Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Facial Plast Surg ; 40(5): 648-654, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151040

ABSTRACT

The optimal timing of rhinoplasty for patients with nasal bone fractures remains controversial. We investigated whether the timing of rhinoplasty after nasal trauma affects the aesthetic outcome of the procedure. A total of 41 adult patients with nasal bone fractures who underwent rhinoplasty between 2006 and 2021 were enrolled in this study. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to indicate the assessor's satisfaction with the surgical outcome after a comparison of the pre- and postoperative facial photographs of each patient. Of the 41 patients, 28 underwent rhinoplasty within 14 days after nasal trauma (early rhinoplasty group), whereas 13 underwent rhinoplasty more than 14 days after nasal trauma (late rhinoplasty group). The rate of receiving spreader and shield graft was higher in the late rhinoplasty group (p = 0.043 and 0.018, respectively). Patients with type IV or V nasal bone fracture and patients with preoperative saddle noses had higher VAS scores than those with types I to III fractures and those without preoperative saddle nose (p = 0.003 and 0.020, respectively). There was no significant difference in overall aesthetic outcome between the early and late rhinoplasty groups. Both groups achieved significantly better radix height, dorsal height, and tip projection after rhinoplasty. The aesthetic outcome of rhinoplasty performed in the early posttrauma period is comparable with that of rhinoplasty performed more than 2 weeks after nasal bone fracture. Rhinoplasty can be considered a safe surgical treatment option for nasal bone fracture, even in the early posttrauma period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : 4.


Subject(s)
Esthetics , Nasal Bone , Rhinoplasty , Humans , Rhinoplasty/methods , Rhinoplasty/adverse effects , Nasal Bone/injuries , Nasal Bone/surgery , Female , Adult , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/surgery , Patient Satisfaction , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog Scale , Time-to-Treatment
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(6): 2945-2952, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36892614

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: It is commonly recommended that tooth extraction should be performed prior to radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head neck cancer to prevent osteoradionecrosis (ORN). However, doctors still occasionally encounter patients who require tooth extraction during RT. This study aimed to determine the risk of ORN in patients who undergo tooth extraction during RT. METHODS: Data were collected from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We retrospectively enrolled 24,412 patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy between 2011 and 2017. The associations between ORN and demographic characteristics, timing of tooth extraction, and treatments were examined using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: A total of 24,412 head and neck cancer patients were enrolled; 133 patients underwent tooth extraction during RT and 24,279 patients did not undergo tooth extraction during RT. Tooth extraction during RT was not associated with a significantly higher risk of ORN (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.303, P = 0.4862). Tumor site, RT dose ≥ 60Ā Gy, age < 55 y/o, mandibulectomy, chronic periodontitis, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with a higher risk of ORN. CONCLUSION: The risk of ORN in head and neck cancer is not significantly different between patients who undergo tooth extraction during RT and patients who do not undergo tooth extraction during RT.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Osteoradionecrosis , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Osteoradionecrosis/epidemiology , Osteoradionecrosis/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Tooth Extraction
3.
Aesthet Surg J ; 43(11): 1237-1247, 2023 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complicated silicone nose is a common clinical problem. Selection of replacement material for revision dorsal augmentation is a challenging task. OBJECTIVES: The authors presented their experience in the use of molded glued diced cartilage graft (GDCG) for revision rhinoplasty in patients who had complicated silicone augmentation. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 28 patients who underwent silicone implant removal and revision dorsal augmentation with costal cartilage at a tertiary center between February 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022. Patient demographics, surgical technique, anthropometric measurements, and complication data were retrieved and analyzed. Aesthetic outcome scoring and anthropometric measurements were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (9 males and 19 females) who underwent revision rhinoplasty with augmentation were reviewed. The principal indication for revision was cosmetic dissatisfaction. Mean postoperative follow-up duration was 18.3 months. All patients had revision dorsal augmentation with molded GDCG. Other key surgical techniques include the use of caudal septal extension and extended spreader and tip grafts. The majority of the patients were judged to have good or excellent outcomes (91.1%). There were significant percentage increases in dorsal height, radix height, nasal length, and nasal tip projection (2.78%, 2.26%, 7.53%, and 2.40%, respectively; P < .05) and reduction of nasal axis deviation of 1.15Ā° (P < .05) postoperatively. Two patients had postoperative complications, including infection and cosmetic dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Revision rhinoplasty following unsuccessful silicone augmentation is commonly encountered in the Asian population. Molded GDCG for revision dorsal augmentation is a reliable option that delivers good to excellent aesthetic outcomes with acceptable complication rates.

4.
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec ; 84(3): 193-199, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34333498

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Foreign body ingestion is the most common reason for otolaryngology specialist consultations in emergency departments. Among the different types of foreign bodies, fish bones are the most common, particularly in Asian populations. In Taiwan, upper aerodigestive tract foreign bodies (UADT-FBs) are mostly managed by residents in the otorhinolaryngology (ORL) department. Considering the learning curve required for all procedures, different management types between residents, and possible resulting safety issues, this study explored the outcomes of UADT-FB management by residents in different years of ORL training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 2,283 patients who visited Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital's Emergency Department for UADT-FB during June 2013-August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The reviewed data included the demographic data of enrolled patients, outcomes of foreign body management, and follow-up chart records of the patients. RESULTS: Among the 2,283 patients, 1,324 (58%) were found to be negative for foreign bodies, and foreign bodies in 951 (41.7%) were removed immediately. In the negative finding (NF) group, 2 (4.9%) patients were later found to be positive for foreign bodies during follow-up in the outpatient department. One (2.4%) patient developed a deep neck infection and esophageal perforation. The percentage of NFs decreased from 62.58% in residents in the first half of their first year (R1a) to 54% for third-year residents (R3). Comparing R1a with R3, the number needed to harm for retained UADT-FBs after patients visited the emergency department was 12.2. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study provides data from 1 referral center regarding the management of UADT-FBs. With increasing resident training, the percentage of NFs declined from 62.58 to 54%. Young residents, especially those in the first 6 months of their training, should have senior residents perform a second examination if UADT-FBs are not found in suspected cases.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Otolaryngology , Foreign Bodies/epidemiology , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Humans , Learning Curve , Pharynx , Retrospective Studies
5.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(9): 3425-3433, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389009

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The association between the tumor subsites of the oral cavity and the risk of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) remains unclear. We study the correlation between oral cavity tumor subsites and the risk of ORNJ in a nationwide population-based database. METHODS: We enrolled 16,701 adult patients with oral cavity cancers who were treated with radiotherapy between 2000 and 2013. The subsites of the oral tumor, treatments of oral cavity cancers, and the timing of tooth extraction were examined for their association with ORNJ in oral cancer patients. RESULTS: 903 patients (5.40%) developed ORNJ. Of the relevant variables, pre-RT mandible surgery, tooth extraction either before or after RT, and tumor sites were associated with the risk of ORNJ. The adjusted HRs for ORNJ in the mouth floor, gums, retromolar, and buccal cancer were 2.056 (1.490-2.837), 1.909 (1.552-2.349), 1.683 (1.105-2.562), and 1.303 (1.111-1.528), respectively, compared with the risk of tongue cancer. There was no significant difference in the risk of ORNJ between the pre-RT extraction group, the during-RT extraction group, and the post-RT extraction (less than 6Ā months) group; the post-RT extraction (more than 6Ā months) group had a significantly higher risk of ORNJ. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that oral cavity tumor subsite is an independent risk factor of ORNJ after RT. Post-RT extraction (less than 6Ā months) group did not carry a significantly higher risk of ORNJ compared with pre-RT extraction group or during RT extraction group.


Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms , Osteoradionecrosis , Adult , Cohort Studies , Humans , Jaw , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Osteoradionecrosis/epidemiology , Osteoradionecrosis/etiology , Risk Factors
6.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 45(6): 896-903, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32738824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) within 7Ā days of tooth extraction is contraindicated because it may increase the risk of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ). However, delayed RT could compromise survival in patients with HNC. By using a national healthcare database, we reviewed the contraindications and analysed other risk factors for ORNJ. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: By using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, 5,062 HNC patients with at least one tooth extraction 1-21Ā days before the first RT day (index day) and without any extractions during or after RT from 2000 to 2013 were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to the time of tooth extraction before the index day: 1-7Ā days and 8-21Ā days. PARTICIPANTS: Taiwanese patients with head and neck cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the risk factors of ORNJ. RESULTS: The overall incidence of ORNJ in the included patients was 1.03% (mean follow-up duration, 4.07Ā Ā±Ā 3.01Ā years; range, 1.00-13.99Ā years). Tooth extraction within 7Ā days before RT was not associated with increased ORNJ risk (hazard ratio [HR] =0.734; PĀ =Ā .312). Significant risk factors for ORNJ included oral cancer (adjusted HRĀ =Ā 3.961), tumour excision surgery within 3Ā months before RT (adjusted HRĀ =Ā 3.488) and mandibulectomy within 3Ā months before RT (adjusted HRĀ =Ā 5.985; all PĀ <Ā .001). CONCLUSION: In a mean follow-up of 4Ā years, tooth extraction within 7Ā days before RT for HNC treatment did not increase the ORNJ risk compared with tooth extraction 7-21Ā days before RT.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Jaw Diseases/epidemiology , Osteoradionecrosis/epidemiology , Tooth Extraction , Female , Humans , Incidence , Jaw Diseases/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoradionecrosis/etiology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Taiwan/epidemiology , Time Factors , Wound Healing
8.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0235069, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32628682

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is the leading cause of death among children and young people (CYP) with severe cerebral palsy (CP). Only a few studies used nomogram for assessing risk factors and the probability of pneumonia. Therefore, we aimed to identify risk factors and devise a nomogram for identifying the probability of severe pneumonia in CYP with severe CP. METHODS: This retrospective nationwide population-based cohort study examined CYP with newly diagnosed severe CP before 18 years old between January 1st, 1997 and December 31st, 2013 and followed them up through December 31st, 2013. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of severe pneumonia with ≥ 5 days of hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was used for determining demographic factors and comorbidities associated with severe pneumonia. These factors were assigned integer points to create a scoring system to identify children at high risk for severe pneumonia. RESULTS: Among 6,356 CYP with newly diagnosed severe CP, 2,135 (33.59%) had severe pneumonia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that seven independent predictive factors, namely age <3 years, male sex, and comorbidities of pressure ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux, asthma, seizures, and perinatal complications. A nomogram was devised by employing these seven significant predictive factors. The prediction model presented favorable discrimination performance. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram revealed that age, male sex, history of pressure ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux, asthma, seizures, and perinatal complications were potential risk factors for severe pneumonia among CYP with severe CP.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/diagnosis , Cerebral Palsy/epidemiology , Nomograms , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Age Factors , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/physiopathology , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cerebral Palsy/mortality , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Pneumonia, Bacterial/complications , Pneumonia, Bacterial/mortality , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Pressure Ulcer/physiopathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/physiopathology , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis , Taiwan/epidemiology
9.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 45(6): 1227-1232, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685504

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In Taiwan, the median age of diagnosis for oral cavity cancer is 51 year old, which is about 10 years earlier than that in Western countries. A recent study assessing the effect of marriage on outcomes for elderly oral cavity cancer patients (≥66 years old) showed that marriage was associated with better survival. However, little is known about the prognostic significance of marital status in oral cavity cancer patients aged 65 years and younger. METHODS: Data from 2007 to 2014 were collected from the Cancer Registry Dataset of the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. We reviewed the records of all newly diagnosed patients with oral cavity cancer who were aged 65 years and younger and being treated by primary surgery with or without neck dissection or adjuvant therapy. None of the included patients had distant metastasis upon diagnosis. In total, 457 patients were indentified. We used multivariate Cox regression model to evaluate the effect of marriage on disease-specific survival rates after adjusting for demographic variables and treatments. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the married and unmarried groups in stage at diagnosis or treatment. The 5-year disease-specific survival was 70.9% in the married group and 51.2% in the unmarried group (P=0.001). Multivariate analysis with Cox regression showed that unmarried patients had worse disease-specific survival (unmarried, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.51, 95% CI: 1.06-2.16). Subgroup analysis among patients stratified by the independent factors in multivariate analysis revealed that being unmarried was associated with a trend of worse survival in most stratified groups. CONCLUSION: Marriage was associated with better disease-specific survival for oral cavity cancer patients aged 65 years and younger.


Subject(s)
Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Mouth , Adult , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Multivariate Analysis , Neck Dissection , Neoplasm Staging , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Survival Rate , Taiwan/epidemiology , Tumor Burden
11.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL