Congenital adrenal hyperplasia in patients with adrenal tumors: a population-based case-control study.

PURPOSE: Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) has been associated with adrenal tumors (ATs) but the relationship is still unclear. The aim was to investigate if CAH was more common in patients with adrenal tumors and their characteristics. METHODS: Using national registers all patients with an AT diagnosis (cases) and selected matched controls without AT diagnosis were included from 1st January 2005 to 31st December 2019. The patients with a CAH diagnosis were scrutinized in detail. RESULTS: ATs were diagnosed in 26,573 individuals and in none of 144,124 controls. In 20 patients with ATs and 1 control, a CAH diagnosis was present. The odds for having CAH in patients with ATs was 109 (95% CI 15-809; P < 0.0001). Among cases, 5 had a CAH diagnosis before the discovery of ATs and 15 afterwards. Half were females and two had been screened for CAH neonatally. The mean age when the ATs was discovered was 55.6 years. Adrenalectomy was performed in seven patients. Five patients had unilateral adrenalectomy before the CAH diagnosis and did not have any glucocorticoid protection. After the CAH diagnosis, 15 were initiated on glucocorticoids and 6 on mineralocorticoids. The majority diagnosed with CAH before index date had classic CAH. In individual diagnosed after index date, only three had classic CAH. The rest had nonclassical CAH. During the follow-up time of 9 years, six deceased, two of them in an adrenal crisis. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CAH was greater in patients with ATs than in patients without. In all patients with ATs, CAH should be considered.

Drug-drug interactions that reduce the formation of pharmacologically active metabolites: a poorly understood problem in clinical practice.

Drug-drug interactions can lead to reduced efficacy of medical treatment. Therapeutic failure may for instance result from combined treatment with an inhibitor of the specific pathway that is responsible for the generation of pharmacologically active drug metabolites. This problem may be overlooked in clinical practice. Several examples of drugs will be discussed -clopidogrel, losartan, tamoxifen and codeine - to illustrate differences in the potential impact on drug treatment in clinical practice. We conclude that the combined use of cytochrome P450-blocking serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tamoxifen or codeine should be avoided, whereas the situation is much more complex regarding the use of proton pump inhibitors together with clopidogrel, and the evidence regarding cytochrome P450 inhibitor-dependent activation of losartan is inconclusive.

The effect of amiodarone on warfarin anticoagulation: a register-based nationwide cohort study involving the Swedish population.

Essentials Data on the effect of introducing amiodarone in patients already using warfarin regime are scarce. Information on 754 patients was extracted from three nationwide registers in Sweden. With amiodaron, 37% of patients had an international normalized ratio (INR) over 3.0 To avoid bleeding, the initiation of amiodarone should be accompanied by closer INR monitoring. SUMMARY: Background Data indicate that the interaction between warfarin and amiodarone results in an increased warfarin effect. There are several large, well-performed studies using genetic and clinical factors such as co-medication to predict an adequate starting dose of warfarin. However, longitudinal data on the effect of introducing amiodarone in patients on an ongoing warfarin regime are more scarce. Objectives An investigation of how initiation of amiodarone affects the anticoagulant effect and dosing of warfarin, using data from three nationwide registries. Patients/Methods In a retrospective cohort study including 754 patients, warfarin doses were compared between two 4-week periods, before and 18-21 weeks after initiating co-treatment with amiodarone. In addition, warfarin doses and international normalized ratio (INR) values were calculated week-by-week after the initiation of amiodarone. Results The initiation of amiodarone increased the mean INR from 2.6 to 3.1. The proportion of patients with a supratherapeutic INR over 3.0 and 4.0 increased from 12% to 37% and 0.9% to 5.5%, respectively. The subsequent mean decrease in warfarin dose was 24.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.5, 25.6). The frequency of INR monitoring within 1 and 2 weeks after initiation of amiodarone was 67% and 90%. Conclusions Although warfarin doses in most patients were within the therapeutic range, more than one in three patients initiating co-treatment with amiodarone were exposed to a supratherapeutic anticoagulative effect within 3 weeks. In order to further avoid severe unnecessary bleeding, the initiation of amiodarone should be accompanied by closer INR monitoring, anticipating an average dose reduction of 25%.

The effect of carbamazepine on warfarin anticoagulation: a register-based nationwide cohort study involving the Swedish population.

BACKGROUND: There are data indicating that the interaction between warfarin and carbamazepine results in decreased warfarin efficacy. However, the evidence on the magnitude of and interindividual differences in susceptibility to this interaction has remained scarce. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of carbamazepine on warfarin anticoagulation and warfarin maintenance doses by the use of data from three nationwide registries. PATIENTS/METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study including 166 patients, warfarin doses were compared 2-4 weeks before and 10-13 weeks after initiation of cotreatment with carbamazepine. In addition, warfarin doses and International Normalized Ratio (INR) values were calculated week-by-week during cotreatment. Data on prescribed warfarin doses and INR measurements were obtained from two large Swedish warfarin registers. Data on carbamazepine use were retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. RESULTS: The average warfarin doses were 49% (95% confidence interval 43-56) higher during carbamazepine treatment. The INR decreased upon carbamazepine initiation, and subtherapeutic INR levels were observed in 79% of all patients during the fifth week of cotreatment. Warfarin maintenance dose increases exceeding 50% and 100% were observed in 59% and 17% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Four of five warfarin-treated patients in whom cotreatment with carbamazepine was initiated experienced subtherapeutic anticoagulative effect within 3-5 weeks. The warfarin dose was subsequently increased by 49%, a change that differed widely between patients. In order to avoid thrombosis and ischemic stroke, carbamazepine initiation should be accompanied by close INR monitoring to better meet the anticipated increase in dose demand.

The impact of interacting drugs on dispensed doses of warfarin in the Swedish population: A novel use of population based drug registers.

To investigate the impact of interacting drugs on the dispensed doses of warfarin in the Swedish population. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional population based register study of patients being dispensed warfarin. Warfarin doses were estimated in different age groups, in men and women, and in patients using interacting drugs. The influence of interacting drugs on the dispensed warfarin dose was analyzed using multiple regression. All 143,729 patients dispensed warfarin were analyzed. The dispensed dose of warfarin was highest in patients 30-39 years old and decreased with age. Co-medication with carbamazepine, simvastatin, paracetamol, amiodarone, fluconazole, lactulose, or bezafibrate was associated with significant changes in dispensed warfarin doses, by +40%, -3.4%, -7.3%, -8.2%, -8.8%, -9.0%, and -9.7%, respectively. After adjustment for age and gender, sulfamethoxazole was also found to significantly alter the dispensed warfarin dose (-6.1%). We provide new support for the previous scarce evidence of interactions between warfarin and carbamazepine, bezafibrate, and lactulose. Initiation or discontinuation of bezafibrate or lactulose in a patient on warfarin should warrant close clinical monitoring. The marked increased warfarin requirement associated with carbamazepine use supports moving from a more conservative reactive towards a proactive strategy including preventive warfarin dose adjustments to avoid potential adverse effects.

UGT1A4*3 encodes significantly increased glucuronidation of olanzapine in patients on maintenance treatment and in recombinant systems.

Olanzapine, a world leader in antipsychotic drugs, is used in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. There is considerable interpatient variability in its hepatic clearance. Polymorphic glucuronidation of olanzapine by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A4 (UGT1A4) was investigated retrospectively in patient samples taken for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and in recombinant metabolic systems in vitro. Multivariate analyses revealed that patients who were heterozygous as well as those who were homozygous for the UGT1A4*3 allelic variant had significantly higher concentrations of the major metabolite olanzapine 10-N-glucuronide in serum (+38% (P = 0.011) and +246% (P < 0.001), respectively). This finding was in line with the significant increases in glucuronidation activity of olanzapine observed with recombinant UGT1A4.3 (Val-48) as compared with UGT1A4.1 (Leu-48) (1.3-fold difference, P < 0.001). By contrast, serum concentrations of the parent drug were not significantly influenced by UGT1A4 genotype. Our findings therefore indicate that UGT1A4-mediated metabolism is not a major contributor to interpatient variability in olanzapine levels. However, with respect to other drugs for which UGT1A4 has a dominant role in clearance, increased glucuronidation encoded by UGT1A4*3 might impact the risk for subtherapeutic drug exposure.