ABSTRACT
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells are being investigated in many settings, including classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). The unique biology of cHL, characterized by scant Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells within an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), may pose challenges for cellular therapies directly targeting antigens expressed on HRS cells. We hypothesized that eradicating CD19+ B cells within the TME and the putative circulating CD19+ HRS clonotypic cells using anti-CD19-directed CAR-modified T cells (CART19) may indirectly affect HRS cells, which do not express CD19. Here we describe our pilot trial using CART19 in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL. To limit potential toxicities, we used nonviral RNA CART19 cells, which are expected to express CAR protein for only a few days, as opposed to CART19 generated by viral vector transduction, which expand in vivo and retain CAR expression. All 5 enrolled patients underwent successful manufacturing of nonviral RNA CART19, and 4 were infused with protocol-specified cell dose. There were no severe toxicities. Responses were seen, but these were transient. To our knowledge, this is the first CART19 clinical trial to use nonviral RNA gene delivery. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02277522 (adult) and #NCT02624258 (pediatric).
Subject(s)
Gene Transfer Techniques , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Adult , Female , Hodgkin Disease/genetics , Hodgkin Disease/immunology , Humans , Male , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/genetics , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunologyABSTRACT
Institutions that perform hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are required by law to report standardized, structured data on transplantation outcomes. A key post-transplantation outcome is engraftment, the time between HCT infusion and reemergence of circulating neutrophils and platelets. At our center, we found that manual chart abstraction for engraftment data was highly error-prone. We developed a custom R/Shiny application that automatically calculates engraftment dates and displays them in an intuitive format to augment the manual chart review. Our hypothesis was that use of the application to assist with calculating and reporting engraftment dates would be associated with a decreased error rate. The study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution. The application was developed in a collaborative, multidisciplinary fashion by members of an embedded cellular therapy informatics team. Retrospective validation of the application's accuracy was conducted on all malignant HCTs from February 2016 to December 2020 (n = 198). Real-world use of the application was evaluated prospectively from April 2021 through April 2022 (n = 53). The Welch 2-sample t test was used to compare error rates preimplementation and postimplementation. Data were visualized using p charts, and standard special cause variation rules were applied. The accuracy of reported data postdeployment increased dramatically; the engraftment error rate decreased from 15% to 3.8% for neutrophils (P = .003) and from 28% to 1.9% for platelets (P < .001). This study demonstrates the effective deployment of a custom R/Shiny application that was associated with significantly reduced error rates in HCT engraftment reporting for operational, research, and regulatory purposes. Users reported subjective satisfaction with the application and that it addressed difficulties with the legacy manual process. Identifying and correcting erroneous data in engraftment reporting could lead to a more efficient and accurate nationwide assessment of transplantation success. Furthermore, we show that it is possible and practical for academic medical centers to create and support embedded informatics teams that can quickly build applications for clinical operations in a manner compliant with regulatory requirements.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Homologous , Registries , AutomationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human adenoviruses (HAdVs) are associated with significant morbidity and death after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In this study, we sought to determine the incidence of HAdV infection among pediatric HCT recipients in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing era, identify risk factors for viremia among patients undergoing HAdV surveillance, and assess the effectiveness of preemptive cidofovir. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort of patients who underwent a transplant within a 10-year period was assembled. The incidence of and outcomes of patients with HAdV infection and disease were determined by PCR results and chart review. A Cox regression model was used for surveilled allogeneic HCT recipients to identify factors associated with viremia. We also used a discrete-time failure model with inverse probability treatment weights to assess the effectiveness of preemptive cidofovir for infection. RESULTS: Among 572 HCT recipients, 76 (13.3%) had ≥1 sample that was HAdV PCR positive (3.5% of autologous HCT recipients and 19.7% of allogeneic HCT recipients). Among 191 allogeneic HCT recipients under surveillance, 58 (30.4%) had HAdV detected from any source, and 50 (26.2%) specifically had viremia. The mortality rate was higher in allogeneic HCT recipients with HAdV infection versus those without infection (25.9% vs 11.3%; P = .01). Factors associated with infection included an age of 6 to 12 years, an absolute lymphocyte count of <200 cells/µL, recent prednisone exposure, and recent bacteremia. Preemptive cidofovir was not associated with a reduced risk of infection progression (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% confidence interval, 0.30-3.05]). CONCLUSIONS: HAdV infection is common and associated with an increased rate of death after allogeneic HCT. Using prediction models that incorporate factors associated with HAdV might help target surveillance. Preemptive cidofovir therapy was not protective in a subset of HAdV-positive patients. Larger observational or randomized investigations are necessary, because the utility of surveillance requires effective preemptive therapies.