Digital Quantification of Tumor Cellularity as a Novel Prognostic Feature of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Non-small cell lung carcinoma is currently staged based on the size and involvement of other structures. Tumor size may be a surrogate measure of the total number of tumor cells. A recently revised reporting system for adenocarcinoma incorporates high-risk histologic patterns, which may have increased cellular density. Modern digital image analysis tools can be utilized to automate the quantification of cells. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that tumor cellularity can be used as a novel prognostic tool for lung cancer. Digital slides from The Cancer Genome Atlas lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) data set (n = 213) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) data set (n = 90) were obtained and analyzed using QuPath. The number of tumor cells was normalized with the surface area of the tumor to provide a measure of tumor cell density. Tumor cellularity was calculated by multiplying the size of the tumor with the cell density. Major histologic patterns and grade were compared with the tumor density of the lung ADC and lung SCC cases. The overall and progression-free survival were compared between groups of high and low tumor cellularity. High-grade histologic patterns in the ADC and SCC cases were associated with greater tumor densities compared with low-grade patterns. Cases with lower tumor cellularity had improved overall and progression-free survival compared with cases with higher cellularity. These results support tumor cellularity as a novel prognostic tool for non-small cell lung carcinoma that considers tumor stage and grade elements.

A test of the effects of androgens on immunity: No relationship between 11-ketotestosterone and immune performance in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus).

The immunosuppressive effects of androgens are a key component of the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis (ICHH). Here, we use bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) to test two predictions arising from this hypothesis: (1) natural circulating concentrations of the androgen 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) will be negatively related with measures of immunity, and (2) immune stimulation will lower circulating 11-KT concentration. We found no evidence for a relationship between natural circulating 11-KT concentration and measures of immunity (lymphocyte and granulocyte counts, respiratory burst, cytokine mRNA levels), and an immune stimulation with Vibrio vaccine did not affect circulating 11-KT concentration. We also performed a meta-analysis of immune stimulation studies to help interpret our results, and report evidence suggesting that immune stimulation has weaker effects on androgen levels in fishes compared to other vertebrates. These results suggest that the ICHH may not apply to all vertebrates, although it remains premature to state what factors account for the weaker evidence in fishes that androgens are immunosuppressive.

Is Oncotype DX testing informative for breast cancers with low ER expression? A retrospective review from a biomarker testing referral center.

PURPOSE: It remains unclear whether patients with HER2-negative, low-estrogen receptor (ER-low)-positive early breast cancer (BC) benefit from Oncotype DX® (ODX) testing. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of cases referred for ODX testing over a seven-year period from a breast biomarker testing referral center (n = 854). For each case, we recorded the ODX Recurrence Score (RS) along with percentage of ER nuclear positivity and staining intensity on immunohistochemistry. Our criteria for ER-low was defined as ≤10% cells with nuclear positivity and/or weak intensity of staining. Slides from all ER-low cases were reviewed and the reported ODX ER gene scores were recorded. We randomly selected a comparator group of 56 patients with ER > 10% positivity and non-weak staining intensity (ER-high). RESULTS: We identified 27 cases (3.2%) that met our criteria for ER-low. Of these, 92.6% had a high RS (>25), and 7.4% had a RS of 25. All cases with ≤10% ER nuclear positivity had a high RS. Most ER-low cases (85.2%) had ODX quantitative ER gene scores in the negative range, whereas all (100%) ER-high cases had positive ER gene scores. CONCLUSION: ODX does not appear to add significant additional information to inform treatment decisions for most patients with ER-low BC. Incorporating weak ER staining intensity in addition to low percentage of nuclear positivity identifies about twice as many ER-low patients, although with reduced specificity for high RS. Our study supports the contention that most ER-low early BC should be regarded similarly to ER-negative BC.