Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 140
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Am J Transplant ; 23(10): 1631-1640, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778868

ABSTRACT

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a cause of severe respiratory illness in older adults. In May 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved the first vaccines for prevention of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease in adults aged ≥60 years. Since May 2022, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines Adult Work Group met at least monthly to review available evidence regarding the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of these vaccines among adults aged ≥60 years. On June 21, 2023, ACIP voted to recommend that adults aged ≥60 years may receive a single dose of an RSV vaccine, using shared clinical decision-making. This report summarizes the body of evidence considered for this recommendation and provides clinical guidance for the use of RSV vaccines in adults aged ≥60 years. RSV vaccines have demonstrated moderate to high efficacy in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease and have the potential to prevent substantial morbidity and mortality among older adults; postmarketing surveillance will direct future guidance.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines , Respiratory Tract Diseases , Humans , United States , Aged , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Advisory Committees , Immunization , Vaccination , Immunization Schedule
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(29): 793-801, 2023 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37471262

ABSTRACT

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a cause of severe respiratory illness in older adults. In May 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved the first vaccines for prevention of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease in adults aged ≥60 years. Since May 2022, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines Adult Work Group met at least monthly to review available evidence regarding the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of these vaccines among adults aged ≥60 years. On June 21, 2023, ACIP voted to recommend that adults aged ≥60 years may receive a single dose of an RSV vaccine, using shared clinical decision-making. This report summarizes the body of evidence considered for this recommendation and provides clinical guidance for the use of RSV vaccines in adults aged ≥60 years. RSV vaccines have demonstrated moderate to high efficacy in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease and have the potential to prevent substantial morbidity and mortality among older adults; postmarketing surveillance will direct future guidance.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Diseases , Humans , United States , Aged , Advisory Committees , Immunization , Vaccination , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Immunization Schedule
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(34): 920-925, 2023 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616235

ABSTRACT

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization among U.S. infants. In July 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody, for passive immunization to prevent RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection among infants and young children. Since October 2021, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Maternal and Pediatric RSV Work Group has reviewed evidence on the safety and efficacy of nirsevimab among infants and young children. On August 3, 2023, ACIP recommended nirsevimab for all infants aged <8 months who are born during or entering their first RSV season and for infants and children aged 8-19 months who are at increased risk for severe RSV disease and are entering their second RSV season. On the basis of pre-COVID-19 pandemic patterns, nirsevimab could be administered in most of the continental United States from October through the end of March. Nirsevimab can prevent severe RSV disease among infants and young children at increased risk for severe RSV disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Humans , Infant , Advisory Committees , Immunization , Pandemics , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(41): 1115-1122, 2023 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824423

ABSTRACT

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization among U.S. infants. Nirsevimab (Bevfortus, Sanofi and AstraZeneca) is recommended to prevent RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants. In August 2023, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved RSVpreF vaccine (Abrysvo, Pfizer Inc.) for pregnant persons as a single dose during 32-36 completed gestational weeks (i.e., 32 weeks and zero days' through 36 weeks and 6 days' gestation) to prevent RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease in infants aged <6 months. Since October 2021, CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) RSV Vaccines Pediatric/Maternal Work Group has reviewed RSV epidemiology and evidence regarding safety, efficacy, and potential economic impact of pediatric and maternal RSV prevention products, including RSVpreF vaccine. On September 22, 2023, ACIP and CDC recommended RSVpreF vaccine using seasonal administration (i.e., during September through end of January in most of the continental United States) for pregnant persons as a one-time dose at 32-36 weeks' gestation for prevention of RSV-associated LRTI in infants aged <6 months. Either maternal RSVpreF vaccination during pregnancy or nirsevimab administration to the infant is recommended to prevent RSV-associated LRTI among infants, but both are not needed for most infants. All infants should be protected against RSV-associated LRTI through use of one of these products.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Female , Humans , Infant , Pregnancy , Advisory Committees , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(4): 109-117, 2022 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085226

ABSTRACT

In 2021, 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) (PCV20) (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.) and 15-valent PCV (PCV15) (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.) were licensed by the Food and Drug Administration for adults aged ≥18 years, based on studies that compared antibody responses to PCV20 and PCV15 with those to 13-valent PCV (PCV13) (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.). Antibody responses to two additional serotypes included in PCV15 were compared to corresponding responses after PCV13 vaccination, and antibody responses to seven additional serotypes included in PCV20 were compared with those to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.). On October 20, 2021, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended use of either PCV20 alone or PCV15 in series with PPSV23 for all adults aged ≥65 years, and for adults aged 19-64 years with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors* who have not previously received a PCV or whose previous vaccination history is unknown. ACIP employed the Evidence to Recommendation (EtR) framework,† using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)§ approach to guide its deliberations regarding use of these vaccines. Before this, PCV13 and PPSV23 were recommended for use for U.S. adults and the recommendations varied by age and risk groups. This was simplified in the new recommendations.


Subject(s)
Health Planning Guidelines , Pneumococcal Vaccines/therapeutic use , Vaccines, Conjugate/therapeutic use , Adult , Advisory Committees , Aged , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , GRADE Approach , Humans , Middle Aged , United States
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(37): 1174-1181, 2022 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36107786

ABSTRACT

The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13 [Prevnar 13, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc]) and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23 [Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC]) have been recommended for U.S. children, and the recommendations vary by age group and risk group (1,2). In 2021, 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15 [Vaxneuvance, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC]) was licensed for use in adults aged ≥18 years (3). On June 17, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an expanded usage for PCV15 to include persons aged 6 weeks-17 years, based on studies that compared antibody responses to PCV15 with those to PCV13 (4). PCV15 contains serotypes 22F and 33F (in addition to the PCV13 serotypes) conjugated to CRM197 (genetically detoxified diphtheria toxin). On June 22, 2022, CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended use of PCV15 as an option for pneumococcal conjugate vaccination of persons aged <19 years according to currently recommended PCV13 dosing and schedules (1,2). ACIP employed the Evidence to Recommendation (EtR) Framework,* using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)† approach to guide its deliberations regarding use of these vaccines. Risk-based recommendations on use of PPSV23 for persons aged 2-18 years with certain underlying medical conditions§ that increase the risk for pneumococcal disease have not changed.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Diphtheria Toxin , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Pneumococcal Vaccines , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination , Vaccines, Conjugate
7.
J Pediatr ; 227: 157-162, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707046

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features of osteoarticular infection in infants cared for in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to assess the presence of multifocal infection. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review with structured data abstraction of infants with osteomyelitis or pyogenic arthritis or both in NICUs at 3 children's hospitals over a 29-year period. RESULTS: Of the 45 cases identified, 87% occurred in prematurely born infants, with a median gestational age of 27.4 weeks (IQR, 26, 31 weeks). Median postnatal age at diagnosis of infection was 33 days (IQR, 20, 50 days). Osteomyelitis was present without joint involvement in 53% and with joint involvement in 44% of cases. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (71%) was the predominant pathogen, despite prevalent methicillin-resistant S aureus in community-associated infections. More than 1 bone was infected in 34% of cases. The femur (in 50% of patients) was the most frequently involved bone and the hip (in 20% of patients) was the most frequently involved joint. Bacteremia persisted for 4 or more days in 54% of patients with a positive blood culture despite active antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Among infants with osteoarticular infection in NICUs, multifocal disease is common and frequently is unsuspected. Search for additional sites of infection including the hip is warranted following the diagnosis of osteoarticular infection at a single site. Involvement of contiguous joints should be suspected in cases of osteomyelitis; conversely the presence of pyogenic arthritis usually indicates extant osteomyelitis in a contiguous bone.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious/epidemiology , Bone Diseases, Infectious/epidemiology , Hip Joint , Osteomyelitis/epidemiology , Arthritis, Infectious/complications , Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , Arthritis, Infectious/therapy , Bone Diseases, Infectious/complications , Bone Diseases, Infectious/diagnosis , Bone Diseases, Infectious/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Osteomyelitis/complications , Osteomyelitis/diagnosis , Osteomyelitis/therapy , Retrospective Studies
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(1): 60-66, 2017 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27624959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bordetella pertussis strains lacking expression of pertactin, a bacterial adhesin and vaccine target, are emerging. There are limited data on disease manifestations of mutant strains in children. We sought to compare clinical manifestations of pertactin-deficient and pertactin-producing B. pertussis infection in infants and describe corresponding molecular characteristics. METHODS: Molecular characterization of archived B. pertussis isolates (collected January 2007 to March 2014) included Western blot analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), polymerase chain reaction, and pertactin gene sequencing. Medical record review compared epidemiologic and clinical courses of pertactin-producing and pertactin-deficient B. pertussis infections. RESULTS: Sixty of 72 B. pertussis isolates were viable for analysis. Within the cohort of infants, the median age was 95 days, 90% received ≤1 dose of vaccine, and 72% were hospitalized. Pertactin deficiency was first noted in 2008, and its prevalence increased over time (68% overall prevalence). There were no statistically significant differences in presenting symptoms or signs, hospitalization, intensive care, respiratory support, or laboratory results related to pertactin expression. Illness length was shorter in pertactin-deficient group (mean difference, 3.2 days; P = .04); no difference was noted in the subgroup of infants <4 months old. Molecular analyses identified 11 PFGE profiles (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention profile No. 002 predominant, 47%). In 41 pertactin-deficient strains, sequencing identified 2 stop codon and 3 IS481 locations disrupting the prn gene. Mutations and nucleotide positions were not unique to PFGE type, nor were they clustered in time. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of predominantly unimmunized infants, clinical disease did not differ between infection with pertactin-deficient and those with pertactin-producing B. pertussis. Molecular analyses demonstrated remarkable PFGE strain diversity, with multiple mechanisms and molecular sites of pertactin inactivation.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/genetics , Bordetella pertussis/classification , Bordetella pertussis/genetics , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Symptom Assessment , Virulence Factors, Bordetella/genetics , Whooping Cough/diagnosis , Whooping Cough/microbiology , Adolescent , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/biosynthesis , Bordetella pertussis/isolation & purification , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Virulence Factors, Bordetella/biosynthesis , Whooping Cough/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL