'Between foods and medicines': A qualitative interview study of patient experiences of the meaning and usage of oral nutritional supplements.

The aim of this study was to deepen the understanding of what oral nutritional supplements mean to patients and how this meaning connects to supplement usage, by exploring patient experiences of such supplements. Qualitative interviews were conducted in June 2019-March 2020 with ten patients with malnutrition or at nutritional risk, prescribed oral nutritional supplements by dietitians. Data were thematically analysed using systematic text condensation. Two final categories were identified: 'Oral nutritional supplements are a one-dimensional remedy' and 'Everyday oral nutritional supplement usage is regulated autonomously'. The patients described the meaning of oral nutritional supplements as nutrition. While the supplements could compensate for nutrients not eaten or be part of a helpful compensation strategy, they could not lessen the burden of altered eating. Supplement usage was described as dependent on the acceptance of taste and the priority given to nutrition in everyday life. Usage was greater when nutrients were perceived as needed, such as when striving for higher bodyweight or disease recovery. Usage was lower when a patient's own goals were not increased nutrient intake or bodyweight or when other activities were perceived as more important. Patient experiences indicated that oral nutritional supplements could serve as a remedy for malnutrition, but not for a situation of altered eating. Supplement usage was described as being regulated autonomously based on patient views on the importance of nutrition. Those views were diverse, highlighting the importance of supplement prescribers discussing treatment goals with each patient. A deeper understanding of the meaning of oral nutritional supplements and reasons for their usage from a patient perspective is crucial in order for healthcare to provide appropriate, effective nutrition therapy for malnutrition.

A qualitative exploration of dietitians' experiences of prescribing oral nutritional supplements to patients with malnutrition: A focus on shared tailoring and behaviour change support.

BACKGROUND: Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are commonly prescribed to patients with malnutrition. Dietitians have been suggested as preferred prescribers but generally lack ONS prescribing rights. How dietitians with prescribing rights experience their professional practice of prescribing ONS remains understudied. Thus, by exploring dietitians' experiences of prescribing ONS, the present study aimed to obtain a deeper understanding of specific aspects that are of importance for dietitians when providing a nutrition therapy including ONS. METHODS: Qualitative individual interviews were conducted with 13 dietitians prescribing ONS to free-living adult outpatients with malnutrition or at nutritional risk in the hospital or primary care setting. Systematic text condensation was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Two main categories signifying important aspects were identified and labelled: 'Shared tailoring of the ONS prescription' and 'Supporting and facilitating ONS use'. First, the dietitians described tailoring the ONS prescription together with the patient, having their acceptance as a prerequisite, and being flexible regarding products and amounts prescribed. Second, they described performing different communication strategies and organising of practical issues (e.g., ONS delivery and support from others) to support and facilitate patients' ONS usage. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identifies patient involvement and the role of dietitians as behaviour change facilitators as two important aspects when dietitians prescribe ONS. These findings allow for dietitians' ideals and strategies on how to prescribe ONS to be made more visible, which can inform both clinical practice and clinical trials for future improvements in nutrition therapy to address malnutrition.

An Audit of Dietitians' Documentation - Comparing the Level of Agreement Between the Audit Instruments Diet-NCP-Audit and NCP-QUEST.

To explore the inter-rater reliability of the Swedish translation of NCP-QUEST in a Swedish context and investigate the level of agreement between Diet-NCP-Audit and NCP-QUEST in assessment of documentation quality. A retrospective audit was conducted of 40 electronic patient records written by dietitians at one University Hospital in Sweden. NCP-QUEST showed good inter-rater reliability for the quality category (ICC = 0.85) and excellent inter-rater reliability for total score (ICC = 0.97).

High Adherence to Oral Nutrition Supplements Prescribed by Dietitians: A Cross-Sectional Study on Hospital Outpatients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess adherence to oral nutrition supplements (ONS) among hospital outpatients and to assess patient characteristics, experiences of ONS, and the characteristics of ONS prescriptions in clinical practice. METHODS: Hospital outpatients aged ≥18 years and prescribed ONS by a dietitian at a Swedish hospital were referred to the study from September 2016 to February 2017. Data were collected from structured telephone interviews, medical records, and a register of ONS delivered. Adherence to ONS was measured by dividing self-reported intake of ONS (frequency question and 24-hour recall question) by the amount prescribed and using the medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Of the 96 patients included (mean age 67 ± 13 years), 52% were male. The 2 most frequent medical diagnoses were malignancy and digestive system disease. Mean adherence to ONS was 93% measured by the frequency question, 87% measured by the 24-hour recall question, and 76% according to MPR. The majority of the patients (83%) were prescribed 1-3 bottles of ONS/day. The average number of flavors of ONS delivered was 4.2. Before prescription, 69% of the patients had been allowed to taste the ONS and 92% had chosen the flavors to be prescribed. Over 75% liked the taste of the ONS and considered them to be good for their health. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to ONS was high in this population, which might be explained by the individual tailoring of ONS prescriptions by a dietitian, positive experiences of ONS, and the relatively young mean age of the participants.