Francis S. Morrison MD-Tribute to an apheresis leader.

Francis S. Morrison MD was among the early developers and promoters of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA). His work was pivotal in creating a lasting institutional structure from which American apheresis medical practice would develop decades after his death. Francis Morrison is honored each year at the ASFA annual meeting as ASFA awards the Francis S. Morrison MD Memorial Award Lecture to an individual who stands out as among its most accomplished members. This tribute seeks to describe the person and the key accomplishments of Francis S. Morrison in the historical context of a time when the future of apheresis medicine was uncertain.

Apheresis medicine in the era of advanced telehealth technologies: An American Society for Apheresis position paper Part I: Understanding the basic technologies and apheresis medicine practice models.

The wide spread availability and use of sophisticated high-speed telecommunication networks coupled with inexpensive and easily accessible computing capacity have catalyzed the creation of new tools and strategies for healthcare delivery. Such tools and strategies are of value to apheresis medicine (AM) practitioners if they improve delivery of patient care, enhance safety during a therapeutic apheresis (TA) intervention, facilitate care access, advance technical capabilities of apheresis devices, and/or elevate quality performance within TA programs. In the past several years, healthcare delivery systems' adoption of telecommunication technologies has been fostered by organizational financial and quality improvement objectives. More recently, adoption of telehealth technologies has been catalyzed by the COVID-19 pandemic as these technologies enhance both patient and provider safety in an era of social distancing. These changes will also influence the delivery of TA services which now can be generally viewed in a tripartite model format comprised of traditional hospital-based fixed site locales, mobile TA operations and lately an evolving telemedicine remote management model now reffered to as telapheresis (TLA). This communication developed by the Public Affairs and Advocacy Committee of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) and endorsed by its Board of Directors, reviews and describes various aspects of established and evolving electronic technologies related to TLA and the practice of AM. In subsequent companion publications, additional aspects to TLA will be explored and ASFA's vision of reasonable, regulatory compliant and high-quality TLA practices will be expounded.

American Society for Apheresis white paper: considerations for medical staff apheresis medicine physician credentialing and privileging.

INTRODUCTION: Physician supervision of apheresis contributes to safe and high-quality patient care. Literature is limited regarding the requirements for hospital privileges of physicians providing apheresis services. This report provides recommendations from the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) regarding this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ASFA Public Affairs Committee was charged by the society's Board of Directors (BOD) to work collaboratively with other ASFA committees to develop guidance pertaining to requirements for hospital privileges of physicians in apheresis medicine. After review of the literature and discussions with members from diverse practice environments, draft guidance was created and circulated among pertinent parties for comment and revision. The final document, approved by the BOD in 2011, is presented herein. RESULTS: Assurance of patient safety was the paramount focus in the deliberations. Establishment and maintenance of physician competency in the discipline of apheresis medicine, and the documentation thereof, were consensus priorities. The importance of care teams involving non-physicians and the support structures within hospitals were also identified as other important contributors to patient safety. CONCLUSION: Patient safety during therapeutic apheresis involves both practitioners' and institutional provision of care aspects. Physician training experiences, medical licensing, and board certification status, along with continuing medical education and participation in risk management/patient safety projects are characteristic facets of physician competency in the provision of quality apheresis medicine interventions. Documentation of such indicators may help in medical staff deliberations regarding physician privileging in the oversight and management of apheresis medicine activities in hospitals.

Relationship between splenomegaly and transfusion requirements in patients with cirrhosis.

Patients with cirrhosis and splenomegaly commonly develop cytopenias and require the transfusion of blood products. In this study, we evaluated spleen size as a clinical indicator for red blood cell transfusion effectiveness and hypothesized that transfusion would be less effective in patients with splenomegaly. Our retrospective cohort study compared 215 cirrhotic patients with splenomegaly and 114 cirrhotic patients without splenomegaly and measured their respective change in hemoglobin concentration after a unit of transfused red blood cells. The primary endpoint was the percent difference between the measured rise in hemoglobin after transfusion in these cohorts. Patient sex (P < 0.0035), body mass index (P < 0.0001), and the change in hemoglobin concentration after a leukocyte-reduced red blood transfusion (P < 0.0001) were found to be significantly related to spleen size. When compared to the nonsplenomegaly cohort, it was found that the splenomegaly cohort experienced 79.70% (95% CI 71.26%-89.14%) of the change in hemoglobin concentration after red blood cell transfusion when adjusted for patient sex and body mass index. In conclusion, in patients with cirrhosis, increased spleen size was correlated with a decreased responsiveness to red blood cell transfusion when adjusted for patient sex and body mass index.

Correlation of ELISA method with three other automated serological tests for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Public health emergency of SARS-CoV-2 has facilitated diagnostic testing as a related medical countermeasure against COVID-19 outbreak. Numerous serologic antibody tests have become available through an expedited federal emergency use only process. This paper highlights the analytical characteristic of an ELISA based assay by AnshLabs and three random access immunoassay (RAIA) by DiaSorin, Roche, and Abbott that have been approved for emergency use authorization (EUA), at a tertiary academic center in a low disease-prevalence area. The AnshLabs gave higher estimates of sero-prevalence, over the three RAIA methods. For positive results, AnshLabs had 93.3% and 100% agreement with DiaSorin or Abbott and Roche respectively. For negative results, AnshLabs had 74.3% and 78.3% agreement with DiaSorin and Roche or Abbott respectively. All discrepant samples that were positive by AnshLabs and negative by RAIA tested positive by all-in-one step SARS-CoV-2 Total (COV2T) assay performed on the automated Siemens Advia Centaur XPT analyzer. None of these methods, however, are useful in early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.

Risk of cytomegalovirus transmission by blood products after solid organ transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and CMV disease are significant contributors to increased morbidity, mortality, and cost for immunocompromised solid organ transplant recipients. Although the most significant risk for CMV transmission is the CMV serological status of the transplant donor and recipient, exposure to blood products is another potential risk factor. Before the era of leukocyte reduction, CMV seronegative products were issued to reduce the risk of CMV transmission, thus rendering the products CMV safe. This approach requires maintenance of two inventories of blood products and continuous donor testing. Leukocyte-reduced cellular transfusion products are also considered CMV safe and are essentially universally available. To minimize the risk of CMV infection in transplant recipients, strategies include use of seronegative blood products or prestorage leukocyte reduction. However, no recent randomized prospective controlled trial directly compares the two CMV safety approaches for transplant recipients. Hence, current policy relies on historic trials and more recent observational studies. As a consequence, though generally considered equivalent approaches, preferred practice varies between centers. This review provides guidance to inform an acceptable practice approach.

Should we establish a new protocol for the treatment of peripartum myocardial infarction?

Peripartum myocardial infarction is a rare event that is associated with high mortality rates. The differential diagnosis includes coronary artery dissection, coronary artery thrombosis, vascular spasm, and stenosis. Our evaluation of 2 cases over a 5-year time period has led to a hypothesis that peripartum myocardial infarction is an immune-mediated event secondary to coronary endothelial sensitization by fetal antigen. In our patients, we supplemented standard medical therapy with immunotherapy consisting of corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Herein, we present our most recent case-that of a 29-year-old black woman (gravida V, para IV), 2 weeks postpartum with no relevant medical history. She presented with a 1-week history of chest pain. Initial electrocardiographic and cardiac biomarkers were consistent with acute coronary syndrome. Echocardiography revealed reduced systolic function with inferior-wall hypokinesis. Angiography revealed diffuse disease with occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery not amenable to revascularization. We were successful in treating the myocardial infarction without the use of catheter-based interventions, by modifying the immunologic abnormalities. Two cases do not make a protocol. Yet we believe that this case and our earlier case lend credence to the hypothesis that peripartum myocardial infarction arises from sensitization by fetal antigens. This concept and the immune-modifying treatment protocol that we propose might also assist in understanding and treating other inflammatory-disease states such as peripartum cardiomyopathy and standard acute myocardial infarction. All of this warrants further investigation.