ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Sexual side effects of treatment are common among cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Little attention has been given to the role of radiation therapists (RTs) in managing sexual issues. The current study sought to address this by assessing the provision of care for sexual issues by RTs in Ireland. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected using an online questionnaire. Measures included: participant characteristics; sexuality-related practice; knowledge, awareness and confidence in dealing with sexual issues; the sexual attitudes and beliefs survey; and opinions as to the "ideal" management of sexual issues. RESULTS: Discussion of sexual issues with patients was rare, and most participants (N = 46) did not feel these issues were addressed effectively in their departments. Barriers to the discussion of sexual issues included low knowledge, awareness and confidence; perceptions of professional role boundaries; and concerns about personal and patient discomfort. Nonetheless, participants indicated that RTs should ideally be equipped to discuss sexual side effects of treatment, as they would any other side effect. CONCLUSION: This study has identified a sub-optimal provision of care for sexual issues by RTs. Training is needed if RTs are to effectively support the work of the multidisciplinary team in this area.
Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Professional Role , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Professional-Patient Relations , Radiation Oncology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Cancer is predominantly a disease of older patients, with over half of those aged over 65 years of age being diagnosed with cancer at some stage. Despite comprising a significant proportion of the patients that we see in clinical practice, there is a lack of representation of older patients in cancer clinical trials. This is mainly due to restrictive trial inclusion criteria that prevent older patients from participating. Also, trial endpoints, such as overall survival, may not represent the most important and most meaningful endpoints for older patients. The latter may place more significance on quality of life and other outcomes such as functional independence. Baseline assessment using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, may provide a better framework for quantifying patient outcomes for varying degrees of fitness or frailty. This short communication makes the case for more age appropriate endpoints, such as quality of life, toxicity and functional independence, and that novel trial designs are necessary to inform evidence-based care of older cancer patients.