Use of HBV RNA and to predict change in serological status and disease activity in CHB.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Predicting changes in disease activity and serological endpoints is necessary for the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We examined whether HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), two specialized virological markers proposed to reflect the activity of covalently closed circular DNA, may improve the ability to predict not sustained inactive carrier phase, spontaneous alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare, HBeAg loss, and HBsAg loss. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Among eligible participants enrolled in the North American Hepatitis B Research Network Adult Cohort Study, we evaluated demographic, clinical, and virologic characteristics, including HBV RNA and HBcrAg, to predict not sustained inactive carrier phase, ALT flare, HBeAg loss, and HBsAg loss through a series of Cox proportional hazard or logistic regression models, controlling for antiviral therapy use. Among the study population, 54/103 participants experienced not sustained inactive carrier phase, 41/1006 had a spontaneous ALT flare, 83/250 lost HBeAg, and 54/1127 lost HBsAg. HBV RNA or HBcrAg were predictive of all 4 events. However, their addition to models of the readily available host (age, sex, race/ethnicity), clinical (ALT, use of antiviral therapy), and viral factors (HBV DNA), which had acceptable-excellent accuracy (e.g., AUC = 0.72 for ALT flare, 0.92 for HBeAg loss, and 0.91 for HBsAg loss), provided only small improvements in predictive ability. CONCLUSION: Given the high predictive ability of readily available markers, HBcrAg and HBV RNA have a limited role in improving the prediction of key serologic and clinical events in patients with CHB.

A risk score to predict the development of hepatic encephalopathy in a population-based cohort of patients with cirrhosis.

Over 40% of patients with cirrhosis will develop hepatic encephalopathy (HE). HE is associated with decreased survival, falls, motor vehicle accidents, and frequent hospitalization. Accordingly, we aimed to develop a tool to risk-stratify patients for HE development. We studied a population-based cohort of all patients with cirrhosis without baseline HE (n = 1,979) from the Veterans Administration from Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio (January 1, 2005-December 31, 2010) using demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pharmacy data. The primary outcome was the development of HE. Risk scores were constructed with both baseline and longitudinal data (annually updated parameters) and validated using bootstrapping. The cohort had a mean age of 58.0 ± 8.3 years, 36% had hepatitis C, and 17% had ascites. Opiates, benzodiazepines, statins, and nonselective beta-blockers were taken at baseline by 24%, 13%, 17%, and 12%, respectively. Overall, 863 (43.7%) developed HE within 5 years. In multivariable models, risk factors (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) for HE included higher bilirubin (1.07, 1.05-1.09) and nonselective beta-blocker use (1.34, 1.09-1.64), while higher albumin (0.54, 0.48-0.59) and statin use (0.80, 0.65-0.98) were protective. Other clinical factors, including opiate and benzodiazepine use, were not predictive. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve for HE using the four significant variables in baseline and longitudinal models were 0.68 (0.66-0.70) and 0.73 (0.71-0.75), respectively. Model effects were validated and converted into a risk score. A score ≤0 in our longitudinal model assigns a 6% 1-year probability of HE, while a score >20 assigns a 38% 1-year risk. CONCLUSION: Patients with cirrhosis can be stratified by a simple risk score for HE that accounts for changing clinical data; our data also highlight a role for statins in reducing cirrhosis complications including HE. (Hepatology 2017).

Incidence of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation and Hepatotoxicity in Patients Receiving Long-term Treatment With Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are the first-line treatment for many autoimmune diseases. However, they have been associated with reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV). We determined the rate of HBV reactivation and hepatotoxicity grade 3 or 4 (HT ≥3) in patients treated with an anti-TNF agent for an autoimmune disease. METHODS: We collected data from 8887 adult patients in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California database who began treatment with TNF antagonists for autoimmune diseases (dermatologic, rheumatologic, or gastrointestinal) from 2001 through 2010, followed through December 2012. We obtained data on HBV infection (52% of patients were screened for HBV before treatment), demographic features, comorbidities, and use of immunosuppressive agents. HBV reactivation was defined as 1 of the following: >1 log increase in HBV DNA, HBV DNA-positive when previously negative, HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL if no baseline level was available, or reverse seroconversion. HT ≥3 was defined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with HT ≥3. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients tested positive for HB surface antigen (HBsAg) at baseline and 9 of these had HBV reactivation; of the 4267 patients with unknown HBV status at baseline, 2 had HBV reactivation. None of the 178 patients who were HBsAg negative and positive for the hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc+) had HBV reactivation. HBV reactivation occurred in 1/5 HBsAg+ patients who received prophylactic antiviral therapy and 8/18 who did not (P = .61). No one with HBV reactivation had liver failure. HT ≥3 occurred in 273 patients (2.7%), but only 3 cases were attributed to HBV. Cirrhosis was significantly associated with HT ≥3 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In a retrospective analysis of patients treated with TNF antagonists for autoimmune diseases, we found HBV reactivation in 39% of patients who were HBsAg+ before therapy, but not in any patients who were HBsAg-negative and anti-HBc+ before therapy. Patients should be screened for HBV infection before anti-TNF therapy; HBsAg+ patients should receive prophylactic antiviral therapy, but not HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc+ patients.

Diagnosis of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review of Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests.

OBJECTIVES: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is common, characterized by deficits in reaction time and executive function, and strongly associated with disability and mortality. Point-of-care diagnostics performed without specialized skills or equipment are now available, albeit with limited data regarding their generalizability. METHODS: We systematically reviewed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for diagnostic studies of MHE using broad search terms including HE and minimal, covert, or the names of published diagnostic modalities. We included tests that provide results during clinical visits without requiring neuropsychologists to administer and/or special equipment. These include the Inhibitory Control Test (ICT, n=16), EncephalApp Stroop (n=3), an algorithm based on the Sickness Impact Profile (n=2), and the Animal Naming Test (ANT, n=1). RESULTS: The populations enrolled in the included study were highly selected, excluding patients with recent (6-months) alcohol or psychoactive medications use. Cutoffs for MHE for each test varied widely. For the ICT, the optimal cutoffs for MHE varied by 300%, whereas healthy control performance varied >400%. The optimal cutoffs for the EncephalApp also varied (by 50%). The gold standards for MHE varied substantially between studies, and clinical outcomes were never used to develop test cutoffs. Data comparing the performance of each modality are lacking. Longitudinal data are limited but suggest that good performance on the ICT, EncephalApp or ANT is associated with reduced risk of developing overt HE. CONCLUSION: The point-of-care tests for MHE are promising tools. However, additional longitudinal studies are needed in clinically representative populations of at-risk patients with cutoffs validated based on the development of clinical outcomes.

Medically Tailored Meals for Patients With Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy: The BRAINFOOD Proof-of-concept Trial.

Background and aims: Guidelines recommend that patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) receive a high-protein diet (roughly 1 g/kg actual body weight). Concommitant sodium restriction, low health literacy, and food insecurity limit patients' ability to meet this goal. We aimed to determine the feasibility of home-delivered high-protein medically tailored meals (MTMs) for patients with a recent episode of overt HE. Methods: We enrolled patients with prior overt HE on active HE therapy in a 6-month trial of MTM. All received 21 home-delivered meals/week with protein snacks (mid-day and bedtime) for 12 weeks. Patients completed follow-up at week 24. The primary outcome was feasibility. Additional outcomes included change in protein and micronutrient intake (measured using 24 h dietary recalls performed by dieticians), cognitive function (Animal Naming Test [ANT]; EncephalApp Stroop), physical function (Liver Frailty Index [LFI]), and quality of life (Short Form-8 Health Survey [SF-8]). Healthcare utilization was also assessed. Results: Ten patients competed the study with >90% of MTM consumed. Protein intake rose from 74.6 ± 25.1 g at baseline to 93.8 ± 24.3 g on MTM (P = 0.04). Branched-chain amino acids also increased-valine 3.73 ± 1.26 g to 5.17 ± 1.28 g, isoleucine 3.32 ± 1.18 to 4.69 ± 1.55, leucine 5.83 ± 2.00 to 7.49 ± 2.07, all P < 0.001. The LFI score improved from 4.42 ± 0.32 to 3.96 ± 0.82 by the end of the MTM phase (P = 0.03). SF-8 quality-of-life scores improved from 55.5 ± 15.5 at baseline to 64.7 ± 18.3 after the MTM phase, to 64.4 ± 19.1 at the end of the study (P = 0.1). EncephalApp Stroop time improved from 227 ± 94 to 194 ± 58s by the end of the MTM phase (P = 0.08). ANT scores were similarly non-significantly improved. Conclusion: Home-delivered MTMs are feasible, increase protein consumption, and may improve patient wellbeing. A randomized trial is needed.

Trends in hepatitis B virus screening at the onset of chemotherapy in a large US cancer center.

BACKGROUND: National organizations recommend screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) before chemotherapy but differ regarding which patients should be screened. We aimed to determine contemporary screening rates at a cancer center and the possible influence on these rates of publication of national recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of HBV screening in cancer patients registered during the period from January 2004 through April 2011. Screening was defined as HBsAg and anti-HBc tests ordered around the time of initial chemotherapy. We compared screening rates for 3 periods: January 1, 2004, through December 18, 2008 (Food and Drug Administration and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2007 recommendations); December 19, 2008, through September 30, 2010 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2009, Institute of Medicine, and American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations); and October 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of screening. RESULTS: Of 141,877 new patients, 18,688 received chemotherapy, and 3020 (16.2%) were screened. HBV screening rates increased over the 3 time periods (14.8%, 18.2%, 19.9%; P <0.0001), but <19% of patients with HBV risk factors were screened. Among patients with hematologic malignancies, over 66% were screened, and odds of screening nearly doubled after publication of the recommendations (P <0.0001). Less than 4% of patients with solid tumors were screened, although odds of screening increased 70% after publication of the recommendations (P =0.003). Other predictors of screening included younger age, planned rituximab therapy, and known risk factors for HBV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with solid tumors or HBV risk factors remained unscreened, although screening rates increased after publication of national recommendations. Efforts are needed to increase awareness of the importance of HBV screening before chemotherapy to identify patients who should start antiviral prophylaxis.

Regional changes in intestinal permeability in cirrhosis are associated with mucosal bacteria.

BACKGROUND: Several complications of cirrhosis are theorized to result from the translocation of bacteria or their products across the intestinal epithelium. We aimed to assess epithelial permeability and associations with mucosal bacteria in patients with cirrhosis. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We collected 247 duodenum, ileum, and colon biopsies from 58 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and 33 controls during clinically indicated endoscopies. Patients with cirrhosis were similarly aged to controls (60 vs. 58 y) and had a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease of 8 (interquartile range 7, 10). Biopsies underwent 16S rRNA-encoding gene amplicon sequencing to determine mucosal bacteria composition and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) to determine epithelial permeability. In the entire cohort, there were regional differences in TEER with the lowest TEER (ie, more permeable) in the ileum; duodenum TEER was 43% higher and colon TEER 20% higher than ileum TEER (ANOVA p = 0.0004). When comparing patients with cirrhosis and controls, both TEER (26% lower in cirrhosis, p = 0.006) and alpha diversity differed in the duodenum (27% lower in cirrhosis, p = 0.01) but not ileum or colon. A beta-binomial model found that 26 bacteria were significantly associated with TEER. Bifidobacteriaceae Bifidobacterium in duodenal mucosa was protective of epithelial permeability and future hospitalization for hepatic decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Duodenal epithelial permeability was higher, and mucosal bacteria alpha diversity was lower in cirrhosis compared to controls, while no such differences were seen in the ileum or colon. Specific bacteria were associated with epithelial permeability and future hepatic decompensation.

Cognitive function does not worsen during long-term low-dose peginterferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES: Neuropsychiatric toxicity is a common dose-limiting side effect of interferon therapy. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether patients receiving long-term low-dose peginterferon therapy had a higher incidence of cognitive side effects compared with untreated patients enrolled in the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term treatment against Cirrhosis (HALT-C) Trial. METHODS: A total of 129 patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis completed a battery of 10 neuropsychological tests and the Beck Depression Inventory at pretreatment baseline and at months 12, 24, 36, and 48 while receiving long-term peginterferonalpha2a (90 microg/week) or no therapy during the randomized phase of the HALT-C Trial. Cognitive impairment was defined as a global deficit score (GDS) > or = 1.0. RESULTS: The mean age was 51.2 years, 67% were male, and 42% had cirrhosis. After accounting for baseline GDS scores, the mean GDS scores did not significantly change over time (P=0.46) nor with treatment group (P=0.49). Cognitive function was also not influenced by medication adherence in the 66 patients receiving maintenance peginterferon (P=0.14) after controlling for baseline GDS scores and time. Beck Depression scores did not significantly increase over time (P=0.60), nor did they vary by treatment group (P=0.74). Although 32% of patients experienced objective worsening of their liver disease during follow-up, the frequency and severity of cognitive impairment did not differ in those with and without disease progression (P=0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Measures of cognitive function were neither influenced by low-dose peginterferon treatment nor with objective evidence of liver disease progression in patients with advanced chronic hepatitis C prospectively followed up for 3.5 years.

Update on viral hepatitis: 2007.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This is a concise review of recent developments in the field of viral hepatitis, based on publications between December 2006 and November 2007. RECENT FINDINGS: Hepatitis A vaccine has similar efficacy to immune globulin as postexposure prophylaxis. Entecavir is a potent antiviral agent with a low rate of drug resistance in nucleoside-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients but it is not as effective in lamivudine-refractory patients. A combination of adefovir and lamivudine is preferred to adefovir monotherapy for lamivudine-refractory hepatitis B patients. Two orally administered hepatitis C protease inhibitors, telaprevir and boceprevir, were shown to have antiviral activity in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients. A 16-week course of pegylated interferon and ribavirin resulted in a lower rate of sustained virologic response compared with the standard 24-week course. Patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis who achieved sustained virologic response to antiviral therapy remain at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. A novel recombinant hepatitis E vaccine was shown to be safe and effective in preventing infection. SUMMARY: Advances have been made in the prevention of hepatitis A and hepatitis E. It is likely that specifically targeted antiviral therapies for hepatitis C will be available in the next few years.

Management of patients with hepatitis B who require immunosuppressive therapy.

Patients with chronic HBV infection are at risk of reactivation of HBV should they require immunosuppressive therapies for a variety of clinical settings, including chemotherapy for patients with cancer, immunosuppression for solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients, and use of anti-CD20 antibodies, TNF inhibitors, or corticosteroids in patients with oncological, gastrointestinal, rheumatological or dermatological conditions. The key to preventing HBV reactivation is the identification of patients with HBV infection prior to immunosuppressive therapy, initiation of prophylactic antiviral therapy in patients at moderate or high risk of HBV reactivation, and close monitoring of other patients so that antiviral therapy can be initiated at the first sign of HBV reactivation. Unfortunately, many patients infected with HBV are unaware of their infection or risk factors, and physicians often do not have sufficient time to systematically assess patients for risk factors for HBV prior to starting immunosuppressive therapy. In this article, we review the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of HBV reactivation, and the efficacy of antiviral therapy in preventing its occurrence. We also propose an algorithm for managing patients with HBV infection who require immunosuppressive therapy.

Update on viral hepatitis: 2006.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This is a concise review of recent developments in the field of viral hepatitis, based on publications between December 2005 and November 2006. RECENT FINDINGS: Elevated hepatitis B virus DNA levels in patients in their 40s with perinatally acquired hepatitis B virus infection increases the risk for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Six approved therapies are available for chronic hepatitis B. Entecavir is a potent antiviral for nucleoside-naïve patients. For lamivudine resistant hepatitis B virus infection, adefovir should be added to lamivudine to reduce the risk of adefovir-resistant mutations; however, tenofovir may be a more promising alternative to adefovir. A shorter duration of treatment wth pegylated interferon and ribavirin is sufficient for genotype 2 hepatitis C infection but the benefits of extending treatment to 72 weeks for genotype 1 needs to be confirmed. Pegylated interferon monotherapy was shown to be effective in patients with hepatitis D and ribavirin provides no additional benefit. SUMMARY: New developments in the past year will help us fine tune the treatment of viral hepatitis. Even as new treatments are approved, the potential benefits of treatment should be weighed against the risk of drug-resistant mutations with long-term therapy.

A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Information on the stage of liver fibrosis is essential in managing chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. However, most models for predicting liver fibrosis are complicated and separate formulas are needed to predict significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. The aim of our study was to construct one simple model consisting of routine laboratory data to predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis among patients with CHC. Consecutive treatment-naive CHC patients who underwent liver biopsy over a 25-month period were divided into 2 sequential cohorts: training set (n = 192) and validation set (n = 78). The best model for predicting both significant fibrosis (Ishak score > or = 3) and cirrhosis in the training set included platelets, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase with an area under ROC curves (AUC) of 0.82 and 0.92, respectively. A novel index, AST to platelet ratio index (APRI), was developed to amplify the opposing effects of liver fibrosis on AST and platelet count. The AUC of APRI for predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.80 and 0.89, respectively, in the training set. Using optimized cut-off values, significant fibrosis could be predicted accurately in 51% and cirrhosis in 81% of patients. The AUC of APRI for predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in the validation set were 0.88 and 0.94, respectively. In conclusion, our study showed that a simple index using readily available laboratory results can identify CHC patients with significant fibrosis and cirrhosis with a high degree of accuracy. Application of this index may decrease the need for staging liver biopsy specimens among CHC patients.