Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Emerg Med ; 48(4): 474-80.e1-4, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25630475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs have significant scheduling flexibility. As a result, there is potentially significant variation in scheduling practices. Few studies have previously sought to describe this variation. It is unknown how this affects training time in the emergency department. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the current variation in clinical training practices through clinical hour, shift length, and rotation survey data. METHODS: A 21-item questionnaire was distributed to all allopathic EM training programs utilizing an online survey during the 2011-2012 academic year. Questions included demographic data, number of EM rotations per year, shifts, average hours, shift length, and scheduling practices. RESULTS: A total of 122 responses were received and 82 programs were analyzed (51.6% of 159 allopathic programs). EM residents work, on average, 45.50 h per week. Postgraduate year 1-3 programs utilizing 28-day schedules averaged two additional EM rotations and 338.2 more clinical EM hours compared with calendar-month rotations. The residents of 4-year programs work approximately 1300 additional hours during residency, with an average of 1279.26 h and 7.9 clinical EM rotations in the fourth year. Clinical hour ranges of 2670-5112 and 4248-6113 were observed for 3-year and 4-year programs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There are different scheduling modalities used to create resident schedules. This flexibility results in a large amount of diversity in scheduling practices, with certain patterns allowing for significantly more clinical time. This may result in a vastly different training experience for EM residents.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Emergency Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Workload
2.
Resuscitation ; 176: 107-116, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35439577

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Post-arrest care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is critical to optimizing outcomes, but little is known about socioeconomic disparities in post-arrest care. We evaluated the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with post-arrest care and outcomes. METHODS: We included adult OHCAs surviving to hospital admission from the 2014-2020 Texas Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) and stratified cases into SES quartiles based on census tract data. Outcomes were targeted temperature management (TTM), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), survival to discharge, and survival with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2. We applied both a multivariable logistic regression and a mixed effects logistic regression, comparing lower quartiles to top quartile for outcomes. We modeled receiving hospital as a random intercept. RESULTS: We included 9,936 OHCAs. Using multivariable logistic regression and ignoring the receiving hospital, lower income had lower TTM (Q3 aOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7; Q4 aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.5-0.6), lower PCI (Q4 aOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8), and lower survival with good CPC. Lower education had lower TTM (Q2 aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.7-0.8; Q3 aOR, 0.6 95% CI 0.5-0.7; Q4 aOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7), lower survival, and lower survival with good CPC. Lower employment had lower TTM (Q3 aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9; Q4 aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9) and survival with good CPC. These relationships for post-arrest care were not significant on mixed model analyses though. CONCLUSION: Lower SES was linked to lower rates of post-arrest care and outcomes, but many of the associations diminished when adjusting for receiving hospital random effect. Further study is needed to evaluate for inter-hospital disparities in care.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Hypothermia, Induced , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Adult , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Social Class , Texas/epidemiology
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 29(4): 427-31, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20825836

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Emergency department (ED) chest pain protocols often include an exercise stress test (EST) in an outpatient setting to further risk stratify patients initially identified as low risk for acute coronary syndrome. Our goal was to characterize the noncompliant patient population and delineate reasons for uncompleted EST. METHODS: We conducted retrospective chart review of all ED-scheduled ESTs over a 6-month period. Demographic and compliance information was abstracted using standardized instrument, a 1-month consecutive patient subset was identified, and a telephone interview was conducted with noncompliant patients to determine why they did not complete their EST. RESULTS: From January to July 2007, 57% (378/668) of patients were noncompliant with the ED-scheduled EST. In the subset, 78% (78/100) did not complete the EST: 58 patients never showed for their scheduled EST and 20 patients showed but could not initiate the EST because it was deemed inappropriate by health care workers in the cardiovascular laboratory or they began the test and it was nondiagnostic. Noncompliant patients were more likely to be male, unmarried, African American, and uninsured compared to compliant patients (P < .05). The most commonly stated reasons for noncompliance were miscommunication, financial, or inconvenience of scheduled time. Employed patients were more likely to state financial reasons for noncompliance, whereas unemployed patients were more likely to state personal reasons (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest lack of patient comprehension about purpose and logistics of EST completion. Based upon our data, the ED should confirm the appropriateness of the EST for each patient and improve patient communication and EST availability.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Chest Pain/etiology , Chest Pain/psychology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Exercise Test , Patient Compliance , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
4.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 2(2): e12417, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33817692

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: With a significant proportion of individuals with opioid use disorder not currently receiving treatment, it is critical to find novel ways to engage and retain patients in treatment. Our objective is to describe the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a program that used emergency physicians to initiate a bridge treatment, followed by peer support services, behavioral counseling, and ongoing treatment and follow-up. METHODS: We developed a program called the Houston Emergency Opioid Engagement System (HEROES) that provides rapid access to board-certified emergency physicians for initiation of buprenorphine, plus at least 1 behavioral counseling session and 4 weekly peer support sessions over the course of 30 days. Follow-ups were conducted by phone and in person to obtain patient-reported outcomes. Primary outcomes included percentage of patients who completed the 30-day program and the percentage for successful linkage to more permanent ongoing treatment after the initial program. RESULTS: There were 324 participants who initiated treatment on buprenorphine from April 2018 to July 2019, with an average age of 36 (±9.6 years) and 52% of participants were males. At 30 days, 293/324 (90.43%) completed the program, and 203 of these (63%) were successfully connected to a subsequent community addiction medicine physician. There was a significant improvement (36%) in health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: Lack of insurance is a predictor for treatment failure. Implementation of a multipronged treatment program is feasible and was associated with positive patient-reported outcomes. This approach holds promise as a strategy for engaging and retaining patients in treatment.

5.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 1(6): 1614-1622, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392570

ABSTRACT

As physician workforce shortages persist, physician reentry is an important and timely issue for the specialty of emergency medicine. Physician reentry is defined as a return to clinical practice following an extended period of clinical inactivity not resulting from discipline or impairment. This review provides a general overview of the physician reentry published literature with a focus on the specialty of emergency medicine. Transition into a non-clinical position, personal health, family issues, and career dissatisfaction all contribute to physicians leaving the workforce voluntarily. Previously, the majority of reentry physicians did not pursue additional training prior to returning to the workforce; however, regulatory agencies are now increasingly requiring additional training, standardized testing, and fitness to practice evaluations prior to restarting clinical work. The burden of proof is on the reentry physician to meet the appropriate requirements for licensure, certification, and credentialing prior to returning to clinical work.

6.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 111: 11-15, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32087833

ABSTRACT

Cognitive motivation theories contend that individuals have greater readiness for behavioral change during critical periods or life events, and a non-fatal overdose could represent such an event. The objective of this study was to examine if the use of a specialized mobile response team (assertive outreach) could help identify, engage, and retain people who have survived an overdose into a comprehensive treatment program. We developed an intervention, consisting of mobile outreach followed by medication and behavioral treatment, in Houston Texas between April and December 2018. Our primary outcome variables were the level of willingness to engage in treatment, and percent who retained in treatment after 30 and 90 day endpoints. We screened 103 individuals for eligibility, and 34 (33%) elected to engage in the treatment program, while two-thirds chose not to engage in treatment, primarily due to low readiness levels. The average age was 38.2 ± 12 years, 56% were male, 79% had no health insurance, and the majority (77%) reported being homeless or in temporary housing. There were 30 (88%) participants still active in the treatment program after 30 days, and 19 (56%) after 90 days. Given the high rates of relapse using conventional models, which wait for patients to present to treatment, our preliminary results suggest that assertive outreach could be a promising strategy to motivate people to enter and remain in long-term treatment.


Subject(s)
Drug Overdose , Ill-Housed Persons , Opiate Overdose , Adult , Drug Overdose/drug therapy , Female , Housing , Humans , Male , Texas
7.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 1(2): 92-94, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33000019

ABSTRACT

In December 2019, a cluster of severe pneumonia cases of unknown cause was reported in Wuhan, Hubei province, China. A novel strain of coronavirus belonging to the same family of viruses that cause severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) was identified. In February 2020, cases began being identified in the United States. We describe a sentinel COVID-19 patient in Houston, Texas, who first presented on March 1, 2020. The patient did not meet criteria for a Person Under Investigation (PUI) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at the time. This case has broad implications for emergency department screening and preparedness for COVID-19 and other future infectious diseases.

8.
J Emerg Med ; 34(1): 13-20, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17976784

ABSTRACT

Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States, with an estimated 50% of adults meeting the definition of being overweight. As this condition has become more prevalent, bariatric surgery has become an increasingly accepted form of treatment of the severely obese. Patients who have had bariatric surgery are presenting more commonly to Emergency Departments as a result. This article will review the most common bariatric surgery procedures, the complications that can arise post-operatively, and the approach to the assessment and management of the bariatric surgery patient in the Emergency Department.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis
9.
Ann Emerg Med ; 49(2): 145-52, 152.e1, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17145112

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We seek to determine whether cardiac risk factor burden (defined as the number of conventional cardiac risk factors present) is useful for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (i*trACS) registry, which had 17,713 ED visits for suspected acute coronary syndromes. First visit for US patients who were not cocaine or amphetamine users, who did not leave against medical advice, and for whom ECG and demographic data were complete were included. Acute coronary syndrome was defined by 30-day revascularization, diagnostic-related group codes, or death within 30 days, with positive cardiac biomarkers at index hospitalization. Cardiac risk factors were diabetes, hypertension, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and family history of coronary artery disease. Cardiac risk factor burden was defined as the number of risk factors present. Because multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age modified the relationship between cardiac risk factor burden and acute coronary syndromes, a stratified analysis was performed for 3 age categories: younger than 40, 40 to 65, and older than 65 years. Positive likelihood ratios and negative likelihood ratios with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each total risk factor cutoff. RESULTS: Of 10,806 eligible patients, 871 (8.1%) had acute coronary syndromes. In patients younger than 40 years, having no risk factors had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.17 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.66), and having 4 or more risk factors had a positive likelihood ratio of 7.39 (95% CI 3.09 to 17.67). In patients between 40 and 65 years of age, having no risk factors had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.53 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.71), and having 4 or more risk factors had a positive likelihood ratio of 2.13 (95% CI 1.66 to 2.73). In patients older than 65 years, having no risk factors had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.96 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.23), and having 4 or more risk factors had a positive likelihood ratio of 1.09 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.62). CONCLUSION: Cardiac risk factor burden has limited clinical value in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes in the ED setting, especially in patients older than 40 years.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Electrocardiography , Emergency Service, Hospital , Registries , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Biomarkers , Coronary Disease/etiology , Diagnosis-Related Groups/classification , Diagnosis-Related Groups/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution
10.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 34(2): 387-407, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27133251

ABSTRACT

Obesity is present in epidemic proportions in the United States, and bariatric surgery has become more common. Thus, emergency physicians will undoubtedly encounter many patients who have undergone one of these procedures. Knowledge of the anatomic changes specific to these procedures aids the clinician in understanding potential complications and devising an organized differential diagnosis. This article reviews common bariatric surgery procedures, their complications, and the approach to acute abdominal pain in these patients.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Acute Disease , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Diagnosis, Differential , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology
11.
Acad Emerg Med ; 21(5): 574-98, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24842511

ABSTRACT

In 2001, "The Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine" was first published. This document, the first of its kind, was the result of an extensive practice analysis of emergency department (ED) visits and several expert panels, overseen by representatives from six collaborating professional organizations (the American Board of Emergency Medicine, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, the Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine, the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors, and the Emergency Medicine Residents' Association). Every 2 years, the document is reviewed by these organizations to identify practice changes, incorporate new evidence, and identify perceived deficiencies. For this revision, a seventh organization was included, the American Academy of Emergency Medicine.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Clinical Protocols/standards , Emergency Medicine/education , Emergency Medicine/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Severity of Illness Index , Standard of Care , Accreditation/standards , Clinical Protocols/classification , Decision Making , Diagnosis, Differential , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Models, Theoretical
12.
J Grad Med Educ ; 6(2): 292-5, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24949134

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Residency applicants have the right to see letters of recommendation written on their behalf. It is not known whether applicants are affected by waiving this right. OBJECTIVES: Our multicenter study assessed how frequently residency applicants waived their FERPA rights to view their letters of recommendation, and whether this affected the ratings they were given by faculty. METHODS: We reviewed all ERAS-submitted letters of recommendation to 14 ACGME-accredited programs in 2006-2007. We collected ERAS ID, program name, FERPA declaration, standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR) use, and SLOR Global Assessment ranking. The percentage of applicants who waived their FERPA rights was determined. Chi-square tests of independence assessed whether applicants' decision to waive their FERPA rights was associated with their SLOR Global Assessment. RESULTS: We examined 1776 applications containing 6424 letters of recommendations. Of 2736 letters that specified a Global Assessment, 2550 (93%) applicants waived their FERPA rights, while 186 did not. Of the applicants who chose not to waive their rights, 45.6% received a ranking of Outstanding, 35.5% Excellent, 18.3% Very Good, and 1.6% Good. Of applicants who waived their FERPA rights, 35.1% received a ranking of Outstanding, 49.6% Excellent, 13.7% Very Good, and 1.6% Good. Applicants who did not waive their FERPA rights were more likely to receive an Outstanding Assessment (P  =  .003). CONCLUSIONS: The majority (93%) of residency applicants waived their FERPA rights. Those who did not waive their rights had a statistically higher chance of receiving an Outstanding Assessment than those who did.

13.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 31(1): 261-90, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23200335

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal injury and diseases are common presentations in the Emergency Department. Emergency physicians must be versed in the critical procedural skills necessary to diagnose joint infection, manage fractures and dislocations, and assess for compartment syndrome. Arthrocentesis, splinting, dislocation reduction, and the evaluation of limb compartment syndrome are reviewed.


Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Contraindications , Emergencies , Fracture Fixation/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation/methods , Humans , Joint Diseases/diagnosis , Joint Diseases/therapy , Joint Dislocations/therapy , Orthopedic Procedures/instrumentation , Paracentesis/instrumentation , Paracentesis/methods
14.
West J Emerg Med ; 14(1): 23-8, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23447753

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cutaneous abscesses are commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). Although incision and drainage (I&D) remains the standard treatment, there is little high-quality evidence to support additional interventions such as pain control, type of incision, and use of irrigation, wound cultures, and packing. Although guidelines exist to support clinician management of abscesses, they do not clearly specify these additional interventions. This study sought to describe the ED treatments administered to adults with uncomplicated superficial cutaneous abscesses, defined as purulent lesions requiring incision and drainage that could be managed in an ED or outpatient setting. METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-four surveys were distributed to 15 EDs across the United States. Participants were queried about their level of training and practice environment as well as specific questions regarding their management of cutaneous abscesses in the ED. RESULTS: In total, 350 providers responded to the survey (74%). One hundred eighty-nine respondents (54%) were attending physicians, 135 (39%) were residents, and 26 (7%) were midlevel providers. Most providers (76%) used narcotics for pain management, 71% used local anesthetic over the roof of the abscess, and 60% used local anesthetic in a field block for pain control. More than 48% of responders routinely used irrigation after (I&D). Eighty-five percent of responders used a linear incision to drain the abscess and 91% used packing in the wound cavity. Thirty-two percent routinely sent wound cultures and 17% of providers routinely prescribed antibiotics. Most providers (73%) only prescribed antibiotics if certain historical factors or physical findings were present on examination. Antibiotic treatment, if used, favored a combination of 2 or more drugs to cover both Streptococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (47%). Follow-up visits were most frequently recommended at 48 hours unless wound was concerning and required closer evaluation. CONCLUSION: Variability exists in the treatment strategies for abscess care. Most providers used narcotic analgesics in addition to local anesthetic, linear incisions, and packing. Most providers did not irrigate, order wound cultures, or routinely prescribe oral antibiotics unless specific risk factors or physical signs were present. Limited evidence is available at this time to guide these treatment strategies.

15.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 29(3): 519-38, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21782072

ABSTRACT

Urolithiasis commonly presents to the emergency department with acute, severe, unilateral flank pain. Patients with a suspected first-time stone or atypical presentation should be evaluated with a noncontrast computed tomography scan to confirm the diagnosis and rule out alternative diagnoses. Narcotics remain the mainstay of pain management but in select patients, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories alone or in combination with narcotics provide safe and effective analgesia in the emergency department. Whereas most kidney stones can be managed with pain control and expectant management, obstructing kidney stones with a suspected proximal urinary tract infection are urological emergencies requiring emergent decompression, antibiotics, and resuscitation.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Urological/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital , Urolithiasis , Humans , Morbidity/trends , United States/epidemiology , Urolithiasis/diagnosis , Urolithiasis/epidemiology , Urolithiasis/therapy
16.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 51(7): 2628-30, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17502411

ABSTRACT

To evaluate empirical therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or doxycycline for outpatient skin and soft tissue infections in an area of high prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, a randomized, prospective, open-label investigation was performed. The overall clinical failure rate was 9%, with all failures occurring in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group. However, there was no significant difference between the clinical failure rate of empirical trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy and that of doxycycline therapy.


Subject(s)
Cellulitis/epidemiology , Cellulitis/microbiology , Empirical Research , Methicillin Resistance/drug effects , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cellulitis/drug therapy , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Sulfamethoxazole/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Trimethoprim/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL