Current recommendations for procedure selection in class I and II obesity developed by an expert modified Delphi consensus.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is widely considered the most effective option for treating obesity, a chronic, relapsing, and progressive disease. Recently, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) issued new guidelines on the indications for MBS, which have superseded the previous 1991 National Institutes of Health guidelines. The aim of this study is to establish the first set of consensus guidelines for selecting procedures in Class I and II obesity, using an Expert Modified Delphi Method. In this study, 78 experienced bariatric surgeons from 32 countries participated in a two-round Modified Delphi consensus voting process. The threshold for consensus was set at an agreement or disagreement of ≥ 70.0% among the experts. The experts reached a consensus on 54 statements. The committee of experts reached a consensus that MBS is a cost-effective treatment option for Class II obesity and for patients with Class I obesity who have not achieved significant weight loss through non-surgical methods. MBS was also considered suitable for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or higher. The committee identified intra-gastric balloon (IGB) as a treatment option for patients with class I obesity and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) as an option for patients with class I and II obesity, as well as for patients with T2DM and a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2. Sleeve gastrectomy (1) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were also recognized as viable treatment options for these patient groups. The committee also agreed that one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a suitable option for patients with Class II obesity and T2DM, regardless of the presence or severity of obesity-related medical problems. The recommendations for selecting procedures in Class I and II obesity, developed through an Expert Modified Delphi Consensus, suggest that the use of standard primary bariatric endoscopic (IGB, ESG) and surgical procedures (SG, RYGB, OAGB) are acceptable in these patient groups, as consensus was reached regarding these procedures. However, randomized controlled trials are still needed in Class I and II Obesity to identify the best treatment approach for these patients in the future.

Outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno ileal bypass and single anastomosis stomach ileal bypass for type II diabetes: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery has demonstrated long-term effectiveness in inducing weight loss and improving metabolic parameters for obesity. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal (SADI) bypass and single anastomosis sleeve-ileal (SASI) bypass have both emerged as new promising bariatric procedures. In this paper, we review the existing literature and compare the outcomes of SADI and SASI bypass procedures in regard to weight loss, complication rate, and improvement of type II diabetes (T2DM). This has not yet been done in the preexisting literature. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a systematic literature search of electronic databases focusing on weight loss outcomes, rate of complications and remission, or improvement of T2DM and other obesity-related comorbidities. Seventeen studies on SADI and nine studies on SASI were included. Both are similar in terms of surgical technique and have demonstrated fewer complications when compared to other bariatric procedures. Mean preoperative BMI was similar in both study groups: 46.4 kg/m2 in SADI and 48.8 kg/m2 in SASI. Mean %EWL at 12 months in the SADI group was 74.1% compared to 77.4% in the SASI group. Preoperative severity of T2DM appeared to be higher in the SASI patient group, with a higher preoperative HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels. T2DM resolution was achieved in a significant proportion of both SADI and SASI patient populations (78.5% in SADI and 89.0% in SASI). Complication rates were comparable for both procedures. EXPERT OPINION: Both SADI and SASI are effective in inducing weight loss at 12 months, with a low rate of major complications and mortality. From the studies included in this review, the SASI procedure had a higher impact on T2DM resolution compared to SADI.

2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

MAJOR UPDATES TO 1991 NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH GUIDELINES FOR BARIATRIC SURGERY: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is recommended for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2, regardless of presence, absence, or severity of co-morbidities.MBS should be considered for individuals with metabolic disease and BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m2.BMI thresholds should be adjusted in the Asian population such that a BMI >25 kg/m2 suggests clinical obesity, and individuals with BMI >27.5 kg/m2 should be offered MBS.Long-term results of MBS consistently demonstrate safety and efficacy.Appropriately selected children and adolescents should be considered for MBS.(Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013 ) © 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Gastric Ischaemia After SADI with Right Gastric Artery Ligation.

There are several bariatric procedures used for the effective management of obesity that employ restrictive or malabsorptive components to achieve effective weight loss and reduction in metabolic disease. The single anastomosis duodeno-ileal (SADI) bypass was first introduced as a simplification of the biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch [1], often accompanied by sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) or as an alternative gastric sleeve revision procedure to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [2]. SADI was developed to address the technical complexity associated with other bypass reconstructions by involving only one anastomosis while preserving pyloric function, minimising dumping symptoms. This procedure has been proven to be safe and effective for sustained weight loss and resolution of metabolic disease, particularly in patients with a high carbohydrate diet [3, 4]. Currently, the SADI/SADI-S procedure is still considered a relatively novel technique with no absolute consensus over the exact surgical technique, and serious postoperative complications can still occur. A key discussion point is the utility of right gastric artery ligation depending on surgeon preference. This paper aims to describe the presentation and management of the first reported case of gastric ischaemia following sleeve to SADI revision with right gastric artery ligation.

Patients with Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Underwent Bariatric Surgery Benefit more from High-Intensity Home Care.

BACKGROUND: Long-term weight loss effect of bariatric surgeries for patients with Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) remains controversial since factors like postoperative home care intensity may impact the outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of home care intensity on long-term weight loss effect of bariatric surgery in patients with PWS. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study on patients with PWS undergoing bariatric surgery and patients were enrolled from July 2015 to December 2016. Detailed information of patients' weight and behaviors was recorded by caregivers postoperatively. The intensities of home care applied to patients were classified into four categories (high, moderate, low, and very low) according to the records. RESULTS: Six cases (3 males, 3 females) were enrolled in this study with LSG (n = 2), RYGB (n = 3), and LSG-DJB (n = 1) as their primary operation. The mean BMI of these participants was 46.78 ± 11.63 kg/m2, and the mean age was 17.66 ± 6.59 years. All patients had at least 5 years of follow-ups, and the %EWL were 51.57 ± 23.36%, 64.54 ± 18.97%, 35.34 ± 36.53%, 19.45 ± 41.78%, and - 4.74 ± 71.50% in the half, first, second, third, and fifth year after surgery respectively. Two patients with high-intensity home care achieved a %EWL of 70.57 ± 8.86% in the fifth year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Overall long-term weight loss of bariatric surgery for patients with PWS was not found through the follow-ups. Two patients with high-intensity home care maintained weight loss at the fifth-year follow-up, suggesting a pivotal role of high-intensity home care in long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with PWS.

Mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernias: a rapid review.

BACKGROUND: Mesh is frequently utilized intraoperatively for the repair of groin hernias. However, patients may request non-mesh hernia repairs owing to adverse events reported in other mesh procedures. To inform surgical safety, this study aimed to compare postoperative complications between mesh and non-mesh groin hernia repairs and identify other operative and patient-related risk factors associated with poor postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE and grey literature were searched to 9 June 2021 for studies comparing mesh to non-mesh techniques for primary groin hernia repair. Outcomes of interest were postoperative complications, recurrence of hernia, pain and risk factors associated with poorer surgical outcomes. Methodological quality was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 tool. RESULTS: The systematic search returned 4268 results, which included seven systematic reviews and five registry analyses. Mesh repair techniques resulted in lower hernia recurrence rates, with no difference in chronic pain, seroma, haematoma or wound infection, compared to non-mesh techniques. Risk factors associated with increased risk of hernia recurrence were increased body mass index (BMI), positive smoking status and direct hernia. These were independent of surgical technique. Patients under 40 years of age were at increased risk of postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of primary groin hernias using mesh achieves lower recurrence rates, with no difference in safety outcomes, compared with non-mesh repairs. Additional risk factors associated with increased recurrence include increased BMI, history of smoking and hernia subtype.

2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO): Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Major updates to 1991 National Institutes of Health guidelines for bariatric surgery.

Patient Selection in One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass-an Expert Modified Delphi Consensus.

PURPOSE: One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is up to date the third most performed obesity and metabolic procedure worldwide, which recently has been endorsed by ASMBS. The main criticisms are the risk of bile reflux, esophageal cancer, and malnutrition. Although IFSO has recognized this procedure, guidance is needed regarding selection criteria. To give clinicians a daily support in performing the right patient selection in OAGB/MGB, the aim of this paper is to generate clinical guidelines based on an expert modified Delphi consensus. METHODS: A committee of 57 recognized bariatric surgeons from 24 countries created 69 statements. Modified Delphi consensus voting was performed in two rounds. An agreement/disagreement among ≥ 70.0% of the experts was considered to indicate a consensus. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 56 statements. Remarkably, ≥ 90.0% of the experts felt that OAGB/MGB is an acceptable and suitable option "in patients with Body mass index (BMI) > 70, BMI > 60, BMI > 50 kg/m2 as a one-stage procedure," "as the second stage of a two-stage bariatric surgery after Sleeve Gastrectomy for BMI > 50 kg/m2 (instead of BPD/DS)," and "in patients with weight regain after restrictive procedures. No consensus was reached on the statement that OAGB/MGB is a suitable option in case of resistant Helicobacter pylori. This is likely as there is a concern that this procedure is associated with reflux and its related long-term complications including risk of cancer in the esophagus or stomach. Also no consensus reached on OAGB/MGB as conversional surgery in patients with GERD after restrictive procedures. Consensus for disagreement was predominantly achieved "in case of intestinal metaplasia of the stomach" (74.55%), "in patients with severe Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)(C,D)" (75.44%), "in patients with Barrett's metaplasia" (89.29%), and "in documented insulinoma" (89.47%). CONCLUSION: Patient selection in OAGB/MGB is still a point of discussion among experts. There was consensus that OAGB/MGB is a suitable option in elderly patients, patients with low BMI (30-35 kg/m2) with associated metabolic problems, and patients with BMIs more than 50 kg/m2 as one-stage procedure. OAGB/MGB can also be a safe procedure in vegetarian and vegan patients. Although OAGB/MGB can be a suitable procedure in patients with large hiatal hernia with concurrent hiatal hernia, it should not be offered to patients with grade C or D esophagitis or Barrett's metaplasia.

Review of the Endoscopic, Surgical and Radiological Techniques of Treating Choledocholithiasis in Bariatric Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients and Proposed Management Algorithm.

Choledocholithiasis in post-surgical bariatric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients presents a significant challenge secondary to altered anatomy. We aim to review the existing management options including either endoscopic, surgical, percutaneous or hybrid means. Current literature suggests reasonably successful cannulation rates for single- or double-balloon ERCP ranging from 50 to 70% and 63-83%, respectively. The hybrid technique of laparoscopic transgastric ERCP has gained popularity with success rates ranging from 90 to 100%. Conventional laparoscopic techniques like transcystic duct and transcholedochal bile duct exploration are still useful options (i.e. high success rates of 81-100% and 83-96%, respectively). The role of percutaneous transhepatic choledochography remains limited although it can help with rapid bile duct decompression. If feasible, treatment pathways should progress from least to more invasive options as required.

A delayed diagnosis of obturator hernia hoodwinked by previous laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Obturator hernia is a rare and diagnostically challenging type of pelvic hernia with associated high morbidity and mortality. It is frequently seen in frail, elderly female multiparous patients with non-specific symptoms and signs that may be clouded by multiple gastrointestinal or musculoskeletal comorbidities. This report discusses the case of an 84-year-old woman with refractory groin pain and previous laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair that was misdiagnosed leading to a delayed diagnosis and mortality. Previous laparoscopic repair was a misleading factor that hoodwinked clinicians and surgeons until computed tomography (CT) imaging proved otherwise. In emaciated, elderly female patients presenting with non-specific abdominal or hip pain, early CT imaging can assist in diagnosis when signs or symptoms are unclear. Clinical vigilance and serial examination are important in elderly patients who are often under the care of geriatricians allowing early discovery and treatment of this hernia.

Role of bariatric surgery in a COVID-19 era: a review of economic costs.

Obesity has rapidly become a significant public health issue. As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, so does its economic burden as a result of both direct and indirect costs. Likewise, since 2019, the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic with rising infection rates carrying significant economic costs associated with treatment of the disease and the reduction in economic activity due to government regulations. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a detrimental impact on obesity, not only creating an increasingly obesogenic environment but also reducing access to bariatric care and treatment of obesity-related diseases. In this article, we form a compelling argument for the resumption of bariatric services as soon as it is safe to do so because bariatric surgery brings significant additional medical and economic benefits. Medically, obesity is a risk factor for increased severity of COVID-19 infections, and therefore, treatment of obesity should be a priority in the current pandemic. Additionally, bariatric surgery has been shown to be a cost-saving procedure in the long term and thus has significant economic benefit in reducing the costs of obesity in the future as we recover from the economic collapse following the global pandemic.

Evaluation of Micronutrient Status Post Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: an Australian Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a type of bariatric technique that has comparable outcomes to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the current gold standard. However, it can be associated with nutritional deficiencies postoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate micronutrient status post LSG. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 565 patients who underwent an LSG from January 2015 to September 2018. Patients lost to follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months were 6.3%, 18.6% and 32.4%, respectively. Follow-up of the patients included regular dietetic input and micronutrient supplementation. Data that was collected included both anthropometry and nutritional markers. RESULTS: The mean preoperative weight and body mass index (BMI) were 118.13 ± 25.36 kg and 42.40 ± 7.66 kg/m2, respectively. Statistically, significant reductions in anthropometric parameters including weight, BMI (30.50 kg/m2), total weight loss (28.03%), excess weight loss (72.03%) and BMI loss (12.32 kg/m2) were observed at all timepoints up to 12 months follow-up. At 12 months, there were significant increases in 25-OH vitamin D with the incidence of deficiency decreasing from 45.7 to 15.0% compared to baseline. The incidence of hyperparathyroidism also decreased from 32.2 to 18.9% compared to baseline, and incidence of folate deficiency increased from 7.7 to 19.2%. Other nutritional parameters including calcium, iron, ferritin, vitamin B12, holotranscobalamin (active B12) and haemoglobin did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: Modest effects on micronutrient status were observed in the 12-month postoperative period. Of clinically significant, de novo folate deficiencies increased, and vitamin D deficiency and hyperparathyroidism decreased. Thus, optimizing postoperative micronutrient status is imperative following LSG.

Retained gallbladder secondary to retrieval bag rupture during laparoscopic cholecystectomy-A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Retrieval bags are used in laparoscopic cholecystectomies to reduce the risk of bile and gallstone spillage during removal of the gallbladder. Retrieval bag rupture is rare, and its complications have never been previously documented. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 17-year-old female presented three months post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a tender periumbilical mass. Her operative report noted difficulty removing the retrieval bag from the infra-umbilical port site. Imaging of the lump revealed an intra-abdominal fluid collection communicating with the umbilicus. A diagnostic laparoscopy uncovered significant pus in the peritoneal cavity and a gallbladder remnant with multiple gallstones. A combination of sharp and blunt dissections was used to free the gallbladder remnant from its adherent surroundings for removal. A peritoneal washout was performed following extraction of the retained gallstones. The patient's presentation could be traced back to her laparoscopic cholecystectomy where it was confirmed that the retrieval bag ruptured during removal. This would have transected the gallbladder, causing its remnants and associated gallstones to be retained in the peritoneal cavity. DISCUSSION: Retrieval bag rupture can result in retained gallbladder remnants in the peritoneal cavity. Abdominal abscess can manifest months after the initial operation. CONCLUSION: Retrieval bags should be inspected following removal to ensure it is completely intact. Surgeons should consider extending the fascial incision if there is any difficulty during removal. Any damage to the retrieval bag mandates immediate pneumoperitoneum for further exploration of retained products. Governance bodies should incorporate practice guidelines related to retrieval bag rupture as these are currently not present.

Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal groin hernia repair with self-gripping polyester mesh: a series of 780 repairs.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic groin hernia repair is an increasingly common procedure with benefits of reduced post-operative pain and infection. Post-operative chronic pain remains an ongoing concern in about 10% of patients. Parietex ProGrip™, a polyester self-gripping mesh, has a theoretical benefit of avoiding tacks for mesh-fixation. This case series reflects our long-term experience of this technique. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series from November 2011 to December 2017. Patients were identified through an operative Medicare Benefits Schedule item number search. Clinical documentation was reviewed with length of stay, mesh infection, chronic pain, recurrence and re-operation as primary data points. RESULTS: A total of 514 patients underwent 780 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs with self-gripping polyester mesh during this period. There were 53 female (10.3%) and 461 male patients (89.7%). Unilateral hernia repair was performed in 248 patients (48.2%) and bilateral repair in 266 patients (51.8%). Almost all repairs (779, 99.8%) were primary hernias. There were no mesh infections. Four recurrences were noted (0.51%) and three of these subsequently underwent open redo-hernia repairs (0.38%). Post-operative follow-up was up to 4.4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our series of laparoscopic groin hernia repair with self-gripping mesh demonstrate this is a safe and reliable mesh and effective technique with low recurrence rates.

Staged laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbidly obese patients: a risk reduction strategy.

BACKGROUND: In our centre laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is the most effective weight loss surgical procedure performed. However, LRYGBP may be associated with higher risk of peri- and postoperative complications in contrast to a purely restrictive procedure to justify this procedure on all comers. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a staged procedure may be an alternate risk reduction strategy. The aim of this study is to report on the short-term outcomes of LSG, the effect on operative risk reduction and resolution of comorbidities. METHODS: A prospective review of 138 patients who underwent consecutive LSG from November 2004 to November 2006 was performed. Data were collected on all patients who attended the three to six monthly clinical follow-up and/or the patient questionnaire. Data collection included demographics, degree of weight reduction, postoperative complications, and changes in comorbidities. RESULTS: Median BMI was 50.60 kg/m(2) (33-82). Of the patients, 46.38% had a BMI >or=50 kg/m(2). The overall median postoperative excess weight loss (EWL) was 43.26%, 31.08% at 6 months, 54.50% at 12 months, 51.47% at 18 months and 46.05% at 24 months. Of the patients, 39% had resolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 48% had resolution of dyslipidemia, 29% in hypertension, 52% in obstructive sleep apnea. Complication rate was 5.07% and four patients needed further surgical intervention. The mortality rate was zero. CONCLUSION: LSG does minimize postoperative complication rates significantly on high-risk patients and achieves effective short-term weight loss with resolutions in comorbidities. Additional studies are required to evaluate LSG as a stand-lone procedure.

Gastric Perforation as a complication of intragastric balloon.

Obesity is considered the most common nutritional disorder in Western countries and is related to multiple morbidity and mortality. There are different options for obesity treatment, including diet, behavioral therapy, medications, and surgery. If patients do not meet the criteria for bariatric surgery, intragastric balloons may be used to achieve weight reduction. Currently, the intragastric balloon is one of the most common bariatric procedures in obese patients in Europe. Gastric perforation associated with intragastric balloon is a rare but dangerous complication. We report a case of a 42-year-old female patient who presented to the emergency department with acute abdomen. Chest x-ray in an erect posture indicated free gas under the diaphragm. She had undergone placement of an intragastric adjustable balloon device 13 months earlier and was overdue for removal of the balloon. In the emergency theater, a large perforated ulcer was found in the posterior wall of the stomach, which was repaired laparoscopically. Her postoperative course was uneventful. We also review the literature on intragastric balloon-induced gastric perforation. Our case is a very rare report of late gastric perforation after adjustable intragastric balloon placement. We recommend regular follow-up and removal in proper time after insertion of the gastric balloon.

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis in sleeve gastrectomy: a 10-year review.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is becoming the dominant bariatric procedure due to its reliable weight loss and low complication rate. Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT) is an uncommon complication of LSG with an incidence of .3% to 1% and can lead to serious consequences, such as bowel ischemia and death. OBJECTIVES: This paper will present the presentation, risk factors, treatment, and long-term outcomes of patients who had PVT post-LSG. SETTING: Five bariatric centers in a private setting in Australia. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from 5 bariatric centers across Australia from 2007 to 2016. RESULTS: Across 5 centers, 5951 patients underwent LSG; 18 had recognized PVT (.3%). The mean body mass index was 41.8. Of patients, 39% had a history or family history of deep vein thrombosis. The average time to diagnosis was 13 days (range, 5-25). Treatment was nonoperative with anticoagulation in 94%. One patient required operative management with bowel resection. All patients were discharged on therapeutic anticoagulation. Mean total weight loss was 27.7% (14.8%-66.3%). Mean follow-up was 10 months. There were no mortalities. Given the low number of patients, no statistically significant data could be derived. CONCLUSION: PVT is difficult to diagnose, with significant consequences. The presenting symptoms are nonspecific, and a high index of suspicion needs to be maintained. Cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography of the abdomen is recommended. Patients with PVT post-LSG without previous risk factors can be anticoagulated for 3 to 6 months with an international normalized ratio of 2 to 3.

Investigating Nutritional Deficiencies in a Group of Patients 3 Years Post Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a single-stage procedure has shown to be effective in achieving significant weight loss and resolving obesity-related co-morbidities. However, its nutrition consequences have not been extensively explored. This study aims to investigate weight loss and evolution of nutritional deficiencies in a group of patients 3 years post LSG. METHODS: Retrospective data of a group of patients, 3 years following LSG as a stand-alone procedure was collected. Data included anthropometry, nutritional markers (hemoglobin, iron studies, folate, calcium, iPTH, vitamins D, and B12), and compliancy with supplementations. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (male/female; 28:63), aged 51.9 ± 11.4 years with a BMI of 42.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2 were identified to be 3 years post LSG. Percentage of weight loss at 1 and 3 years post-operatively was 29.8 ± 7.0 and 25.9 ± 8.8 %, respectively. Pre-operatively, the abnormalities included low hemoglobin (4 %), ferritin (6 %), vitamin B12 (1 %), vitamin D (46 %), and elevated iPTH (25 %). At 3 years post-operatively, the abnormal laboratory values included low hemoglobin (14 % females, P = 0.021), ferritin (24 %, P = 0.011), vitamin D (20 %, P = 0.018), and elevated iPTH (17 %, P = 0.010). Compliancy with multivitamin supplementation was noted in 66 % of patients. CONCLUSION: In these patients, LSG resulted in pronounced weight loss at 1 year post-operatively, and most of this was maintained at 3 years. Nutritional deficiencies are prevalent among patients prior to bariatric surgery. These deficiencies may persist or exacerbate post-operatively. Routine nutrition monitoring and supplementations are essential to prevent and treat these deficiencies.