Is Prophylactic Splenectomy Necessary for Proximal Advanced Gastric Cancer Invading the Greater Curvature with Clinically Negative Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Metastasis? A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study (YCOG2003).

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic splenectomy for hilar lymph node (#10) dissection has shown no survival benefit for patients with proximal advanced gastric cancer that does not invade the greater curvature. However, the survival benefit of prophylactic splenectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer invading the greater curvature side, particularly for clinically negative #10 lymph node metastasis (#10[-]) cases remains controversial. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective study enrolled 146 consecutive patients with proximal advanced gastric cancers invading the greater curvature side with clinical #10(-) who underwent R0 total gastrectomy. For 33 of these patients, splenectomy was performed, and the remaining 113 underwent spleen-preservation gastrectomy. Short- and long-term results were compared between the splenectomy and spleen-preservation groups, with the incidence of #10 metastasis in the splenectomy group and recurrence in the spleen-preservation group compared. RESULTS: In the splenectomy group, longer operative time, greater blood loss, more frequent postoperative abdominal infection, and longer hospital stay were observed than in the spleen-preservation group. The two groups exhibited no differences in median relapse-free survival time (31.1 vs 59.8 months; P = 0.684) or median overall survival time (64.9 vs 65.1 months; P = 0.765). The pathologic #10 lymph node metastasis rate was 3% in the splenectomy group, and the #10 lymph node recurrence rate was 2.7% in the spleen-preservation group. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic splenectomy showed more frequent postoperative morbidities and a longer hospital stay than spleen preservation, without any long-term survival benefits.

Is Routine Prophylactic Cholecystectomy Necessary During Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer?

BACKGROUND: Performing routine prophylactic cholecystectomy during gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients has been controversial. The frequency of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and cholangitis after gastrectomy has not been reported for large patient populations, so we carried out this retrospective study to aid the assessment of the necessity for prophylactic cholecystectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 969 patients with gastric cancer who underwent distal gastrectomies with Billroth I reconstructions (DG) or total gastrectomies with Roux-en-Y reconstructions (TG), preserving the gallbladder, between January 2000 and May 2012. Risk factors for cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and cholangitis after gastrectomy were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up period after gastrectomy was 48 months (range 12-159 months). After gastrectomy, cholelithiasis occurred in 6.1% (59/969) patients and cholecystitis and/or cholangitis occurred in 1.2% (12/969) patients. The method used for gastrectomy was an independent risk factor for both cholelithiasis (TG/DG: OR (95%CI): 1.900 (1.114-3.240), p = 0.018) and cholecystitis and/or cholangitis (TG/DG: OR (95%CI): 8.325 (1.814-38.197), p = 0.006). In patients who developed cholelithiasis, the incidence of cholecystitis and/or cholangitis was 31.3% (10/32) after TG, but only 7.4% after DG. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic cholecystectomy may be unnecessary in distal gastrectomy with Billroth I reconstruction.

Surgical advantages of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although a few studies have reported the use of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (RPG) in gastric cancer patients, the feasibility of routinely using this technique remains unclear. It is therefore important to evaluate the surgical advantages of this technique in this patient group. METHODS: Between August 2010 and July 2015, 165 patients underwent RPGs at our hospital, performed by a single surgeon. Of these patients, 88 underwent reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RPLDG) and 77 underwent reduced-port laparoscopic total gastrectomy (RPLTG). In addition to short-term surgical outcomes after RPG, survival times and the surgical learning curve were also evaluated. RESULTS: Blood losses during lymph node dissection in the RPLDG and RPLTG groups were not significantly different (p = 0.160). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in only two patients. Postoperative morbidities were observed in 14.8 % of the RPLDG group and 14.3 % of the RPLTG group, but there were no deaths. Most patients expressed high cosmetic satisfaction in both groups. In the RPLDG group, operation time during reconstruction decreased over the first 50 cases and then plateaued, as the surgeon's experience of the technique increased. In contrast, in the RPLTG group, operation times dropped with surgical experience for both lymph node dissection, plateauing after 40 cases, and for reconstruction, plateauing after 30 cases. Only three patients died of gastric cancer in the follow-up period and three patients died of other diseases. Five-year overall survival and 5-year disease-specific survival were 95.6 and 98.0 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that reduced-port gastrectomy (RPG) could be an acceptable and satisfactory procedure for treating gastric cancer for an experienced laparoscopic gastric surgeon who has sufficient previous experience of conventional laparoscopic gastrectomies.

Impact of S-1 plus Cisplatin Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Scirrhous Gastric Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to address the therapeutic outcome for scirrhous gastric cancer patients by evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to gastrectomy. METHODS: Two cycles of a 3-week regimen of fluoropyrimidine S-1 (40 mg/m(2), orally, twice daily), together with cisplatin (60 mg/m(2), intravenously, day 8), were administered to patients, separated by a 2-week rest period. Surgery was performed 3 weeks later in the neoadjuvant group (n = 27). We retrospectively evaluated overall survival and prognostic factors in these patients. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that positive lavage cytology indicated significantly worse prognoses. In the 15 patients who also underwent curative gastrectomies after S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy, the pathological response grade was a significant prognostic factor for 5-year survival. Additionally, lymph node metastasis tended to be an adverse prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: After S-1 plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a grade 2-3 pathological response may predict favorable outcomes in scirrhous gastric cancer patients receiving curative gastrectomy, but further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Thrombomodulin improves rat survival after extensive hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM) protects against disseminated intravascular coagulopathy by inhibiting coagulation, inflammation, and apoptosis. This study tests the hypothesis that rTM is hepatoprotective after extensive hepatectomy (Hx) and investigates the mechanisms underlying this effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiment 1: rats (15 per group) were injected with rTM (1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg) or saline just before 95% Hx and their 7-d survival assessed. Experiment 2: rats were assigned to either a treated (2.0 mg/kg rTM just before Hx) or control group (n = 5 per group). Five rats per group were euthanized immediately after surgery, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; serum and liver remnant samples were collected for biochemical and histologic analysis, as well as reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. RESULTS: All saline-injected rats died within 52 h of Hx, whereas injection of 2.0 mg/kg rTM prolonged survival (P = 0.003). rTM increased the number of Ki67-positive cells and reduced the number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling-positive cells. The number of myeloperoxidase-positive cells and the expression of high-mobility group box 1 protein did not differ. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed that rTM significantly enhanced protease-activated receptor-1 and sphingosine kinase 1 messenger RNA expression and significantly reduced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and Bax messenger RNA expression. Immunohistochemistry and Western blotting demonstrated that protease-activated receptor-1 expression 24 h after Hx was significantly higher in rTM-treated than in control rats. CONCLUSIONS: rTM may improve survival after extensive Hx by inhibiting apoptosis and promoting liver regeneration.

Application of reduced-port laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer preserving the pancreas and spleen.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of using reduced-port laparoscopic total gastrectomy (RPLTG) for the treatment of gastric cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to address the potentially important advantages of this surgical technique. METHODS: Between April 2002 and February 2014, 90 patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomies, performed by a single surgeon. Of these, 45 patients underwent RPLTG and 45 patients underwent conventional laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (CLATG). Short-term outcomes were compared to evaluate the feasibility of RPLTG for gastric cancer. RESULTS: There were several significant differences between the RPLTG and CLATG groups in short-term outcomes: the mean total operation durations were significantly longer in the RPLTG group (319.0 min) than in the CLATG group (259.0 min). However, the mean volume of blood loss, the degree of lymph node dissection, and the number of dissected lymph nodes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that RPLTG could be an acceptable and satisfactory procedure for the treatment of gastric cancer requiring total gastrectomy for surgeons sufficiently experienced in CLATG.

A systematic review of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) has been performed since 1999. Although surgical outcomes have been reported from Japan, Korea, China, and many Western countries, the effectiveness of this technique has not been conclusively established. This study therefore aimed to review the literature systematically. METHODS: Our search of the research literature identified 150 studies, which were mostly retrospective and from single institutions. RESULTS: There has recently been a remarkable increase in the number of studies from Korea, and the number of patients included in studies has increased since 2009. In most studies, the surgical procedures were longer, blood loss was reduced, and the number of retrieved lymph nodes was the same in the LTG group as in the open total gastrectomy group. The incidence of postoperative complications and that of inflammation during postoperative recovery were the same in these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: During LTG, the method used for esophagojejunostomy is important for surgical reliability and to reduce postoperative complications. There has been rapid development of new techniques from the level of esophagojejunostomy through a small skin incision to the high level of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using various techniques. A nationwide prospective phase II study is urgently needed to establish the value of LTG.

Implications of BMI for the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer among the Japanese Population.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of body mass index (BMI) on the surgical outcomes in gastric cancer patients still remains controversial. METHODS: The subjects included 427 patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2001 and December 2005. The patients were principally divided into 3 groups on the basis of BMI: low (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (≥18.5-<25.0 kg/m2) and high (≥25.0 kg/m2). RESULTS: The low-BMI patients had more advanced disease than the other patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics of the normal- and high-BMI patients. The operation time was longer in the high-BMI group, but there were no differences in terms of lymph node dissection and postoperative complications among these 3 groups. The overall survival and disease-specific survival of the low-BMI group were worse than the other 2 groups. These survival rates of high-BMI group tended to be better than those of the normal BMI group; however, it was not statistically different. A multivariate analysis of these survival rate showed that a low BMI was an independent predictor of a poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: A low-BMI was an independent factor of poor prognosis for overall and disease-specific survivals after surgery in Japanese patients with gastric cancer. A high-BMI was not a risk factor.

Serum Type IV Collagen Concentration Correlates with Indocyanine Green Retention Rate and is an Indicator Of Hepatotoxicity In Patients Receiving FOLFOX for Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of oxaliplatin-associated hepatotoxicity in patients receiving oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin chemotherapy (FOLFOX) for colorectal cancer remains controversial. The aims of this study were to clarify which variables are indicators of such hepatotoxicity. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-seven patients who were to receive FOLFOX for colorectal cancer were included in this study. A range of liver function tests, including serum hyaluronic acid (HA) and type IV collagen concentrations, indocyanine green (ICG) retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) and splenic volume were assessed before commencement of chemotherapy and after four cycles of FOLFOX. RESULTS: No significant changes were found in conventional liver function tests or splenic volume. Significant changes pre- and post-FOLFOX were found in type IV collagen concentrations and ICGR15. Correlation analyses showed that the following two factors were associated with significant changes in ICGR15 after four cycles of FOLFOX: platelet count (p = 0.028, correlation coefficient 0.423), and type IV collagen concentration (p < 0.001, correlation coefficient 0.830). The regression line between type IV collagen concentration and ICGR15 was Y = 2.70 + 0.84 x X. CONCLUSION: Serum type IV collagen concentration is an indicator of oxaliplatin-associated hepatotoxicity and correlates with significant changes in ICGR15 in patients receiving FOLFOX.

Serum Type IV Collagen Concentration Correlates with Indocyanine Green Retention Rate.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Assessment of oxaliplatin-associated hepatotoxicity in patients receiving oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin chemotherapy (FOLFOX) for colorectal cancer remains controversial. The aims of this study were to clarify which variables are indicators of such hepatotoxicity. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-seven patients who were to receive FOLFOX for colorectal cancer were included in this study. A range of liver function tests, including serum hyaluronic acid (HA) and type IV collagen concentrations, indocyanine green (ICG) retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) and splenic volume were assessed before commencement of chemotherapy and after four cycles of FOLFOX. RESULTS: No significant changes were found in conventional liver function tests or splenic volume. Significant changes pre- and post-FOLFOX were found in type IV collagen concentrations and ICGR15. Correlation analyses showed that the following two factors were associated with significant changes in ICGR15 after four cycles of FOLFOX: platelet count (p = 0.028, correlation coefficient 0.423), and type IV collagen concentration (p < 0.001, correlation coefficient 0.830). The regression line between type IV collagen concentration and ICGR15 was Y = 2.70 + 0.84 x X. CONCLUSION: Serum type IV collagen concentration is an indicator of oxaliplatin-associated hepatotoxicity and correlates with significant changes in ICGR15 in patients receiving FOLFOX.

[Clinical Experience of Nutritional Support in Patients Treated with Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer].

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of nutritional support in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). METHODS: Eleven patients treated with CRT for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were included. Oral intake energy expenditure (OIE) and total energy expenditure (TEE) of all patients were calculated. Oral nutrition supplementations (ONSs) were utilized as nutritional therapy for the patients with malnutrition (OIE/TEE<0.6). Enteral nutrition (EN) was used in the patients with tumor obstruction. RESULT: Two patients (18.9%) received ONS and 2 other patients received EN. Seven patients were able to take enough energy in the meal. The mean energy charge was increased from 67.9%to 84.9%. Nine patients (81.8%) completed the treatment regimen. During the CRT period, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and C-reactive protein level (mg/dL) were not significantly different. The body mass index decreased to 0.39 kg/m2 (p=0.039) and the mean weight loss was 1.57%. The overall response rate was 81.8%. CONCLUSION: The nutritional support in the patients treated with CRT for LAEC is effective for maintaining nutritional status. Moreover, the response rate is satisfactory.

[A Case of Advanced Gastric Cancer Responding to Neoadjuvant Docetaxel/CDDP/S-1 Therapy with Metallic Stent Placement, Leading to Curative Surgery].

A 59-year-old man presented with epigastralgia. A diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer MLU, Circ, Type 3, 160 mm, tub2, cT4b (SI: panc), cN1, cM0, cH0, cP0, cCY0, cStage ⅢB was made. Because of difficulty with oral intake due to malignant outlet obstruction and tumor bleeding, endoscopic self-expanding metallic stent placement was performed. We administered chemotherapy involving docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1(DCS). After 2 courses of chemotherapy, the primary lesion and regional lymph nodes had reduced in size. His response was judged as SD according to the RECIST criteria. The patient elected to undergo explorative laparotomy for assessment of the gastric cancer. The intraoperative findings showed that there was no pancreatic invasion, peritoneal dissemination, or distal metastasis, so a total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection was performed. The pathological findings showed that there were very few cancer cells in the primary lesion, and a lymph node metastasis was found. The final stage was gastric cancer MLU, Circ, Type 3, 100 mm, muc, ypT4a(SE), ypN3a (13/51), ypM0, ypH0, ypP0, ypCY0, ypStage ⅢC. The therapy evaluation was Grade 1b. In summary, we encountered a patient with gastric cancer in whom curative surgery was made possible by undergoing chemotherapy and metallic stent placement.

[A Case of Resected Gastric Cancer Invading the Esophagus with Esophageal Recurrence That Responded to Weekly Docetaxel／Cisplatin Chemotherapy].

A 77-year-old man underwent total gastrectomy with D1+ lymph node dissection after being diagnosed with cT4aN2M0, cStage ⅢB gastric cancer. Peritoneal dissemination was detected in the bursa omentalis. The pathological diagnosis after surgery was pT4aN3b (21/41) M1 (P1). He was treated with 6 courses of S-1 chemotherapy. Two years after surgery, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed the presence of a tumor in the mid-thoracic esophagus. It was diagnosed to as metastatic esophageal cancer and treated with combination chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (25 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) in a 28-day cycle. A clinically complete response was observed after 5 courses of chemotherapy. Currently, the patient is alive with no signs of recurrence 12 months after the initial recurrence.

Postoperative surveillance and prognostic factors in patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Here we investigated postoperative prognostic factors and surveillance in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODOLOGY Prognostic factors were evaluated at several different postoperative stages in 257 patients with curative (R0) esophagectomy. Cause of death and pattern of tumor recurrence were also analyzed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the distribution of cause of death according to the time after surgery (p<0.001). The pattern of recurrence also differed according to the time after surgery, although this was not statistically significant. A Cox proportional regression hazard model for disease-specific survival revealed that Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage was an independent prognostic factor only from the time of initial surgery until the third postoperative year, and no postoperative prognostic factors were detected after the fourth and fifth years. There were significant differences in disease-specific survival among pathological TNM stages between the time of initial surgery and postoperative year five, but not between stages I and II at postoperative years two, three, or four. There were no significant differences between the stages at postoperative year five. Relapse-free survival differed between stages II and III at postoperative year five, although the other results were similar to those for disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors for esophageal cancer alter during the postoperative period. Although the pathological stage at the time of initial surgery has less prognostic power after 3 years, it remains important to monitor treatments for esophageal cancer continuously, as well as concomitant diseases and other malignancies.

[A case of locally advanced gastric cancer in which the patient underwent curative gastrectomy after treatment with systemic chemotherapy with bi-weekly s-1/docetaxel].

Here, we report the case of a patient with advanced gastric cancer complicated by pyloric stenosis and direct invasion into the pancreas who underwent curative resection after bi-weekly S-1/docetaxel(DS)therapy after gastrojejunostomy. A 73-year-old man consulted a general practitioner because of indigestibility, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy indicated gastric cancer. He was referred to our hospital. Gastric cancer, whole stomach tumor(LMU), 150×80 mm, Type 3, T4a(SE), N2, M0, stage III B was diagnosed, and surgery was performed. The tumor was seen to directly invade the pancreas and the middle colic artery intraoperatively, so only a gastrojejunostomy was performed. After the operation, the patient was treated with DS therapy for 13 courses, and the response was defined as non-complete response(CR)and non-progressive disease (PD). During the second laparotomy, a curative operation was performed via distal gastrectomy because frozen-section diagnosis revealed that no cancer cells were present at the oral margin. Postoperatively, the tumor was diagnosed as LM, 10× 7 mm, 10×2.5 mm, pType 4, pT2(MP), pN0, pM0, CY0, stage I B. The patient is now receiving S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy and is still alive 2 years and 4 months after the first operation.

Long-term Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin and S-1 for Stage III Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In the previous phase I/II study, we established neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using bi-weekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) for clinical stage III gastric cancer. This study aimed to clarify long-term outcomes of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors for RFS and OS were identified by univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. The 5-year RFS and OS rates were 69.8% and 74.3%, respectively, in all registered patients. Moreover, the 5-year OS and RFS rates in patients receiving R0 gastrectomy were 68.0% and 79.4%, respectively. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) before NAC ≥2.41, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) before NAC ≤50.4, Glasgow prognostic score before NAC classification 2, NLR after NAC ≥1.43, PNI after NAC <48.0, and Grade 1a/1b pathological response significantly worsened RFS. NLR after NAC ≥1.43, PNI before NAC ≤50.4, NLR after NAC ≥1.43, and body weight loss >5 kg after NAC significantly worsened OS. CONCLUSION: Although bi-weekly DCS therapy as neoadjuvant setting showed acceptable long-term outcomes, poor immune-nutritional status before and after NAC caused worse long-term survival in stage III gastric cancer patients. It is warranted to conduct a well-designed prospective randomized control study to compare long-term outcomes using the bi-weekly DCS regimen between patients with and without immune-nutritional support during peri-NAC.

Inflammation-based prognostic score predicts survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving biweekly docetaxel and s-1 combination chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine the prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), an inflammation-based prognostic score composed of C-reactive protein and albumin, for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: A total of 83 advanced gastric cancer patients receiving biweekly docetaxel/S-1 treatment (DS) were included in the study. To identify the value of GPS as prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Unresectable tumors were observed in 78 patients and recurrent tumors were detected in 5 patients. Of these, 12 patients underwent gastrectomy. There were significant correlations between the GPS and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Univariate analysis revealed that the GPS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and gastrectomy after DS treatment significantly affected prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that the GPS, age and gastrectomy independently influenced DSS, and that the GPS and gastrectomy also influenced PFS. Multivariate analysis restricted to patients without gastrectomy showed that the GPS and age independently affected DSS, and that the GPS influenced PFS. CONCLUSION: In the low GPS group, it may be possible to obtain favorable outcomes by chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients. However, a well-designed prospective trial in a large patient cohort is required to corroborate the prognostic value of the GPS.

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify the technical feasibility and oncological efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for gastric cancer compared with open gastrectomy (OG). METHODS: Between April 2002 and March 2008, a series of 623 patients with gastric cancer underwent R0 gastrectomy (314 LAG patients and 309 OG patients). Age, gender, lymph node dissection, and pathological stage were matched by propensity scoring, and 212 patients (106 LAG and 106 OG) were selected for analysis after the exclusion of 40 patients who had proximal gastrectomy. Intraoperative factors, postoperative morbidity, long-term quality of life (QOL), and survival were evaluated. Moreover, these outcomes were also compared between the laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) and the open total gastrectomy (OTG). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative characteristics between the two patient groups. Regarding intraoperative characteristics, blood loss was significantly lower in the LAG group (143 ml) than in the OG group (288 ml), while operation time was significantly longer in the LAG group (273 min) than the OG group (231 min). The degree of lymph node dissection and number of retrieved lymph nodes did not differ between the two groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative courses or overall and disease-specific survival (89.8% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.0886; 100% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.1073) except time to first flatus and time to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory derivatives between the two groups. Significantly fewer patients felt wound pain in the LAG group 1 year after surgery. Analyses between the LATG and OTG groups showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: LAG for gastric cancer may be both feasible and safe. However, it will be necessary to conduct a well-designed randomized controlled trial comparing short-term and long-term outcomes between LAG and OG in a larger number of patients.

Relevance of reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Single-port and reduced-port laparoscopic surgeries are performed as a less invasive form of surgery than conventional laparoscopy. In this study, short-term patient outcomes were compared between reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RPLDG) and conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) to evaluate the feasibility of RPLDG for gastric cancer. METHODS: Between August 2010 and July 2011, 38 patients underwent LADGs that were performed by a single surgeon. Of these, 20 patients underwent RPLDG, and 18 patients underwent conventional LADG. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Surgical procedures, total operation time (278.8 versus 228.7 min, p = 0.0002) and time for lymph node dissection (181.3 versus 136.3 min, p = 0.0001) were significantly longer in the RPLDG group compared with the LADG group, while the volume of blood loss during reconstruction was reduced (17.5 versus 49.6 ml, p = 0.0019). Cosmetic satisfaction in the RPLDG group showed significant superiority over that in the conventional LADG group (p = 0.0252). CONCLUSION: RPLDG was shown to be an acceptable and satisfactory procedure for the treatment of gastric cancer. To confirm the feasibility of this surgical procedure, it is necessary to conduct a well-designed randomized controlled study comparing RPLDG and conventional LADG in many patients.