ABSTRACT
Social media, in the form of digital videos targeted to people with limited health literacy, as well as disadvantaged or marginalized groups, may help reduce cancer health disparities and improve health outcomes in these populations. In this article, we document the process of adapting the content from the Cancer 101 curriculum to create animated scripts about the cancer care continuum that is clear, straightforward, and in plain language. The development of the Cancer 101 digital videos required a multidisciplinary collaboration from-public health, medicine, technology, and expertise in correctional health, smoking cessation, web development, video producers, and individuals directly impacted by cancer disparities. The Cancer 101 videos were showcased at a community health fair where the videos were viewed by attendants waiting to be seen by a medical provider. While waiting for their cancer screening, 13 individuals were selected and invited to watch all 11 videos totaling less than 60-minutes of viewing time. They included 3 Latina women, 2 Latino men, and 8 Haitian women. All participants were between the ages of 40-65 years old. Overall, participants agreed that they would recommend the videos to friends/family (M = 4.77, SD = 0.44) and that they plan to watch other video modules to learn more information about cancer (M = 4.72, SD = 0.47). Additionally, participants enjoyed the graphics and audio of the videos presented (M = 4.85, SD = 0.38). Furthermore, participants noted that Cancer 101 digital videos described cancer in plain language, leading to a better understanding of the disease. Future research is needed to implement Cancer 101 digital videos in healthcare clinics to increase cancer information and improve cancer screening rates in marginalized communities.
Subject(s)
Health Education/methods , Health Literacy/methods , Neoplasms , Video Recording , Adult , Aged , Feedback , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Social Marginalization , Social Media , United StatesABSTRACT
We critically reviewed the motivations, processes, and implementation methods underlying a faculty-driven diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) curriculum self-reflection project in the Rutgers School of Public Health. This case study offers guidance on a curriculum self-reflection tool that was developed through the school's Curriculum Committee to promote DEI throughout the school's curricula. We review the key steps in this process and the unique aspects of developing and implementing such evaluations within higher education. The study draws on faculty experience, was informed by students and staff within the Curriculum Committee, and builds on existing knowledge and tools. A flexible 6-step framework-including guiding principles and strategic approaches to planning, developing, and implementing a DEI curriculum self-assessment-is provided to assist instructors, curriculum committees, DEI groups, and academic leaders at schools of public health interested in refining their courses and curricula. Academic units experience contextual challenges, and while each is at a different stage in curriculum reform, our findings provide lessons about integrating the assessment of DEI in school curriculum in a systematic and iterative way. Our approach can be applied to diverse academic settings, including those experiencing similar implementation challenges.