ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of measuring diffusivity, diffusional kurtosis, and cellular-interstitial water exchange time with long diffusion times (100-800 ms) using stimulated-echo DWI. METHODS: Time-dependent diffusion MRI was tested on two well-established diffusion phantoms and in 5 patients with head and neck cancer. Measurements were conducted using an in-house diffusion-weighted STEAM-EPI pulse sequence with multiple diffusion times at a fixed TE on three scanners. We used the weighted linear least-squares fit method to estimate time-dependent diffusivity, D ( t ) $$ D(t) $$ , and diffusional kurtosis, K ( t ) $$ K(t) $$ . Additionally, the Kärger model was used to estimate cellular-interstitial water exchange time ( τ ex $$ {\tau}_{ex} $$ ) from K ( t ) $$ K(t) $$ . RESULTS: Diffusivity measured by time-dependent STEAM-EPI measurements and commercial SE-EPI showed comparable results with R2 above 0.98 and overall 5.4 ± 3.0% deviation across diffusion times. Diffusional kurtosis phantom data showed expected patterns: constant D $$ D $$ and K $$ K $$ = 0 for negative controls and slow varying D $$ D $$ and K $$ K $$ for samples made of nanoscopic vesicles. Time-dependent diffusion MRI in patients with head and neck cancer found that the Kärger model could be considered valid in 72% ± 23% of the voxels in the metastatic lymph nodes. The median cellular-interstitial water exchange time estimated for lesions was between 58.5 ms and 70.6 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Based on two well-established diffusion phantoms, we found that time-dependent diffusion MRI measurements can provide stable diffusion and kurtosis values over a wide range of diffusion times and across multiple MRI systems. Moreover, estimation of cellular-interstitial water exchange time can be achieved using the Kärger model for the metastatic lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer.
Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , WaterABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To demonstrate a method for quantification of impeded diffusion fraction (IDF) using conventional clinical DWI protocols. METHODS: The IDF formalism is introduced to quantify contribution from water coordinated by macromolecules to DWI voxel signal based on fundamentally different diffusion constants in vascular capillary, bulk free, and coordinated water compartments. IDF accuracy was studied as a function of b-value set. The IDF scaling with restricted compartment size and polyvinylpirrolidone (PVP) macromolecule concentration was compared to conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and isotropic kurtosis model parameters for a diffusion phantom. An in vivo application was demonstrated for six prostate cancer (PCa) cases with low and high grade lesions annotated from whole mount histopathology. RESULTS: IDF linearly scaled with known restricted (vesicular) compartment size and PVP concentration in phantoms and increased with histopathologic score in PCa (from median 9% for atrophy up to 60% for Gleason 7). IDF via non-linear fit was independent of b-value subset selected between b = 0.1 and 2 ms/µm2 , including standard-of-care (SOC) PCa protocol. With maximum sensitivity for high grade PCa, the IDF threshold below 51% reduced false positive rate (FPR = 0/6) for low-grade PCa compared to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC > 0.81 µm2 /ms) of PIRADS PCa scoring (FPR = 3/6). CONCLUSION: The proposed method may provide quantitative imaging assays of cancer grading using common SOC DWI protocols.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Grading , Phantoms, Imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , WaterABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty regarding the reproducibility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) hampers the use of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluation of the prostate with magnetic resonance imaging MRI. The quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) profile for quantitative DWI claims a within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) for prostate lesion ADC of 0.17. Improved understanding of ADC reproducibility would aid the use of quantitative diffusion in prostate MRI evaluation. PURPOSE: Evaluation of the repeatability (same-day) and reproducibility (multi-day) of whole-prostate and focal-lesion ADC assessment in a multi-site setting. STUDY TYPE: Prospective multi-institutional. SUBJECTS: Twenty-nine males, ages 53 to 80 (median 63) years, following diagnosis of prostate cancer, 10 with focal lesions. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, single-shot spin-echo diffusion-weighted echo-planar sequence with four b-values. ASSESSMENT: Sites qualified for the study using an ice-water phantom with known ADC. Readers performed DWI analyses at visit 1 ("V1") and visit 2 ("V2," 2-14 days after V1), where V2 comprised scans before ("V2pre") and after ("V2post") a "coffee-break" interval with subject removal and repositioning. A single reader segmented the whole prostate. Two readers separately placed region-of-interests for focal lesions. STATISTICAL TESTS: Reproducibility and repeatability coefficients for whole prostate and focal lesions derived from median pixel ADC. We estimated the wCV and 95% confidence interval using a variance stabilizing transformation and assessed interreader reliability of focal lesion ADC using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The ADC biases from b0 -b600 and b0 -b800 phantom scans averaged 1.32% and 1.44%, respectively; mean b-value dependence was 0.188%. Repeatability and reproducibility of whole prostate median pixel ADC both yielded wCVs of 0.033 (N = 29). In 10 subjects with an evaluable focal lesion, the individual reader wCVs were 0.148 and 0.074 (repeatability) and 0.137 and 0.078 (reproducibility). All time points demonstrated good to excellent interreader reliability for focal lesion ADC (ICCV1 = 0.89; ICCV2pre = 0.76; ICCV2post = 0.94). DATA CONCLUSION: This study met the QIBA claim for prostate ADC. Test-retest repeatability and multi-day reproducibility were largely equivalent. Interreader reliability for focal lesion ADC was high across time points. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2 TOC CATEGORY: Pelvis.
Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prostate , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvis , Prospective Studies , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is commonly used to detect prostate cancer, and a major clinical challenge is differentiating aggressive from indolent disease. PURPOSE: To compare 14 site-specific parametric fitting implementations applied to the same dataset of whole-mount pathologically validated DWI to test the hypothesis that cancer differentiation varies with different fitting algorithms. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Thirty-three patients prospectively imaged prior to prostatectomy. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T, field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot DWI sequence. ASSESSMENT: Datasets, including a noise-free digital reference object (DRO), were distributed to the 14 teams, where locally implemented DWI parameter maps were calculated, including mono-exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (MEADC), kurtosis (K), diffusion kurtosis (DK), bi-exponential diffusion (BID), pseudo-diffusion (BID*), and perfusion fraction (F). The resulting parametric maps were centrally analyzed, where differentiation of benign from cancerous tissue was compared between DWI parameters and the fitting algorithms with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC). STATISTICAL TEST: Levene's test, P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The DRO results indicated minimal discordance between sites. Comparison across sites indicated that K, DK, and MEADC had significantly higher prostate cancer detection capability (AUC range = 0.72-0.76, 0.76-0.81, and 0.76-0.80 respectively) as compared to bi-exponential parameters (BID, BID*, F) which had lower AUC and greater between site variation (AUC range = 0.53-0.80, 0.51-0.81, and 0.52-0.80 respectively). Post-processing parameters also affected the resulting AUC, moving from, for example, 0.75 to 0.87 for MEADC varying cluster size. DATA CONCLUSION: We found that conventional diffusion models had consistent performance at differentiating prostate cancer from benign tissue. Our results also indicated that post-processing decisions on DWI data can affect sensitivity and specificity when applied to radiological-pathological studies in prostate cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Background Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimated by using chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI is an accepted imaging biomarker of hepatic steatosis. This work aims to promote standardized use of CSE MRI to estimate PDFF. Purpose To assess the accuracy of CSE MRI methods for estimating PDFF by determining the linearity and range of bias observed in a phantom. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, a commercial phantom with 12 vials of known PDFF values were shipped across nine U.S. centers. The phantom underwent 160 independent MRI examinations on 27 1.5-T and 3.0-T systems from three vendors. Two three-dimensional CSE MRI protocols with minimal T1 bias were included: vendor and standardized. Each vendor's confounder-corrected complex or hybrid magnitude-complex based reconstruction algorithm was used to generate PDFF maps in both protocols. The Siemens reconstruction required a configuration change to correct for water-fat swaps in the phantom. The MRI PDFF values were compared with the known PDFF values by using linear regression with mixed-effects modeling. The 95% CIs were calculated for the regression slope (ie, proportional bias) and intercept (ie, constant bias) and compared with the null hypothesis (slope = 1, intercept = 0). Results Pooled regression slope for estimated PDFF values versus phantom-derived reference PDFF values was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.98) in the biologically relevant 0%-47.5% PDFF range. The corresponding pooled intercept was -0.27% (95% CI: -0.50%, -0.05%). Across vendors, slope ranges were 0.86-1.02 (vendor protocols) and 0.97-1.0 (standardized protocol) at 1.5 T and 0.91-1.01 (vendor protocols) and 0.87-1.01 (standardized protocol) at 3.0 T. The intercept ranges (absolute PDFF percentage) were -0.65% to 0.18% (vendor protocols) and -0.69% to -0.17% (standardized protocol) at 1.5 T and -0.48% to 0.10% (vendor protocols) and -0.78% to -0.21% (standardized protocol) at 3.0 T. Conclusion Proton density fat fraction estimation derived from three-dimensional chemical shift-encoded MRI in a commercial phantom was accurate across vendors, imaging centers, and field strengths, with use of the vendors' product acquisition and reconstruction software. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Dyke in this issue.
Subject(s)
Fatty Liver/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Algorithms , Biomarkers , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Prospective Studies , Protons , Reproducibility of Results , United StatesABSTRACT
Background The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group A6702 multicenter trial helped confirm the potential of diffusion-weighted MRI for improving differential diagnosis of suspicious breast abnormalities and reducing unnecessary biopsies. A prespecified secondary objective was to explore the relative value of different approaches for quantitative assessment of lesions at diffusion-weighted MRI. Purpose To determine whether alternate calculations of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can help further improve diagnostic performance versus mean ADC values alone for analysis of suspicious breast lesions at MRI. Materials and Methods This prospective trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02022579) enrolled consecutive women (from March 2014 to April 2015) with a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category of 3, 4, or 5 at breast MRI. All study participants underwent standardized diffusion-weighted MRI (b = 0, 100, 600, and 800 sec/mm2). Centralized ADC measures were performed, including manually drawn whole-lesion and hotspot regions of interest, histogram metrics, normalized ADC, and variable b-value combinations. Diagnostic performance was estimated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Reduction in biopsy rate (maintaining 100% sensitivity) was estimated according to thresholds for each ADC metric. Results Among 107 enrolled women, 81 lesions with outcomes (28 malignant and 53 benign) in 67 women (median age, 49 years; interquartile range, 41-60 years) were analyzed. Among ADC metrics tested, none improved diagnostic performance versus standard mean ADC (AUC, 0.59-0.79 vs AUC, 0.75; P = .02-.84), and maximum ADC had worse performance (AUC, 0.52; P < .001). The 25th-percentile ADC metric provided the best performance (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.88), and a threshold using median ADC provided the greatest reduction in biopsy rate of 23.9% (95% CI: 14.8, 32.9; 16 of 67 BI-RADS category 4 and 5 lesions). Nonzero minimum b value (100, 600, and 800 sec/mm2) did not improve the AUC (0.74; P = .28), and several combinations of two b values (0 and 600, 100 and 600, 0 and 800, and 100 and 800 sec/mm2; AUC, 0.73-0.76) provided results similar to those seen with calculations of four b values (AUC, 0.75; P = .17-.87). Conclusion Mean apparent diffusion coefficient calculated with a two-b-value acquisition is a simple and sufficient diffusion-weighted MRI metric to augment diagnostic performance of breast MRI compared with more complex approaches to apparent diffusion coefficient measurement. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Aged , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Societies, Medical , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) is well-established to quantify proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as a quantitative biomarker of hepatic steatosis. However, temperature is known to bias PDFF estimation in phantom studies. In this study, strategies were developed and evaluated to correct for the effects of temperature on PDFF estimation through simulations, temperature-controlled experiments, and a multi-center, multi-vendor phantom study. THEORY AND METHODS: A technical solution that assumes and automatically estimates a uniform, global temperature throughout the phantom is proposed. Computer simulations modeled the effect of temperature on PDFF estimation using magnitude-, complex-, and hybrid-based CSE-MRI methods. Phantom experiments were performed to assess the temperature correction on PDFF estimation at controlled phantom temperatures. To assess the temperature correction method on a larger scale, the proposed method was applied to data acquired as part of a nine-site multi-vendor phantom study and compared to temperature-corrected PDFF estimation using an a priori guess for ambient room temperature. RESULTS: Simulations and temperature-controlled experiments show that as temperature deviates further from the assumed temperature, PDFF bias increases. Using the proposed correction method and a reasonable a priori guess for ambient temperature, PDFF bias and variability were reduced using magnitude-based CSE-MRI, across MRI systems, field strengths, protocols, and varying phantom temperature. Complex and hybrid methods showed little PDFF bias and variability both before and after correction. CONCLUSION: Correction for temperature reduces temperature-related PDFF bias and variability in phantoms across MRI vendors, sites, field strengths, and protocols for magnitude-based CSE-MRI, even without a priori information about the temperature.
Subject(s)
Liver , Protons , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Reproducibility of Results , TemperatureABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Anisotropic transverse R2 (1/T2 ) relaxation of water proton is sensitive to cartilage degenerative changes. The purpose is to develop an efficient method to extract this relaxation metric in clinical studies. METHODS: Anisotropic R2 can be measured inefficiently by standard R2 mapping after removing an isotropic contribution obtained from R1ρ mapping. In the proposed method, named as a unique anisotropic R2 of collagen degeneration (ARCADE) mapping, an assumed uniform isotropic R2 was estimated at magic angle locations in the deep cartilage, and an anisotropic R2 was thus isolated in a single T2W sagittal image. Five human knees from 4 volunteers were studied with standard R2 and R1ρ mappings at 3T, and anisotropic R2 derived from ARCADE on the T2W (TE = 48.8 ms) image from R2 mapping was compared with the composite relaxation (R2 - R1ρ ) using statistical analysis including Student's t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Anisotropic R2 (1/s) from ARCADE was highly positively correlated with but not significantly different from standard R2 - R1ρ (1/s) in the segmented deep (r = 0.83 ± 0.06; 8.3 ± 2.9 vs. 7.3 ± 1.9, P = .50) and the superficial (r = 0.82 ± 0.05; 3.5 ± 2.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.6, P = .39) zones. However, after eliminating systematic errors by the normalization in terms of zonal contrast, anisotropic R2 was significantly higher (60.2 ± 18.5% vs. 38.4 ± 16.6%, P < .01) than R2 - R1ρ as predicted. CONCLUSION: The proposed anisotropic R2 mapping could be an efficient alternative to the conventional approach, holding great promise in providing both high-resolution morphological and more sensitive transverse relaxation imaging from a single T2W scan in a clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular , Collagen/chemistry , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Knee Joint , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Cartilage, Articular/chemistry , Cartilage, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Knee Joint/chemistry , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Protons , Water/chemistryABSTRACT
Physiological properties of tumors can be measured both in vivo and noninvasively by diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Although these techniques have been used for more than two decades to study tumor diffusion, perfusion, and/or permeability, the methods and studies on how to reduce measurement error and bias in the derived imaging metrics is still lacking in the literature. This is of paramount importance because the objective is to translate these quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) into clinical trials, and ultimately in clinical practice. Standardization of the image acquisition using appropriate phantoms is the first step from a technical performance standpoint. The next step is to assess whether the imaging metrics have clinical value and meet the requirements for being a QIB as defined by the Radiological Society of North America's Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA). The goal and mission of QIBA and the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) initiatives are to provide technical performance standards (QIBA profiles) and QIN tools for producing reliable QIBs for use in the clinical imaging community. Some of QIBA's development of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced QIB profiles has been hampered by the lack of literature for repeatability and reproducibility of the derived QIBs. The available research on this topic is scant and is not in sync with improvements or upgrades in MRI technology over the years. This review focuses on the need for QIBs in oncology applications and emphasizes the importance of the assessment of their reproducibility and repeatability. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e101-e121.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Clinical Trials as Topic , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Male , Medical Oncology/standards , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neuroimaging/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the in vitro accuracy, test-retest repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T1 quantification protocols used for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 and 3 T. METHODS: A T1 phantom with 14 samples was imaged at eight centers with a common inversion-recovery spin-echo (IR-SE) protocol and a variable flip angle (VFA) protocol using seven flip angles, as well as site-specific protocols (VFA with different flip angles, variable repetition time, proton density, and Look-Locker inversion recovery). Factors influencing the accuracy (deviation from reference NMR T1 measurements) and repeatability were assessed using general linear mixed models. Interplatform reproducibility was assessed using coefficients of variation. RESULTS: For the common IR-SE protocol, accuracy (median error across platforms = 1.4-5.5%) was influenced predominantly by T1 sample (P < 10-6 ), whereas test-retest repeatability (median error = 0.2-8.3%) was influenced by the scanner (P < 10-6 ). For the common VFA protocol, accuracy (median error = 5.7-32.2%) was influenced by field strength (P = 0.006), whereas repeatability (median error = 0.7-25.8%) was influenced by the scanner (P < 0.0001). Interplatform reproducibility with the common VFA was lower at 3 T than 1.5 T (P = 0.004), and lower than that of the common IR-SE protocol (coefficient of variation 1.5T: VFA/IR-SE = 11.13%/8.21%, P = 0.028; 3 T: VFA/IR-SE = 22.87%/5.46%, P = 0.001). Among the site-specific protocols, Look-Locker inversion recovery and VFA (2-3 flip angles) protocols showed the best accuracy and repeatability (errors < 15%). CONCLUSIONS: The VFA protocols with 2 to 3 flip angles optimized for different applications achieved acceptable balance of extensive spatial coverage, accuracy, and repeatability in T1 quantification (errors < 15%). Further optimization in terms of flip-angle choice for each tissue application, and the use of B1 correction, are needed to improve the robustness of VFA protocols for T1 mapping. Magn Reson Med 79:2564-2575, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Subject(s)
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media/chemistry , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Male , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To elucidate the dynamic, structural, and molecular properties that create inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) contrast. METHODS: Amphiphilic lipids, lamellar phospholipids with cholesterol, and bovine spinal cord (BSC) specimens were examined along with nonlipid systems. Magnetization transfer (MT), enhanced MT (eMT, obtained with double-sided radiofrequency saturation), ihMT (MT - eMT), and dipolar relaxation, T1D , were measured at 2.0 and 11.7 T. RESULTS: The amplitude of ihMT ratio (ihMTR) is positively correlated with T1D values. Both ihMTR and T1D increase with increasing temperature in BSC white matter and in phospholipids and decrease with temperature in other lipids. Changes in ihMTR with temperature arise primarily from alterations in MT rather than eMT. Spectral width of MT, eMT, and ihMT increases with increasing carbon chain length. CONCLUSIONS: Concerted motions of phospholipids in white matter decrease proton spin diffusion leading to increased proton T1D times and increased ihMT amplitudes, consistent with decoupling of Zeeman and dipolar spin reservoirs. Molecular specificity and dynamic sensitivity of ihMT contrast make it a suitable candidate for probing myelin membrane disorders. Magn Reson Med 77:1318-1328, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Subject(s)
Lipid Bilayers/chemistry , Magnetic Fields , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Phospholipids/chemistry , White Matter/chemistry , Animals , Cattle , Diffusion , Materials Testing , Protons , TemperatureABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of gadoxetate disodium administration on arterial phase respiratory waveforms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From 2013 to 2015, 107 subjects undergoing liver MRI with either gadoxetate disodium (10 mL diluted 1:1 with saline; injection rate, 2 mL/s; n = 40) or gadobenate dimeglumine (0.2 mL/kg; maximum, 20 mL; injection rate, 2 mL/s; n = 67) were enrolled. Respiratory waveforms obtained during unenhanced and dynamic contrast-enhanced phases were filtered by a physicist, who was blinded to contrast agent and imaging phase, to eliminate electronic and cardiac noise using fast Fourier transformation. The average root-mean-square difference of two intrasubject control phases (unenhanced and late dynamic) was termed D1, and the root-mean-square deviation of the arterial phase referent to the control record mean was termed D2. D1, D2, and their difference were compared across agents with the Mann-Whitney U test. Bland-Altman plots were generated for D1 and D2 values. RESULTS: D1 values were similar for both agents (mean [± SD], 232 ± 203 for gadoxetate vs 201 ± 230 for gadobenate; p = 0.48), indicating similar intercohort baseline breath-holding capability. D2 was greater and more variable for the gadoxetate cohort (438 ± 381) than for the gadobenate cohort (167 ± 167; p < 0.001), indicating larger and more unpredictable respiratory waveform deviations isolated to the arterial phase (subject-level rate, 48% [19/40] for gadoxetate vs 1% [1/67] for gadobenate; p < 0.001). Aberrant respiratory waveform peaks in the arterial phase were usually associated with transient tachypnea (mean maximum arterial phase respiratory rate for the gadoxetate cohort, 27 breaths/min; range, 11-40 breaths/min). CONCLUSION: Fixed-dose gadoxetate disodium (10 mL; 1:1 dilution with 10 mL of saline; injection rate, 2 mL/s) transiently reduces breath-holding capacity during the arterial phase and is accompanied by brief transient tachypnea.
Subject(s)
Breath Holding/drug effects , Gadolinium DTPA/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Respiratory Mechanics/drug effects , Tachypnea/chemically induced , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Artifacts , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Female , Fourier Analysis , Gadolinium DTPA/administration & dosage , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tachypnea/diagnosis , Tachypnea/physiopathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Characterize system-specific bias across common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) platforms for quantitative diffusion measurements in multicenter trials. METHODS: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) was performed on an ice-water phantom along the superior-inferior (SI) and right-left (RL) orientations spanning ± 150 mm. The same scanning protocol was implemented on 14 MRI systems at seven imaging centers. The bias was estimated as a deviation of measured from known apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) along individual DWI directions. The relative contributions of gradient nonlinearity, shim errors, imaging gradients, and eddy currents were assessed independently. The observed bias errors were compared with numerical models. RESULTS: The measured systematic ADC errors scaled quadratically with offset from isocenter, and ranged between -55% (SI) and 25% (RL). Nonlinearity bias was dependent on system design and diffusion gradient direction. Consistent with numerical models, minor ADC errors (± 5%) due to shim, imaging and eddy currents were mitigated by double echo DWI and image coregistration of individual gradient directions. CONCLUSION: The analysis confirms gradient nonlinearity as a major source of spatial DW bias and variability in off-center ADC measurements across MRI platforms, with minor contributions from shim, imaging gradients and eddy currents. The developed protocol enables empiric description of systematic bias in multicenter quantitative DWI studies.
Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Multicenter Studies as Topic/standards , Nonlinear Dynamics , Phantoms, Imaging , BiasABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Gradient nonlinearity of MRI systems leads to spatially dependent b-values and consequently high non-uniformity errors (10-20%) in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements over clinically relevant field-of-views. This work seeks practical correction procedure that effectively reduces observed ADC bias for media of arbitrary anisotropy in the fewest measurements. METHODS: All-inclusive bias analysis considers spatial and time-domain cross-terms for diffusion and imaging gradients. The proposed correction is based on rotation of the gradient nonlinearity tensor into the diffusion gradient frame where spatial bias of b-matrix can be approximated by its Euclidean norm. Correction efficiency of the proposed procedure is numerically evaluated for a range of model diffusion tensor anisotropies and orientations. RESULTS: Spatial dependence of nonlinearity correction terms accounts for the bulk (75-95%) of ADC bias for FA = 0.3-0.9. Residual ADC non-uniformity errors are amplified for anisotropic diffusion. This approximation obviates need for full diffusion tensor measurement and diagonalization to derive a corrected ADC. Practical scenarios are outlined for implementation of the correction on clinical MRI systems. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed simplified correction algorithm appears sufficient to control ADC non-uniformity errors in clinical studies using three orthogonal diffusion measurements. The most efficient reduction of ADC bias for anisotropic medium is achieved with non-lab-based diffusion gradients.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artifacts , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Nonlinear Dynamics , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study examines the relationship between quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) parameters and the molecular composition of a model lamellar liquid crystal (LLC) system composed of 1-decyl alcohol (decanol), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and water. METHODS: Samples were made within a stable lamellar mesophase to provide different ratios of total semisolid protons (SDS + decanol) to water protons. Data were collected as a function of radiofrequency power, frequency offset, and temperature. qMT parameters were estimated by fitting a standard model to the data. Fitting results of four different semisolid line shapes were compared. RESULTS: A super-Lorentzian line shape for the semisolid component provided the best fit. The estimated amount of semisolids was proportional to the ratio of decanol-to-water protons. Other qMT parameters exhibited nonlinear dependence on sample composition. Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) was a linear function of the semisolid fraction over a limited range of decanol concentration. CONCLUSION: In LLC samples, MT between semisolid and water originates from intramolecular nOe among decanol aliphatic chain protons followed by proton exchange between decanol hydroxyl and water. Exchange kinetics is influenced by SDS, although SDS protons do not participate in MT. These studies provide clinically relevant range of semisolid fraction proportional to detected MTR.
Subject(s)
Fatty Alcohols/chemistry , Liquid Crystals/chemistry , Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular/methods , Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate/chemistry , Models, Theoretical , ProtonsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Protocol standardization and optimization for clinical translation of emerging quantitative multiparametric (mp)MRI biomarkers of high-risk prostate cancer requires imaging references that mimic realistic tissue value combinations for bias assessment in derived relaxation and diffusion parameters. PURPOSE: This work aimed to develop a novel class of hydrogel-based synthetic materials with simultaneously controlled quantitative relaxation, diffusion, and kurtosis parameters that mimic in vivo prostate value combinations in the same spatial compartment and allow stable assemblies of adjacent structures. METHODS: A set of materials with tunable T2, diffusion, and kurtosis were assembled to create quantitative biomimetic (mp)MRI references. T2 was controlled with variable agarose concentration, monoexponential diffusion by polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and kurtosis by addition of lamellar vesicles. The materials were mechanically stabilized by UV cross-linked polyacrylamide gels (PAG) to allow biomimetic morphologies. The reference T2 were measured on a 3T scanner using multi-echo CPMG, and diffusion kurtosis-with multi-b DWI. RESULTS: Agarose concentration controls T2 values which are nominally independent of PVP or vesicle concentration. For agarose PVP hydrogels, monoexponential diffusion values are a function of PVP concentration and independent of agarose concentration. Compared to free vesicles, for agarose-PAG combined with vesicles, diffusion was predominantly controlled by vesicles and PAG, while kurtosis was affected by agarose and vesicle concentration. Both hydrogel classes achieved image voxel parameter values (T2, Da, Ka) for relaxation (T2: 65-255 ms), apparent diffusion (Da: 0.8-1.7 µm2/ms), and kurtosis (Ka: 0.5-1.25) within the target literature ranges for normal prostate zones and cancer lesions. Relaxation and diffusion parameters remained stable for over 6 months for layered material assemblies. CONCLUSION: A stable biomimetic mpMR reference based on hydrogels has been developed with a range of multi-compartment diffusion and relaxation parameter combinations observed in cancerous and healthy prostate tissue.
Subject(s)
Hydrogels , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Hydrogels/chemistry , Humans , Diffusion , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Biomimetic Materials/chemistry , Magnetic Resonance ImagingABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine quantitative quality control procedures to evaluate technical variability in multi-center measurements of the diffusion coefficient of water as a prerequisite to use of the biomarker apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in multi-center clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A uniform data acquisition protocol was developed and shared with 18 participating test sites along with a temperature-controlled diffusion phantom delivered to each site. Usable diffusion weighted imaging data of ice water at five b-values were collected on 35 clinical MRI systems from three vendors at two field strengths (1.5 and 3 Tesla [T]) and analyzed at a central processing site. RESULTS: Standard deviation of bore-center ADCs measured across 35 scanners was <2%; error range: -2% to +5% from literature value. Day-to-day repeatability of the measurements was within 4.5%. Intra-exam repeatability at the phantom center was within 1%. Excluding one outlier, inter-site reproducibility of ADC at magnet isocenter was within 3%, although variability increased for off-center measurements. Significant (>10%) vendor-specific and system-specific spatial nonuniformity ADC bias was detected for the off-center measurement that was consistent with gradient nonlinearity. CONCLUSION: Standardization of DWI protocol has improved reproducibility of ADC measurements and allowed identifying spatial ADC nonuniformity as a source of error in multi-site clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Ice , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Phantoms, Imaging , Water , Equipment Failure Analysis/instrumentation , Equipment Failure Analysis/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , United StatesABSTRACT
Quantitative MRI biomarkers are sought to replace painful and invasive sequential bone-marrow biopsies routinely used for myelofibrosis (MF) cancer monitoring and treatment assessment. Repeatability of MRI-based quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB) measurements was investigated for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) in a JAK2 V617F hematopoietic transplant model of MF. Repeatability coefficients (RCs) were determined for three defined tibia bone-marrow sections (2-9 mm; 10-12 mm; and 12.5-13.5 mm from the knee joint) across 15 diseased mice from 20-37 test-retest pairs. Scans were performed on consecutive days every two weeks for a period of 10 weeks starting 3-4 weeks after transplant. The mean RC with (95% confidence interval (CI)) for these sections, respectively, were for ADC: 0.037 (0.031, 0.050), 0.087 (0.069, 0.116), and 0.030 (0.022, 0.044) µm2/ms; for PDFF: 1.6 (1.3, 2.0), 15.5 (12.5, 20.2), and 25.5 (12.0, 33.0)%; and for MTR: 0.16 (0.14, 0.19), 0.11 (0.09, 0.15), and 0.09 (0.08, 0.15). Change-trend analysis of these QIBs identified a dynamic section within the mid-tibial bone marrow in which confident changes (exceeding RC) could be observed after a four-week interval between scans across all measured MRI-based QIBs. Our results demonstrate the capability to derive quantitative imaging metrics from mouse tibia bone marrow for monitoring significant longitudinal MF changes.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow , Primary Myelofibrosis , Animals , Mice , Bone Marrow/diagnostic imaging , Primary Myelofibrosis/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , BiomarkersABSTRACT
A murine model of myelofibrosis in tibia was used in a co-clinical trial to evaluate segmentation methods for application of image-based biomarkers to assess disease status. The dataset (32 mice with 157 3D MRI scans including 49 test-retest pairs scanned on consecutive days) was split into approximately 70% training, 10% validation, and 20% test subsets. Two expert annotators (EA1 and EA2) performed manual segmentations of the mouse tibia (EA1: all data; EA2: test and validation). Attention U-net (A-U-net) model performance was assessed for accuracy with respect to EA1 reference using the average Jaccard index (AJI), volume intersection ratio (AVI), volume error (AVE), and Hausdorff distance (AHD) for four training scenarios: full training, two half-splits, and a single-mouse subsets. The repeatability of computer versus expert segmentations for tibia volume of test-retest pairs was assessed by within-subject coefficient of variance (%wCV). A-U-net models trained on full and half-split training sets achieved similar average accuracy (with respect to EA1 annotations) for test set: AJI = 83-84%, AVI = 89-90%, AVE = 2-3%, and AHD = 0.5 mm-0.7 mm, exceeding EA2 accuracy: AJ = 81%, AVI = 83%, AVE = 14%, and AHD = 0.3 mm. The A-U-net model repeatability wCV [95% CI]: 3 [2, 5]% was notably better than that of expert annotators EA1: 5 [4, 9]% and EA2: 8 [6, 13]%. The developed deep learning model effectively automates murine bone marrow segmentation with accuracy comparable to human annotators and substantially improved repeatability.
Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Primary Myelofibrosis , Humans , Animals , Mice , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Primary Myelofibrosis/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methodsABSTRACT
This review focuses on the principles, applications, and performance of mpMRI for bladder imaging. Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) derived from mpMRI are increasingly used in oncological applications, including tumor staging, prognosis, and assessment of treatment response. To standardize mpMRI acquisition and interpretation, an expert panel developed the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS). Many studies confirm the standardization and high degree of inter-reader agreement to discriminate muscle invasiveness in bladder cancer, supporting VI-RADS implementation in routine clinical practice. The standard MRI sequences for VI-RADS scoring are anatomical imaging, including T2w images, and physiological imaging with diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Physiological QIBs derived from analysis of DW- and DCE-MRI data and radiomic image features extracted from mpMRI images play an important role in bladder cancer. The current development of AI tools for analyzing mpMRI data and their potential impact on bladder imaging are surveyed. AI architectures are often implemented based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), focusing on narrow/specific tasks. The application of AI can substantially impact bladder imaging clinical workflows; for example, manual tumor segmentation, which demands high time commitment and has inter-reader variability, can be replaced by an autosegmentation tool. The use of mpMRI and AI is projected to drive the field toward the personalized management of bladder cancer patients.