Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Blood ; 143(9): 757-768, 2024 Feb 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38145574

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by arterial, venous, or microvascular thrombosis, pregnancy morbidities, or nonthrombotic manifestations in patients with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. These antibodies bind cellular phospholipids and phospholipid-protein complexes resulting in cellular activation and inflammation that lead to the clinical features of APS. Our evolving understanding of APS has resulted in more specific classification criteria. Patients meeting these criteria should be treated during pregnancy according to current guidelines. Yet, despite treatment, those positive for lupus anticoagulant have at least a 30% likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Patients with recurrent early miscarriage or fetal death in the absence of preeclampsia or placental insufficiency may not meet current classification criteria for APS. Patients with only low titer anticardiolipin or anti-ß(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies or immunoglobulin M isotype antibodies will not meet current classification criteria. In such cases, clinicians should implement management plans that balance potential risks and benefits, some of which involve emotional concerns surrounding the patient's reproductive future. Finally, APS may present in pregnancy or postpartum as a thrombotic microangiopathy, a life-threatening condition that may initially mimic preeclampsia with severe features but requires a very different treatment approach.


Subject(s)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome , Pre-Eclampsia , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/diagnosis , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/therapy , Placenta , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid , Phospholipids , Pregnancy Outcome , Autoantibodies , Antibodies, Anticardiolipin
2.
Blood ; 140(12): 1335-1344, 2022 09 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35797471

ABSTRACT

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is characterized by recurring episodes of thrombotic microangiopathy, causing ischemic organ impairment. Black patients are overrepresented in iTTP cohorts in the United States, but racial disparities in iTTP outcome and response to therapy have not been studied. Using the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathies Consortium iTTP Registry, we evaluated the impact of race on mortality and relapse-free survival (RFS) in confirmed iTTP in the United States from 1995 to 2020. We separately examined the impact of rituximab therapy and presentation with newly diagnosed (de novo) or relapsed iTTP on RFS by race. A total of 645 participants with 1308 iTTP episodes were available for analysis. Acute iTTP mortality did not differ by race. When all episodes of iTTP were included, Black race was associated with shorter RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.16-2.21); the addition of rituximab to corticosteroids improved RFS in White (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73) but not Black patients (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71-1.31). In de novo iTTP, rituximab delayed relapse, but Black patients had shorter RFS than White patients, regardless of treatment. In relapsed iTTP, rituximab significantly improved RFS in White but not Black patients. Race affects overall relapse risk and response to rituximab in iTTP. Black patients may require closer monitoring, earlier retreatment, and alternative immunosuppression after rituximab treatment. How race, racism, and social determinants of health contribute to the disparity in relapse risk in iTTP deserves further study.


Subject(s)
Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic , ADAMTS13 Protein , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Humans , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/therapy , Recurrence , Rituximab/therapeutic use
3.
Haemophilia ; 30(2): 470-477, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343098

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines on the management of pregnant individuals with von Willebrand disease (VWD) at the time of delivery recommend that von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII:C (FVIII:C) levels be ≥50% to prevent postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). Yet, high PPH rates persist despite these levels or with prophylactic factor replacement therapy to achieve these levels. AIMS: The current practice at our centre has been to target peak plasma VWF and FVIII:C levels of ≥100 IU/dL at time of delivery. The objective of this study was to describe obstetric outcomes in pregnant individuals with VWD who were managed at our centre. METHODS: Demographics and outcomes on pregnant individuals with VWD who delivered between January 2015 and April 2023 were collected. RESULTS: Forty-seven singleton deliveries (among 41 individuals) resulting in 46 live births and one foetal death were included. Twenty-one individuals had at least one prior birth by the start date of this study, of which 11 (52.4%) self-reported a history of PPH. Early PPH occurred in 12.8% (6/47) of deliveries. Two individuals required blood transfusion, of which one also had an unplanned hysterectomy and transfer to ICU. There were no thrombotic events reported. CONCLUSION: The strategy of targeting higher peak plasma VWF and FVIII:C levels (≥100 IU/dL) at the time of delivery may be effective in reducing the risk of delivery-associated bleeding complications in VWD patients. Yet, the rate of early PPH remains unsatisfactory compared to the non-VWD population.


Subject(s)
Hemostatics , Postpartum Hemorrhage , von Willebrand Diseases , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , von Willebrand Diseases/complications , von Willebrand Factor , Cohort Studies , Factor VIII , Postpartum Hemorrhage/etiology
4.
Haemophilia ; 30(1): 87-97, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38111071

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Gene therapy is now a reality for individuals with haemophilia, yet little is known regarding the quality-of-life impact of factor correction. As few data exist, and recognizing the analogy to liver transplantation (OLTX), we identified OLTX+ and OLTX- men in the ATHNdataset to compare post-OLTX factor VIII and IX on quality of life (QoL) by Haem-A-QoL and PROMIS-29. METHODS: OLTX- were matched to OLTX+ by age, race, and haemophilia type and severity. Deidentified demographic data, including post-transplant factor levels, genotype and target joint disease were analysed by descriptive statistics. Haem-A-Qol and PROMIS-29 were compared in OLTX+ and OLTX- by student's t-test and univariate regression models. RESULTS: Of 86 people with haemophilia A (HA) or haemophilia B (HB) cared for at 10 haemophilia treatment centers (HTCs), 21 (24.4%) OLTX+ and 65 (75.6%) OLTX- were identified. OLTX+ and OLTX- had a similar frequency of target joint disease (p = .806), HA genotypes, null versus non-null (p = .696), and HIV infection (p = .316). At a median 9.2 years post-OLTX, median FVIII, .63 IU/mL [IQR 0.52-0.97] and FIX, .91 IU/mL [IQR .63-1.32], Haem-A-QoL, PROMIS-29, and HOT scores were comparable. Severe HA/HB had lower post-OLTX 'dealing with haemophilia' scores (p = .022) and higher 'sports and leisure' (p = .010) and 'view of yourself' scores (p = .024) than OLTX+ non-severe participants. Non-caucasian OLTX+ had significantly lower scores in sports and leisure (p = .042), future expectations (p = .021) and total score (p = .010). CONCLUSION: Nine years after OLTX, QoL is comparable to OLTX-, but significantly better in OLTX+ with severe than non-severe disease and in caucasians than non-caucasians.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hemophilia A , Hemophilia B , Joint Diseases , Liver Transplantation , Male , Humans , Hemophilia A/therapy , Quality of Life , Cohort Studies , Heme
5.
Haemophilia ; 29(1): 240-247, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36395791

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Reproductive-age women with bleeding disorders (BDs) are underdiagnosed and understudied, despite their increased risk for adverse health outcomes and pregnancy complications. AIM: This study examines pregnancy outcomes and obstetric complications of Utah women with BDs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized linked birth records and clinical billing data from two large Utah healthcare systems. Utah residents who had their first birth at > 20 weeks gestation (2008-2015) and who received non-emergent care within either system before delivery were included (n = 61 226). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine relationships between BDs and neonatal and obstetric outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 295 women (.48%) were included in the BD study population. Women with BDs had significantly increased odds of preterm birth (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.32-2.60), Caesarean delivery (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06-1.79), postpartum blood transfusion (aOR 2.55, 95% CI 1.05-6.22), unplanned postpartum hysterectomy (aOR 33.96, 95% CI 7.30-157.89) and transfer to an intensive care unit (aOR 18.18, 95% CI 7.17-46.08). All of the women with BDs who experienced these serious complications were not diagnosed with a BD until the year of their first birth. Additionally, those with BDs were more likely to experience maternal and infant mortality. CONCLUSION: Women with BDs had an increased risk for preterm birth, Caesarean delivery, blood transfusion, unplanned hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, maternal and infant mortality. Those who were not diagnosed with a BD before the year of their first birth were at an increased risk for serious pregnancy complications.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders , Hemorrhagic Disorders , Pregnancy Complications , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Parturition , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Blood Coagulation Disorders/complications , Hemorrhagic Disorders/complications
6.
Am J Hematol ; 98(12): E399-E402, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37800397

ABSTRACT

Graphical representation of increasing percentage of female patients seen at HTCs, percentage of females by diagnosis, number of clinics in existence, and absolute number of female patients seen over a 10-year period (top left then clockwise).


Subject(s)
Hemophilia A , Humans , Female , Hemophilia A/epidemiology , Hemophilia A/therapy
7.
Haemophilia ; 28(1): 4-17, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34820989

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the approval of emicizumab, a bispecific, factor VIII-mimetic antibody, for use in persons with congenital haemophilia A in 2018, there have been increasing case reports and case series of off-label use of emicizumab in other bleeding disorders, including acquired haemophilia A (AHA) and von Willebrand disease (VWD). AIM: We conducted a scoping review on the use of emicizumab in AHA and VWD, focusing on the clinical presentation and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus up to July 15, 2021. The following criteria were applied to the studies identified in the initial search: patients had a diagnosis of AHA or VWD; and the study reported on the clinical outcome of emicizumab use. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the final review for a total of 41 patients (33 AHA, eight type 3 VWD). The majority of AHA patients and all type 3 VWD patients were started on emicizumab for active/recurrent bleeds. The dosing regimen of emicizumab used varied significantly in AHA patients. All patients had a clinical response to emicizumab use. One AHA patient developed a stroke on emicizumab use in association with concomitant recombinant FVIIa use for surgery. Data on adverse events from emicizumab use were not specifically reported in 24.4% of patients (four AHA, six type 3 VWD). CONCLUSION: Based on published case reports and case series, emicizumab appears to be an effective haemostatic therapy for AHA and VWD. Larger confirmatory clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Hemophilia A , von Willebrand Diseases , Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Humans , Off-Label Use , von Willebrand Diseases/drug therapy
8.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(13)2022 06 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35728777

ABSTRACT

Patients with cancer are at high risk of developing arterial and venous thromboembolism (VTE). They constitute 15% to 20% of the patients diagnosed with VTE. Depending on the type of tumor, cancer therapy, and presence of other risk factors, 1% to 25% of patients with cancer will develop thrombosis. The decision to start patients with cancer on primary thromboprophylaxis depends on patient preference, balancing risk of bleeding versus risk of thrombosis, cost, and adequate organ function. Currently, guidelines recommend against the use of routine primary thromboprophylaxis in unselected ambulatory patients with cancer. Validated risk assessment models can accurately identify patients at highest risk for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). This review summarizes the recently updated NCCN Guidelines for CAT primary prophylaxis, with a primarily focus on VTE prevention. Two main clinical questions that providers commonly encounter will also be addressed: which patients with cancer should receive primary thromboprophylaxis (both surgical and medical oncology patients) and how to safely choose between different anticoagulation agents.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/chemically induced
9.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(1): 91-95, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991076

ABSTRACT

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major complication in all patients with cancer. Compared with the general population, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have a 9-fold increase in VTE risk, likely because of their malignancy, its treatments, and other additional patient-related factors. In MM, thromboembolism events tend to occur within 6 months of treatment initiation, regardless of treatment regimen; however, the use of immunomodulatory agents such as thalidomide or lenalidomide, especially in combination with dexamethasone or multiagent chemotherapy, is known to create a significant risk for VTE. Currently, official recommendations for VTE prophylaxis in MM outlined in various national guidelines or multidisciplinary society panels are based on expert opinion, because data from randomized controlled trials are scarce. Large studies which have mainly focused on the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer at higher risk for VTE either had a very low representation of patients with MM, or excluded them all together, limiting our ability to draw evidence-based conclusions on how to effectively protect MM population from VTE. In this brief perspective, we highlight some of the greatest challenges that have hampered the field concerning the availability of high-quality clinical trial data for the formulation of best VTE prophylaxis strategies in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as well as the rationale for the latest updates in the NCCN Guidelines on this topic.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Venous Thromboembolism , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Humans , Lenalidomide/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Thalidomide/adverse effects , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control
10.
Blood ; 143(23): 2347-2349, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842856
11.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(10): 1203-1210, 2021 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34666314

ABSTRACT

Venous thromboembolic disease can be a fatal complication of cancer. Despite advances in prevention, thousands of patients require treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) each year. Guidelines have advocated low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as the preferred anticoagulant for CAT for years, based on clinical trial data showing LMWH to be associated with a lower risk of recurrent thrombosis when compared with vitamin K antagonists. However, the potentially painful, subcutaneously administered LMWH injections can be expensive, and clinical practice has not been consistent with guideline recommendations. Recently, studies have compared LMWH to the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of CAT. Based on promising trial results outlined in this review, DOACs are now preferred anticoagulants for CAT occurring in patients without gastric or gastroesophageal lesions. For patients with gastrointestinal cancers, who may be at higher risk of hemorrhage with the DOACs, LMWH remains the anticoagulant of choice. Applying the latest data from this rapidly evolving field to care for diverse patient groups can be challenging. This article provides an evidence-based review of outpatient anticoagulant selection for lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in the setting of cancer, and takes into account special populations with cancer.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Venous Thrombosis , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
12.
Curr Opin Hematol ; 27(5): 295-301, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32701616

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nonsevere hemophilia A (NSHA) patients have received relatively little clinical and research attention as compared with their severe counterparts. There is increasing recognition that despite their milder bleeding phenotype, the management of NSHA can be a challenge, with most management decisions largely inferred from severe hemophilia A data. This review focuses on some of the more recent developments in the field of NSHA. RECENT FINDINGS: Epidemiologic studies suggest that NSHA remain under-recognized and under-diagnosed globally. As the NSHA population ages, they are susceptible to age-related comorbidities. Large cohort studies of NSHA report that the most common primary cause of death is malignancy. NSHA patients have a lifetime risk of inhibitor development with increasing exposure to factor VIII concentrate. Even so, not all patients with inhibitors will require eradication treatment, irrespective of bleeding phenotype at time of inhibitor development. SUMMARY: As there are currently no evidence-based strategies for inhibitor eradication in NSHA patients, preventive strategies are critical to mitigate inhibitor risk in NSHA. There is a need for active surveillance of NSHA patients by hemophilia treatment centers to address hemophilia-related issues and other age-related comorbidities, in collaboration with primary care physicians and other subspecialists.


Subject(s)
Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Hemophilia A/pathology , Humans , Prevalence , Risk Factors
13.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 49(3): 451-456, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31712946

ABSTRACT

The United States is facing a shortage of physicians dedicated to nonmalignant hematology to meet future needs. The Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS) developed a medical education program for trainees, "HTRS Trainee Workshops: Building a Career in Hemostasis and Thrombosis" in 2016. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the workshop in recruiting the next generation of nonmalignant hematologists. Two surveys (post-workshop survey and alumni survey) were conducted. The post-workshop survey occurred within 30 days of each workshop and was completed by 81.9% (n = 185) of participants. Majority of respondents reported that the workshop had a positive impact to their practice and/or research (93.0%, n = 174) and career development (87.7%, n = 164). For the alumni survey which was conducted in 2018, 73 participants responded to the survey (38.2% response rate). Of the 38 respondents who had graduated from fellowship at the time of the survey, almost all chose a career in academic medicine. 41.7% (n = 15) reported their specialty as adult nonmalignant hematology and 25.0% (n = 9) as pediatric hematology/oncology with a nonmalignant hematology focus. 41.1% (n = 30) developed collaborative professional relationships, and 78.1% (n = 57) reported that the workshop had a positive influence in their choice to pursue nonmalignant hematology as a career. 67.1% (n = 49) were actively involved in research in nonmalignant hematology, with the most common being clinical research. This survey suggests that the HTRS Trainee Workshop is meeting its goals to recruit, train, and mentor the next generation of nonmalignant hematologists.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing , Hematology/economics , Hemostasis , Societies, Scientific , Thrombosis , Female , Humans , Male , United States
14.
J Cancer Educ ; 35(4): 705-708, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30919266

ABSTRACT

It remains unclear on whether the traditional formal didactic lecture sessions improve knowledge acquisition with conflicting data in the literature. This study evaluates the impact of an additional benign hematology didactic curriculum on the American Society of Hematology In-Service Exam (ASHISE). During the first 5 years of the study (2012-2016), formal didactic lectures consisted of medical oncology and malignant hematology topics only. Formal benign hematology didactic lectures were added during the last 2 years of the study (2017-2018). All fellows are required to take the ASHISE annually. All fellows' ASHISE scores from 2012 to 2018 were collected. The mean total and Coagulation scale score were calculated by year of fellowship training. Pre-intervention (2012-2016) and post-intervention (2017-2018) scores were analyzed using a Student's t test. Over a 7-year period, 34 hematology-oncology fellows took the ASHISE. There was no statistical difference in the mean total and Coagulation scale score for the ASHISE in the pre-intervention and post-intervention group. The addition of a benign hematology curriculum did not improve fellows' performance on the ASHISE.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Fellowships and Scholarships/standards , Hematology/education , Medical Oncology/education , Teaching/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Curriculum , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 47(1): 109-112, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30317412

ABSTRACT

Over the next decade, there is a predicted shortage of nonmalignant hematologist to maintain the workforce in the United States. To address this, the American Society of Hematology described the creation of the healthcare systems-based hematologist (SBH). The role of SBH has the potential to provide high-value, cost-conscious care to the healthcare system. In 2011, an Anticoagulation and Bleeding Management Medical Directorship position for a SBH was created at our healthcare system. We described our 6-year experience as SBH at a 750-bed tertiary academic medical center to improve clinical outcomes while reducing costs. Via four different initiatives, we were able to provide high-value, cost-conscious care as SBH by reducing cost of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia management, optimizing blood product utilization using goal-directed algorithms, reducing inappropriate thrombophilia testing and improving inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates. To ensure continuing success as a SBH, business plans need to include education, enforcement, monitoring, feedback, validation of safety and outcomes and a shared vision among leadership.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/standards , Hematology/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/economics , Algorithms , Humans , Quality Improvement , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Workforce
16.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 47(2): 287-291, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30612329

ABSTRACT

A high frequency of PF4-ELISA testing in patients suspected to have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) despite low 4T scores has been observed in multiple medical centers. Education of clinicians has been suggested to reduce inappropriate testing. We determined trends of PF4-ELISA testing in our institution after the introduction of a HIT education program for clinicians. A HIT Program was developed that included ongoing education, individual feedback, and continuous clinical audit of PF4-ELISA utilization. To assess the impact of education on PF4-ELISA testing trends, we conducted a prospective cohort review of all adult patients who had a PF4-ELISA ordered over a 3 month period (the last quarter of the academic year). 72 PF4-ELISA tests were ordered during the study period. Prospectively calculated 4T scores by investigators revealed 60 low-risk (83.3%), 9 intermediate-risk (12.5%), and 3 high-risk (4.16%). We observed divergent 4T scores with the ordering clinician calculating a higher 4T score compared to the Hematology Quality Improvement (QI) team. The majority of PF4-ELISA testing was ordered by the intensive care units (ICUs) (n = 32, 44.44%). Our study revealed that the frequency of calculation of 4T scores remains poor with the majority inappropriately performed in the ICU setting, with ordering clinicians calculating higher 4T scores than the Hematology QI team. This suggests that clinician education alone is insufficient. Introducing mandatory 4T score calculation prior to PF4-ELISA testing may not be helpful as ordering clinicians can bypass the restriction through inaccurate 4T score calculation.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Heparin/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Inservice Training/methods , Platelet Factor 4/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Unnecessary Procedures , Anticoagulants/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , Clinical Decision-Making , Decision Support Techniques , Feedback, Psychological , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Heparin/immunology , Humans , Patient Selection , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Thrombocytopenia/blood , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/immunology
17.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 45(1): 130-134, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29185142

ABSTRACT

Many medical centers are faced with a major challenge in making an accurate diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and ensuring appropriate changes in management strategy in line with guideline recommendations. We report the initial and long-term impact and challenges of institution-wide changes in the diagnosis and management of HIT in the inpatient setting at an academic medical center. We established a HIT Task Force, consisting of a multidisciplinary team of non-malignant hematologists, nursing, pharmacist, pathology, blood bank and clinical lab informatics. Changes were implemented from 2011 to 2012. In 2013, testing for PF4 and SRA decreased by 37.5 and 85%, respectively. 100% of positive PF4 received an automatic hematology consult to guide management, leading to a 78% reduction in the use of direct thrombin inhibitors. Annual audits in the subsequent years demonstrated increasing testing for HIT due to changes in the electronic ordering system. Through continuous monitoring, these shortfalls were detected and intervene early on with continued success. The implementation of a centralized hospital-wide protocol via a multidisciplinary task force that coordinates testing and treatment of patients suspected of having HIT led to a substantial reduction in PF4 and SRA testing, as well as use of DTIs, resulting in a safe and cost-effective approach for the diagnosis and treatment of HIT. Our study highlights the important of continuous monitoring to maintain the improvements made. Despite our initial success, annual re-auditing allowed for early detection of challenges, which then allowed appropriate early intervention.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Heparin/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Management , Humans , Platelet Factor 4 , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Time Factors
19.
Eur J Haematol ; 96(1): 60-4, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25782416

ABSTRACT

Up to 14% of individuals with systemic AL amyloidosis develop acquired factor X deficiency, which occurs due to adsorption of factor X onto amyloid fibrils. Although baseline factor X levels are not predictive of bleeding risk in these patients, serious hemorrhagic complications can occur, particularly during invasive procedures. Optimal management strategies to attenuate bleeding risk in these patients are unknown. We describe our experience in the management of acquired factor X deficiency, secondary to systemic AL amyloidosis, in a case series of three patients who received prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) for treatment and prevention of bleeding events. We performed a retrospective review extracting information on baseline demographics, laboratory data, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, and clinically documented bleeding events. Our case series demonstrates that individuals with acquired factor X deficiency secondary to amyloidosis have variable laboratory and clinical responses to PCCs. This is likely due to distinct amyloid loads and fibril sequences, leading to different binding avidities for factor X. Our data emphasize the importance of performing PK testing prior to any invasive procedures to determine the dose and frequency interval to achieve adequate factor X levels for hemostasis, given the variable response between individuals.


Subject(s)
Amyloidosis , Blood Coagulation Factors , Factor X Deficiency , Adult , Aged , Amyloidosis/blood , Amyloidosis/complications , Amyloidosis/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Factors/administration & dosage , Blood Coagulation Factors/pharmacokinetics , Factor X Deficiency/blood , Factor X Deficiency/drug therapy , Factor X Deficiency/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
20.
Eur J Haematol ; 97(4): 353-60, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26773706

ABSTRACT

The risk of thrombosis in individuals with rare compound thrombophilias, homozygous factor V Leiden (FVL) plus heterozygous prothrombin G20210A (PTM), homozygous PTM plus heterozygous FVL, and homozygous FVL plus homozygous PTM, is unknown. We identified, worldwide, individuals with these compound thrombophilias, predominantly through mailing members of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Physicians were sent a clinical questionnaire. Confirmatory copies of the genetic results were obtained. One hundred individuals were enrolled; 58% were female. Seventy-one individuals had a venous thrombosis (includes superficial and deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), 4 had an arterial thrombosis and 6 had both. Nineteen individuals had never had a thrombotic event. Thrombosis-free survival curves demonstrated that 50% of individuals had experienced a thrombotic event by 35 yrs of age, while 50% had a first venous thromboembolic event (VTE; includes all venous thrombosis except superficial thrombosis) by 41 yrs of age; 38.2% of first VTEs were unprovoked. 37% of patients had at least one VTE recurrence. Seventy percent of first pregnancies carried to term and not treated with anticoagulation were thrombosis-free. In conclusion, patients with these rare compound thrombophilias are not exceedingly thrombogenic, even though they have a substantial risk for VTE.


Subject(s)
Factor V/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Polymorphism, Genetic , Prothrombin/genetics , Thrombophilia/epidemiology , Thrombophilia/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alleles , Blood Coagulation , Blood Coagulation Tests , Child , Female , Genetic Association Studies , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Risk , Thrombophilia/diagnosis , Thrombophilia/mortality , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL