Covid-19 positive donor utilization for heart transplantation: The new frontier for donor pool expansion.

BACKGROUND: Hearts from COVID-19 positive donors (CPD) are being utilized for heart transplantation by some centers; however, this is in the setting of the lack of guidelines or robust evidence. The paucity of evidence is reflected in the recent Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) communication describing CPD utilization as an "unknown risk." METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the UNOS database for adult heart transplants performed between January 2021 to December 2022, and CPD comprised of a significant percentage of donors, being used in >10% of recipients in some UNOS regions. Between July 2022 and December 2022, 7.9% of heart transplants were with CPD, and in the same period Hepatitis C positive donors accounted for 7.1% and donation after circulatory death (DCD) accounted for 10.3%. CONCLUSION: If the transplant community comes up with a standardized approach and guidance in using CPD hearts, this could provide an effective donor pool expansion strategy.

Patterns and outcomes of COVID-19 donor utilization for heart transplant.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes following COVID-19 positive donor (CPD) utilization for heart transplant are unknown. METHODS: UNOS database was analyzed for heart transplants performed from the declaration of COVID-19 pandemic until September 30, 2022. RESULT: Since the onset of pandemic, there were 9876 heart transplants reported. COVID-19 antigen or NAT results were available in 7698 adult donors within 14 days of donation, of which 177 (2.3%) were positive. There was no difference in recipient demographics, including age (COVID positive donor vs. negative: 55 vs. 56 years, p = .2) and BMI. Listing status 1 and 2 were similar in both groups (7% vs. 10% and 48% vs. 49% respectively, p = .4). Durable and temporary mechanical support were similar in both groups pre-transplant (both groups 33%, p = .9). There was no difference in days on the waitlist (median 31 days, p = .9). Simultaneous renal transplant rates were similar (11% vs. 10%, p = .9). CPD utilization has increased since the onset of the pandemic, and the adoption is present across most UNOS regions. Post-transplant, there was no difference in length of stay (median 16 vs. 17 days, p = .9) and acute rejection episodes prior to discharge (3% vs. 8%, p = .1). In survival analysis of 90-day follow up, number of deaths reported were comparable (5% in both groups, p = .9) Follow-up LVEF was comparable (62% vs. 60%, p = .4). CONCLUSION: Active COVID-19 infection in donors did not affect survival or rejection rates in the short-term post-heart transplant.

Evaluation of adjusted international normalized ratio goal in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate3 left ventricular assist device (HM3 LVAD) has shown a low incidence of thrombosis, but bleeding risk is as high as 43%. We aim to describe the impact of lower international normalization ratio (INR) goal on clinical outcomes. METHODS: In February 2019, our tertiary care institution lowered INR goal in HM3 patients from manufacturer recommendations to 1.8-2.2 and retrospectively analyzed the data. Two cohorts were compared: patients with lower INR goal upon implant (De novo) and those with subsequently lowered INR goal (Adjusted). The Adjusted group also served as its own historical control. Both groups continued aspirin 81 milligrams daily per manufacturer recommendations. The primary outcomes were incidences of bleed and thrombosis events within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to remove or replace the device and Rosendaal time in therapeutic range (TTR) over 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were evaluated for inclusion with 26 meeting criteria. Within 12 months, incidence of bleeding events was 25% and 28.6% in the De novo and Adjusted groups, respectively. Incidence of thrombotic events within 12 months was 0% in the De novo group and 7.1% in the Adjusted group. Twelve-month survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to remove or replace the device was higher over 12 months for patients in the De novo group (91.7% vs. 78.6%). Median 12-month TTR was 36%, which was primarily attributable to subtherapeutic deviations. CONCLUSIONS: A lower INR goal may be safe when initiated De novo following implantation of the HM3. This study informs the need for larger prospective studies.

HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Pump Exchange: A Single-Institution Experience.

Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with end-stage heart failure. These devices are replaced when pump complications arise if heart transplant is not possible. We present our experience with HeartMate II (HMII (Thoratec, Plesanton, California, United States)) LVAD pump exchange. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed all cases that required pump exchange due to LVAD complication from November 2011 until June 2016 at a single high-volume institution. The indications, demographics, and outcome were extracted and analyzed. Results Of 250 total patients with implanted HMII LVADs, 16 (6%) required pump exchange during the study period. The initial indications for LVAD placement in these patients were bridge to transplantation (n = 6 [37.5%]) or destination therapy (n = 10 [62.5%]). Fifteen patients (93.8%) required pump exchange due to pump thrombosis and 1 (6.2%) due to refractory driveline infection. Nine patients (56.2%) underwent repeat median sternotomy while a left subcostal approach was used in the remaining seven patients. Fifteen patients (93.7%) survived until hospital discharge. During the follow-up period (median, 155 days), 11 patients remained alive and 4 of these underwent successful cardiac transplantation. Conclusion HMII LVAD pump exchange can be safely performed for driveline infection or pump thrombosis when heart transplantation is not an option.

Extracorporeal Life Support and Mechanical Circulatory Support in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.

The prevalence of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is increasing worldwide as more health care centers develop the necessary infrastructure, protocols, and technical expertise required to provide mobile extracorporeal life support with short notice. Strict adherence to patient selection guidelines in the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, as well as in-hospital cardiac arrest, allows for improved survival with neurologically favorable outcomes in a larger patient population. This review discusses the preferred approaches, cannulation techniques, and available support devices ideal for the various clinical situations encountered during the treatment of cardiac arrest and refractory cardiogenic shock.

Tricuspid Valve Excision Complicated by Postoperative Gerbode Defect Following Recurrent Infective Endocarditis: A Case Report.

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis is an increasingly common sequela of the opioid epidemic. While often managed medically, certain subsets of patients will require surgical intervention, including repair, replacement, and possibly even excision. Historically, simple valvectomy was performed in instances of recidivism and reinfection; however, reoperation and replacement has become the preferred treatment in the current era. Given the increasing incidence of intravenous drug use and the increase in the number of patients presenting with recurrent infections, simple valvectomy has regained favor in recent years. In this article, we present the management of a critically ill patient with recurrent tricuspid valve endocarditis who underwent tricuspid valvectomy that was complicated by a left ventricle to right atrium fistula and discuss some of the most important perioperative issues and complications for patients who undergo tricuspid valvectomy.

Venoarterial ECMO for Adults: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue therapy that can stabilize patients with hemodynamic compromise, with or without respiratory failure, for days or weeks. In cardiology, the main indications for ECMO include cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, post-cardiotomy shock, refractory ventricular tachycardia, and acute management of complications of invasive procedures. The fundamental premise underlying ECMO is that it is a bridge-to recovery, to a more durable bridge, to definitive treatment, or to decision. As a very resource- and effort-intensive intervention, ECMO should not be used on unsalvageable patients. As the use of this technology continues to evolve rapidly, it is important to understand the indications and contraindications; the logistics of ECMO initiation, management, and weaning; the general infrastructure of the program (including the challenges associated with transferring patients supported by ECMO); and ethical considerations, areas of uncertainty, and future directions.

Ambulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with subclavian venoarterial cannulation to increase mobility and recovery in a patient awaiting cardiac transplantation.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide temporary cardiopulmonary support for patients in hemodynamic extremis or refractory heart failure until more durable therapies-such as cardiac transplantation or a left ventricular assist device-can be safely implemented. Conventional ECMO cannulation strategies commonly employ the femoral artery and vein, constraining the patients to the supine position for the duration of ECMO support. We have recently adopted a modified cannulation approach to promote patient mobility, rehabilitation, and faster recovery and to mitigate complications associated with femoral arterial cannulation, such as limb ischemia and compartment syndrome. This technique involves cannulation of the subclavian artery and vein. The current case report details our recent experience with this approach in a critically ill patient awaiting cardiac transplantation.

Using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support preoperatively and postoperatively as a successful bridge to recovery in a patient with a large infarct-induced ventricular septal defect.

Rupture of the ventricular septum during acute myocardial infarction usually occurs within the first week. The event is usually followed by low cardiac output, heart failure, and multiorgan failure. Despite the many advances in the nonoperative treatment of heart failure and cardiogenic shock, including the intra-aortic balloon pump and a multitude of new inotropic agents and vasodilators, these do not supplant the need for operative intervention in these critically ill patients. This article describes the successful use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support as a bridge to recovery postoperatively in a patient with a large infarct-produced ventricular septal defect.