Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Br J Cancer ; 119(4): 517-522, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30057408

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for older rectal cancer patients remains unclear. The current study aimed to compare treatment and survival of rectal cancer patients aged 80+. METHODS: Patients of ≥80 years diagnosed with rectal cancer between 2001 and 2010 were included. Population-based cohorts from Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), the Netherlands (NL), Norway (NO) and Sweden (SE) were compared side by side for neighbouring countries on treatment strategy and 5-year relative survival (RS), adjusted for sex and age. Analyses were performed separately for stage I-III patients and stage IV patients. RESULTS: Overall, 19 634 rectal cancer patients were included. For stage I-III patients, 5-year RS varied from 61.7% in BE to 72.3% in SE. Proportion of preoperative radiotherapy ranged between 7.9% in NO and 28.9% in SE. For stage IV patients, 5-year RS differed from 2.8% in NL to 5.6% in BE. Rate of patients undergoing surgery varied from 22.2% in DK to 40.8% in NO. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation was observed in the 5-year relative survival between European countries for rectal cancer patients aged 80+, next to a wide variation in treatment, especially in the use of preoperative radiotherapy in stage I-III patients and in the rate of patients undergoing surgery in stage IV patients.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Registries , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 54(1): 147-154, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35112314

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Integrin subunit ß4 (ß4) has been proposed to play an important role in colon cancer progression through its involvement in hemidesmosome disassembly processes and tumor cell migration. However, the association between ß4 expression and clinicopathological outcomes in colon cancer remains unclear. METHODS: Expression of ß4 was assessed by immunohistochemistry in a large cohort of 651 colon cancer patients, the largest colon cancer cohort so far. Chi-squared tests were used to study the association between ß4 expression and clinicopathological features. Overall and disease-free survival were assessed by Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Loss of ß4 expression was associated with local tumor invasion. Only 17.9% of the pT1 tumors displayed weak ß4 expression level versus 28.1% of pT4 tumors, and 25.0% of the pT1 tumors had a high expression level versus 8.6% of the pT4 tumors (p = 0.012). No association between ß4 expression and overall (p = 0.845) or disease-free survival (p = 0.767) was encountered, which disputes the role of ß4 as a biomarker of malignant behavior in colon cancer. CONCLUSION: Contradictory reports have suggested opposite roles for ß4 expression in (colon) cancer progression. In the present large cohort of colon cancer patients, we found that ß4 expression was not associated with worse clinical prognosis, but decreased with advanced pathological tumor stage. Future studies should establish whether loss of ß4 expression promotes invasive characteristics of colon cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Integrin beta4 , Humans , Integrin beta4/metabolism , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Immunohistochemistry
3.
BMC Cancer ; 10: 153, 2010 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20406480

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Large number of patients with colorectal liver metastasis show recurrent disease after curative surgical resection. Identification of these high-risk patients may guide therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow from patients undergoing surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases can predict clinical outcome. METHODS: Sixty patients with colorectal liver metastases were planned for a curative resection between 2001 and 2007. All patients underwent bone marrow aspiration before surgery. Detection of tumor cells was performed using immunocytochemical staining for cytokeratin (CK-ICC) combined with automated microscopy or indirectly using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Disseminated tumor cells were found in 15 of the 46 patients (33%) using CK-ICC and in 9 of 44 of the patients (20%) using RT-PCR. Patients with negative results for RT-PCR had a significant better disease-free survival after resection of their liver metastases (p = 0.02). This group also showed significant better overall survival (p = 0.002). CK-ICC did not predict a worse clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow detected using RT-PCR did predict a worse clinical outcome. The presence of cells detected with CK-ICC did not correlate with poor prognosis.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Bone Marrow Examination/methods , Bone Marrow/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Immunohistochemistry , Keratins/analysis , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biopsy, Needle , Bone Marrow/chemistry , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Keratins/genetics , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/chemistry , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol ; 11(10): 610-8, 2014 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24958181

ABSTRACT

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Great efforts are dedicated to the development of prognostic and predictive biomarkers to improve diagnosis and achieve optimal treatment selection, thereby, introducing precision medicine in the multimodality treatment of cancer. Genomic aberrations are the basis of tumour development, representing excellent candidates for the development of promising clinical biomarkers. Over the past decade, single-gene mutations and genomic profiling have been increasingly used in multidisciplinary consultations for risk-assessment and treatment planning for patients with cancer. We discuss the impact of such genetic-based information on surgical decision-making. Single-gene mutations have already influenced surgical decision-making in breast, colorectal and thyroid cancer. However, the direct impact of genomic profiling on surgical care has not yet been fully established. We discuss the direct and indirect influences of genomic profiling on surgery, and analyse the limitations and unresolved issues of a genotypic-approach to the surgical management of cancer.


Subject(s)
Genomics/methods , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/surgery , Precision Medicine/methods , Genetic Variation , Genome, Human , Humans , Mutation , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Patient Selection , Prognosis , Sequence Analysis, DNA
5.
Biomark Cancer ; 5: 13-29, 2013 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24179395

ABSTRACT

Research towards biomarkers that predict patient outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC) is rapidly expanding. However, none of these biomarkers have been recommended by the American Association of Clinical Oncology or the European Group on Tumor Markers. Current staging criteria result in substantial under-and over-treatment of CRC patients. Evasion of apoptosis, a characteristic feature of tumorigenesis, is known to correlate with patient outcome. We reviewed the literature on immunohistochemistry-based studies between 1998 and 2011 describing biomarkers in this pathway in CRC and identified 26 markers. Most frequently described were p53, Bcl-2, survivin, and the Fas and TRAILR1 receptors and their ligands. None of the studies reviewed provided sufficient support for implementing a single marker into current clinical practice. This is likely due to the complex biology of this pathway. We suggest focusing on the combination of key markers within the apoptosis pathway that together represent an 'apoptotic tumor profile', which better reflects the status of this pathway in a tumor.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL