Evaluating the Quality of Narrative Feedback for Entrustable Professional Activities in a Surgery Residency Program.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the quality of narrative feedback given to surgical residents during the first five years of Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) implementation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: CBME requires ongoing formative assessments and feedback on learners' performance. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using assessments of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) in the Surgical Foundations curriculum at Queen's University from 2017-2022. Two raters independently evaluated quality of narrative feedback using the Quality of Assessment of Learning (QuAL) Score (0-5). RESULTS: A total of 3,900 EPA assessments were completed over 5 years. Fifty-seven percent (2229/3900) of assessments had narrative feedback documented with a mean QuAL score of 2.16±1.49. Of these, 1614 (72.4%) provided evidence about the resident's performance, 951 (42.7%) provided suggestions for improvement, and 499/2229 (22.4%) connected suggestions to the evidence. There was no meaningful change in narrative feedback quality over time (r=0.067, P=0.002). Variables associated with lower quality of narrative feedback include: Attending role (2.04±1.48) compared to medical student (3.13±1.12, P<0.001) and clinical fellow (2.47±1.54, P<0.001), concordant specialties between the assessor and learner (2.06±1.50 vs. 2.21±1.49, P=0.025), completion of the assessment one month or more after the encounter versus one week (1.85±1.48 vs. 2.23±1.49, P<0.001), and resident entrustment versus not entrusted to perform the assessed EPA (2.13±1.45 vs. 2.35±1.66; P=0.008). The quality of narrative feedback was similar for assessments completed under direct and indirect observation (2.18±1.47 vs. 2.06±1.54; P=0.153). CONCLUSIONS: Just over half of the EPA assessments of surgery residents contained narrative feedback with overall fair quality. There was no meaningful change in the quality of feedback over 5 years. These findings prompt future research and faculty development.

Was it all worth it? A graduating resident perspective on CBME.

BACKGROUND: Our institution simultaneously transitioned all postgraduate specialty training programs to competency-based medical education (CBME) curricula. We explored experiences of CBME-trained residents graduating from five-year programs to inform the continued evolution of CBME in Canada. METHODS: We utilized qualitative description to explore residents' experiences and inform continued CBME improvement. Data were collected from fifteen residents from various specialties through focus groups, interviews, and written responses. The data were analyzed inductively, using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: We identified five overarching themes. Three themes provided insight into residents' experiences with CBME, describing discrepancies between the intentions of CBME and how it was enacted, challenges with implementation, and variation in residents' experiences. Two themes - adaptations and recommendations - could inform meaningful refinements for CBME going forward. CONCLUSIONS: Residents graduating from CBME training programs offered a balanced perspective, including criticism and recognition of the potential value of CBME when implemented as intended. Their experiences provide a better understanding of residents' needs within CBME curricula, including greater balance and flexibility within programs of assessment and curricula. Many challenges that residents faced with CBME could be alleviated by greater accountability at program, institutional, and national levels. We conclude with actionable recommendations for addressing residents' needs in CBME.

Postdischarge opioid use after lumbar spine surgery among older adults in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid use places a considerable economic burden on health care systems. Older patients undergoing surgical procedures for painful conditions commonly receive opioids pre- and postoperatively, and are susceptible to adverse reactions. This study explores predictors of prolonged postoperative opioid use among older patients after lumbar spine surgery and the consequences in terms of health care utilization and costs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using Ontario administrative data from older adults undergoing spine surgery between 2006 and 2017. Data were analyzed from 90 days preoperatively to 1 year after hospital discharge, with last postoperative opioid prescriptions stratified into 90-day increments. We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression to identify predictors of long-term opioid use and generalized linear modelling to examine resource utilization and health care costs (2021 Canadian dollars). RESULTS: Of 15 109 patients included, 40.8% received preoperative opioid prescriptions. Preoperative opioid use strongly predicted prolonged postoperative use (odds ratio [OR] 4.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.16-4.79), with 48.3% of patients who received preoperative opioids continuing to use opioids for longer than 9 months, relative to 12.7% of those without preoperative use. Several other risk factors for prolonged use were identified. Patients receiving long-term postoperative opioids incurred greater health care costs relative to those with opioids prescribed for fewer than 90 days (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.44-1.54). CONCLUSION: Among older adults undergoing spine surgery, preoperative opioid use was a strong predictor of prolonged postoperative use, which was associated with increased health care costs. These results form an important baseline for future studies evaluating strategies to reduce opioid use targeting older surgical populations.

Patient Radiation Doses in IR Procedures: The American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy Pilot.

PURPOSE: To update normative data on fluoroscopy dose indices in the United States for the first time since the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology study in the late 1990s. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy pilot study collected data from March 2018 through December 2019, with 50 fluoroscopes from 10 sites submitting data. Primary radiation dose indices including fluoroscopy time (FT), cumulative air kerma (Ka,r), and kerma area product (PKA) were collected for interventional radiology fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. Clinical facility procedure names were mapped to the American College of Radiology (ACR) common procedure lexicon. Distribution parameters including the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th, and 99th percentiles were computed. RESULTS: Dose indices were collected for 70,377 FGI procedures, with 50,501 ultimately eligible for analysis. Distribution parameters are reported for 100 ACR Common IDs. FT in minutes, Ka,r in mGy, and PKA in Gy-cm2 are reported in this study as (n; median) for select ACR Common IDs: inferior vena cava filter insertion (1,726; FT: 2.9; Ka,r: 55.8; PKA: 14.19); inferior vena cava filter removal (464; FT: 5.7; Ka,r: 178.6; PKA: 34.73); nephrostomy placement (2,037; FT: 4.1; Ka,r: 39.2; PKA: 6.61); percutaneous biliary drainage (952; FT: 12.4; Ka,r: 160.5; PKA: 21.32); gastrostomy placement (1,643; FT: 3.2; Ka,r: 29.1; PKA: 7.29); and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement (327; FT: 34.8; Ka,r: 813.0; PKA: 181.47). CONCLUSIONS: The ACR DIR-Fluoro pilot has provided state-of-the-practice statistics for radiation dose indices from IR FGI procedures. These data can be used to prioritize procedures for radiation optimization, as demonstrated in this work.

Patient Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures: Comparison of Fluoroscopy Dose Indices between the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy Pilot and the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Study.

PURPOSE: To compare radiation dose index distributions for fluoroscopically guided interventions in interventional radiology from the American College of Radiology (ACR) Fluoroscopy Dose Index Registry (DIR-Fluoro) pilot to those from the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology (RAD-IR) study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individual and grouped ACR Common identification numbers (procedure types) from the DIR-Fluoro pilot were matched to procedure types in the RAD-IR study. Fifteen comparisons were made. Distribution parameters, including the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles, were compared for fluoroscopy time (FT), cumulative air kerma (Ka,r), and kerma area product (PKA). Two derived indices were computed using median dose indices. The procedure-averaged reference air kerma rate (Ka,r¯) was computed as Ka,r / FT. The procedure-averaged x-ray field size at the reference point (Ar) was computed as PKA / (Ka,r × 1,000). RESULTS: The median FT was equally likely to be higher or lower in the DIR-Fluoro pilot as it was in the RAD-IR study, whereas the maximum FT was almost twice as likely to be higher in the DIR-Fluoro pilot than it was in the RAD-IR study. The median Ka,r was lower in the DIR-Fluoro pilot for all procedures, as was median PKA. The maximum Ka,r and PKA were more often higher in the DIR-Fluoro pilot than in the RAD-IR study. Ka,r¯ followed the same pattern as Ka,r, whereas Ar was often greater in DIR-Fluoro. CONCLUSIONS: The median dose indices have decreased since the RAD-IR study. The typical Ka,r rates are lower, a result of the use of lower default dose rates. However, opportunities for quality improvement exist, including renewed focus on tight collimation of the imaging field of view.

Utility of routine postoperative chest radiography in patients undergoing clavicle fixation: a retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Although uncommon, pneumothorax is a potentially serious complication following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of clavicle fractures. In many centres it is routine practice to obtain postoperative chest radiographs following ORIF of clavicle fractures to assess for iatrogenic pneumothorax. Given the need to contain health care costs, the low sensitivity for detecting small pneumothorax and a desire to decrease patient radiation exposure, the practice of ordering chest radiographs following ORIF of clavicle fractures may be unnecessary. METHODS: All patients undergoing ORIF of clavicle fractures with plate and screw fixation at Kingston Health Sciences Centre between April 2009 and June 2020 were identified from the Discharge Abstract Database (inpatient) and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (outpatient) using relevant Canadian Classification of Health Intervention procedure codes. Charts were manually reviewed to confirm diagnosis and procedure, and patients with preoperative pneumothorax were excluded. The frequency of postoperative chest radiograph and pneumothorax detection were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 292 patients who underwent ORIF of clavicle fractures during the study period, 17 were excluded for having a pneumothorax on preoperative chest radiograph. Of the remaining 275 patients, 101 (36.7%) had postoperative chest radiographs, of whom none were found to have postoperative iatrogenic pneumothorax. CONCLUSION: Since 2009, the rate of routine postoperative chest radiography following ORIF of clavicle fractures is 36.7% at our centre. During this time period, none of the 101 patients who had postoperative chest radiographs had a postoperative iatrogenic pneumothorax. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients available, and our findings confirm those of several smaller studies. Owing to the low rate of postoperative iatrogenic pneumothorax, we conclude that postoperative chest radiography is unnecessary following ORIF of clavicle fractures.

Long-term opioid use in seniors following hip and knee arthroplasty in Ontario: a historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: Canadian seniors who undergo hip and knee arthroplasty often experience significant postoperative pain, which could result in persistent opioid use. We aimed to document the impact of preoperative opioid use and other characteristics on postoperative opioid prescriptions in elderly patients following hip and knee replacement before widespread dissemination of opioid reduction strategies. METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study to evaluate postoperative opioid use in patients over 65 yr undergoing primary total hip and knee replacement over a ten-year period from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2016, using linked de-identified Ontario administrative data. We determined the use of preoperative opioids and the duration of postoperative opioid prescriptions (short-term [1-90 days], prolonged [91-180 days], chronic [181-365 days], or undocumented). RESULTS: The study included 49,638 hip and 85,558 knee replacement patients. Eighteen percent of hip and 21% of knee replacement patients received an opioid prescription within 90 days before surgery. Postoperatively, 51% of patients filled opioid prescriptions for 1-90 days, while 24% of hip and 29% of knee replacement patients filled prescriptions between 6 and 12 months, with no impact of preoperative opioid use. Residence in long-term care was a significant predictor of chronic opioid use (hip: odds ratio [OR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93 to 3.59; knee: OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.75 to 3.45); other risk factors included female sex and increased comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Despite a main goal of joint arthroplasty being relief of pain, seniors commonly remained on postoperative opioids, even if not receiving opioids before surgery. Opioid reduction strategies need to be implemented at the surgical, primary physician, long-term care, and patient levels. These findings form a basis for future investigations following implementation of opioid reduction approaches.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les aînés canadiens subissant une arthroplastie de la hanche ou du genou éprouvent souvent une douleur postopératoire importante, ce qui pourrait entraîner la consommation persistante d'opioïdes. Nous avons cherché à documenter l'impact d'une utilisation préopératoire d'opioïdes et d'autres caractéristiques sur les prescriptions postopératoires d'opioïdes chez les patients âgés suivant un remplacement de hanche ou de genou avant l'utilisation répandue de stratégies de réduction d'opioïdes. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte historique pour évaluer la consommation postopératoire d'opioïdes chez les patients de plus de 65 ans subissant une arthroplastie totale primaire de la hanche ou du genou sur une période de dix ans du 1er avril 2006 au 31 mars 2016, à l'aide de données administratives dépersonnalisées et codées de l'Ontario. Nous avons déterminé la durée des ordonnances préopératoires et postopératoires d'opioïdes (à court terme [1-90 jours], prolongées [91-180 jours], chroniques [181-365 jours] ou non documentées). RéSULTATS: L'étude a porté sur 49 638 patients ayant subi une arthroplastie de la hanche et 85 558 patients une arthroplastie du genou. Dix-huit pour cent des patients ayant subi une arthroplastie de la hanche et 21 % des patients ayant subi une arthroplastie du genou ont reçu une ordonnance d'opioïdes dans les 90 jours précédant leur chirurgie. En période postopératoire, 51 % des patients ont utilisé leurs ordonnances d'opioïdes pendant 1 à 90 jours, tandis que 24 % des patients d'arthroplastie de la hanche et 29 % des patients d'arthroplastie du genou ont utilisé leurs ordonnances entre six et 12 mois. Le fait d'habiter dans un établissement de soins de longue durée était un prédicteur important de consommation chronique d'opioïdes (hanche : rapport de cotes [RC], 2,64; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1,93 à 3,59; genou : RC, 2,46; IC 95 %, 1,75 à 3,45); le sexe féminin et l'augmentation des comorbidités constituaient d'autres facteurs de risque. CONCLUSION: Bien que l'un des principaux objectifs de l'arthroplastie articulaire soit le soulagement de la douleur, les personnes âgées continuent généralement à consommer des opioïdes en période postopératoire, même si elles ne prenaient pas d'opioïdes avant leur chirurgie. Il est nécessaire de mettre en œuvre des stratégies de réduction des opioïdes qui s'adressent aux chirurgiens, aux médecins traitants, aux soins de longue durée et aux patients. Ces constatations constituent la base d'études futures réalisées à la suite de la mise en œuvre d'approches de réduction des opioïdes.

Chronic opioid use after joint replacement surgery in seniors is associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs: a historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: Postoperative opioid use may be associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs. We sought to examine the relationship between duration of postoperative opioid prescriptions and healthcare costs and resource utilization in senior patients following hip and knee replacement. METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study evaluating postoperative opioid use and healthcare costs in patients over the age of 65 yr undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty over a ten-year period from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2016. The last follow-up date was 31 March 2017. We identified preoperative and postoperative opioid prescriptions, patient characteristics, and healthcare costs using deidentified Ontario administrative databases (Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences). Duration of postoperative opioid use was divided into four categories: short-term (1-90 days), prolonged (91-180 days), chronic (181-365 days), and undocumented. RESULTS: The study included 49,638 hip and 85,558 knee replacement patients. Although the initial hospitalization accounted for the greatest cost in all patients, over the following year patients in the short-term opioid use group incurred the lowest average costs, and those in the chronic group incurred the highest (hip, CAD 17,528 vs CAD 26,736; knee, CAD 16,043 vs CAD 23,007), driven by increased healthcare resource utilization. CONCLUSION: Chronic opioid use after arthroplasty was associated with higher resource utilization and healthcare costs during the year following surgery. These results can be used to develop predictors of longer opioid use and higher costs. Further research is planned to determine whether recently implemented opioid reduction strategies can reduce healthcare resource utilization.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'utilisation postopératoire d'opioïdes peut être associée à une augmentation de l'utilisation et des coûts des soins de santé. Nous avons cherché à examiner la relation entre la durée des ordonnances d'opioïdes postopératoires, les coûts des soins de santé et l'utilisation des ressources chez les patients âgés après une arthroplastie de la hanche et du genou. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte historique évaluant la consommation postopératoire d'opioïdes et les coûts des soins de santé chez les patients de plus de 65 ans subissant une arthroplastie totale primaire de la hanche ou du genou sur une période de dix ans allant du 1er avril 2006 au 31 mars 2016. La dernière date de suivi était le 31 mars 2017. Nous avons identifié les ordonnances pré- et postopératoires d'opioïdes, les caractéristiques des patients et les coûts des soins de santé à l'aide de bases de données administratives de l'Ontario désidentifiées (ICES). La durée de la consommation d'opioïdes postopératoires était divisée en quatre catégories : à court terme (1 à 90 jours), prolongée (91 à 180 jours), chronique (181 à 365 jours) et non documentée. RéSULTATS: L'étude a porté sur 49 638 patients ayant subi une arthroplastie de la hanche et 85 558 patients une arthroplastie du genou. Bien que l'hospitalisation initiale ait représenté le coût le plus élevé chez tous les patients, au cours de l'année suivante, les patients du groupe de consommation d'opioïdes à court terme ont encouru les coûts moyens les plus bas et ceux du groupe chronique les coûts les plus élevés (hanche, 17 528 CAD vs 26 736 CAD; genou, 16 043 CAD vs 23 007 CAD) en raison de l'utilisation accrue des ressources de soins de santé. CONCLUSION: La consommation chronique d'opioïdes après une arthroplastie a été associée à une augmentation de l'utilisation des ressources et des coûts des soins de santé au cours de l'année suivant la chirurgie. Ces résultats peuvent être utilisés pour développer des modèles de prédiction d'une consommation prolongée d'opioïdes et de coûts plus élevés. D'autres recherches sont prévues pour déterminer si les stratégies de réduction de la consommation d'opioïdes récemment mises en œuvre pourront réduire l'utilisation des ressources en soins de santé.

Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of glove perforation among surgical team members performing a typical set of trauma procedures, as well as to identify the rate at which these people recognize potential perforations. METHODS: Gloves used in orthopedic trauma room procedures were collected from all participating team members over 2 weeks and were subsequently examined for perforations. Perforation rates based on glove position, type, wearer and procedure were assessed. RESULTS: Perforations were found in 5.9% of gloves; 4.3% of the perforations were found in outer gloves and 1.6% in inner gloves. Among the outer gloves, 30.7% of the perforations were recognized by the wearer at the time of perforation; none of the inner glove perforations were recognized, even when they were associated with an accompanying outer glove perforation. Significantly more perforations were identified in the gloves of attending staff than in those of other team members. Attending staff experienced more perforations than other wearers, regardless of whether they were acting as the primary surgeon or as an assistant. Perforations were more common in open reduction internal fixation and amputation procedures. For open reduction internal fixation procedures, longer operative times were associated with more frequent glove perforations. CONCLUSION: The rates of glove perforation are high in orthopedic trauma surgeries, and often these perforations are not recognized by the wearer. Attending staff are at an elevated risk of glove perforation. It is recommended that all members of the surgical team change both pairs of gloves whenever an outer glove perforation is observed.

The American College of Radiology Fluoroscopy Dose Index Registry Pilot: Technical Considerations and Dosimetric Performance of the Interventional Fluoroscopes.

PURPOSE: To characterize the accuracy and consistency of fluoroscope dose index reporting and report rates of occupational radiation safety hardware availability and use, trainee participation in procedures, and optional hardware availability at pilot sites for the American College of Radiology (ACR) Fluoroscopy Dose Index Registry (DIR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine institutions participated in the registry pilot, providing fluoroscopic technical and clinical practice data from 38 angiographic C-arm-type fluoroscopes. These data included measurements of the procedure table and mattress transmission factors and accuracy measurements of the reference-point air kerma (Ka,r) and air kerma-area product (PKA). The accuracy of the radiation dose indices were analyzed for variation over time by 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Sites also self-reported information on availability and use of radiation safety hardware, hardware configuration of fluoroscopes, and trainee participation in procedures. RESULTS: All Ka,r and PKA measurements were within the ±35% regulatory limit on accuracy. The mean absolute difference between correction factors for a given system in fluoroscopic and acquisition mode was 0.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.03). For the 28 fluoroscopic imaging planes that provided data for 3 time points, ANOVA yielded an F value of 0.134 with an F-critical value of 3.109 (P = .875). CONCLUSIONS: This publication provides the technical and clinical framework pertaining to the ACR Fluoroscopy DIR pilot and offers necessary context for future analysis of the clinical procedure radiation-dose data collected.

Improved Dose Estimates for Fluoroscopically Guided Lumbar Epidural Injections.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to determine the potential impact of system inaccuracies and table attenuation on fluoroscope-reported dose values. DESIGN: An Institutional Review Board-approved study was conducted to collect detailed acquisition and patient exposure data for fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural injections. BACKGROUND: System-reported dosimetry values, especially the air Kinetic Energy Released per unit MAss and dose-area product metrics, are routinely used for estimating the radiation burden to patients undergoing fluoroscopy-guided procedures. However, these metrics do not account for other factors, such as acquisition geometry, where the table may attenuate a substantial fraction of the x-ray intensity, and system dosimetry inaccuracies, which are only required to be accurate within ±35%. METHODS: Acquisition data from 46 patients undergoing fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural injections were collected to better estimate the true incident dose-area product. Gantry angles, x-ray technique factors, and field sizes were collected to characterize each procedure. Additionally, the fluoroscope dosimetry accuracy and table attenuation properties were evaluated as a function of kVp to generate the correction factors necessary for accurate dosimetry estimates. RESULTS: The system-reported values overestimated the total patient entrance dose-area product by an average of 34% (13-44%). Errors may be substantially higher for systems with less accurate fluoroscopes or more anterior-posterior projections. Correcting system-reported dosimetry values for systematic inaccuracies and variability can substantially improve fluoroscopic dose values. CONCLUSIONS: Including corrections for system output inaccuracies and acquisition factors such as table attenuation is necessary for any reliable assessment of radiation burden to patients associated with fluoroscopy-guided procedures.

Variability in radiation dose and image quality: A comparison across fluoroscopy-system vendors, generations of equipment and institutions.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences in radiation dose and image quality across institutions, fluoroscope vendors and generations of fluoroscopes for pediatric cardiac catheterization. BACKGROUND: Increased recognition of the potentially harmful effects of ionizing radiation has spurred technological advances in fluoroscopes, as well as increased focus on optimizing fluoroscope performance. There is currently little understanding of variability in the dose-image quality relationship across institutions, fluoroscope vendor and/or generation of equipment. METHODS: We evaluated latest generation fluoroscopes from Phillips, Siemens, GE, and Toshiba, and an older generation Phillips fluoroscope (release date 2003) at three different institutions. Radiation dose was measured using an anthropomorphic dose-assessment phantom with effective dose in mSv estimated from Monte Carlo simulations. Image quality phantom images were scored on a 12-point scale by three blinded reviewers. RESULTS: Fluoroscope effective doses ranged from 0.04 to 0.14 mSv/1,000 pulses for fluoroscopy with associated composite image quality scores ranging from 8.0 ± 0.6 to 10.4 ± 1.3. For cineangiography, effective doses ranged from 0.17 to 0.57 mSv/1,000 frames with image quality scores ranging from 10.1 ± 0.3 to 11.1 ± 0.3. There was modest correlation between effective dose and image quality (r = 0.67, P = 0.006). The older generation fluoroscope delivered consistently higher doses than the newer generation systems (2.3- to 3.5-fold higher for fluoroscopy; 1.1- to 3.4-fold higher for cineangiography) without appreciable differences in image quality. CONCLUSION: Technological advances have markedly improved fluoroscope performance. Comparing latest generation systems across vendors and institutions, we found variability in the dose-IQ relationship and speculate that this reflects both equipment and institutional optimization practices.

The effects of exercise referral schemes in the United Kingdom in those with cardiovascular, mental health, and musculoskeletal disorders: a preliminary systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Exercise referral schemes within clinical populations may offer benefits for inactive and sedentary individuals, and improve and aid treatment of specific health disorders. This systematic review aims to provide an overview, and examine the impact, of exercise referral schemes in patients with cardiovascular, mental health, and musculoskeletal disorders. This review focuses on populations within the United Kingdom (UK) only, with an aim to inform national exercise referral policies and guidelines. METHOD: Data was collected from specific sources using validated methodology through PRISMA. Systematic searches were performed using Locate, PubMed, Scopus and Pro Quest: Public Health databases. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria set for each sub group. This included that all studies aimed to prevent, observe, or decrease ill-health relating to the disorder, participants over the age of sixteen, and health disorders and outcomes were reviewed. All studies were conducted in the UK only. RESULTS: In the 13 articles, a variety of modes and types of exercise were utilised. One-to-one supervised exercise sessions based in a gym environment were most frequently employed. Results showed that longer length schemes (20+ weeks) produced better health outcomes, and had higher adherence to physical activity prescribed, than those of shorter length (8-12 weeks). In patients referred with cardiovascular disorders, cardiovascular-related measures showed significant decreases including blood pressure. Schemes increased physical activity levels over the length of scheme for all disorders. CONCLUSION: Longer length schemes (20+ weeks) improved adherence to physical activity prescribed over the course of the scheme, and could support longer term exercise adherence upon completion, however additional research on larger samples should examine this further. An implication is that schemes currently recommended in guidelines do not tailor programmes to support long term adherence to exercise, which must be addressed. There is currently a lack of research examining programmes tailored to suit the individual's health conditions thus further research might allow providers to tailor delivery and build upon policy recommendations in the UK.

Characterization of CT Hounsfield Units for 3D acquisition trajectories on a dedicated breast CT system.

Hounsfield Units (HU) are used clinically in differentiating tissue types in a reconstructed CT image, and therefore the HU accuracy of a system is important, especially when using multiple sources, novel detector and non-traditional trajectories. Dedicated clinical breast CT (BCT) systems therefore should be similarly evaluated. In this study, uniform cylindrical phantoms filled with various uniform density fluids were used to characterize differences in HU values between simple circular and complex 3D (saddle) orbits. Based on ACR recommendations, the HU accuracy, center-to-edge variability within a slice, and overall variability within the reconstructed volume were characterized for simple and complex acquisitions possible on a single versatile BCT system. Results illustrate the statistically significantly better performance of the saddle orbit, especially close to the chest and nipple regions of what would clinically be a pendant breast volume. The incomplete cone beam acquisition of a simple circular orbit causes shading artifacts near the nipple, due to insufficient sampling, rendering a major portion of the scanned phantom unusable, whereas the saddle orbit performs exceptionally well and provides a tighter distribution of HU values throughout the reconstructed volumes. This study further establishes the advantages of using 3D acquisition trajectories for breast CT as well as other applications by demonstrating the robustness of HU values throughout large reconstructed volumes.

Abstract 12670: Variability in Radiation Dose and Image Quality: A Comparison Across Fluoroscopy-system Vendors and Generations of Equipment.

INTRODUCTION: Increased recognition of the potentially harmful effects of ionizing radiation has spurred technological advances to reduce exposure during fluoroscopy. However there is currently little understanding of the dose-image quality (IQ) relationship between fluoroscopy vendors and across generations of equipment used for imaging during pediatric catheterization. METHODS: We evaluated latest generation fluoroscopy systems from Phillips, Siemens, GE and Toshiba, and an older generation Phillips system (2004 release). Fluoroscopy and cineangiography were performed on a tissue simulation anthropomorphic phantom using a standardized imaging approach. Phantom surface exposures were used for Monte Carlo simulations to calculate radiation effective dose, accounting for differences in beam parameters. We also imaged a fluoroscopy IQ phantom to assess contrast-detail and line-per-inch visualization. IQ images were scored by 3 blinded reviewers with scores averaged to produce a composite rating (scale 0-18). To assess the impact of imaging approach we then simulated a neonatal cardiac catheterization incorporating "typical" imaging protocols provided by institutions using the various systems. RESULTS: Effective doses and IQ scores are summarized in the table. Effective doses varied by >400% with the older generation system consistently delivering markedly higher doses. The associated figure summarizes dose and IQ for a simulated neonatal cardiac catheterization which accounts for measured doses as well as the reported institutional imaging parameters summarized in the figure legend. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate substantial technological improvements in fluoroscopy equipment and may be useful to justify institutional "upgrades". Comparing latest generation systems across vendors and institutions, we found variability in the dose-IQ relationship that reflects both equipment and imaging approach.

Characterization of X-ray scattering for various phantoms and clinical breast geometries using breast CT on a dedicated hybrid system.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to utilize a dedicated breast CT system using a 2D beam stop array to physically evaluate the scatter to primary ratios (SPRs) of different geometric phantoms and prospectively acquired clinical patient data. METHODS: Including clinically unrealizable compositions of 100% glandular and 100% fat, projection images were acquired using three geometrically different phantoms filled with fluids simulating breast tissue. The beam stop array method was used for measuring scatter in projection space, and creating the scatter corrected primary images. 2D SPRs were calculated. Additionally, a new figure of merit, the 3D normalized scatter contribution (NSC) volumes were calculated. RESULTS: The 2D SPR values (0.52-1.10) were primarily dependent on phantom geometry; a secondary dependence was due to their uniform density; 2D SPRs were low frequency and smoothly varying in the uniformly filled phantoms. SPRs of clinical patient data followed similar trends as phantoms, but with noticeable deviations and high frequency components due to the heterogeneous distribution of glandular tissue. The maximum measured patient 2D SPRs were all <0.6, even for the largest diameter breast. These results demonstrate modest scatter components with changing object geometries and densities; the 3D NSC volumes with higher frequency components help visualize scatter distribution throughout the reconstructed image volumes. Furthermore, the SPRs in the heterogeneous clinical breast cases were underestimated by the equivalent density, uniformly filled phantoms. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide guidance on the use of uniformly distributed density and differently shaped phantoms when considering simulations. They also clearly demonstrate that results from patients can vary considerably from 2D SPRs of uniformly simulated phantoms.

Impact of COVID-19 on Confidence and Anxiety in Medical Students Related to Procedural Skills.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, opportunities for hands-on surgical and procedural skills training and practice were significantly reduced, as many curricular activities were deferred or converted to a virtual format. This study focused on whether these changes contributed to increased anxiety and decreased confidence for medical students performing these skills. METHODS: The Surgical Skills Technology Elective Program (SSTEP) is an annual five-day intensive procedural skills program after second-year medical school. Surveys assessing anxiety and confidence with respect to procedural skills were distributed and completed before and after SSTEP in 2016 and 2022. RESULTS: Pre-SSTEP scores were higher for anxiety and lower for confidence in the 2022 cohort compared to the prepandemic group. Post-SSTEP scores for anxiety and confidence were comparable between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Curricular changes and restrictions during the pandemic likely played a major role in the 2022 cohort having more anxiety and less confidence in their skills than prepandemic cohorts. However, these changes were effectively mitigated after participation in SSTEP. Medical schools should consider using and expanding on in-person bootcamps to support those with decreased exposure to surgical and procedural skills related to resource constraints and/or curricular changes.