Barriers and motivators to women's cancer screening: A qualitative study of a sample of diverse women.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer is an enormous public health challenge in the United States and around the world. Early detection through screening can identify cancer when it is most treatable and can result in greater survival rates; however, racial and ethnic disparities in breast and cervical screening result in late diagnosis and a higher risk of poor outcomes and death for women of color. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine barriers that a diverse sample of women in Rhode Island face related to breast and cervical cancer screening, as well as motivators that encourage women to obtain screening services. DESIGN AND METHODS: Women, most of whom self-identified as Black or Hispanic, who were aged 40 years and older, were recruited to participate in focus groups via Zoom. The main topics of the discussions included thoughts, attitudes, beliefs, and prior experiences with screening. RESULTS: Forty-seven women from Rhode Island participated in a total of six focus groups. The following themes emerged: (1) fear, lack of knowledge, cultural beliefs, and the role of women as caretakers are personal barriers; (2) communication challenges, a shortage of primary care providers and negative health experiences are system barriers; and (3) family history of cancer, encouragement from providers, and clinic reminders are motivators that encourage women to get screened. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that communities must focus on eliminating barriers, promoting motivators, and expanding access to supportive screening services to reduce the number of cases and deaths due to breast and cervical cancer.

Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection with Bendamustine and Rituximab as First-Line Therapy for B-Cell Lymphomas: A Phase I Study.

BACKGROUND: We conducted an investigator-initiated, phase I trial of vincristine sulfate liposomal injection (VSLI) in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for indolent B-cell (BCL) or mantle cell lymphoma. METHODS: Participants received 6 cycles of standard BR with VSLI at patient-specific dose determined by the Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) model targeting 33% probability of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included rates of adverse events (AEs), overall response rate (ORR), and complete response (CR). Vincristine sulfate liposomal injection is FDA approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). RESULTS: Among 10 enrolled patients, VSLI was escalated from 1.80 to 2.24 mg/m2, with one DLT (ileus) at 2.04 mg/m2. Two patients discontinued VSLI early. The most common AE included lymphopenia (100%), constipation, nausea, infusion reaction (each 60%), neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy (50%). Grade 3/4 AE included lymphopenia (90%), neutropenia (20%), and ileus (10%), with prolonged grade ≥2 lymphopenia observed in most patients. Calculated MTD for VSLI was 2.25 mg/m2 (95% Bayesian credible interval: 2.00-2.40). Overall response was 100% with 50% CR. With median follow-up 26 months, 4/10 patients experienced recurrence and 1 died. CONCLUSION: Vincristine sulfate liposomal injection at 2.25 mg/m2 can be safely combined with BR for indolent B-cell lymphoma, but given observed toxicities and recurrences, we did not pursue an expanded cohort.Clinical Trials Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02257242.

A Pilot Study of Short-course Nivolumab and Low-dose Ipilimumab for Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma: Brown University Oncology Research Group Trial, BrUOG 324.

BACKGROUND: Combined cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and programmed death 1 inhibitor blockade is a promising strategy in advanced melanoma and other solid tumors. This pilot study assessed the safety and toxicity of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab in patients with high-risk completely resected melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received ipilimumab, 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, and nivolumab, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, for a total of 24 weeks (4 cycles). The primary objective was to assess the toxicity of the combined regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with resected melanoma were enrolled. One patient was stage IIC, 16 patients were stage III and 4 patients had resected stage 4 disease. Ten of 21 (48%) had grade 3 treatment-related toxicities but there was no grade 4 or grade 5 toxicities. The rate of grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities exceeded the toxicity limits defined by the study. Fifteen of 21 patients (71%) completed all 4 cycles of therapy. The median follow-up is 41 months. The 2-year recurrence-free survival is 85.7% and the 2-year overall survival is 90.5%. CONCLUSION: A 6-month course of nivolumab and low-dose ipilimumab may be a promising adjuvant treatment for patients with resected melanoma. Further studies of this regimen are indicated.

Nanoliposomal Irinotecan and Metronomic Temozolomide for Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: BrUOG329, A Phase I Brown University Oncology Research Group Trial.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal formulations may improve the solubility and bioavailability of drugs potentially increasing their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. We performed a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and preliminary efficacy of pegylated nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI)+metronomic temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with glioblastoma who progressed after at least 1 line of therapy were eligible. All patients received TMZ 50 mg/m2/d until disease progression. Three dose levels of nal-IRI were planned, 50, 70, and 80 mg/m2, intravenously every 2 weeks. Patients were accrued in a 3+3 design. The study included a preliminary assessment after the first 13 evaluable patients. The trial would be terminated early if 0 or 1 responses were observed in these patients. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated over 2 dose levels (nal-IRI 50 and 70 mg/m2). At dose level 2, nal-IRI 70 mg/m2, 2 of 3 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities including 1 patient who developed grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea and anorexia and 1 patient with grade 3 diarrhea, hypokalemia fatigue, and anorexia. Accrual to dose level 1 was expanded to 9 patients. The Drug Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) reviewed the data of the initial 12 patients-there were 0/12 responses (0%) and the median progression-free survival was 2 months and accrual was halted. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of nal-IRI was 50 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with TMZ 50 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea and neutropenia. No activity was seen at interim analysis and the study was terminated.

Adjuvant FOLFOX+Nab-Paclitaxel (FOLFOX-A) for Pancreatic Cancer: A Brown University Oncology Research Group Phase II Study (BrUOG295).

OBJECTIVES: Multiple clinical trials have established a role for adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX increases survival as compared with gemcitabine but with increased toxicity. FOLFOX+nab-paclitaxel (FOLFOX-A) was developed by the Brown University Oncology Research Group (BrUOG) as an alternative to FOLFIRINOX. This phase II trial explored the feasibility and toxicity of adjuvant FOLFOX-A in patients who have completed resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were eligible. The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of adjuvant FOLFOX-A. Patients experiencing grade 2 neuropathy received a 20% reduction of oxaliplatin. Secondary end points were disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Between June 2014 and October 2018, 25 patients were enrolled following surgical resection. The median number of cycles completed was 9.5. Median disease-free survival was 19.7 months (95% confidence interval, 10.3 to not reached) and median overall survival was 53.5 months (95% confidence interval, 24.2 to not reached). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or greater adverse events were fatigue (58%), nausea (13%), and neutropenia (26%). Fourteen patients had grade 2 neuropathy (58%) and 1 patient (4%) had grade 3 neuropathy. Only 2 patients (8%) had grade 3 diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant FOLFOX-A is a feasible multi-agent adjuvant treatment regimen and, with further validation, could be an alternative to FOLFIRINOX.