Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 81
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Med Genet ; 61(8): 727-733, 2024 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834294

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This document addresses the clinical application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies for prenatal genetic diagnosis and aims to establish clinical practice recommendations in Spain to ensure uniformity in implementing these technologies into prenatal care. METHODS: A joint committee of expert obstetricians and geneticists was created to review the existing literature on fetal NGS for genetic diagnosis and to make recommendations for Spanish healthcare professionals. RESULTS: This guideline summarises technical aspects of NGS technologies, clinical indications in prenatal setting, considerations regarding findings to be reported, genetic counselling considerations as well as data storage and protection policies. CONCLUSIONS: This document provides updated recommendations for the use of NGS diagnostic tests in prenatal diagnosis. These recommendations should be periodically reviewed as our knowledge of the clinical utility of NGS technologies, applied during pregnancy, may advance.


Subject(s)
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Prenatal Diagnosis , Humans , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/standards , Pregnancy , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/standards , Female , Spain , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/standards , Genetic Counseling/methods , Genetic Counseling/standards , Obstetrics/standards , Obstetrics/methods , Gynecology/standards
2.
Lancet ; 401(10375): 447-457, 2023 02 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36669520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2021, we showed an increased risk associated with COVID-19 in pregnancy. Since then, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has undergone genetic mutations. We aimed to examine the effects on maternal and perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 during pregnancy, and evaluate vaccine effectiveness, when omicron (B.1.1.529) was the variant of concern. METHODS: INTERCOVID-2022 is a large, prospective, observational study, involving 41 hospitals across 18 countries. Each woman with real-time PCR or rapid test, laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in pregnancy was compared with two unmatched women without a COVID-19 diagnosis who were recruited concomitantly and consecutively in pregnancy or at delivery. Mother and neonate dyads were followed until hospital discharge. Primary outcomes were maternal morbidity and mortality index (MMMI), severe neonatal morbidity index (SNMI), and severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index (SPMMI). Vaccine effectiveness was estimated, adjusted by maternal risk profile. FINDINGS: We enrolled 4618 pregnant women from Nov 27, 2021 (the day after WHO declared omicron a variant of concern), to June 30, 2022: 1545 (33%) women had a COVID-19 diagnosis (median gestation 36·7 weeks [IQR 29·0-38·9]) and 3073 (67%) women, with similar demographic characteristics, did not have a COVID-19 diagnosis. Overall, women with a diagnosis had an increased risk for MMMI (relative risk [RR] 1·16 [95% CI 1·03-1·31]) and SPMMI (RR 1·21 [95% CI 1·00-1·46]). Women with a diagnosis, compared with those without a diagnosis, also had increased risks of SNMI (RR 1·23 [95% CI 0·88-1·71]), although the lower bounds of the 95% CI crossed unity. Unvaccinated women with a COVID-19 diagnosis had a greater risk of MMMI (RR 1·36 [95% CI 1·12-1·65]). Severe COVID-19 symptoms in the total sample increased the risk of severe maternal complications (RR 2·51 [95% CI 1·84-3·43]), perinatal complications (RR 1·84 [95% CI 1·02-3·34]), and referral, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or death (RR 11·83 [95% CI 6·67-20·97]). Severe COVID-19 symptoms in unvaccinated women increased the risk of MMMI (RR 2·88 [95% CI 2·02-4·12]) and referral, ICU admission, or death (RR 20·82 [95% CI 10·44-41·54]). 2886 (63%) of 4618 total participants had at least a single dose of any vaccine, and 2476 (54%) of 4618 had either complete or booster doses. Vaccine effectiveness (all vaccines combined) for severe complications of COVID-19 for all women with a complete regimen was 48% (95% CI 22-65) and 76% (47-89) after a booster dose. For women with a COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccine effectiveness of all vaccines combined for women with a complete regimen was 74% (95% CI 48-87) and 91% (65-98) after a booster dose. INTERPRETATION: COVID-19 in pregnancy, during the first 6 months of omicron as the variant of concern, was associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity and mortality, especially among symptomatic and unvaccinated women. Women with complete or boosted vaccine doses had reduced risk for severe symptoms, complications, and death. Vaccination coverage among pregnant women remains a priority. FUNDING: None.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Male , Vaccine Efficacy , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing , Prospective Studies , Mothers
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(1): 89.e1-89.e12, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37481152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic isthmic contractions are a frequent physiological phenomenon in pregnancy, sometimes triggered by bladder voiding. They can interfere with proper cervical length assessment and may lead to false images of placenta previa. However, there is limited research on the prevalence and characteristics of these contractions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of isthmic contractions after bladder voiding in the second trimester of pregnancy, to evaluate their effect on cervical length assessment, and to propose a new method for the objective assessment of the presence and intensity of isthmic contractions. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational study, long videos of the uterine cervix were recorded in 30 singleton pregnancies during the second trimester of pregnancy after bladder voiding. Isthmic length and cervicoisthmic length changes were assessed over time. The isthmic length was measured using a new approach, which involved calculating the distance from the base of the cervix to the internal os, including the isthmus. RESULTS: Isthmic contractions were observed in 43% of pregnant women (95% confidence interval, 26%-62%) after bladder voiding. The median time for complete isthmus relaxation was 19.7 minutes (95% confidence interval, 15.0 to not available). No substantial differences in maternal characteristics were found between individuals with and without contractions. The proposed method for measuring isthmic length provided an objective assessment of the presence and intensity of isthmic contractions. A cutoff of 18 mm in isthmic length allowed for the distinction of pregnant women presenting a contraction. In addition, the study identified a characteristic undulatory pattern in the relaxation of the isthmus in half of the cases with contractions. CONCLUSION: Isthmic contractions are a common occurrence after bladder voiding in the second trimester of pregnancy and may interfere with proper cervical length assessment. We recommend performing cervical assessment at least 20 minutes after bladder voiding to reduce the risk of bias in cervical length measurement and to avoid false images of placenta previa. The new method for measuring isthmic length provides an objective way to assess the presence and intensity of isthmic contractions. Further research is needed to understand the role of isthmic contractions in the physiology of pregnancy and birth.


Subject(s)
Placenta Previa , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Cervix Uteri/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Contraction , Ultrasonography , Cervical Length Measurement/methods , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Premature Birth/epidemiology
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 231(4): 460.e1-460.e17, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38367758

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In early 2023, when Omicron was the variant of concern, we showed that vaccinating pregnant women decreased the risk for severe COVID-19-related complications and maternal morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 during pregnancy on newborns and the effects of maternal COVID-19 vaccination on neonatal outcomes when Omicron was the variant of concern. STUDY DESIGN: INTERCOVID-2022 was a large, prospective, observational study, conducted in 40 hospitals across 18 countries, from November 27, 2021 (the day after the World Health Organization declared Omicron the variant of concern) to June 30, 2022, to assess the effect of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes and to assess vaccine effectiveness. Women diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy were compared with 2 nondiagnosed, unmatched women recruited concomitantly and consecutively during pregnancy or at delivery. Mother-newborn dyads were followed until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were a neonatal positive test for COVID-19, severe neonatal morbidity index, severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index, preterm birth, neonatal death, referral to neonatal intensive care unit, and diseases during the neonatal period. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with adjustment for maternal risk profile. RESULTS: We enrolled 4707 neonates born to 1577 (33.5%) mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 and 3130 (66.5%) nondiagnosed mothers. Among the diagnosed mothers, 642 (40.7%) were not vaccinated, 147 (9.3%) were partially vaccinated, 551 (34.9%) were completely vaccinated, and 237 (15.0%) also had a booster vaccine. Neonates of booster-vaccinated mothers had less than half (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.91) the risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 when compared with those of unvaccinated mothers; they also had the lowest rates of preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, respiratory distress syndrome, and number of days in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborns of unvaccinated mothers had double the risk for neonatal death (relative risk, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.00) when compared with those of nondiagnosed mothers. Vaccination was not associated with any congenital malformations. Although all vaccines provided protection against neonatal test positivity, newborns of booster-vaccinated mothers had the highest vaccine effectiveness (64%; 95% confidence interval, 10%-86%). Vaccine effectiveness was not as high for messenger RNA vaccines only. Vaccine effectiveness against moderate or severe neonatal outcomes was much lower, namely 13% in the booster-vaccinated group (all vaccines) and 25% and 28% in the completely and booster-vaccinated groups, respectively (messenger RNA vaccines only). Vaccines were fairly effective in protecting neonates when given to pregnant women ≤100 days (14 weeks) before birth; thereafter, the risk increased and was much higher after 200 days (29 weeks). Finally, none of the neonatal practices studied, including skin-to-skin contact and direct breastfeeding, increased the risk for infecting newborns. CONCLUSION: When Omicron was the variant of concern, newborns of unvaccinated mothers had an increased risk for neonatal death. Neonates of vaccinated mothers had a decreased risk for preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes. Because the protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination decreases with time, to ensure that newborns are maximally protected against COVID-19, mothers should receive a vaccine or booster dose no more than 14 weeks before the expected date of delivery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Adult , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Vaccine Efficacy
5.
BJOG ; 131(3): 334-342, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37555464

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether aspirin treatment can be discontinued in pregnancies with normal uterine artery pulsatility index (≤90th percentile) at 24-28 weeks. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of a clinical trial. SETTING: Nine maternity hospitals in Spain. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Pregnant individuals at high risk of pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks and normal uterine artery Doppler at 24-28 weeks. METHODS: All participants received treatment with daily aspirin at a dose of 150 mg. Participants were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, either to continue aspirin treatment until 36 weeks (control group) or to discontinue aspirin treatment (intervention group), between September 2019 and September 2021. In this secondary analysis, women with a UtAPI >90th percentile at 24-28 weeks were excluded. The non-inferiority margin was set at a difference of 1.9% for the incidence of preterm pre-eclampsia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of preterm pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: Of the 1611 eligible women, 139 were excluded for UtAPI >90th percentile or if UtAPI was not available. Finally, 804 were included in this post-hoc analysis. Preterm pre-eclampsia occurred in three of 409 (0.7%) women in the aspirin discontinuation group and five of 395 (1.3%) women in the continuation group (-0.53; 95% CI -1.91 to 0.85), indicating non-inferiority of aspirin discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuing aspirin treatment at 24-28 weeks in women with a UtAPI ≤90th percentile was non-inferior to continuing aspirin treatment until 36 weeks for preventing preterm pre-eclampsia.


Subject(s)
Aspirin , Pre-Eclampsia , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Pre-Eclampsia/prevention & control , Pre-Eclampsia/drug therapy , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Uterine Artery/diagnostic imaging , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
6.
Prenat Diagn ; 2024 Sep 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39304976

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether targeted magnetic resonance of one or both of the progenitors could refine the diagnosis in cases of fetal brain anomalies with uncertain prognosis. METHODS: Single-center retrospective case series, where targeted magnetic resonance was performed on one or both of progenitors after a suspicion of fetal complex brain anomalies, and prognosis was unclear based solely on fetal tests (neurosonogram, fetal magnetic resonance, and genetic testing). RESULTS: Seven women were included. Results were relevant for prenatal counseling in five cases, with a definitive diagnosis in three: one periventricular nodular heterotopia, one mild tubulinopathy, and one dynein-associated neurodevelopmental disorder. Median gestational age at referral was 28.3 weeks (range, 20.7-34.9). Neurosonogram findings were inconclusive in all cases. Exome sequencing in amniotic fluid was conducted for all cases. Fetal magnetic resonance was performed at a median gestational age of 34.4 weeks (range, 29.3-35.7), confirming ultrasound diagnosis in all cases, and providing substantial additional information in two (2/7, 28.6%). Parental magnetic resonance findings aligned with fetal findings in 5/7 cases (71.4%). CONCLUSION: DUO or TRIO magnetic resonance, involving both progenitors and the fetus, could play a significant role in prenatal diagnosis of selected brain anomalies with uncertain prognosis.

7.
Prenat Diagn ; 44(9): 1073-1087, 2024 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898590

ABSTRACT

Open dysraphisms, that is, myelomeningocele and myeloschisis, are rare diseases associated with a risk of severe disability, including lower limb motor and sensory deficiency, sphincter deficiency, and potential intellectual deficiency. Open dysraphism is diagnosed in Europe in 93.5% of cases. In case of suspicion of fetal open dysraphism, a detailed fetal morphologic assessment is required to confirm the diagnosis and exclude associated structural anomalies, as well as genetic assessment. In case of isolated fetal open dysraphism, assessment of prognosis is based on fetal imaging including the level of the lesion, the presence or not of a sac, the presence and nature of intra cranial anomalies, and the anatomical and functional evaluation of the lower extremities. Based on these biomarkers, a personalized prognosis as well as comprehensive information about prenatal management alternatives will allow parents to decide on further management options. Standardization of prenatal assessment is essential to compare outcomes with benchmark data and make assessment of surgical innovation possible. Herein, we propose a protocol for the standardized ultrasound assessment of fetuses with isolated open dysraphism.


Subject(s)
Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Europe , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/standards , Telemedicine/standards , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/standards , Spina Bifida Cystica/diagnostic imaging , Spina Bifida Cystica/diagnosis , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Meningomyelocele/diagnosis , Meningomyelocele/diagnostic imaging
8.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 103(6): 1083-1091, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504476

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cannabis potency and its use during pregnancy have increased in the last decade. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of antenatal cannabis use on fetal growth, preterm birth and other perinatal outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A propensity score-matched analysis was performed in women with singleton pregnancies attending a tertiary care site in Barcelona. Women in the cannabis group were selected based on the results of a detection test. Primary outcomes were small for gestational age at birth (SGA), low birthweight and preterm birth. Secondary outcomes were other biometric parameters (neonatal length and head circumference), respiratory distress, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and breastfeeding at discharge. A second propensity score-matched analysis excluding other confounders (use of other recreational drugs and discontinuation of cannabis use during pregnancy) was performed. RESULTS: Antenatal cannabis was associated with a higher odds ratio of SGA (OR 3.60, 95% CI: 1.68-7.69), low birthweight (OR 3.94, 95% CI: 2.17-7.13), preterm birth at 37 weeks (OR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.12-3.84) and 32 weeks of gestation (OR 4.13, 95% CI: 1.06-16.11), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (OR 1.95, 95% CI: 1.03-3.71), respiratory distress (OR 2.77, 95% CI: 1.26-6.34), and lower breastfeeding rates at discharge (OR 0.10, 95% CI: 0.05-0.18). When excluding other confounders, no significant association between antenatal cannabis use and SGA was found. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal cannabis use increases the risk of SGA, low birthweight, preterm birth and other adverse perinatal outcomes. However, when isolating the impact of cannabis use by excluding women who use other recreational drugs and those who discontinue cannabis during pregnancy, no significant association between antenatal cannabis use and SGA birth was found.


Subject(s)
Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth , Propensity Score , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Adult , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Cannabis/adverse effects , Infant, Low Birth Weight
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 2023 Nov 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38036166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Miscarriage and preterm birth are leading causes of loss and disability in monochorionic twins after laser treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the use of cervical pessary to reduce preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies after fetal surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: In this open-label multicenter randomized trial, pregnant women carrying monochorionic diamniotic twins requiring fetoscopic laser coagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to pessary placement or conservative management. The primary outcome was birth before 32 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were birth before 28, 30, 34, or 37 weeks of gestation; preterm premature rupture of membranes; fetal and neonatal survival; and a composite of maternal and neonatal complications. The estimated sample size was 364 patients, with 182 cases in each arm of the study. The analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Moreover, 2 interim analyses were planned. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely after the first planned interim analysis for futility. Overall, 137 women were included in the analysis, 67 in the pessary group and 70 in the conservative management group. Preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation occurred in 27 of 67 women (40.3%) in the pessary group and in 25 of 70 women (35.7%) in the conservative management group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-2.47; P=.63). No differences between groups was observed in the rate of deliveries before 28, 30, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation. Overall survival to delivery was 91.2% (125/137) for at least 1 twin, and 70.8% (97/137) for both twins, with no difference between groups. Neonatal survival at 30 days was 76.5% (208/272). There was no difference between the groups in maternal or neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: In monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies requiring fetal therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome, routine use of cervical pessary did not reduce the rate of preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation.

10.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 102(7): 883-890, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37194337

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of the study was to identify risk factors associated with fetal or neonatal loss, neonatal morbidity, and the need for surgery in fetuses diagnosed with an abdominal cyst. The secondary aim was to compare the characteristics of the cyst according to trimester at diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an observational retrospective study performed at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. The study included pregnant women aged 18 years or older with diagnosis of a fetal abdominal cyst from 2008 to 2021. RESULTS: A total of 82 women with a median gestational age of 31+1 weeks (12+0-39+4) were included in the analysis. Seven (8.5%) cases were diagnosed in the first trimester, 28 (34.1%) in the second trimester, and 47 (57.3%) in the third trimester. Fetal or neonatal loss occurred in 10 (12.2%) cases; significant predictors were diagnosis in the first trimester (OR 36.67, 95% CI: 4.89-274.79), male gender (OR 4.75, 95% CI: 1.13-19.9), and associated abnormalities (OR 15.2, 95% CI: 2.92-79.19). A total of 10 of 75 (13.3%) neonates showed at least one neonatal complication, and the only predictor was occurrence of associated abnormalities (OR 7.36, 95% CI: 1.78-30.51). A total of 16 of 75 (21.3%) neonates required postnatal surgery, and the predictors were second-trimester diagnosis (OR 3.92, 95% CI: 1.23-12.51), associated abnormalities (OR 3.81, 95% CI: 1.15-12.64), and bowel location (OR 10.0, 95% CI: 1.48-67.55). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with adverse outcomes in fetuses diagnosed with abdominal cysts are first-trimester diagnosis and associated abnormalities. Cysts detected in the second trimester and those of intestinal origin are more likely to require surgery.


Subject(s)
Cysts , Pregnancy Outcome , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Cysts/diagnosis , Cysts/epidemiology , Cysts/surgery , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL