Laparoscopic Removal of Streak Gonads in Turner Syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the skills necessary for complete resection of bilateral streak gonads in Turner syndrome. DESIGN: Video case presentation with narration highlighting the key techniques used. The video was deemed exempt from formal review by our institutional review board. SETTING: Turner syndrome is a form of gonadal dysgenesis that affects 1 in 2500 live births. Patients often have streak gonads and may present with primary amenorrhea or premature ovarian failure. Patients with a mosaic karyotype that includes a Y chromosome are at increased risk for gonadoblastoma and subsequent transformation into malignancy. Gonadectomy is recommended for these patients, typically at adolescence. Streak gonads can be difficult to identify, and tissue margins are often in close proximity to critical retroperitoneal structures. Resection can be technically challenging and requires a thorough understanding of retroperitoneal anatomy and precise dissection techniques to ensure complete removal. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic approach to bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy of streak gonads. Retroperitoneal dissection and ureterolysis are performed, with the aid of the Ethicon Harmonic Ace, to ensure complete gonadectomy. CONCLUSION: Careful and complete resection of gonadal tissue in the hands of a skilled laparoscopic surgeon is key for effective cancer risk reduction surgery in Turner syndrome mosaics.

Preconception counseling: do patients learn about genetics from their obstetrician gynecologists?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this observational survey study is to assess genetic knowledge in reproductive-aged women and to determine the role played by their obstetricians in their education. METHODS: A 31-item survey was distributed via an internet survey service to women between the ages of 18 and 45. The survey included subject demographics, a query regarding the source of subjects' knowledge of genetics, and 6 question genetics quiz with 3 fundamental questions and 3 advanced questions. Subjects were divided into parous and nulliparous groups, and responses were compared using student's t-test for continuous variables and chi square for proportions. RESULTS: Participants included 207 parous and 221 nulliparous women. There were no differences in demographic characteristics including age and education. Parous women scored significantly higher than nulliparous women on the fundamental genetics quiz (71 vs 61 %, p = 0.03). This difference remained but was no longer significant when the 3 advanced questions were included (48 vs 42 %). Only 39 % of parous and 8 % of nulliparous subjects listed their physician as one of their main sources of genetic information. 78 % of all subjects stated that they would prefer to receive genetic information from their physicians over other sources. CONCLUSIONS: Recently parous women scored higher on a genetics assessment quiz than did their nulliparous counterparts, but the majority did not cite their obstetrician gynecologists as a main source of information. As genetic counseling and testing are becoming increasingly important aspects of obstetrical care, obstetricians should play a more substantial role in educating their patients.

Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Positive Farmers in South Africa: Mixed-Method Assessment.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, a See and Treat cervical cancer screening program was implemented at a local HIV clinic in Limpopo, South Africa, where infrastructure limited adequate Pap smear usability. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this evaluation was to determine the quality and sustainability of the implemented program. METHODS: A mixed-methods program analysis was conducted at 18-months post implementation. Data collection techniques included in-depth interviews of staff and patients, observation of healthcare workers delivering screening, and review of charts and patient logs. FINDINGS: Eighteen in-depth interviews revealed improved cervical cancer screening understanding and awareness. Privacy concerns and negative perceptions of medical care were barriers to screening. Informal observations revealed continued clinical competence among healthcare workers who had been previously trained. Review of charts demonstrated positive correlation between VIA and Pap smear results. In evaluating loss to attrition, about half of the first cohort of patients were lost to follow-up. VIAs and Pap smears were offered on an ongoing basis, and month-over-month change for overlapping four months of programming between 2015 and 2016 showed a 4.4% negative change in number of Pap smears and a 57% negative change in VIAs. CONCLUSION: Our evaluation reveals successful integration of See and Treat into current clinic services in rural South Africa and increased awareness of cervical cancer among health workers and participants. Program sustainability was challenging to assess as many patients were lost to follow-up, given the migrant and transient population attending this clinic. Acceptance by health workers and patients alike is vital for the long-term impact on cervical cancer incidence in this region.