Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 160(10): 1891-1898, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30039290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical approaches still provide limited exposure. Access to the L2-L5 intervertebral discs during a single procedure is challenging and often requires repositioning of the patient and adopting an alternative approach. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the windows to the L2-L5 intervertebral discs to assess the dimensions of the interbody implants suitable for the procedure and evaluate the feasibility of multi-level lumbar intervertebral disc surgery in robot-assisted surgery (RAS) METHODS: Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens underwent a retroperitoneal approach to access the L2-L5 intervertebral discs. The L2-L3 to L4-L5 windows were defined as the distance between the left lateral border of the aorta (or nearest common iliac vessel) and the medial border of the psoas, measured in a static state and after gentle medial retraction of the vascular structures. Two living porcine specimens and one cadaveric specimen underwent da Vinci robot-assisted transperitoneal approach to expose the L2-L3 to L4-L5 intervertebral discs and perform multi-level discectomy and interbody implant placement. RESULTS: The L2-L3 to L4-L5 intervertebral disc windows significantly increased from a static to a retracted state (p < 0.05). The mean L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 windows measured respectively 20.1, 21.6, and 19.6 mm in the static state, and 27.2, 30.9, and 30.3 mm after gentle vascular retraction. The intervertebral windows from L2-L3 to L4-L5 were successfully exposed through an anterior transperitoneal approach with the da Vinci robot on the cadaveric and living porcine specimens, and interbody implants were inserted. CONCLUSION: RAS appears to be feasible for a mini-invasive multi-level lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. The RAS procedure, longer and more expensive than conventional MIS approaches, should be reserved for elective patients.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy/methods , Intervertebral Disc/anatomy & histology , Lumbosacral Region/anatomy & histology , Robotics/methods , Spinal Fusion/methods , Animals , Humans , Intervertebral Disc/surgery , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL