Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Surgeon ; 19(1): 15-19, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32340801

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the readability and quality of information regarding arteriovenous (AV) fistula for dialysis on the Internet in the English language. STUDY DESIGN: Using Google© search, the keywords "AV Fistula for dialysis" were searched. The top 75 ranking sites were analyzed. One website was excluded due to repetition. Each landing page was assessed independently by two authors (RB, LR) for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Gunning Fog Index (GFI). Web site quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument. The individual position of the top 15 websites in the search engine ranking order list was noted. The country of origin, organization type and issuance of Health on the Net (HoN) Certification was recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t-tests and ANOVA variance. RESULTS: The mean GFI score was 9.2 and the mean FRES score was 50.6, indicating poor readability. The mean DISCERN score was 48.4, indicating weak quality of websites. Website quality was influenced by the academic/healthcare organization type (p = 0.012). Organization type was not found to impact GFI and FRES scores. Presence of a HoN Certification was not found to impact the quality of information. The majority of sites originated from the United States (61%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that internet information pertaining to AV fistula for dialysis is of poor quality necessitating improvements to readability and overall website quality to improve the patient experience. Further research into how to improve healthcare web information is needed.


Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Fistula , Comprehension , Humans , Internet , Renal Dialysis , Search Engine
2.
Brain Inj ; 32(7): 900-906, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29683734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant burden of care for acute surgical services, particularly in the absence of on-site neurosurgical cover or sufficient post-acute rehabilitation facilities. We examine factors contributing to TBI, prolonged lengths of stay (LoS) and implications for hospital resources. Long-term outcomes are assessed. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a regional trauma unit with TBI from 2008 to 2013. Patients with LoS > 48 h were assessed. Demographic, clinical and longitudinal mortality data were collected using electronic clinical and radiological systems and chart review. RESULTS: A total of 690 patients presented with TBI from 2008 to 2013; 213 patients with LoS > 48 h were assessed. One hundred and thirty (61%) were male. Mean age was 56 years (±SD 24). Mechanical fall was the most frequent injury mechanism (n = 120/213, 56%). Twenty-five per cent were associated with alcohol consumption; these were more likely to be male, involved in an Road Traffic Accident (RTA) or assault and necessitate transfer to a neurosurgical unit (p < 0.001, p = 0.029, p < 0.001, p = 0.05). A total of 112 patients(53%) had a prolonged LoS (>2 weeks). Mean LoS was 20 days (±SD 35), increasing to 39 days for patients requiring neurosurgical intervention. The 12-month all-cause mortality rate was 12%. CONCLUSIONS: TBIs result in significant utilisation of acute inpatient bed days. Improved rehabilitation services and strategies to reduce acute hospital LoS are warranted.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Trauma Centers , Adult , Aged , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnostic imaging , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/surgery , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Length of Stay , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures , Treatment Outcome
4.
Vascular ; 23(3): 285-96, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25026892

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesise the available evidence of randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous laser therapy to traditional open surgery, high ligation and stripping, for the treatment of great saphenous vein varicose veins in terms of clinical effectiveness, patient satisfaction and peri-operative complications. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched to identify eligible studies. All randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous laser therapy to high ligation and stripping that used ultrasound examination as an outcome measure and had follow up of one year or more were included. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was also used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used as the measure of effect for each dichotomous outcome. FINDINGS: Nine eligible publications relating to six randomised controlled trials were identified. The total enrolment of the studies was 1289 limbs. The clinical efficacy of endovenous laser therapy is comparable to that of surgery in the relatively short follow up period described in the studies. Meta-analysis revealed a trend towards a higher risk of ultrasound recurrence after endovenous laser therapy at 12 months. Quality of life questionnaires reveal similar outcomes for endovenous laser therapy and surgery. There is low quality evidence to suggest surgery is associated with more pain, sensory complications and infection. CONCLUSION: Endovenous laser therapy is a safe alternative to traditional open surgery. There is some weak evidence to suggest that endovenous laser therapy has a higher risk of ultrasound-detected recurrence at 12 months following treatment compared to open surgery. However, it may be associated with less sensory complications, pigmentation and infection.


Subject(s)
Femoral Vein/surgery , Saphenous Vein/surgery , Varicose Veins/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Laser Therapy , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
5.
Surg Innov ; 21(6): 643-8, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24821260

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Peer-to-peer learning is a well-established learning modality, which has been shown to improve learning outcomes, with positive implications for clinical practice. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of linking students from North America and Europe with a peer-to-peer learning approach. METHODS: Face and content validity studies were completed on the previously designed and validated online repository http://www.pilgrimshospital.com. Four medical students from the University of Toronto, Canada, were paired with four students from University College Cork, Ireland. Each student was invited to upload two pieces of information learned from a senior colleague that day. Each student was asked to review the information uploaded by their partner, editing with references if needed. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the e-peer system were conducted. RESULTS: Over the study period, the system recorded a total of 10 079 individual page views. Questionnaires completed by participants demonstrated that 6/8 found the system either "very easy" or "easy" to use, whereas all found that the system promoted evidenced-based and self-directed learning. Structured interviews revealed 3 main themes: The Peer Connection, Trust in Data Veracity, and Aid to Clinical Learning. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrates it is feasible to link students from separate continents in a community of peer-to-peer learning. This is viewed positively by students and enhances evidenced-based learning, and the aspect of peer connectivity was important to participating students. Such an approach encourages peer cooperation and has the potential to disseminate key clinical learning experiences widely.


Subject(s)
Peer Group , Surgeons/education , Europe , Evidence-Based Medicine , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Internet , North America , Pilot Projects
6.
Med Sci (Basel) ; 10(1)2022 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35225944

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, and more recently the revised ACR criteria (rACR), are a scoring system developed to aid in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Our aim was to investigate the value of the non-biopsy criteria of the original ACR criteria and rACR criteria to predict GCA, and investigate the utilization of such scores to avoid biopsy when a very high or very low likelihood of a positive temporal artery biopsy TAB was predicted. Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 59 patients undergoing TAB from 2013 to 2017 in Beaumont Hospital, a tertiary referral centre in Dublin, Ireland. Demographic data, biochemical results, presenting features, and histology results were collected and collated. Results: Data were analysed from 53 patients and ACR scores were compiled. Seventeen scored < 3 and thirty-six scored 3−5. All 11 positive biopsies were in the 3−5 score range. Forty-five patients were analysed with rACR scores. Eight were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria. Of the 11 positive biopsies, 2 were in the 3−4 score range, and 9 were in the ≥5 score range. In the ACR method, 36% of all biopsies scored as low-risk pre-biopsy. In the rACR method, 84.4% of all biopsies scored in the low- and intermediate-risk group pre-biopsy and 15.6% of all biopsies scored in the high-risk group pre-biopsy. Conclusions: This study illustrates the potential value of the rACR scoring system as a useful tool to categorize patients according to risk with a view to avoiding unnecessary TAB. The data suggest that a TAB has a helpful role in low- and intermediate-risk groups but is of minimal benefit in the high-risk group.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Rheumatology , Biopsy , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/pathology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Temporal Arteries/pathology , United States
7.
J Patient Exp ; 9: 23743735221102675, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35647271

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the readability and quality of online patient information regarding treatment for constipation in the English language. Methods: By utilizing the Google © website, the keyword "treatment for chronic constipation" was searched. Each webpage was assessed by 2 authors independently for readability using both the Gunning Fog Index (GFI) and the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES). The quality of the information produced on each individual website was assessed using the DISCERN instrument. Other parameters that were recorded included the country of origin, the organization type, and whether or not the website was issued a Health on the Net (HoN) certificate. Results: This study identified a mean GFI score of 13.2 and a mean FRES score of 48.9. This result indicates poor overall readability. A mean DISCERN score of 37.9 was produced, indicating an overall weak quality of online information on this topic. This study indicated that parameters such as website organization type and the presence or absence of HoN certification impacted the quality of the information websites on this topic. Conclusion: This study indicated a poor level of quality and readability of online information on the topic of chronic constipation treatment. Further resources should be directed towards improving website readability and quality. Patients may be advised that if they wish to access online information on this topic, websites that display HoN accreditation will likely produce higher quality information.

8.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 798, 2021 01 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33436684

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer worldwide and the second most deadly. Recent research efforts have focused on developing non-invasive techniques for CRC detection. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic capabilities of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) for CRC detection by building 6 classification models based on support vector machines (SVMs). Our dataset consists of 2889 diffuse reflectance spectra collected from freshly excised ex vivo tissues of 47 patients over wavelengths ranging from 350 and 1919 nm with source-detector distances of 630-µm and 2500-µm to probe different depths. Quadratic SVMs were used and performance was evaluated using twofold cross-validation on 10 iterations of randomized training and test sets. We achieved (93.5 ± 2.4)% sensitivity, (94.0 ± 1.7)% specificity AUC by probing the superficial colorectal tissue and (96.1 ± 1.8)% sensitivity, (95.7 ± 0.6)% specificity AUC by sampling deeper tissue layers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first DRS study to investigate the potential of probing deeper tissue layers using larger SDD probes for CRC detection in the luminal wall. The data analysis showed that using a broader spectrum and longer near-infrared wavelengths can improve the diagnostic accuracy of CRC as well as probing deeper tissue layers.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Spectrophotometry/methods , Support Vector Machine , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Discriminant Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
9.
Breast ; 32: 126-129, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28178606

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the readability, accessibility and quality of information pertaining to breast reconstruction post mastectomy on the Internet in the English language. METHODS: Using the Google© search engine the keywords "Breast reconstruction post mastectomy" were searched for. We analyzed the top 75 sites. The Flesch Reading Ease Score and Gunning Fog Index were calculated to assess readability. Web site quality was assessed objectively using the University of Michigan Consumer Health Web site Evaluation Checklist. Accessibility was determined using an automated accessibility tool. In addition, the country of origin, type of organisation producing the site and presence of Health on the Net (HoN) Certification status was recorded. RESULTS: The Web sites were difficult to read and comprehend. The mean Flesch Reading Ease scores were 55.5. The mean Gunning Fog Index scores was 8.6. The mean Michigan score was 34.8 indicating weak quality of websites. Websites with HoN certification ranked higher in the search results (p = 0.007). Website quality was influenced by organisation type (p < 0.0001) with academic/healthcare, not for profit and government sites having higher Michigan scores. 20% of sites met the minimum accessibility criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Internet information on breast reconstruction post mastectomy and procedures is poorly written and we suggest that Webpages providing information must be made more readable and accessible. We suggest that health professionals should recommend Web sites that are easy to read and contain high-quality surgical information. Medical information on the Internet should be readable, accessible, reliable and of a consistent quality.


Subject(s)
Consumer Health Information/standards , Internet/standards , Mammaplasty , Mastectomy , Search Engine/standards , Adult , Breast Neoplasms , Comprehension , Female , Health Literacy , Humans , Middle Aged
10.
JAMA Surg ; 150(9): 899-904, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26176318

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: This Delphi study provides consensus related to many aspects of acute diverticulitis and identifies other areas in need of research. OBJECTIVE: To generate an international, expert-based, consensus statement to address controversies in the management of acute diverticulitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted using the Delphi technique from April 3 through October 21, 2014. A survey website was used and a panel of acute diverticulitis experts was formed via the snowball method. The top 5 acute diverticulitis experts in 5 international geographic regions were identified based on their number of publications related to acute diverticulitis. INTERVENTIONS: The Delphi study used 3 rounds of questions, after which the consensus statement was collated. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A consensus statement related to the management of acute diverticulitis. RESULTS: Twenty items were selected for inclusion in the consensus statement following 3 rounds of questioning. A clear definition of uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis is provided. In uncomplicated diverticulitis, consensus was reached regarding appropriate laboratory and radiological evaluation of patients as well as nonsurgical, surgical, and follow-up strategies. A number of important topics, including antibiotic treatment, failed to reach consensus. In addition, consensus was reached regarding many nonsurgical and surgical treatment strategies in complicated diverticulitis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Controversy continues internationally regarding the management of acute diverticulitis. This study demonstrates that there is more nonconsensus among experts than consensus regarding most issues, even in the same region. It also provides insight into the status quo regarding the treatment of acute diverticulitis and provides important direction for future research.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Disease Management , Diverticulitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Delphi Technique , Female , Humans , International Cooperation , Male
11.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2013(7)2013 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24964456

ABSTRACT

Obturator hernia is a rare pelvic hernia that occurs primarily in multiparous, elderly (>70 years of age), thin females. This case highlights the successful laparoscopic mesh repair of an incarcerated obturator hernia in an octogenarian. The authors report a case of an incarcerated obturator hernia in an elderly female with subsequent high-grade small bowel and its successful laparoscopic operative management. A review of the relevant literature was also performed following a search on the online literature databases such as PUBMED and EMBASE. Laparoscopic mesh repair of the incarcerated obturator hernia and an ipsilateral femoral hernia found incidentally was successfully performed. A review of the literature showed a significant burden of morbidity and mortality associated with obturator hernias. Laparoscopic mesh repair has been previously shown to be a safe therapeutic modality. Small bowel obstruction and leg pain in a thin elderly lady should arouse suspicion for an incarcerated obturator hernia. Laparoscopic management of an incarcerated obturator hernia is a feasible and safe therapeutic option.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL