Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int Wound J ; 20(10): 3974-3980, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37376826

ABSTRACT

A meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively assess the effect of continuous nursing on wound infection and quality of life in patients with cancer-related stomas, providing an evidence-based rationale for the care of these patients. A computerised search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of continuous nursing on wound infection and quality of life in patients with cancer-related stoma was conducted from the time the database was created to March 2023. The retrieved literature was screened, data were extracted, and the quality of the literature was evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Seventeen RCTs involving 1437 patients were included. Of the 1437 patients, 728 were in the continuous nursing group and 709 were in the control group. The results showed that continuous nursing significantly reduced the rate of wound infection in patients with cancer-related stomas (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-0.53, p < 0.001) and improved their quality of life (standardised mean difference: 1.90. 95% CI: 1.32-2.47, p < 0.001). Available evidence suggests that continuous nursing for patients with cancer-related stomas can significantly reduce wound infections and improve their quality of life.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Surgical Stomas , Humans , Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection , Quality of Life , China
2.
Int Wound J ; 20(10): 3990-3998, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37650448

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on surgical site infections, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. A comprehensive search was conducted of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data from database inception to April 2023 to identify relevant studies on the application of ERAS in colorectal surgery. Studies were screened, and data were extracted based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 22 studies, including 3702 patients (ERAS group: 1906; control group: 1796), were included in the final analysis. ERAS significantly reduced the incidence of surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.69, p < 0.001), postoperative complications (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.27-0.41, p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (standardised mean difference: -1.22 days, 95% CI: -1.66 to -0.77 days, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that ERAS reduces the incidence of surgical site infections and postoperative complications and shortens the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Therefore, ERAS should be promoted and applied in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Length of Stay , Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology
4.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 12(2): 689-92, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27461634

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the factors influencing early enteral nutrition (EN) to develop guidelines after gastric carcinoma (GC) surgery, and to propose appropriate interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 GC patients have administrated EN 24 h after surgery and were divided into standard-achieving and nonstandard-achieving groups based on meeting 60% of energy needs. The clinical data of these two groups were retrospectively analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The intraoperative blood loss, proportion of those with body mass ≤60 kg, and those cases tolerating EN in the standard-achieving group were significantly greater than in the nonstandard-achieving group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Gender, age, operative time, catheter length, American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class, and postoperative exhaust time showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). However, logistic regression analysis revealed that intraoperative blood loss, body mass, and EN tolerance were independent risk factors influencing achievement of standards for early postoperative EN in GC patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences should be considered when performing EN, and individualized nutritional support should be provided to improve the standard-achieving rate.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Female , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Time-to-Treatment , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL