical trials for sialorrhea and compare the contemporary botulinum toxin clinical trials in the treatment of sialorrhea.
Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Parkinson Disease , Sialorrhea , Adult , Humans , Child , Sialorrhea/drug therapy , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Parkinson Disease/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Swedish population-based national health registers are widely used data sources in epidemiological research. Register-based diagnoses of Parkinson's disease have not been validated against clinical information. METHODS: Parkinson's disease (PD) and other parkinsonian disorder diagnoses were ascertained in two registers, i.e. the National Patient Register (NPR) and the Cause of Death Register (CDR). Diagnoses were validated in terms of accuracy (positive predictive value) and sensitivity against data from a population-based study of PD in 1998-2004 that screened more than 35,000 persons and identified 194 cases of parkinsonian disorders including 132 PD cases (the gold standard for the purposes of this study). RESULTS: Accuracy for any parkinsonian disorder diagnoses was 88.0% in the NPR and 94.4% in the CDR. Accuracy of PD diagnoses was 70.8% in the NPR and 66.7% in the CDR. Misclassification between differential parkinsonian diagnoses was common. The accuracy of PD diagnoses in the NPR improved to 83.0% by restricting the definition to primary diagnoses only. The sensitivity of PD diagnoses in the NPR and CDR combined was 83.1%, with a mean time to detection of 6.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based national health registers are valid data sources in epidemiological studies of PD or parkinsonian disorder etiology but are less suitable in studies of incidence or prevalence.
Subject(s)
Diseases in Twins/diagnosis , Diseases in Twins/epidemiology , Parkinsonian Disorders/diagnosis , Parkinsonian Disorders/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cause of Death , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Registries , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson's disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three "on-demand" treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and sublingual apomorphine. We empirically propose that "on-demand" treatments can be utilized as a complementary treatment when OFF episodes emerge and can be utilized when needed rather than reserving these treatments only until other treatment approaches (adjustment of baseline treatment and/or addition of adjunctive treatment with "ON-extenders") have failed. Current treatment approaches combine "ON-extenders" with increasing levodopa dosing and/or frequency to treat OFF episodes. Yet, OFF episodes often persist, with a substantial amount of daily OFF time. OFF episode treatment is hindered by variable gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of oral levodopa, reflecting GI dysmotility and protein competition. Novel "on-demand" treatments bypass the gut and can improve OFF symptoms more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. With the emergence of novel "on-demand" treatments, we conclude that a shift in treatment paradigm to the earlier, complementary use of these medications be considered.
ABSTRACT
Disease modification or slowing the progression of any neurodegenerative disorder represents a dire unmet need. There have been trials for several decades specifically designed to help evaluate whether a specific therapy might be able to slow the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) or be disease modifying. Trials evaluating the use of coenzyme Q10, pramipexole, and levodopa suggest that these medications offer symptomatic benefit uniquely, while other studies reveal that rasagiline and selegiline may be disease modifying. This review will discuss in detail the design and results of clinical trials for varied medical therapies that were specifically undertaken to discern whether a particular treatment might be disease modifying in the treatment of PD.
Subject(s)
Disease Progression , Parkinson Disease/pathology , Antiparkinson Agents/classification , Antiparkinson Agents/metabolism , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/trends , Humans , Neuroprotective Agents/classification , Neuroprotective Agents/metabolism , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Assess motor function and quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects with end-of-dose wearing off (EODWO), comparing immediate and delayed switch (IS, DEL) to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE). BACKGROUND: LCE treatment improves motor function in PD patients with EODWO. Correlations with QoL have not been previously assessed. METHODS: A 16-week, prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study in PD subjects on stable levodopa/carbidopa (LC) doses with EODWO. The IS subjects switched to LCE at baseline; DEL subjects at week 4. The primary efficacy variable was UPDRS III score (baseline to week 4). QoL measurements (PDQUALIF, PDQ-39) were assessed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and study endpoint. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 350/359 patients (IS, n = 177; DEL, n = 173). A significant decrease in UPDRS III scores at week 4 was observed (IS, 3.7U, p < .0001; DEL, 1.8U, p = .0018). Group differences favored IS (1.9U, p = .0148). At week 8, IS subjects had significant total score decreases in PDQUALIF (2.5U, p = .0133) and PDQ-39 (5.8U, p = .0001). In the mobility and activities of daily living PDQ-39 subdomains, IS subjects had significantly larger week 4 decreases (versus DEL p = .0331 and p = .0125, respectively). Adverse events included diarrhea (14.5%), nausea (12.3%), and dizziness (8.4%). CONCLUSION: The IS provided greater motor improvement at week 4 and improved QoL at week 8.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Catechols/administration & dosage , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Nitriles/administration & dosage , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacokinetics , Carbidopa/administration & dosage , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Carbidopa/pharmacokinetics , Catechols/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Humans , Levodopa/adverse effects , Levodopa/pharmacokinetics , Male , Middle Aged , Nitriles/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind MethodABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cervical dystonia (CD) is a neurologic movement disorder with potentially disabling effects and significant impact on quality of life of those affected. AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) was initially approved for a dilution of 500 U/1 mL and subsequently for a dilution of 500 U/2 mL, providing flexibility for clinicians to treat CD. Here, we explore the safety and efficacy of the 500 U/2 mL dilution versus 500 U/1 mL dilution of aboBoNT-A in a retrospective analysis based on published clinical trial data. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of aboBoNT-A in patients with CD was evaluated in three multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and open-label extensions. Trials 1 (NCT00257660) and 2 (NCT00288509) evaluated the 500 U/1 mL dilution in 80 and 116 patients, respectively; Trial 3 (NCT01753310) evaluated the 500 U/2 mL dilution in 125 patients. RESULTS: Comparison of the adjusted mean difference in TWSTRS total scores at Week 4 from baseline for aboBoNT-A in Trial 1 (-6.0; 95% CI, -10.8, -1.3), Trial 2 (-8.8; 95% CI, -12.9, -4.7), and Trial 3 (-8.7; 95% CI, -13.2, -4.2) showed similar, significant improvements. Dysphagia and muscle weakness patterns were comparable across the three trials, indicating that an increased dilution of aboBoNT-A does not result in an increased risk of diffusion-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: The results of these trials show that aboBoNT-A is similarly efficacious using either dilution, with similar safety and tolerability across trials. Having the 500 U/1 mL and 500 U/2 mL dilution volumes available provides further flexibility in administration, benefiting patient care.
ABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245827.].
ABSTRACT
Cervical dystonia (CD) is primarily treated with botulinum toxin, at intervals of ≥ 12 weeks. We present efficacy, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and safety in adults with CD at the last available visit after a single set of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) injections versus placebo using 500 U in a 2-mL injection volume. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind trial, patients were ≥ 18 years of age with primary idiopathic CD, had a Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score ≥ 20, and TWSTRS-Severity subscale score > 10 at baseline. Patients (N = 134) were randomized (2:1) to aboBoNT-A (n = 89) or placebo (n = 45), with aboBoNT-A patients treated with 500 units (U) if toxin-naïve, and 250 to 500 U based on previous onabotulinumtoxinA dose if non-naïve. Endpoints included total TWSTRS, Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-Pain; 24-hour), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, and other PROs for pain, depression, and global health. Results are for the intent-to-treat population, with "Week 12" (Wk12) comprising the last available post-baseline assessment (end-of-study or early withdrawal). Mean TWSTRS total scores improved from 42.5 at baseline to 35.4 at Wk12 with aboBoNT-A and 42.4 to 40.4 with placebo (treatment difference: -4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.5, -1.1; p = 0.011). At Wk12, mean (95% CI) change from baseline in NRS-Pain was -1.0 (-1.59, -0.45) for aboBoNT-A and -0.2 (-0.96, 0.65) for placebo. AboBoNT-A demonstrated numeric improvements in other PROs. More aboBoNT-A-treated patients than patients receiving placebo reported being at least "somewhat satisfied" with treatment (60.4% vs 42.2%, respectively), symptom relief (57.0% vs 40.0%), and time for treatment to work (55.8% vs 33.3%). No new adverse events were reported. Results indicate that in patients with CD, treatment with aboBoNT-A using a 2-mL injection provided sustained improvement in the TWSTRS total score and patient-perceived benefits up to 12 weeks. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identified: NCT01753310.
Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Dystonia/congenital , Dystonia/drug therapy , Dystonia/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Injections , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , PlacebosABSTRACT
Response rate (RR) and mean improvement (MI) in the pain subscale of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS-PS) from two placebo-controlled studies and one comparator-controlled study were evaluated to examine the effect of rimabotulinumtoxinB (BoNT-B) on cervical dystonia (CD) pain. Subjects receiving either of two doses of BoNT-B in the AN072-301 trial had an RR of 66% and 58% compared with 23% for placebo (p < .05). Subjects receiving BoNT-B in the AN072-302 trial had an RR of 49% compared with 19% for placebo (p < .05). Subjects receiving BoNT-B in the AN072-402 comparator-controlled trial had a significantly higher RR than those treated with BoNT-A (59% vs. 36%; p < .05). Additionally, subjects treated with BoNT-B in these placebo-controlled trials had significantly larger MIs than those treated with placebo (4.3 and 3.7 vs. 0.5 for AN072-301 and 3.6 vs. 0.1 for AN072-302; p < .05). Subjects treated with BoNT-B in the comparator-controlled trial demonstrated a numerically larger MI than those treated with BoNT-A (2.6 vs. 1.8; p = .1651). These results support the consideration of BoNT-B as an effective first-line botulinum toxin treatment for patients with CD who list pain as a primary complaint.
Subject(s)
Anti-Dyskinesia Agents/therapeutic use , Botulinum Toxins/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Torticollis/complications , Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Disability Evaluation , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Pain Measurement/methods , Probability , Time FactorsABSTRACT
This study was designed to follow the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rasagiline for Parkinson's disease (PD) with data collected from all patients who had ever taken rasagiline during the 12-month TEMPO monotherapy trial (N = 398) and subsequent open-label extension. Patients were followed for up to 6.5 years with a mean of 3.5 +/- 2.1 years. After 12 months, additional PD medications were added as required. Of patients remaining in the trial at 2 years, 46% were maintained on rasagiline monotherapy. The majority of patients received a dopamine agonist prior to levodopa as the first additional dopaminergic agent. Analysis using a Kaplan-Meier method indicated that by 5.4 years only 25% of patients progressed to Hoehn & Yahr stage III. Rasagiline was well tolerated, with 11.3% of patients (45/398) withdrawing because of an adverse event. Rasagiline therapy for PD was effective, well tolerated, and safe in this long-term trial.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Indans/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Dopamine Agents/administration & dosage , Dopamine Agents/therapeutic use , Dopamine Agonists/administration & dosage , Dopamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Indans/administration & dosage , Indans/adverse effects , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The purpose of this study to compare the long-term clinical outcome of early versus delayed rasagiline treatment in early Parkinson's disease (PD). Subjects (N = 404) were randomly assigned to initial treatment with rasagiline (early-start group) or placebo for 6 months followed by rasagiline (delayed-start group) in the TEMPO study. Subjects who chose to participate in an open-label extension (N = 306) continued to receive rasagiline as well as other PD medications as needed. Average (+/-SD) duration in the study was 3.6 +/- 2.1 years; 177 subjects received rasagiline for > or =5.0 years. Over the entire 6.5-year follow-up period, the adjusted mean difference in change from baseline in total UPDRS scores was 2.5 units (SE 1.1; P = 0.021) or 16% (SE 5.7; P = 0.006) in favor of the early-start versus delayed-start rasagiline group. Although the interaction between treatment and time was significant, values for the early-start group were better than the delayed-start group across all time points. Significantly less worsening (percent change) in total UPDRS scores was observed in the early-start group at the time points 0.5, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 years (P < 0.05). Compared to delayed start, early initiation of rasagiline provided long-term clinical benefit, even in the face of treatment with other dopaminergic agents. This might reflect enduring benefits due to neuroprotection or effects on compensatory mechanisms in early PD.
Subject(s)
Indans/administration & dosage , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Aim: Due to active engagement of sensory and afferent nerve fibers in reflex tearing which could be affected in Parkinson's disease (PD), we tested reflex tears as a source of potential PD biomarkers. Patients & methods: Reflex tears collected from 84 PD and 84 age- and sex-equivalent healthy controls (HC) were used to measure levels of oligomeric α-Syn (α-SynOligo), total α-Syn (α-SynTotal), CCL2, DJ-1, lactoferrin and MMP9. Results: α-synOligo (p < 0.0001), CCL2 (p = 0.003) and lactoferrin (p = 0.002) were significantly elevated in PD patient tears relative to HC tears. Tear flow was significantly lower in PD relative to HC (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Reflex tears are a potential source for detection of characteristic changes in PD patients.