Folate Receptor Immunohistochemical Staining and Gynecologic Tumors: Initial Experience With 216 Cases.

Folate receptor alpha has been shown to have possible mechanisms of tumorigenesis in malignancies, becoming a potential target for therapy. Mirvetuximab soravtansine is an antifolate receptor alpha monoclonal antibody, with an approved FOLR1-2.1 immunohistochemical biomarker. After IRB approval, a retrospective review of gynecologic pathology cases was performed to identify cases in which FOLR1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed at our institution over a period of 9 months as part of clinical care for therapy eligibility. Clinical data collected included patients' age, tumor histotype, tumor grade, primary tumor site, FIGO stage, dates of recurrence/progression, and use of mirvetuximab therapy. FOLR1 IHC data were recorded, including the date specimen obtained, date IHC was performed, site tested, case type, percentage tumor staining, and intensity. Cases were deemed positive or negative according to current recommendations (75%, 2-3+intensity). Two hundred sixteen cases were identified. Patient ages ranged from 25 to 83 years old (median: 59 yr). Staining intensity was reported as 0 in 15 (6.9%) cases, weak (1+) in 8 (3.7%), moderate (2+) in 27 (12.5%), strong (3+) in 27 (12.5%), weak-to-moderate (1-2+) in 15 (6.9%), and moderate-to-strong (2-3+) in 99 (45.8%); intensity was not provided in 25 (11.6%). Percentage of tumor staining ranged from 0 to 100, with a median of 60. The IHC was overall deemed positive in 98 (45.4%) cases and negative in 118 (54.6%). By histotype, 5 of 17 (29.4%) low-grade serous carcinomas, 88 of 162 (54.3%) high-grade serous carcinomas, 3 of 5 (60%) of carcinosarcomas, and 2 of 6 (33.3%) of mixed carcinomas were positive. No case of clear cell CA, endometrioid CA, Mullerian CA NOS, serous borderline, mucinous CA, or granulosa cell tumor was positive. The primary site of disease was tubo-ovarian in 192 (88.9%) cases, peritoneal in 8 (3.7%) cases, uterine in 3 (1.4%) cases, and unknown in 13 (6%) cases. By site on which immunohistochemical stain was performed: primary site positive in 53 of 96 (55.2%) cases, metastatic site at time of diagnosis/debulking positive in 23 of 41 (52.1%) cases, and metastatic/recurrent cases positive in 22 of 79 (27.8%) cases. There was a statistically significant correlation when comparing the positivity rates between these sites (P = 0.0004). Survival data were examined with high-grade serous carcinoma, with no statistically significant difference between positive and negative cases in overall survival (P = 0.622) or progression-free survival (P = 0.711). Biopsy specimens were positive in 17 (25%) cases, while negative in 51 (75%), whereas resection specimens were positive in 81 (54.7%) and negative in 67 (45.3%), a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). Cases that were <19 months old had 38 (36.2%) positive and 67 (63.8%) negative, compared with cases ≥19 months old that had 60 (54.1%) positive and 51 (45.9%) negative, a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0084). Significant differences in FOLR1 staining were noted between histotypes, age of the specimen, type of case tested, and site of disease tested. Further testing is needed to help determine the best tissue to be utilized for this new biomarker.

SOX17: A Highly Sensitive and Specific Immunomarker for Ovarian and Endometrial Carcinomas.

PAX8 is the most commonly used immunomarker to link a carcinoma to the gynecologic tract; however, it lacks specificity. Through mining The Cancer Genome Atlas mRNA expression profile data, we identified SOX17 as a potential specific marker at the mRNA level for gynecologic tumors. To evaluate the utility of this marker in the identification of the gynecologic origin of a given carcinoma, we performed immunochemical staining in a large cohort of ovarian and endometrial cancer cases (n = 416), together with a large cohort of solid tumors from other organs (n = 1544) in tissue microarrays. Similar to PAX8, SOX17 was highly expressed in different subtypes of ovarian carcinoma (97.5% for SOX17 vs 97% for PAX8 in serous carcinoma, 90% vs 90% in endometrioid carcinoma, and 100% vs 100% in clear cell carcinoma), except for mucinous carcinoma (0% vs 27%), and was also highly expressed in different subtypes of endometrial carcinoma (88% vs 84% in endometrioid carcinoma, 100% vs 100% in serous and clear cell carcinoma). SOX17 was not expressed in thyroid and renal cell carcinomas, whereas PAX8 expression was high (86% and 85%, respectively). In addition, SOX17 was expressed at low levels in cervical adenocarcinoma (20%) and had no expression in cervical squamous carcinoma, mesothelioma, and carcinomas from the breast, lung, pancreas, colon, stomach, liver, bladder, and salivary gland. Our data indicate that SOX17 is not only a sensitive but also a specific marker for the origin of ovarian and endometrial carcinomas.

Peritoneal Mesothelioma-An Update.

A remarkable amount of new information has been generated on peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM), ranging from nomenclature changes, including the removal of "malignant" when referring to this neoplasm and the use of the term "tumor" rather than "mesothelioma" to designate the neoplasm formerly known as "well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma", to the acknowledgment that PeMs can be associated with tumor predisposition syndromes or germline mutations. Although the disease is still more frequently seen in caucasian males, PeM is not uncommon in women. In addition, it can represent a diagnostic challenge when it has an uncommon presentation (ie, paraneoplastic syndrome or incidental finding) or when it has confounding histologic features. Ancillary testing, including immunohistochemical stains, in situ hybridization for CDKN2A or NF2 , and molecular studies, in selected cases, allows its correct diagnosis. The molecular landscape of PeM is still a work in progress; however, some findings, such as ALK gene rearrangements and EWSR1/FUS-ATF1 fusions, are specifically seen in PeM of young patients. The biological behavior of PeM is variable; however, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have markedly improved the survival of patients affected by this disease.

Integrated multi-omic analysis of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma collected from short and long-term survivors.

BACKGROUND: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare disease that occurs more frequently in younger women than those with high-grade disease. The current treatment is suboptimal and a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of this disease is required. In this study, we compared the proteogenomic analyses of LGSOCs from short- and long-term survivors (defined as < 40 and > 60 months, respectively). Our goal was to identify novel mutations, proteins, and mRNA transcripts that are dysregulated in LGSOC, particularly in short-term survivors. METHODS: Initially, targeted sequencing of 409 cancer-related genes was performed on 22 LGSOC and 6 serous borderline ovarian tumor samples. Subsequently, whole-genome sequencing analysis was performed on 14 LGSOC samples (7 long-term survivors and 7 short-term survivors) with matched normal tissue samples. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), quantitative proteomics, and phosphoproteomic analyses were also performed. RESULTS: We identified single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) (range: 5688-14,833 per sample), insertion and deletion variants (indels) (range: 880-1065), and regions with copy number variants (CNVs) (range: 62-335) among the 14 LGSOC samples. Among all SNVs and indels, 2637 mutation sites were found in the exonic regions. The allele frequencies of the detected variants were low (median12%). The identified recurrent nonsynonymous missense mutations included KRAS, NRAS, EIF1AX, UBR5, and DNM3 mutations. Mutations in DNM3 and UBR5 have not previously been reported in LGSOC. For the two samples, somatic DNM3 nonsynonymous missense mutations in the exonic region were validated using Sanger sequencing. The third sample contained two missense mutations in the intronic region of DNM3, leading to a frameshift mutation detected in RNA transcripts in the RNA-seq data. Among the 14 LGSOC samples, 7754 proteins and 9733 phosphosites were detected by global proteomic analysis. Some of these proteins and signaling pathways, such as BST1, TBXAS1, MPEG1, HBA1, and phosphorylated ASAP1, are potential therapeutic targets. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use whole-genome sequencing to detect somatic mutations in LGSOCs with matched normal tissues. We detected and validated novel mutations in DNM3, which were present in 3 of the 14 samples analyzed. Additionally, we identified novel indels, regions with CNVs, dysregulated mRNA, dysregulated proteins, and phosphosites that are more prevalent in short-term survivors. This integrated proteogenomic analysis can guide research into the pathogenesis and treatment of LGSOC.

Contemporary primary treatment of women with stage II-IV low-grade serous ovarian/peritoneal cancer (LGSOC): Determinants of relapse and disease-free survival.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to describe a cohort who received contemporary primary treatment for stage II-IV low-grade serous ovarian/peritoneal cancer (LGSOC), including patient characteristics and determinants of relapse and disease-free survival. METHODS: The study included 99 patients: 1) with pathologically confirmed stage II-IV LGSOC of the ovary or peritoneum, 2) who underwent primary treatment consisting of cytoreductive surgery and either a) platinum/taxane chemotherapy followed by aromatase inhibitor maintenance therapy or b) aromatase inhibitor monotherapy, and 3) for whom there was availability of clinical data. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize clinicodemographic features. Subgroups were compared for PFS and OS. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Median PFS for the entire cohort was 56.8 months (95% CI, 41.3-NE), and median OS was 130.7 months (95% CI, 115.0-146.4). Forty-nine of 99 (49.5%) patients have relapsed to date. For these 49 patients, median time from diagnosis to relapse was 29.6 months (95% CI, 24.6-33.1) (range, 5.4-69.1 months). Only 1/49 (2%) patients who relapsed did so >5 years from diagnosis. Fifty (50.0%) patients have not experienced disease progression or relapse. Median follow-up time for these 50 patients is 86.2 months (range, 25.3-169.0). Thirty-three of the 50 (66.0%) have been followed for >5 years from diagnosis. On regression analyses, factors associated with improved patient outcomes-either PFS, OS, or both-included no gross residual disease, normal serum CA 125 at diagnosis, primary peritoneal site, and presence of extensive psammomatous calcifications. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to describe the clinicopathologic features and outcomes of women with stage II-IV LGSOC who received contemporary primary therapy.

The genomic landscape of low-grade serous ovarian/peritoneal carcinoma and its impact on clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare epithelial ovarian/peritoneal cancer characterized by younger age at diagnosis, relative chemoresistance, prolonged overall survival (OS), and mutations in the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway compared to high-grade serous carcinoma. We describe the genomic profile of LGSOC by next generation sequencing (NGS) and evaluated its potential relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: The study included 215 women with LGSOC with: 1) pathologically confirmed LGSOC, 2) availability of NGS data, and 3) adequate clinical data. Clinical subgroups were compared for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 46.6 years. The majority had a stage III ovarian primary. One or more mutations were identified in 140 (65.1%) cases; 75 (34.9%) had none. The most common mutations were KRAS (n = 71; 33.0%), NRAS (n = 24; 11.2%), and BRAF (n = 18; 8.4%). Patients with MAPK-mutated tumors (n = 113) (52.6%) had a significantly longer OS compared to those with tumors lacking MAPK pathway mutations (n = 102) (47.4%) [median OS, 147.8 months (95% CI,119.0-176.6) versus 89.5 months (95% CI, 61.4-117.7) (p = 0.01)], respectively. Median OS for patients with MAPK-mutated tumors was also significantly better than for patients whose tumors had no mutations (n = 75) [median OS, 147.8 months (95% CI, 119.0-176.6) versus 78.0 months (95% CI, 57.6-98.3)], respectively (p = 0.001). Median OS for patients with non-MAPK-mutated tumors (n = 27) was 125.1 months (95% CI, 83.9-166.3). In multivariable analysis, having a MAPK mutation was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MAPK-mutated tumors have a significantly improved OS compared to those without MAPK-mutated tumors.

Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Associated With Endometriosis: A Clinicopathologic Study of 15 Cases.

Only a few cases of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) associated with endometriosis have been published; with chronic inflammation of the peritoneum associated with the latter being postulated as an inducing factor in the pathogenesis of this tumor. We assessed the clinicopathologic characteristics of MPeM associated with endometriosis to determine if there were other factors besides inflammation that may contribute to the pathogenesis in this patient population. Fifteen MPeM associated with endometriosis were retrieved from our files. Most presented with abdominal/pelvic pain, mass or distention; median age was 45 yr. Only 16% of patients had a history of asbestos exposure. In contrast, a third of the patients had a personal history of other neoplasms, and >80% had a family history of malignancies. Although most tumors had gross and microscopic features typical of MPeM, some had confounding features including "adhesion-like" appearance or gelatinous cysts/nodules, and signet ring cells. Tumors were epithelioid (9) and biphasic (6). MPeM was misdiagnosed as Müllerian carcinoma in 40% of cases. All patients (n=15) had cytoreductive surgery in addition to other therapies. Only 2/12 patients died of disease (17%). The 3- and 5-yr overall survival was 90%. MPeM associated with endometriosis tends to occur in patients with personal/familial history of malignancies, which may be a predisposing factor. In light of this finding, the role of endometriosis in the pathogenesis of MPeM is likely less relevant. The favorable outcome seen in these patients may be related to germline mutations or the hormonal milieu and needs further investigation.

Data Set for the Reporting of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

The move toward consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for cancer resection specimens has been a key development in supporting evidence-based patient management and consistent cancer staging. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) previously developed a data set for reporting of the ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas which was published in 2015. In this paper, we provide an update on this data set, as a second edition, that reflects changes in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours as well as some other minor modifications. The data set has been developed by a panel of internationally recognized expert pathologists and a clinician and consists of "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in surgical pathology reports, with detailed commentary to guide users, including references. This data set replaces the widely used first edition, and will facilitate consistent and accurate case reporting, data collection for quality assurance and research, and allow for comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations.

Immunohistochemical Loss of DPC4 in Tumors With Mucinous Differentiation Arising in or Involving the Gynecologic Tract.

DPC4 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is usually part of the work-up of mucinous neoplasms in the ovary where the distinction between an ovarian primary and metastatic pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (PanACa) must be made. Although DPC4 IHC is lost in about 55% (46%-61%) of PanACas and typically retained in most primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms, no study has evaluated the expression of this marker in a large cohort of neoplasms arising in or involving gynecologic (GYN) organs. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the expression of DPC4 IHC in a total of 251 tumors and lesions related to the GYN tract in which DPC4 IHC stain was performed during the initial pathology evaluation. Of these, 138 were primary GYN tumors and lesions, 31 were metastatic GYN tumors involving non-GYN sites, and 83 were metastatic non-GYN tumors involving the GYN tract. We identified 27 cases with loss of DPC4 IHC expression of which 20 cases met the inclusion criteria (i.e. clinical information was available to determine the site of tumor origin). We observed that loss of DPC4 nuclear expression was most commonly seen in tumors of endocervical origin (n=7), of which 5 were gastric-type cervical adenocarcinomas (GCxACa) and 2 were usual-type cervical adenocarcinomas, either primary or metastatic. This was followed by tumors of the pancreaticobiliary tract (n=5), ovary (n=2), and appendix (n=1). In addition, 1 gastric-type vaginal adenocarcinoma (GVaACa) also showed loss of DPC4. Our findings indicate that in female patients with mucinous neoplasms involving the ovary or other sites, with loss of DPC4 by IHC, and negative pancreaticobiliary imaging, the possibility of an occult GCx/GVaACa, and rarely an ovarian primary must be considered.

Endocervical Adenocarcinoma, Gross Examination, and Processing, Including Intraoperative Evaluation: Recommendations From the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

The International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP) Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Project aims to provide evidence-based guidance for the pathologic evaluation, classification, and reporting of endocervical adenocarcinoma. This review presents the recommendations pertaining to gross evaluation and intraoperative consultation of specimens obtained from patients in the setting of cervical cancer. The recommendations are the product of review of published peer-reviewed evidence, international guidelines and institutional grossing manuals, as well as deliberation within this working group. The discussion presented herein details the approach to the different specimen types encountered in practice: loop electrosurgical excision procedure, cone, trachelectomy, radical hysterectomy, pelvic exenteration, and lymphadenectomy specimens. Guidelines for intraoperative evaluation of trachelectomy and sentinel lymph node specimens are also addressed. Correlation with ISGyP recommendations on cancer staging, which appear as a separate review in this issue, is also included when appropriate. While conceived in the framework of endocervical adenocarcinoma, most of the discussion and recommendations can also be applied to other cervical malignancies.

The Silva Pattern-based Classification for HPV-associated Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinoma and the Distinction Between In Situ and Invasive Adenocarcinoma: Relevant Issues and Recommendations From the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

The Silva pattern-based classification for human papilloma virus-associated invasive adenocarcinoma has emerged as a reliable system to predict risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrences. Although not a part of any staging system yet, it has been incorporated in synoptic reports as established by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Moreover, the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines include this classification as an "emergent concept." In order to facilitate the understating and application of this new classification by all pathologists, the ISGyP Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Project Working Group presents herein all the current evidence on the Silva classification and aims to provide recommendations for its implementation in practice, including interpretation, reporting, and application to biopsy and resection specimens. In addition, this article addresses the distinction of human papilloma virus-associated adenocarcinoma in situ and gastric type adenocarcinoma in situ from their invasive counterparts.

Gynaecological malignancies and sentinel lymph node mapping: an update.

Assessment of pelvic, para-aortic or inguinal lymph nodes (LNs) provides not only important prognostic information, but also determines the need for adjuvant treatment. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has the potential to provide this prognostic information, while reducing morbidity compared with extended LN dissection. This review discusses the clinical and pathological aspects of SLN biopsy in gynaecological cancer.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: State of the science.

In January 2019, a group of basic, translational, and clinical investigators and patient advocates assembled in Miami, Florida, to discuss the current state of the science of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum-a rare ovarian cancer subtype that may arise de novo or following a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor. The purpose of the conference was to review current knowledge, discuss ongoing research by established researchers, and frame critical questions or issues for future directions. Following presentations and discussions, the primary objective was to initiate future collaborations, uniform database platforms, laboratory studies, and clinical trials to better understand this disease and to advance clinical care outside the boundaries of single academic institutions. This review summarizes the state of the science in five principal categories: epidemiology and patient outcomes, pathology, translational research, patient care and clinical trials, and patients' perspective.

Prophylactic Risk-reducing Hysterectomies and Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomies in Patients With Lynch Syndrome: A Clinicopathologic Study of 29 Cases and Review of the Literature.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased risk for colorectal, endometrial, and ovarian carcinomas in women. Risk-reducing hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRHSO) has been shown to be a cost-effective form of management and prevention of gynecological malignancies in patients with LS. Studies of incidental gynecologic malignancies identified in RRHSO are limited. In addition, recommendations on optimal handling of this type of specimen have ranged from submitting for microscopic examination the entire endometrium, fallopian tubes and ovaries to submitting only routine representative sections of these organs. In this study, we present the clinicopathologic findings of 29 cases of LS patients that underwent risk-reducing gynecologic surgery at our institution over a period of 13 yr. Clinical-pathologic information was obtained from the patients' charts and pathology reports. Significant pathologic abnormalities were identified in 17% (5/29) of cases, all showing endometrial hyperplasia. Four of them with atypical and 1 without atypical. All of our cases with endometrial pathology had significant findings on preoperative endometrial sampling. To further study the recommendation of in toto submission of the endometrium, ovaries and fallopian tubes and the utility of preoperative endometrial sampling, we undertook a literature review of all the reported cases of incidental pathologic findings identified in RRHSO. The findings of our cohort and the literature reviewed support in toto submission of endometrium, and adnexal structures in the absence of gross lesions. In addition, our findings show a definite benefit for preoperative endometrial sampling as part of the workup for LS patients undergoing RRHSO.

Current Practices in the Processing, Diagnosis, and Reporting of Endometrial Carcinoma: Results of a Web-based Survey by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP).

There have been significant advances in our understanding of the biology and classification of endometrial carcinoma, over the last few years, and the new prediction models proposed for prognostication. To accurately diagnose and stage tumors and apply these prediction models, it is necessary that there be standardized processing of specimens, and a common understanding and usage of the diagnostic terminology of endometrial carcinoma. The International Society of Gynecological Pathologists embarked on an ambitious project to achieve this goal in 2015. An early step in the process was to collect baseline information on existing practices with regard to the processing, diagnosis, and reporting of endometrial carcinomas among the members of the society. This was carried out using a web-based survey comprising 112 questions. The results are presented herein and reveal areas of uniformity but also areas of substantial variation among pathologists. The results of the survey assisted in developing the subsequent recommendations that follow as separate articles in this issue of the journal with regard to processing, diagnosis, and reporting of endometrial carcinomas.

Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

In this review, we sought to address 2 important issues in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma: how to grade endometrial endometrioid carcinomas and how to incorporate the 4 genomic subcategories of endometrial carcinoma, as identified through The Cancer Genome Atlas, into clinical practice. The current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grading scheme provides prognostic information that can be used to guide the extent of surgery and use of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. We recommend moving toward a binary scheme to grade endometrial endometrioid carcinomas by considering International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics defined grades 1 and 2 tumors as "low grade" and grade 3 tumors as "high grade." The current evidence base does not support the use of a 3-tiered grading system, although this is considered standard by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the College of American Pathologists. As for the 4 genomic subtypes of endometrial carcinoma (copy number low/p53 wild-type, copy number high/p53 abnormal, polymerase E mutant, and mismatch repair deficient), which only recently have been identified, there is accumulating evidence showing these categories can be reproducibly diagnosed and accurately assessed based on biopsy/curettage specimens as well as hysterectomy specimens. Furthermore, this subclassification system can be adapted for current clinical practice and is of prognostic significance independent of conventional variables used for risk assessment in patients with endometrial carcinoma (eg, stage). It is too soon to recommend the routine use of genomic classification in this setting; however, with further evidence, this system may become the basis for the subclassification of all endometrial carcinomas, supplanting (partially or completely) histotype, and grade. These recommendations were developed from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists Endometrial Carcinoma project.

Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa From Metastatic Spread Between These and Other Sites.

In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.

Issues in the Differential Diagnosis of Uterine Low-grade Endometrioid Carcinoma, Including Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas: Recommendations from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

This article provides practical recommendations developed from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists Endometrial Carcinoma Project to address 4 issues that may arise in the diagnosis of uterine corpus low-grade endometrioid carcinoma: (1) The distinction between atypical hyperplasia and low-grade endometrioid carcinoma. (2) The distinction between low-grade endometrioid carcinoma and serous carcinoma. (3) The distinction between corded and hyalinized or spindle cell variants of low-grade endometrioid carcinoma and carcinosarcoma. (4) The diagnostic criteria for mixed endometrial carcinomas, a rare entity that should be diagnosed only after exclusion of a spectrum of tumors including morphologic variants of endometrioid carcinoma, dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and endometrial carcinomas with ambiguous morphology.

International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP) Endometrial Cancer Project: Guidelines From the Special Techniques and Ancillary Studies Group.

The aim of this article is to propose guidelines and recommendations in problematic areas in pathologic reporting of endometrial carcinoma (EC) regarding special techniques and ancillary studies. An organizing committee designed a comprehensive survey with different questions related to pathologic features, diagnosis, and prognosis of EC that was sent to all members of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. The special techniques/ancillary studies group received 4 different questions to be addressed. Five members of the group reviewed the literature and came up with recommendations and an accompanying text which were discussed and agreed upon by all members of the group. Twelve different recommendations are made. They address the value of immunohistochemistry, ploidy, and molecular analysis for assessing prognosis in EC, the value of steroid hormone receptor analysis to predict response to hormone therapy, and parameters regarding applying immunohistochemistry and molecular tests for assessing mismatch deficiency in EC.

Endometrial Carcinoma, Grossing and Processing Issues: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic neoplasm in developed countries; however, updated universal guidelines are currently not available to handle specimens obtained during the surgical treatment of patients affected by this disease. This article presents recommendations on how to gross and submit sections for microscopic examination of hysterectomy specimens and other tissues removed during the surgical management of endometrial cancer such as salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and lymph node dissection-including sentinel lymph nodes. In addition, the intraoperative assessment of some of these specimens is addressed. These recommendations are based on a review of the literature, grossing manuals from various institutions, and a collaborative effort by a subgroup of the Endometrial Cancer Task Force of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. The aim of these recommendations is to standardize the processing of endometrial cancer specimens which is vital for adequate pathological reporting and will ultimately improve our understanding of this disease.