High dose proton and photon-based radiation therapy for 213 liver lesions: a multi-institutional dosimetric comparison with a clinical perspective.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and Proton therapy (PT) are both options in the management of liver lesions. Limited clinical-dosimetric comparison are available. Moreover, dose-constraint routinely used in liver PT and SRT considers only the liver spared, while optimization strategies to limit the liver damaged are poorly reported. METHODS: Primary endpoint was to assess and compare liver sparing of four contemporary RT techniques. Secondary endpoints were freedom from local recurrence (FFLR), overall survival (OS), acute and late toxicity. We hypothesize that Focal Liver Reaction (FLR) is determined by a similar biologic dose. FLR was delineated on follow-up MRI. Mean C.I. was computed for all the schedules used. A so-called Fall-off Volume (FOV) was defined as the area of healthy liver (liver-PTV) receiving more than the isotoxic dose. Fall-off Volume Ratio (FOVR) was defined as ratio between FOV and PTV. RESULTS: 213 lesions were identified. Mean best fitting isodose (isotoxic doses) for FLR were 18Gy, 21.5 Gy and 28.5 Gy for 3, 5 and 15 fractions. Among photons, an advantage in terms of healthy liver sparing was found for Vmat FFF with 5mm jaws (p = 0.013) and Cyberknife (p = 0.03). FOV and FOVR resulted lower for PT (p < 0.001). Three years FFLR resulted 83%. Classic Radiation induced liver disease (RILD, any grade) affected 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cyberknife and V-MAT FFF with 5mm jaws spare more liver than V-MAT FF with 10 mm jaws. PT spare more liver compared to photons. FOV and FOVR allows a quantitative analysis of healthy tissue sparing performance showing also the quality of plan in terms of dose fall-off.

Radiotherapy at oligoprogression for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a multi-institutional analysis.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively estimate the impact of radiotherapy as a progression-directed therapy (PDT) in oligoprogressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients under androgen receptor-target therapy (ARTT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: mCRPC patients are treated with PDT. End-points were time to next-line systemic treatment (NEST), radiological progression-free survival (r-PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was registered according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were analyzed. The median follow-up after PDT was 25.2 months (interquartile, 17.1-44.5). One-year NEST-free survival, r-PFS and OS were 49.8%, 50.4% and 82.1%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, polymetastatic condition at diagnosis of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) (HR 2.82, p = 0.004) and PSA doubling time at diagnosis of mCRPC (HR 2.76, p = 0.006) were associated with NEST-free survival. The same variables were associated with r-PFS (HR 2.32, p = 0.021; HR 2.24, p = 0.021). One patient developed late grade ≥ 2 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that radiotherapy in oligoprogressive mCRPC is safe, is effective and seems to prolong the efficacy of ARTT in patients who otherwise would have gone systemic treatment switch, positively affecting disease progression. Prospective trials are needed.

Non-metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: pattern of care from an uro-oncology multidisciplinary group.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review our 20 year experience of multidisciplinary management of non-metastatic ductal prostate cancer (dPC), a rare but aggressive histological subtype of prostate cancer whose optimal therapeutic approach is still controversial. METHODS: Histologically confirmed dPC patients undergoing primary, curative treatment [radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)] were included, and percentage of ductal and acinar pattern within prostate samples were derived. Survival outcomes were assessed using the subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) and Fine-and-Gray model. RESULTS: From January 1997 to December 2016, 81 non-metastatic dPC fitted selection criteria. Compared to surgery alone, SHR for progression-free survival and cancer-specific mortality were 2.8 (95% CI 0.6-13.3) and 1.3 (95% CI 0.1-16.2) for exclusive EBRT, 2.7 (95% CI 0.6-13.0) and 6.5 (95% CI 0.6-69.8) for adjuvant EBRT, 4.9 (95% CI 0.7-35.5) and 5.8 (95% CI 0.5-65.6) for salvage EBRT post-prostatectomy recurrence, and 3.2 (95% CI 0.7-14.0) and 3.9 (95% CI 0.3-44.1) for primary ADT (P = 0.558; P = 0.181), respectively. Comparing multimodal treatment and monotherapy confirmed the above trends. Local recurrence more typically occurred in pure dPC patients, mixed histology more frequently produced metastatic spread (29.6% relapse in total, P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Albeit some limitations affected the study, our findings support the role of local treatment to achieve better disease control and improve quality of life. Different behavior, with typical local growth in pure dPC, higher distant metastatization in the mixed form, might influence treatment response. Given its poor prognosis, we recommend multidisciplinary management of dPC.

How radical prostatectomy procedures have changed over the last 10 years in Italy: a comparative analysis based on more than 1500 patients participating in the MIRROR-SIU/LUNA and the Pros-IT CNR study.

PURPOSE: Therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer (PCa) have been evolving dramatically worldwide. The current article reports on the evolution of surgical management strategies for PCa in Italy. METHODS: The data from two independent Italian multicenter projects, the MIRROR-SIU/LUNA (started in 2007, holding data of 890 patients) and the Pros-IT-CNR project (started in 2014, with data of 692 patients), were compared. Differences in patients' characteristics were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with robot-assisted (RA) procedure, nerve sparing (NS) approach, and lymph node dissection (LND). RESULTS: The two cohorts did not differ in terms of age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at biopsy. Patients enrolled in the Pros-IT-CNR project more frequently were submitted to RA (58.8% vs 27.6%, p < 0.001) and NS prostatectomy (58.4% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.04), but received LND less frequently (47.7% vs. 76.7%, p < 0.001), as compared to the MIRROR-SIU/LUNA patients. At multivariate logistic models, Lower Gleason Scores (GS) and PSA levels were significantly associated with RA prostatectomy in both cohorts. As for the MIRROR-SIU/LUNA data, clinical T-stage was a predictor for NS (OR = 0.07 for T3, T4) and LND (OR = 2.41 for T2) procedures. As for Pros-IT CNR data, GS ≥ (4 + 3) and positive cancer cores ≥ 50% were decisive factors both for NS (OR 0.29 and 0.30) and LND (OR 7.53 and 2.31) strategies. CONCLUSIONS: PCa management has changed over the last decade in Italian centers: RA and NS procedures without LND have become the methods of choice to treat newly medium-high risk diagnosed PCa.

PROACTA: a survey on the actual attitude of the Italian radiation oncologists in the management and prescription of hormonal therapy in prostate cancer patients.

AIM: To investigate the actual attitude of Radiation Oncologists in the prescription of hormonal therapy in prostate cancer (PC) with or without Radiation Therapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2019, a survey named Prescription of Radiation Oncologists ACtual Attitude including 18 items was sent to all Italian Radiation Oncologists of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology. The first 4 items were about the Radiation Oncology Centers characteristics and years of practice of the respondents. The remaining 14 items concerned the setting in which hormone therapy was prescribed in PC patients (radical, postprostatectomy/oligometastatic state), the kind of drug, the choice modality (Multidisciplinary Group/autonomy decision) and other factors. RESULTS: A total of 127 questionnaires were returned, mainly by Northern Italy Radiation Oncology Centres (44.9%), and by experienced Radiation Oncologists (78%), who declared to prescribe independently hormone therapy in 85.8% of cases. The Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prescription in castration naive PC was made independently by 56.7% of respondents and associated with radical RT, postoperative or salvage RT according to various risk factors. In castration-sensitive oligorecurrent PC, the majority (51.2%) administered ADT only if local ablative treatment was not feasible, while in metastatic castration resistant disease novel hormone therapy use was established in almost half of cases within multidisciplinary board. Radiation Oncologists could prescribe these drugs independently in 64% of cases. CONCLUSION: Our survey established the prescription attitude of ADT and new hormonal agents (abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide) by Italian Radiation Oncologists and highlighted the importance of expertise in global PC management.

Short fractionation radiotherapy for early prostate cancer in the time of COVID-19: long-term excellent outcomes from a multicenter Italian trial suggest a larger adoption in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in low-risk Prostate Cancer patients as preferred treatment option in emergency health conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2013 to September 2015, 28 patients with low-risk prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled. The SBRT prescribed dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions, twice a week. Primary endpoints were acute and late toxicity. Secondary endpoints were biochemical recurrence free survival (bRFS) and overall survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 65.5 months (range 52-81). No acute G3 or G4 toxicity was recorded. Acute G1 or G2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurred in 43% and acute G1-G2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in 14%. Late G1 and G3 GU toxicity in 18% and 3.5%, respectively. The G3 toxicity was not directly attributable to radiotherapy. Late G1 GI toxicity occurred in 18%. 5yy bRFS was 96.5% (95% CI 82.3-99.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early prostate cancer reported safe toxicity profile and a good clinical outcome at the median follow-up of 5 years. It may be an useful option if radiotherapy is required in emergency medical conditions.

Metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy for oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Herein, we report the clinical outcomes of a multicenter study evaluating the role of SBRT in a cohort of patients affected by oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter observational study including eleven centers. Inclusion criteria of the current study were: (a) Karnofsky performance status > 80, (b) histologically proven diagnosis of PC, (c) 1-5 oligoprogressive metastases, defined as progressive disease at bone or nodes levels (detected by means of choline PET/CT or CT plus bone scan) during ADT, (d) serum testosterone level under 50 ng/ml during ADT, (e) controlled primary tumor, (f) patients treated with SBRT with a dose of at least 5 Gy per fraction to a biologically effective dose (BED) of at least 80 Gy using an alpha-to-beta ratio of 3 Gy, (g) at least 6 months of follow-up post-SBRT. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients for a total of 117 lesions were treated with SBRT. The median follow-up was 30.7 months (range 4-91 months). The median new metastasis-free survival after SBRT was 12.3 months (95% CI 5.5-19.1 months). One- and two-year distant progression-free survival was 52.3% and 33.7%, respectively. Twenty-six out of 86 patients underwent a second course of SBRT due to further oligoprogressive disease: This resulted in a median systemic treatment-free survival of 21.8 months (95% CI 17.8-25.8 months). One-year systemic treatment-free survival was 72.1%. CONCLUSION: SBRT appears to be a promising approach in oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Further investigations are warranted.

Applying radiation protection and safety in radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy is one of the primary treatment options in cancer management. Modern radiotherapy includes complex processes requiring many different kinds of expertise. Among them, knowledge and skills are needed in clinical oncology, radiobiology, radiotherapy planning and simulation, dose measurement and calculation, radiation safety and medical physics. Radiation oncologists should assume the full and final responsibility for treatment, follow-up and supportive care of the patient. For all these activities, radiation oncologist should coordinate and collaborate with a team including different professionals: nurses, radiographers (RTT), clinical engineers, information system experts, taking advantage in particular of the dosimetry expertise of the medical physicist. Radiation therapy is widely recognized to be one of the safest areas of modern medicine, and errors are very rare. However, radiation protection recommendations developed at national level should comply with the EURATOM Directive 2013/59. This paper describes several contemporary and emerging concerns related to radioprotection in radiation therapy including quality and safety in external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, foetal dose, secondary malignancies, and the safety issues related to the new techniques and treatment strategies.

Non-palliative radiotherapy in ab initio oligometastatic prostate cancer: an Italian national survey.

AIMS: The purpose of this survey was to investigate the current opinion among Italian radiation oncologists regarding the non-palliative radiotherapy in ab initio oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) patients. METHODS: A link to complete the survey was sent via e-mail to Italian radiation oncologists on February 2018. It was requested that only one physician per facility completed the survey, and that he/she was dedicated to PC management in his/her daily clinical practice. The questionnaire consisted of 15 questions concerning the management of OMPC. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven radiation oncologists filled in the questionnaire. The majority of them see ≤ 10 patients affected by OMPC in a year. More than 80% of respondents would perform radiotherapy (RT) to both the prostate and all metastases sites, but mostly up to 2-3 metastases; furthermore, > 80% of physicians would perform RT on both nodal and bone secondary lesions. Most respondents deem a choline- or prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET) mandatory before considering a patient affected by OMPC for non-palliative RT. The association of RT with androgen deprivation therapy for at least 12 months would be recommended by > 50% of respondents. In the follow-up phase, the majority would suggest a clinical examination and PSA every 3-6 months and a choline- or PSMA-PET only at biochemical progression. More than 90% of respondents confirmed to be interested in participating in a multicentre study regarding this subject. CONCLUSIONS: This survey investigated the current opinion of Italian radiation oncologists and confirmed their interest in OMPC management.

Concomitant radiotherapy and TKI in metastatic EGFR- or ALK-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentric analysis on behalf of AIRO lung cancer study group.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the management of EGFR- or ALK-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with TKI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 106 patients (pts) from five Institutions treated with RT concomitant to TKI were retrospectively revised. Overall survival (OS) and toxicities were analyzed as endpoints of the study. RESULTS: Median age of pts was 65 years. TKIs were given for EGFR (81%)- or ALK (19%)-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Stereotactic RT (SRT) was delivered to 49 pts (46%). Patients with four or less metastasis were defined as oligometastatic/oligoprogressive (OM/OP); sites of RT were brain, bone, lung or others in 46%, 27%, 14% and 13%, respectively. Median OS was 23 months. At univariate analysis SRT, ECOG PS 0-1, OM/OP disease, lung sites and a TKI duration longer than median favorably affected OS (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed SRT (HR 0.355, CI 95% 0.212-0.595; p < 0.001) and median duration of TKI > 14 months (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10-0.30; p < 0.001) as independent factors related to better OS. Toxicities were rare. CONCLUSIONS: SRT seems to positively affect OS with limited toxicity in selected patients.

Radiotherapy for oligometastatic cancer: a survey among radiation oncologists of Lombardy (AIRO-Lombardy), Italy.

AIMS: To evaluate the use of radiotherapy (RT) for oligometastatic cancer (OMC) among radiation oncologists in Lombardy, Italy. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A survey with 12 items regarding data of 2016 was sent to all 34 Lombardy RT centers. The survey included six general items and six specific items regarding patient/disease/treatment characteristics. RESULTS: Thirteen centers answered the survey (38%). All centers responded to general items and 12 centers submitted patient/disease/treatment data. General items The majority of centers (8/13) consider OMC if metastases number is less than 5. The most commonly prescribed dose/fraction is 5-10 Gy (8/13) using schedules of 3-5 fractions (11/13). Patient data items A total of 15.681 patients were treated in 2016 with external beam RT in 12 responding centers, and 1.087 patients were treated for OMC (7%). Primary tumor included lung, prostate, breast, colorectal and other malignancies in 33%, 21%, 12%, 9% and 25% of all OMC patients, respectively. Brain, lymph node, lung, bone, liver and others were the most common treated sites (24%, 24%, 22%, 17%, 8% and 5%, respectively). One and more than one metastasis were treated in 75 and 25% of patients, respectively. The vast majority of patients (95%) were treated with image-guided intensity-modulated RT or stereotactic RT. CONCLUSIONS: Seven percent of all RT patients in Lombardy are treated for OMC. Extreme hypofractionation and high-precision RT are commonly employed. The initiative of multicenter and multidisciplinary collaboration has been undertaken in order to prepare the platform for prospective and/or observational studies in OMC.

Disease-specific and general health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: the Pros-IT CNR study.

BACKGROUND: The National Research Council (CNR) prostate cancer monitoring project in Italy (Pros-IT CNR) is an observational, prospective, ongoing, multicentre study aiming to monitor a sample of Italian males diagnosed as new cases of prostate cancer. The present study aims to present data on the quality of life at time prostate cancer is diagnosed. METHODS: One thousand seven hundred five patients were enrolled. Quality of life is evaluated at the time cancer was diagnosed and at subsequent assessments via the Italian version of the University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: At diagnosis, lower scores on the physical component of the SF-12 were associated to older ages, obesity and the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities. Lower scores on the mental component were associated to younger ages, the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities and a T-score higher than one. Urinary and bowel functions according to UCLA-PCI were generally good. Almost 5% of the sample reported using at least one safety pad daily to control urinary loss; less than 3% reported moderate/severe problems attributable to bowel functions, and sexual function was a moderate/severe problem for 26.7%. Diabetes, 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities, T2 or T3-T4 categories and a Gleason score of eight or more were significantly associated with lower sexual function scores at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected by the Pros-IT CNR study have clarified the baseline status of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. A comprehensive assessment of quality of life will allow to objectively evaluate outcomes of different profile of care.

GUROPA survey: genito-urinary radiation oncology prescription attitudes.

AIMS: To investigate the role of Radiation Oncology in the management of genito-urinary (GU) cancer excluding prostate and penile cancer. METHODS: The questionnaire was focused on the evaluation of the degree of involvement of radiation oncologists in the work-up of bladder, renal cell carcinoma and testicular cancer (TC). RESULTS: Eighty-eight radiation oncologists completed the survey. The majority (85.4%) of participating radiation oncologists were senior consultants (> 5 years of experience). Sixty-four (73.6%) carried out a multidisciplinary tumor board discussion of GU cases, while 23 (26.4%) did not. Seventy-five percent of responders reported that, every year, visited < 50 GU patients (pts), 18.1% visited 50-100 pts and 6.9% visited > 100 pts. Bladder cancer, curative radiotherapy (RT) as part of trimodality approach was claimed to be adopted in less than 10 cases per year. Regarding renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, primary tumor directed RT was adopted only in 8 cases (9.4%) in at least 10 pts per year. Palliative RT was more frequent in RCC (48.2%) in over than 10 pts per year. In case of TC, the prescription of RT was limited (< 10 patients per year) due to the low incidence of disease and recent shift to surveillance as a first option in stage I seminoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey showed that radiation oncologists are rarely involved in the decision making strategy of GU cancer, despite many clinical trials support RT use. These patients probably deserve a more uniform approach based on updated, detailed and evidence-based recommendations.

Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the sooner the better and potential to reduce toxicity even further.

PURPOSE: To evaluate biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), overall survival (OS), late rectal and bladder toxicities in a retrospective single institution series, also applying an in-house software for biological dose calculation. METHODS: 258 patients submitted to radiotherapy after prostatectomy were considered. Differences between groups were calculated using the log-rank test and the relevant clinical and therapeutic variables were considered for multivariate analysis. PRODVH is an in-house system able to calculate mean dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of a series of patients, to convert them in biologically effective DVHs (BEDVHs) and allowing to compare them with ANOVA and t Student test. RESULTS: Adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) were performed in 131 (50.8%) and 127 patients (49.2%). At multivariate analysis advanced T stage, androgen deprivation total (ADT) and SRT resulted as independent variables related to a worst bRFS (p = 0.019, 0.001 and 0.02), while GS > 7 and SRT affected negatively OS (p 0.047 and 0.039). High grade toxicity events occurred mainly in patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) (proctitis p = 0.006; cystitis: p = 0.041). A significantly more favorable mean rectum BEDVH for patients with G0 or G1 rectal toxicity was shown (p < 0.001). Mean BEDVH for both bladder (p < 0.01) and rectum (p < 0.05) were also significantly better for volumetric modulated arc therapy-image guided radiotherapy (VMAT-IGRT) plans than for 3DCRT plans. CONCLUSION: ART is better than SRT in terms of bRFS and OS, particularly for more aggressive cases, advanced T stage and higher Gleason Score. Postoperative prostate cancer radiotherapy should be applied as soon as possible after surgery. The use of modern techniques such as VMAT-IGRT significantly reduces toxicity.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) plus temozolomide in good prognosis patients with glioblastoma: a multicenter phase II study by the Brain Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO).

INTRODUCTION: A multicenter phase II study for assessing the efficacy and the toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy with SIB plus temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma was carried out by the Brain Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma belonging to Recursive Partitioning Analysis classes III and IV were enrolled. The prescribed dose was 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions of 3.5 Gy and 67.5 in 15 fractions of 4.5 Gy to the SIB volume. Dose constraints for the hypofractionated schedule were provided. Radiotherapy was associated with concomitant and sequential temozolomide. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was 15.1 months, while median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months. Actuarial OS at 12 months was 65.6% ± 0.09, whereas actuarial PFS at 12 months was 41.2% ± 0.10. Status of methylation of MGMT promoter resulted to be a significant prognostic factor for OS. Radiotherapy-related acute toxicity was not relevant. Three patients (12.5%) had G3 myelotoxicity that required temozolomide temporary interruption or dose reduction during the chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy was not definitely discontinued for toxicity in any case. One patient out of 24 (4.2%) developed radionecrosis that required surgical resection with no evidence of disease in the surgical specimen. CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirms that hypofractionated radiotherapy with SIB and association with temozolomide may be a reasonable and feasible option for good prognosis patients with GBM.

Efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligorecurrent and in oligoprogressive prostate cancer: new evidence from a multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in two groups of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients: oligorecurrent PC and oligoprogressive castration-resistant PC (oligo-CRPC). METHODS: Inclusion criteria of the present multicentre retrospective analysis were: (1) oligorecurrent PC, defined as the presence of 1-3 lesions (bone or nodes) detected with choline positron emission tomography or CT plus bone scan following biochemical recurrence; (2) oligo-CRPC, defined as metastases (bone or nodes) detected after a prostatic-specific antigen rise during androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Primary end points were: distant progression-free survival (DPFS) and ADT-free survival in oligorecurrent PC patients; DPFS and second-line systemic treatment-free survival in oligo-CRPC patients. RESULTS: About 100 patients with oligorecurrent PC (139 lesions) and 41 with oligo-CRPC (70 lesions), treated between March 2010 and April 2016, were analysed. After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, in the oligorecurrent group 1- and 2-year DPFS were 64.4 and 43%. The rate of LC was 92.8% at 2 years. At a median follow-up of 23.4 months, in the oligo-CRPC group 1- and 2-year DPFS were 43.2 and 21.6%. Limitations include the retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy seems to be a useful treatment both for oligorecurrent and oligo-CRPC.

Pros-IT CNR: an Italian prostate cancer monitoring project.

AIMS: The Pros-IT CNR project aims to monitor a sample of Italian males ≥18 years of age who have been diagnosed in the participating centers with incident prostate cancer, by analyzing their clinical features, treatment protocols and outcome results in relation to quality of life. METHODS: Pros-IT CNR is an observational, prospective, multicenter study. The National Research Council (CNR), Neuroscience Institute, Aging Branch (Padua) is the promoting center. Ninety-seven Italian centers located throughout Italy were involved. The field study began in September 1, 2014. Subjects eligible were diagnosed with biopsy-verified prostate cancer, naïve. A sample size of 1500 patients was contemplated. A baseline assessment including anamnestic data, clinical history, risk factors, the initial diagnosis, cancer staging information and quality of life (Italian UCLA Prostate Cancer Index; SF-12 Scale) was completed. Six months after the initial diagnosis, a second assessment evaluating the patient's health status, the treatment carried out, and the quality of life will be made. A third assessment, evaluating the treatment follow-up and the quality of life, will be made 12 months after the initial diagnosis. The 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th assessments, similar to the third, will be completed 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after the initial diagnosis, respectively, and will include also a Food Frequency Questionnaire and the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly. DISCUSSION: The study will provide information on patients' quality of life and its variations over time in relation to the treatments received for the prostate cancer.

Pattern of relapse of glioblastoma multiforme treated with radical radio-chemotherapy: Could a margin reduction be proposed?

To analyse the pattern of recurrence of patients treated with Stupp protocol in relation to technique, to compare in silico plans with reduced margin (1 cm) with the original ones and to analyse toxicity. 105 patients were treated: 85 had local recurrence and 68 of them were analysed. Recurrence was considered in field, marginal and distant if >80 %, 20-80 % or <20 % of the relapse volume was included in the 95 %-isodose. In silico plans were retrospectively recalculated using the same technique, fields angles and treatment planning system of the original ones. The pattern of recurrence was in field, marginal and distant in 88, 10 and 2 % respectively and was similar in in silico plans. The margin reduction appears to spare 100 cc of healthy brain by 57 Gy-volume (p = 0.02). The target coverage was worse in standard plans (pt student < 0.001), especially if the tumour was near to organs at risk (pχ2 < 0.001). PTV coverage was better with IMRT and helical-IMRT, than conformal-3D (pAnova test = 0.038). This difference was no more significant with in silico planning. A higher incidence of asthenia and leuko-encephalopathy was observed in patients with greater percentage of healthy brain included in 57 Gy-volume. No differences in the pattern of recurrence according to margins were found. The margin reduction determines sparing of healthy brain and could possibly reduce the incidence of late toxicity. Margin reduction could allow to use less sophisticated techniques, ensuring appropriate target coverage, and the choice of more costly techniques could be reserved to selected cases.

Clinical outcomes and toxicity after exclusive versus postoperative radiotherapy in supraglottic cancer: new solutions for old problems? The case of stage III and IV disease.

PURPOSE: To compare toxicity, survival and laryngeal preservation rate after radiotherapy alone (RR), radiotherapy after supraglottic horizontal laryngectomy (SHLR) and radiotherapy after total laryngectomy (TLR) for advanced supraglottic laryngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1984 to 2012, 532 patients (pts) were treated in our Department: 273 were potentially fit for conservative surgery (Group I) and 259 were not amenable to partial surgery (Group II). RESULTS: A younger age (p = 0.005), a better performance status (p < 0.001), the absence of comorbidities (p < 0.001) and the absence of nodal involvement (p = 0.006) favorably impacted on overall survival. More high-grade mucositis (p = 0.009), mild dysphagia (p < 0.001) and mild xerostomia (p < 0.001) were found in RR group; surgical patients had more edema of neck (p = 0.009) and skin toxicity (p = 0.008). Group I No differences in local, nodal and distant recurrences and in number of rescue laryngectomies were observed. The disease characteristics (T, N and stage) but not the treatment modality impacted on disease-free survival (DFS). Group II There was an higher number of local (p = 0.013) and nodal (p = 0.022) recurrences after RR. DFS (p = 0.01) was longer after TLR. No differences in DFS between TLR patients and RR patients who underwent radio-chemotherapy were found. CONCLUSION: In Group I, RR results in a local-regional control and organ preservation comparable to surgical treatments, with only slight increase of late mild xerostomia and dysphagia. In Group II RR was less effective than TLR, with a significantly worse DFS. The use of concurrent radical radio-chemotherapy seems to provide comparable loco-regional control to TLR.