Racial/ethnic differences in 21-gene recurrence score and survival among patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous studies on racial/ethnic disparities among patients with breast cancer, there is a paucity of literature evaluating racial/ethnic differences in 21-gene recurrence score (RS) and survival differences stratified by RS risk categories. We thus performed an observational cohort study to examine racial/ethnic disparities in the context of RS. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for female patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2018 with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, pT1-3N0-1aM0 breast cancer who received surgery followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy and had RS data available. Logistic multivariable analysis (MVA) was built to evaluate variables associated with RS ≥ 26. Cox MVA was used to evaluate OS. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences stratified by RS. P values less than 0.017 were considered statistically significant based on Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: A total of 140,133 women were included for analysis. Of these, 115,651 (82.5%), 8,213 (5.9%), 10,814 (7.7%), and 5,455 (3.9%) were NHW, Hispanic, Black, and API women, respectively. Median (IQR) follow up was 66.2 months (48.0-89.8). Logistic MVA showed that, compared with NHW women, Black women were associated with higher RS (≥ 26 vs < 26: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.26, p < 0.001), while HW (aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.00, p = 0.04) and API women (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.95-1.13, p = 0.45) were not. Cox MVA showed that, compared with NHW women, Black women had worse OS (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.19, p = 0.012), while HW (aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94, p = 0.001) and API (aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.77, p < 0.001) women had better OS. In subgroup analysis, similar findings were noted among those with RS < 26, while only API women were associated with improved OS among others with RS ≥ 26. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest study using nationwide oncology database to suggest that Black women were associated with higher RS, while HW and API women were not. It also suggested that Black women were associated with worse OS among those with RS < 26, while API women were associated with improved OS regardless of RS when compared to NHW women.

Association of low adherence to weekly cisplatin with outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommends consideration of weekly cisplatin as an alternative option for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation. However, in a recent phase III trial (ConCERT), 20% of patients treated with weekly cisplatin could not receive a total of 200 mg/m2, and the association of low adherence to weekly cisplatin and cancer control outcomes remains unclear. To fill this knowledge gap, we performed an observational cohort study of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin. METHODS: Our institutional database was queried for patients with non-metastatic head and neck cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) between November 2007 and April 2023. Adherence to weekly cisplatin was defined as receiving at least 5 cycles with a total cumulative dose of 200 mg/m2. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, Cox proportional hazard multivariable (MVA) analyses. Logistic MVA was performed to identify variables associated with low adherence to weekly cisplatin. Fine-Gray MVA was performed to analyze failure outcomes with death as a competing event. RESULTS: Among 119 patients who met our criteria, 51 patients (42.9%) had low adherence to weekly cisplatin. Median follow up was 19.8 months (interquartile range 8.8-65.6). Low adherence to weekly cisplatin was associated with worse overall survival (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-5.47, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (aHR 2.32, 95% CI 1.29-4.17, p = 0.005). It was also associated with worse distant failure (aHR 4.55, 95% CI 1.19-17.3, p = 0.03), but not locoregional failure (aHR 1.61, 95% CI 0.46-5.58, p = 0.46). KPS < 90 was the only variable associated with low adherence to weekly cisplatin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.67, 95% CI 1.10-6.65, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that over 40% of patients underwent fewer than 5 weekly cisplatin cycles and that low adherence to weekly cisplatin was an independent, adverse prognostic factor for worse survival and distant failure outcomes. Those with reduced adherence to weekly cisplatin were more likely to have poor performance status. Further studies are warranted to improve the adherence to chemotherapy and outcomes.

Palliative care utilization and racial and ethnic disparities among women with de novo metastatic breast cancer in the United States.

PURPOSE: The potential disparities in palliative care delivery for underrepresented minorities with breast cancer are not well known. We sought to determine whether race and ethnicity impact the receipt of palliative care for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the National Cancer Database for female patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer between 2010 and 2017 who received palliative care following diagnosis of MBC to assess the proportion of patients who received palliative care, including non-curative-intent local-regional or systemic therapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with receiving palliative care. RESULTS: 60,685 patients were diagnosed with de novo MBC. Of these, only 21.4% (n = 12,963) received a palliative care service. Overall, there was a positive trend in palliative care receipt from 18.2% in 2010 to 23.0% in 2017 (P < 0.001), which persisted when stratified by race and ethnicity. Relative to non-Hispanic White women, Asian/Pacific Islander women (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.90, P < 0.001), Hispanic women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.76, P < 0.001), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99, P = 0.03) were less likely to receive palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 25% of women with MBC received palliative care between 2010 and 2017. While palliative care has significantly increased for all racial/ethnic groups, Hispanic White, Black, and Asian/Pacific Islander women with MBC still receive significantly less palliative care than non-Hispanic White women. Further research is needed to identify the socioeconomic and cultural barriers to palliative care utilization.

Outcomes of definitive local therapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in elderly patients ≥70 years with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasing among elderly (≥70 years) patients and the optimal treatment approach is not known. In this study, we aimed to determine disease and toxicity outcomes in an elderly HPV-OPSCC population primarily treated with a chemoradiation (CRT) approach. We identified 70 elderly HPV-OPSCC patients who were treated with either surgery, radiotherapy, or CRT between 2011 and 2021. Time-to-event analysis for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio associated with covariates. The median follow-up for our cohort was 43.9 months. Of the 70 elderly patients, 55 (78.6%) receive CRT and 15 (22.4%) received RT alone. Two patients underwent TORS resection. Of the 55 patients treated with CRT, the most common systemic agents were weekly carboplatin/taxol (n = 18), cetuximab (n = 17), and weekly cisplatin (n = 11). The 5-year OS, PFS, and LC were 57%, 52%, and 91%, respectively. On univariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were significant predictors of OS, while on multivariate analysis only CCI was a significant predictor of OS (p = 0.006). The rate of late peg tube dependency, osteoradionecrosis, and aspiration was 10%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. Definitive local therapy in elderly HPV-OPSCC patients is associated with excellent LC and a low rate of late toxicities. Prospective studies are needed to further stratify subgroups of elderly patients who may benefit from aggressive definitive local therapy.

Association of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio with survival in peripheral early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after stereotactic body radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: The role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor for survival in single fraction SBRT-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains unclear. We performed an observational cohort study to determine the role of pretreatment NLR in predicting survival of early-stage NSCLC patients after single fraction SBRT. METHODS: A single-institution database of peripheral early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT from February 2007 to May 2022 was queried. Optimal threshold of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was defined based on maximally selected rank statistics. Cox multivariable analysis (MVA), Kaplan-Meier, and propensity score matching were performed to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients were included for analysis with median follow up of 19.7 months. On Cox multivariate analysis, as a continuous variable, NLR was shown to be an independent predictor of OS (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10, p = 0.005) and PFS (aHR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.013). In addition, NLR was associated with DF (aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18, p < 0.001). Maximally selected rank statistics determined 3.28 as the cutoff point of high NLR versus low NLR. These findings were confirmed upon propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment NLR is an independent predictor for survival outcomes of peripheral early-stage NSCLC patients after single fraction SBRT.

Association of progesterone receptor status with 21-gene recurrence score and survival among patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Progesterone receptor (PR)-negative tumors have been shown to have worse prognosis and were underrepresented in recent trials on patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The role of PR-negative status in the context of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) and nodal staging remains unclear. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for women diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 with ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, pT1-3N0-1a breast cancer. Logistic and Cox multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to identify association of PR status with high RS (> 25) and overall survival (OS), respectively. RESULTS: Among 143,828 women, 130,349 (90.6%) and 13,479 (9.4%) patients had PR-positive and PR-negative tumors, respectively. Logistic MVA showed that PR-negative status was associated with higher RS (> 25: aOR 16.15, 95% CI 15.23-17.13). Cox MVA showed that PR-negative status was associated with worse OS (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31). There was an interaction with nodal staging and chemotherapy (p = 0.049). Subgroup analyses using Cox MVA showed the magnitude of the chemotherapy benefit was greater among those with pN1a, PR-negative tumors than pN1a, PR-positive tumors (PR-positive: aHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.67; PR-negative: aHR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.47). It was comparable among those with pN0 tumors regardless of PR status (PR-positive: aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.82; PR-negative: aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.77). CONCLUSION: PR-negative tumors were independently correlated with higher RS and were associated with greater OS benefits from chemotherapy for pN1a tumors, but not pN0 tumors.

Association of pre-treatment lymphocyte-monocyte ratio with survival outcome in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiation.

BACKGROUND: Given the role of systematic inflammation in cancer progression, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) from peripheral blood has been suggested as a biomarker to assess the extent of inflammation in several solid malignancies. However, the role of LMR as a prognostic factor in head and neck cancer was unclear in several meta-analyses, and there is a paucity of literature including patients in North America. We performed an observational cohort study to evaluate the association of LMR with survival outcomes in North American patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective database was queried for patients with non-metastatic head and neck cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiation from June 2007 to April 2021 at the Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The association of LMR with OS and CSS was examined using nonlinear Cox proportional hazard model using restricted cubic splines (RCS). Cox multivariable analysis (MVA) and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze OS and CSS. Pre-radiation LMR was then stratified into high and low based on its median value. Propensity scored matching was used to reduce the selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 476 patients met our criteria. Median follow up was 45.3 months (interquartile range 22.8-74.0). The nonlinear Cox regression model showed that low LMR was associated with worse OS and CSS in a continuous fashion without plateau for both OS and CSS. On Cox MVA, higher LMR as a continuous variable was associated with improved OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0,90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.99, p = 0.03) and CSS (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.95, p = 0.009). The median value of LMR was 3.8. After propensity score matching, a total of 186 pairs were matched. Lower LMR than 3.8 remained to be associated with worse OS (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12-2.26, p = 0.009) and CSS (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.08-2.63, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Low LMR, both as a continuous variable and dichotomized variable, was associated with worse OS and CSS. Further studies would be warranted to evaluate the role of such prognostic marker to tailor interventions.

Effect of musculature on mortality, a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: While often life-saving, treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) can be debilitating resulting in unplanned hospitalization. Hospitalizations in cancer patients may disrupt treatment and result in poor outcomes. Pre-treatment muscle quality and quantity ascertained through diagnostic imaging may help identify patients at high risk of poor outcomes early. The primary objective of this study was to determine if pre-treatment musculature was associated with all-cause mortality. METHODS: Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were abstracted from the cancer center electronic database (n = 403). Musculature was ascertained from pre-treatment CT scans. Propensity score matching was utilized to adjust for confounding bias when comparing patients with and without myosteatosis and with and without low muscle mass (LMM). Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A majority of patients were male (81.6%), white (89.6%), with stage IV (41.2%) oropharyngeal cancer (51.1%) treated with definitive radiation and chemotherapy (93.3%). Patients with myosteatosis and those with LMM were more likely to die compared to those with normal musculature (5-yr OS HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.03-2.34; HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.04-2.38). CONCLUSIONS: Musculature at the time of diagnosis was associated with overall mortality. Diagnostic imaging could be utilized to aid in assessing candidates for interventions targeted at maintaining and increasing muscle reserves.

Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation following neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for resectable stage I-II pancreatic cancer.

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NT), either with systemic treatment alone or in combination with radiation, is often utilized in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to increase the likelihood of margin-negative resection. Following NT and resection, additional adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) can be considered for select patients and has been shown to improve overall survival (OS). This National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes of AC versus observation for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with NT. Methods: The NCDB was queried for primary stage I-II cT1-3N0-1M0 resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with NT (2004-2015). Baseline patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were extracted. The primary endpoint was OS. With a 6-month conditional landmark, Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards method, 1:1 propensity score matching were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 1737 eligible patients were identified, of which 1247 underwent postoperative observation compared to 490 with AC. The overall median follow-up was 34.7 months. The addition of AC showed improved survival on the multivariate analysis (HR 0.78, p<0.001). Of 490 propensity-matched pairs, all variables were well balanced, including age (p=0.61), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score (p=0.80), ypT stage (p=0.93), ypN stage (p=0.83), surgical margin (p=0.83), duration of postoperative inpatient admission (p=0.96), and 30-day unplanned readmission after resection (p=0.34). AC remained statistically significant for improved OS, with median OS of 26.3 months vs 22.3 months and 2-year OS of 63.9% vs 52.9% for the observation cohort (p<0.001). Treatment interaction analysis showed OS benefit of AC for patients with smaller tumors (HR 0.67, p<0.001 for <3.1 cm vs HR 0.93, p=0.48 for ≥3.1 cm). Conclusion: Using propensity score matched analysis, our findings suggest a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy compared to observation following NT and surgery for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, especially in patients with smaller tumors. Prospective studies are needed to identify subset of patients that would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Association of survival with stereotactic body radiation therapy following induction chemotherapy for unresected locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Background: Induction chemotherapy (iC) followed by concurrent chemoradiation has been shown to improve overall survival (OS) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, the survival benefit of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) following iC remains unclear. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for primary stage III, cT4N0-1M0 LAPC (2004-2015). Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards method, and propensity score matching were used. Results: Among 872 patients, 738 patients underwent CFRT and 134 patients received SBRT. Median follow-up was 24.3 months and 22.9 months for the CFRT and SBRT cohorts, respectively. The use of SBRT showed improved survival in both the multivariate analysis (HR 0.78, p=0.025) and 120 propensity-matched pairs (median OS 18.1 vs 15.9 months, p=0.004) compared to the CFRT. Conclusion: This NCDB analysis suggests survival benefit with the use of SBRT versus CFRT following iC for the LAPC.

Evaluation of risk stratification using gene expression assays in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of various gene expression assays with pathologic complete response (pCR) in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients with breast cancer METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for women diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 with stage I-III breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and either 21-gene recurrence score (RS) or 70-gene signature (GS). Logistic multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to identify variables associated with pCR. RESULTS: A total of 3009 patients met our inclusion criteria. The median follow up was 48.0 months (interquartile range 32.2-66.7 months). On logistic MVA for all patients, those with a high risk from GS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-8.13, p = 0.006) or with RS ≥ 31 (aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.41-2.82, p < 0.001) were more likely to have pCR. When compared to RS ≥ 31, a high risk from GS was not associated with pCR (aOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75-1.37, p = 0.94). However, among those with favorable hormone receptor status, similar findings were noted, except that those with a high risk group from GS were less likely to have pCR compared to those with RS ≥ 31 (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.96, p = 0.03). When analyses were repeated using a high risk group from RS defined as RS ≥ 26 among those with favorable hormone receptor status, RS ≥ 26 was not associated with pCR when compared to the high risk from GS (aOR 0.74, 0.50-1.07, p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest study using a nationwide oncology database suggesting that high recurrence risk groups in both assays were associated with pCR. Among those with favorable hormone receptor status, RS ≥ 31 may be a more selective prognostic marker for pCR.

Survival outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy and high 21-gene recurrence score in early-stage breast cancer.

Among patients with early-stage breast cancer and a high 21-gene recurrence score (RS) ≥ 26, it remains unclear on whether those with RS 26-30 would benefit from chemotherapy with a comparable magnitude as those with RS > 30. In addition, RS > 30 as an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) compared to RS 26-30 also remains unclear. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, and T1-2N0 breast cancer with a RS ≥ 26. Primary end points were OS and BCSS, evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox multivariable analysis. Subgroups of RS 26-30 and RS > 30 were examined using propensity score matching to address selection bias. Among 5054 patients who met the inclusion criteria, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.83, P < .001) and BCSS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83, P = .001). In the subgroup of 943 matched pairs of patients with RS 26-30, the addition of chemotherapy remained statistically significant (OS: HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79, P = .003; BCSS: HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.81, P = .009). Among 1194 matched pairs who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, those with RS > 30 had worse outcomes than others with RS 26-30 (OS: HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.17-2.42, P = .005; BCSS: HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.17-3.15, P = .01). Our study builds on prior literature using a population-based database to suggest the association of adjuvant chemotherapy with improved survival among those with RS 26-30 and worse mortality associated with RS > 30 compared to RS 26-30.

Outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer.

The proportion of breast cancer cases among elderly (over 70 years old) patients is expected to rise from 24% to 35% by the next decade. However, elderly patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative, node-negative breast cancer were underrepresented in prior landmark prospective trials. Using a nationwide hospital cancer registry, our study of 12 004 elderly patients demonstrates that adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with overall survival (hazards ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.20, P = .71). Given the toxicities associated with systemic treatment, cautious recommendation or the omission of chemotherapy may be considered in select elderly patients.

Association of endocrine therapy with overall survival in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer of favorable histology.

Breast carcinomas are histologically diverse and have distinct prognostic significance. Early-stage breast cancers with favorable histopathologic features are managed comprehensively including adjuvant endocrine therapy at the discretion of clinicians. Using a de-identified large national cancer registry, we evaluated the overall survival benefit of endocrine therapy in patients diagnosed with HR-positive, HER2-negative, pT1-2N0 (tumor size < 3 cm), non-high-grade breast cancer with favorable histologies including tubular, mucinous, and cribriform types. On propensity score matching of 2482 matched pairs, the addition of adjuvant endocrine therapy was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.98, P = .03). Our findings suggest a role for endocrine therapy in future risk mitigation for favorable histologies but should be balanced with the implications of prolonged utilization.

A pilot study of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after surgery for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer with chemotherapy and conventional radiation has suboptimal outcomes. We hypothesized that a combination of surgery followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) would be a safe alternative. METHODS: Patients with stage IIIA (multistation N2) or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled from March 2013 to December 2015. The protocol included transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) followed by surgical resection, 10 Gy SBRT directed to the involved mediastinum/hilar stations and/or positive surgical margins, and adjuvant systemic therapy. Patients not suitable for anatomic lung resection were treated with 30 Gy to the primary tumor. The primary efficacy end-point was the proportion of patients with grade 3 or higher adverse events (AE) or toxicities. RESULTS: Of 10 patients, 7 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients had TEMLA. Nine of 10 patients underwent surgical resection. The remaining patient had an unresectable tumor and received 30 Gy SBRT to the primary lesion. All patients had post-operative SBRT. Median follow-up was 18 months. There were no perioperative mortalities. Six patients had any grade 3 AEs with no grade 4-5 AEs. Of these, 4 were not attributable to radiation. Pulmonary-related grade 3 AEs were experienced by 2 patients. There were no failures within the 10 Gy volume. Overall survival and progression-free survival rates at 2 years were 68% (90% CI 36-86) and 40% (90% CI 16-63), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In carefully selected patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, combining surgery with SBRT was well tolerated with no local failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifying number NCT01781741 . Registered February 1, 2013.

Comparison of single- and five-fraction schedules of stereotactic body radiation therapy for central lung tumours: a single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who are medically inoperable or decline surgery. Here we compare the outcome of patients with centrally located lung tumours who underwent either single fraction (SF)- or five-fraction (FF-) SBRT at a single institution over 5 years. METHODS: Between January 2009 and October 2014, patients with centrally located lung tumours who underwent SBRT were included in this study. Data were retrospectively collected using an institutional review board-approved database. For analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method and competing risks method were used. RESULTS: In total, 11 patients received 26-30 Gy in 1 fraction, whereas 31 patients received 50-60 Gy (median 55 Gy) in 5 fractions. After a median follow-up of 12 months for SF-SBRT and 17 months for FF-SBRT groups (p = 0.64), 1-year overall survival rates were 82 and 87%, respectively. SF- and FF-SBRT groups showed no significant difference in grade 3+ toxicity (p = 0·28). The only grade 4 toxicity (n = 1) was reported in the SF-SBRT group. All toxicities occurred >12 months after the SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: SF- and FF-SBRT have comparable overall survival. SF-SBRT may have some utility for patients unable to have multi-fraction SBRT.

Vertebral body collapse after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: a single-center institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of metastatic disease is increasingly utilized owing to improved pain and local control over conventional regimens. Vertebral body collapse (VBC) is an important toxicity following spine SBRT. We investigated our institutional experience with spine SBRT as it relates to VBC and spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 83 patients with 100 spinal lesions treated with SBRT between 2007 and 2022 were reviewed. Clinical information was abstracted from the medical record. The primary endpoint was post-treatment VBC. Logistic univariate analysis was performed to identify clinical factors associated with VBC. RESULTS: Median dose and number of fractions used was 24 Gy and 3 fractions, respectively. There were 10 spine segments that developed VBC (10%) after spine SBRT. Median time to VBC was 2.4 months. Of the 11 spine segments that underwent kyphoplasty prior to SBRT, none developed subsequent VBC. No factors were associated with VBC on univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of vertebral body collapse following spine SBRT is low. Prophylactic kyphoplasty may provide protection against VBC and should be considered for patients at high risk for fracture.

National Survey of Oncologists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Behaviors: Caring for Cancer Patients Experiencing Incarceration.

Cancer is the leading cause of illness-related death in state prisons in the United States. The experiences of physicians providing oncological care to individuals experiencing incarceration are underexplored. The study aims were to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and practices of oncologists caring for cancer patients who are incarcerated. An online survey was distributed to a random sample of 150 oncologists from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology from July 2020 to December 2021. Statistical analyses included two proportion Z-test, Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Cramer's V to estimate factors associated with attitudes and barriers to care. Of the 55 respondents (36.7% response rate), 21 were medical oncologists and 34 were radiation oncologists. Academic center oncologists were more likely to report caring for incarcerated patients than community or private practice oncologists (p = .04). Most (53%) incorrectly reported "heart disease" as the leading cause of death, as opposed to "cancer" (15% identified correctly). Oncologists practicing at both academic and community centers were more likely to report care coordination barriers than oncologists at academic or community centers (p < .01). We identified potential barriers in caring for incarcerated cancer patients. Future studies should explore ways to improve care coordination between oncology teams and prisons.

Efficacy of Prophylactic High-Dose Gabapentin and Venlafaxine on Reducing Oral Mucositis Pain Among Patients Treated With Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: A Single-Institution, Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Given the paucity of level 1 evidence, the optimal regimen to control oral mucositis pain remains unclear. Although national guidelines allow consideration of prophylactic gabapentin, prior trials showed improved pain control with venlafaxine among patients with diabetic neuropathy. We sought to investigate the role of prophylactic high-dose gabapentin with venlafaxine to reduce oral mucositis pain among patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a single-institution, phase 2 randomized trial on nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with chemoradiation. Patients were randomized to either prophylactic gabapentin (3600 mg daily) with or without venlafaxine (150 mg daily). Primary endpoint was differences in pain levels at the end of chemoradiation. Secondary endpoint was toxicity profiles, quality of life changes, opioid use, and feeding tube placement. Differences between the 2 arms at multiple time points were evaluated using a generalized linear mixed regression model with Sidak correction. RESULTS: Between May 2018 and March 2021, a total of 62 patients were enrolled and evaluable for analysis (n = 32 for the gabapentin alone arm, n = 30 for the gabapentin + venlafaxine arm). Over 90% of patients tolerated gabapentin well. Head and neck pain level showed a mean value of 45 (standard deviation, 23) and 43 (standard deviation, 21) for the gabapentin alone and the gabapentin + venlafaxine arms, respectively (P = .65). No statistically significant differences were observed in adverse events, opioid use, feeding tube placement, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of venlafaxine to prophylactic gabapentin did not result in improvements in pain control and quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer.