Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 33
Filter
Add more filters

Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 15: 261, 2015 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26463046

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal maternal health conditions (such as obesity, underweight, depression and stress) and health behaviours (such as smoking, alcohol consumption and unhealthy nutrition) during pregnancy have been associated with negative pregnancy outcomes. Our first aim was to give an overview of the self-reported health status and health behaviours of pregnant women under midwife-led primary care in the Netherlands. Our second aim was to identify potential differences in these health status indicators and behaviours according to educational level (as a proxy for socio-economic status) and ethnicity (as a proxy for immigration status). METHODS: Our cross-sectional study (data obtained from the DELIVER multicentre prospective cohort study conducted from September 2009 to March 2011) was based on questionnaires about maternal health and prenatal care, which were completed by 6711 pregnant women. The relationships of education and ethnicity with 13 health status indicators and 10 health behaviours during pregnancy were examined using multilevel multiple logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age, parity, number of weeks pregnant and either education or ethnicity. RESULTS: Lower educated women were especially more likely to smoke (Odds Ratio (OR) 11.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6- 16.8); have passive smoking exposure (OR 6.9; 95% CI 4.4-11.0); have low health control beliefs (OR 10.4; 95% CI 8.5-12.8); not attend antenatal classes (OR 4.5; 95% CI 3.5-5.8) and not take folic acid supplementation (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.7-4.4). They were also somewhat more likely to skip breakfast daily, be obese, underweight and depressed or anxious. Non-western women were especially more likely not to take folic acid supplementation (OR 4.5; 95% CI 3.5-5.7); have low health control beliefs (OR 4.1; 95% CI 3.1-5.2) and not to attend antenatal classes (OR 3.3; 95% CI 2.0-5.4). They were also somewhat more likely to have nausea, back pains and passive smoking exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial socio-demographic inequalities persist with respect to many health-related issues in medically low risk pregnancies in the Netherlands. Improved strategies are needed to address the specific needs of socio-demographic groups at higher risk and the structures underlying social inequalities in pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Health Behavior , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Smoking/epidemiology
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 15: 98, 2015 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25895975

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little research into non-western women's prenatal care utilisation in industrialised western countries has taken generational differences into account. In this study we examined non-western women's prenatal care utilisation and its explanatory factors according to generational status. METHODS: Data from 3300 women participating in a prospective cohort of primary midwifery care clients (i.e. women with no complications or no increased risk for complications during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium who receive maternity care by autonomous midwives) in the Netherlands (the DELIVER study) was used. Gestational age at entry and the total number of prenatal visits were aggregated into an index. The extent to which potential factors explained non-western women's prenatal care utilisation was assessed by means of blockwise logistic regression analyses and percentage changes in odds ratios. RESULTS: The unadjusted odds of first and second-generation non-western women making inadequate use of prenatal care were 3.26 and 1.96 times greater than for native Dutch women. For the first generation, sociocultural factors explained 43% of inadequate prenatal care utilisation, socioeconomic factors explained 33% and demographic and pregnancy factors explained 29%. For the second generation, sociocultural factors explained 66% of inadequate prenatal care utilisation. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of generation, strategies to improve utilisation should focus on those with the following sociocultural characteristics (not speaking Dutch at home, no partner or a first-generation non-Dutch partner). For the first generation, strategies should also focus on those with the following demographic, pregnancy and socioeconomic characteristics (aged ≤ 19 or ≥ 36, unplanned pregnancies, poor obstetric histories (extra-uterine pregnancy, molar pregnancy or abortion), a low educational level, below average net household income and no supplementary insurance.


Subject(s)
Communication Barriers , Culture , Emigrants and Immigrants , Language , Midwifery , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Income , Insurance, Health , Logistic Models , Morocco/ethnology , Netherlands , Netherlands Antilles/ethnology , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Suriname/ethnology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Turkey/ethnology , Young Adult
3.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 46(2): 107-13, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24350790

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes. In the Netherlands, testing for C. trachomatis is based on risk assessment. We assessed midwives' knowledge, test practices, assessment of risk behavior, and attitudes regarding testing for C. trachomatis infection during pregnancy. We evaluated the association between midwives' characteristics and their knowledge of C. trachomatis infection in terms of symptomatology and outcomes. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study among primary care midwives in the Netherlands. Between September and November 2011, midwives from all Dutch primary care midwifery practices were invited to complete a questionnaire about C. trachomatis infection. RESULTS: Of the 518 midwives invited to participate in this study, 331 (63.9%) responded. The overall median knowledge score for questions about symptomatology and outcomes was 10 out of a maximum score of 15. The median knowledge score was higher among midwives in urban areas. In total, 239 (72.2%) midwives reported testing pregnant women for C. trachomatis. The primary reason for testing was a request by the woman herself (96.2%), followed by symptoms of infection (89.1%), risk behavior (59.3%), and risk factors for infection (7.3%). Almost 25% of midwives showed positive attitudes towards universal screening for C. trachomatis. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives were knowledgeable about symptoms of infection, but less about outcomes. Midwives test pregnant women for C. trachomatis mainly on the women's request. Otherwise, testing is based on symptoms of infection rather than on known risk factors. This may contribute to under-diagnosis and under-treatment, leading to maternal, perinatal, and neonatal morbidity.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Midwifery , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Professional Competence , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 14: 264, 2014 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25106057

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies are offered to all pregnant women in the Netherlands on an opt-in basis: the Combined Test (CT) for Down syndrome at twelve weeks, and the Fetal Anomaly Scan (FAS) at around twenty weeks. The CT is free for women who are 36 or older; the FAS is free for all women. We investigated factors associated with the CT and FAS uptake. METHOD: This study is part of the DELIVER study that evaluated primary care midwifery in the Netherlands. Associations between the women's characteristics and the CT and FAS uptake were measured using multivariate and multilevel logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 5216 participants, 23% had the CT and 90% had the FAS, with uptake rates ranging from 4% to 48% and 62% to 98% respectively between practices. Age (OR: 2.71), income (OR: 1.38), ethnicity (OR: 1.37), being Protestant (OR: 0.25), multiparous (OR: 0.64) and living in the east of the country (OR: 0.31) were associated with CT uptake; education (OR: 1.26), income (OR: 1.66), being Protestant (OR: 0.37) or Muslim (OR: 0.31) and being multiparous (OR: 0.74) were associated with FAS uptake. Among western women with a non-Dutch background, first generation (OR: 2.91), age (OR: 2.00), income (OR: 1.97), being Protestant (OR: 0.32) and living in the east (OR: 0.44) were associated with CT uptake; being Catholic (OR: 0.27), Protestant (OR: 0.13) were associated with FAS uptake. Among non- western women with a non-Dutch background, age (OR: 1.73), income (OR: 1.97) and lacking proficiency in Dutch (OR: 2.18) were associated with CT uptake; higher education (OR: 1.47), being Muslim (OR: 0.37) and first generation (OR: 0.27) were associated with FAS uptake. CONCLUSION: The uptake of the CT and FAS varied widely between practices. Income, parity and being Protestant were associated with uptake of both tests; ethnicity, age and living in the east were associated with CT uptake, and education and being Muslim with FAS uptake. These findings help to explain some differences between women choosing or declining early and late screening, but not the large variation in test uptake among practices, nor between the Netherlands and other countries.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Congenital Abnormalities/blood , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Down Syndrome/genetics , Educational Status , Emigration and Immigration , Female , Humans , Income , Maternal Age , Netherlands , Parity , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Prospective Studies , Religion , Residence Characteristics
5.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 14: 237, 2014 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25037919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, prenatal screening follows an opting in system and comprises two non-invasive tests: the combined test to screen for trisomy 21 at 12 weeks of gestation and the fetal anomaly scan to detect structural anomalies at 20 weeks. Midwives counsel about prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies and they are increasingly having to counsel women from religious backgrounds beyond their experience. This study assessed midwives' perceptions and practices regarding taking client's religious backgrounds into account during counseling. As Islam is the commonest non-western religion, we were particularly interested in midwives' knowledge of whether pregnancy termination is allowed in Islam. METHODS: This exploratory study is part of the DELIVER study, which evaluated primary care midwifery in The Netherlands between September 2009 and January 2011. A questionnaire was sent to all 108 midwives of the twenty practices participating in the study. RESULTS: Of 98 respondents (response rate 92%), 68 (69%) said they took account of the client's religion. The two main reasons for not doing so were that religion was considered irrelevant in the decision-making process and that it should be up to clients to initiate such discussions. Midwives' own religious backgrounds were independent of whether they paid attention to the clients' religious backgrounds. Eighty midwives (82%) said they did not counsel Muslim women differently from other women. Although midwives with relatively many Muslim clients had more knowledge of Islamic attitudes to terminating pregnancy in general than midwives with relatively fewer Muslim clients, the specific knowledge of termination regarding trisomy 21 and other congenital anomalies was limited in both groups. CONCLUSION: While many midwives took client's religion into account, few knew much about Islamic beliefs on prenatal screening for congenital anomalies. Midwives identified a need for additional education. To meet the needs of the changing client population, counselors need more knowledge of religious opinions about the termination of pregnancy and the skills to approach religious issues with clients.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Counseling , Islam , Midwifery , Religion and Medicine , Abortion, Eugenic , Adult , Clinical Competence , Congenital Abnormalities/genetics , Cultural Competency , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Female , Genetic Testing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
6.
Public Health Nutr ; 17(10): 2344-50, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24107718

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Neural tube defects are among the most common birth defects worldwide. Folic acid intake from one month before to three months after conception reduces the likelihood of neural tube defects by at least 50%. Since 1995, several campaigns have been organised in the Netherlands which resulted in 51% of pregnant women using folic acid supplements during the entire recommended period in the northern part of the Netherlands in 2005. Our research question was to gain insight into the current prevalence and factors associated with inadequate pregnancy-related use of folic acid supplements. DESIGN: Data from the DELIVER study were used, which is a population-based cohort study. SETTING: Twenty midwifery practices across the Netherlands in 2009 and 2010. SUBJECTS: In total 5975 pregnant women completed a questionnaire covering items on sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, including folic acid intake. RESULTS: Of our study population, 55·5% (3318/5975) used folic acid supplements before conception. Several sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were associated with no preconception use of folic acid, of which non-Western ethnicity and not having a partner had the largest effect size. CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, the folic acid intake before conception is suboptimal and has not improved over recent years. Fortification of staple foods with folic acid should be reconsidered as it would provide a more effective means of ensuring an adequate intake, especially for those groups of women who are unlikely to plan their pregnancies or to receive or respond to health promotion messages.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Folic Acid/therapeutic use , Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Neural Tube Defects/prevention & control , Nutrition Policy , Patient Compliance , Preconception Care , Adult , Africa/ethnology , Asia/ethnology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Latin America/ethnology , Life Style/ethnology , Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena/ethnology , Midwifery , Netherlands , Neural Tube Defects/ethnology , Patient Compliance/ethnology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Single Person , Turkey/ethnology , Young Adult
7.
BMC Public Health ; 14: 704, 2014 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25011479

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnancy can cause maternal disease, adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal disease, which is why chlamydia screening during pregnancy has been advocated. The effectiveness of a screening program depends on the knowledge of health care professionals, women and partners and the acceptability for screening of the target population. We assessed the knowledge of chlamydia infection among pregnant women and their partners in the Netherlands, their attitudes towards testing, and their experiences of being offered a chlamydia test. In addition, we evaluated the association between participants' background characteristics and knowledge of chlamydia. METHODS: Pregnant women aged ≤ 30 years and their partners (regardless of their age) attending one of the participating primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands were invited to participate. All participants completed a questionnaire, pregnant women provided a vaginal swab and partners provided a urine sample to test for C. trachomatis. RESULTS: In total, 383 pregnant women and 282 partners participated in the study of whom 1.9% women and 2.6% partners tested chlamydia positive. Participants had high levels of awareness (92.8%) of chlamydial infection. They were knowledgeable about the risk of chlamydia infection; median knowledge score was 9.0 out of 12.0. Lower knowledge scores were found among partners (p-value <0.001), younger aged (p-value 0.02), non-western origin (p-value <0.001), low educational level (p-value <0.001), and no history of sexually transmitted infections (p-value <0.001). In total, 78% of respondents indicated that when pregnant women are tested for chlamydia, their partners should also be tested; 54% believed that all women should routinely be tested. Pregnant women more often indicated than partners that testing partners for chlamydial infection was not necessary (p-value <0.001). The majority of pregnant women (56.2%) and partners (59.2%) felt satisfied by being offered the test during antenatal care. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women and their partners were knowledgeable about chlamydial infection, found testing, both pregnant women and their partners, for chlamydia acceptable and not stigmatizing.


Subject(s)
Awareness , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mass Screening , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/complications , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Midwifery , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care , Prevalence , Sexual Partners , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/microbiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
8.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12882, 2024 06 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839796

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV2 infection results in a range of disease severities, but the underlying differential pathogenesis is still not completely understood. At presentation it remains difficult to estimate and predict severity, in particular, identify individuals at greatest risk of progression towards the most severe disease-states. Here we used advanced models with circulating serum analytes as variables in combination with daily assessment of disease severity using the SCODA-score, not only at single time points but also during the course of disease, to correlate analyte levels and disease severity. We identified a remarkably strong pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine profile with high levels for sCD163, CCL20, HGF, CHintinase3like1 and Pentraxin3 in serum which correlated with COVID-19 disease severity and overall outcome. Although precise analyte levels differed, resulting biomarker profiles were highly similar at early and late disease stages, and even during convalescence similar biomarkers were elevated and further included CXCL3, CXCL6 and Osteopontin. Taken together, strong pro-inflammatory marker profiles were identified in patients with COVID-19 disease which correlated with overall outcome and disease severity.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , COVID-19 , Macrophage Activation , Severity of Illness Index , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Humans , Biomarkers/blood , Male , Female , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Cytokines/blood , Cytokine Release Syndrome/blood , Adult , Aged , Serum Amyloid P-Component/metabolism , Serum Amyloid P-Component/analysis , C-Reactive Protein
9.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 13: 98, 2013 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23627427

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and cytomegalovirus (CMV) can negatively affect pregnancy outcomes, but can be prevented by simple precautions of pregnant women. Literature suggests that pregnant women are not always adequately informed by their care provider about preventable infectious diseases and most pregnant women have a low level of knowledge regarding these topics. There is not much information about the actual risk behaviour of pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge and risk behaviour related to toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and CMV infection prevention in pregnant women. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey among pregnant women from twenty midwifery practices across the Netherlands that participated in the DELIVER study, between October 2010 and December 2010. The questionnaire items covered respondents' knowledge of preventive practices in general, risk behaviour, and sources of received information. RESULTS: Of the 1,097 respondents (response 66.0%), 75.3% had heard, read or seen information about toxoplasmosis, 61.7% about listeriosis and 12.5% about CMV. The majority reported having heard about these infections from their care providers or read about these in printed media or on the Internet. Respondents showed limited knowledge about preventive practices for toxoplasmosis, listeriosis or CMV infection. Regarding toxoplasmosis, risk behaviour was more prevalent among respondents who had a high level of education, had the Dutch nationality, did not take folic acid during their first trimester, and had ever worked in a children day-care setting. Regarding listeriosis, risk behaviour was more prevalent among respondents who where in their third trimester. Regarding CMV infections, risk behaviour was less prevalent among respondents who were in their third trimester of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Of the respondents, a substantial part did not have knowledge about preventive practices to avoid listeriosis, toxoplasmosis and CMV infections during pregnancy. Many pregnant women are appropriately avoiding risk behaviour, without knowing what they are avoiding. Advising pregnant women about behaviours and life-style habits to prevent infectious diseases remains important and information about preventive practices need to be complete and adequate. However, it may be less important to give pregnant women specific infectious diseases information. More attention towards CMV is necessary.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Listeriosis/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Toxoplasmosis/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Folic Acid , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Humans , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Risk-Taking , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
10.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 13: 81, 2013 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23537172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential of prenatal care for addressing many pregnancy complications and concurrent health problems, non-western women in industrialized western countries more often make inadequate use of prenatal care than women from the majority population do. This study aimed to give a systematic review of factors affecting non-western women's use of prenatal care (both medical care and prenatal classes) in industrialized western countries. METHODS: Eleven databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, Women's Studies International, MIDIRS, CINAHL, Scopus and the NIVEL catalogue) were searched for relevant peer-reviewed articles from between 1995 and July 2012. Qualitative as well as quantitative studies were included. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Factors identified were classified as impeding or facilitating, and categorized according to a conceptual framework, an elaborated version of Andersen's healthcare utilization model. RESULTS: Sixteen articles provided relevant factors that were all categorized. A number of factors (migration, culture, position in host country, social network, expertise of the care provider and personal treatment and communication) were found to include both facilitating and impeding factors for non-western women's utilization of prenatal care. The category demographic, genetic and pregnancy characteristics and the category accessibility of care only included impeding factors.Lack of knowledge of the western healthcare system and poor language proficiency were the most frequently reported impeding factors. Provision of information and care in women's native languages was the most frequently reported facilitating factor. CONCLUSION: The factors found in this review provide specific indications for identifying non-western women who are at risk of not using prenatal care adequately and for developing interventions and appropriate policy aimed at improving their prenatal care utilization.


Subject(s)
Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Australia , Canada , Cultural Competency , Emigration and Immigration , Europe , Female , Humans , Language , Pregnancy , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors
11.
PLoS One ; 18(9): e0291212, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37683031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A multitude of diagnostic and predictive algorithms have been designed for COVID-19. However, currently no score can accurately quantify and track day-to-day disease severity in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We aimed to design such a score to improve pathophysiological insight in COVID-19. METHODS: Development of the Severity of COronavirus Disease Assessment (SCODA) score was based on the 4C Mortality score but patient demographic variables that remain constant during admission were excluded. Instead, parameters associated with breathing and oxygenation were added to reflect the daily condition. The SCODA score was subsequently applied to the BEAT-COVID cohort to describe COVID-19 severity over time and to determine the timing of clinical recovery for each patient, an important marker in pathophysiological studies. The BEAT-COVID study included patients with PCR confirmed COVID-19 who were hospitalized between April 2020 and March 2021 in the Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands. RESULTS: The SCODA score consists of 6 clinical and 2 routine lab parameters. 191 patients participated in the BEAT-COVID study. Median age was 66, and 74.4% was male. The modal timepoint at which recovery was clinically initiated occurred on days 8 and 24 since symptom onset for non-ICU and ICU-patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a daily score which can be used to track disease severity of patients admitted due to COVID-19. This score is useful for improving insight in COVID-19 pathophysiology, its clinical course and to evaluate interventions. In a future stage this score can also be used in other (emerging) infectious respiratory diseases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Male , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Patient Acuity , Academic Medical Centers
12.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 12: 69, 2012 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22433820

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, midwives are autonomous medical practitioners and 78% of pregnant women start their maternity care with a primary care midwife. Scientific research to support evidence-based practice in primary care midwifery in the Netherlands has been sparse. This paper describes the research design and methodology of the multicenter multidisciplinary prospective DELIVER study which is the first large-scale study evaluating the quality and provision of primary midwifery care. METHODS/DESIGN: Between September 2009 and April 2011, data were collected from clients and their partners, midwives and other healthcare professionals across the Netherlands. Clients from twenty midwifery practices received up to three questionnaires to assess the expectations and experiences of clients (e.g. quality of care, prenatal screening, emotions, health, and lifestyle). These client data were linked to data from the Netherlands Perinatal Register and electronic client records kept by midwives. Midwives and practice assistants from the twenty participating practices recorded work-related activities in a diary for one week, to assess workload. Besides, the midwives were asked to complete a questionnaire, to gain insight into collaboration of midwives with other care providers, their tasks and attitude towards their job, and the quality of the care they provide. Another questionnaire was sent to all Dutch midwifery practices which reveals information regarding the organisation of midwifery practices, provision of preconception care, collaboration with other care providers, and provision of care to ethnic minorities. Data at client, midwife and practice level can be linked. Additionally, partners of pregnant women and other care providers were asked about their expectations and experiences regarding the care delivered by midwives and in six practices client consults were videotaped to objectively assess daily practice. DISCUSSION: In total, 7685 clients completed at least one questionnaire, 136 midwives and assistants completed a diary with work-related activities (response 100%), 99 midwives completed a questionnaire (92%), and 319 practices across the country completed a questionnaire (61%), 30 partners of clients participated in focus groups, 21 other care providers were interviewed and 305 consults at six midwifery practices were videotaped.The multicenter DELIVER study provides an extensive database with national representative data on the quality of primary care midwifery in the Netherlands. This study will support evidence-based practice in primary care midwifery in the Netherlands and contribute to a better understanding of the maternity care system.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Midwifery/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care , Cohort Studies , Evidence-Based Practice , Female , Focus Groups , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Midwifery/standards , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Netherlands , Patient Satisfaction/ethnology , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Primary Health Care/standards , Prospective Studies , Sexual Partners/psychology , Workforce
13.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 70(2): 389-397, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31177218

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quality of Life (QoL) is an important outcome measure in dementia, particularly in the context of interventions. Research investigating longitudinal QoL in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate determinants and trajectories of QoL in DLB compared to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and controls. METHODS: QoL was assessed annually in 138 individuals, using the EQ5D-utility-score (0-100) and the health-related Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100). Twenty-nine DLB patients (age 69±6), 68 AD patients (age 70±6), and 41 controls (age 70±5) were selected from the Dutch Parelsnoer Institute-Neurodegenerative diseases and Amsterdam Dementia Cohort. We examined clinical work-up over time as determinants of QoL, including cognitive tests, neuropsychiatric inventory, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and disability assessment of dementia (DAD). RESULTS: Mixed models showed lower baseline VAS-scores in DLB compared to AD and controls (AD: ß±SE = -7.6±2.8, controls: ß±SE = -7.9±3.0, p < 0.05). An interaction between diagnosis and time since diagnosis indicated steeper decline on VAS-scores for AD patients compared to DLB patients (ß±SE = 2.9±1.5, p < 0.1). EQ5D-utility-scores over time did not differ between groups. Higher GDS and lower DAD-scores were independently associated with lower QoL in dementia patients (GDS: VAS ß±SE = -1.8±0.3, EQ5D-utility ß±SE = -3.7±0.4; DAD: VAS = 0.1±0.0, EQ5D-utility ß±SE = 0.1±0.1, p < 0.05). No associations between cognitive tests and QoL remained in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION: QoL is lower in DLB, while in AD QoL shows steeper decline as the disease advances. Our results indicate that non-cognitive symptoms, more than cognitive symptoms, are highly relevant as they impact QoL.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Lewy Body Disease/diagnosis , Lewy Body Disease/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 44(7): 921-7, 2007 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17342642

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) following total hip arthroplasty can lead to prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity and mortality, and high costs. This article analyzes the effect of various parameters of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis on the risk of SSI following total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Data about SSI and potential prophylaxis-, patient-, and procedure-related risk factors were prospectively collected for 1922 patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty in 11 hospitals that participated in the Dutch intervention project, Surgical Prophylaxis and Surveillance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to correct for random variation among hospitals. RESULTS: SSIs (superficial and deep) occurred in 50 patients (2.6%). The highest odds ratios for SSI were found in patients who received prophylaxis after incision (2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-8.6; P=.07), had an American Society of Anesthesiology score that was >2 (2.8, 95% CI, 0.8-9.2; P=.09), and experienced a duration of surgery that was >75th percentile (2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8; P=.04). Prolonged prophylaxis after the end of surgery and the use of antibiotic-impregnated cement did not contribute to fewer SSIs in this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that intervention programs in search of amendable factors to prevent SSI should focus on timely administration of antibiotic prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Confidence Intervals , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Postoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Probability , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
Intensive Care Med ; 33(2): 271-8, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17146632

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence of and risk factors for device-associated infections and associated mortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective surveillance-based study in ICUs of 19 hospitals in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: The study included 2,644 patients without infection at admission during 1997-2000, staying in the ICU for at least 48 h. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), central venous catheter (CVC) related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI), urinary catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI) and risk factors was monitored. Of the ventilated patients 19% developed pneumonia (25/1,000 ventilator days); of those with a central line 3% developed CR-BSI (4/1,000 CVC days,) and of catheterized patients 8% developed CA-UTI (9/1,000 catheter days). Longer device use increased the risk for all infections, especially for CR-BSI. Independent risk factors were sex, immunity, acute/elective admission, selective decontamination of the digestive tract, and systemic antibiotics at admission, dependent upon the infection type. Crude mortality significantly differed in patients with and without CR-BSI (31% vs. 20%) and CA-UTI (27% vs. 17%) but not for VAP (26% vs. 23%). Acquiring a device-associated infection was not an independent risk factor for mortality. Being in need of ventilation or a central line, and the duration of this, contributed significantly to mortality, after adjusting for other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Device use was the major risk factor for acquiring VAP, CR-BSI and CA-UTI. Acquiring a device-associated infection was not an independent risk factor for mortality, but device use in itself was.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Cross Infection/etiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Adult , Aged , Cross Infection/mortality , Female , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Risk Factors , Urinary Tract Infections/mortality
16.
Midwifery ; 46: 37-44, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28161688

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to explore the experiences, wishes and needs of pregnant women with respect to health education in primary care with midwives. DESIGN: qualitative semi-structured interview study, using thematic analysis and constant comparison. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: twenty-two pregnant women in midwife-led primary care, varying in socio-demographic characteristics, weeks of pregnancy and region of residence in the Netherlands, were interviewed between April and December 2013. FINDINGS: women considered midwives to be the designated health caregivers for providing antenatal health education, and generally appreciated the information they had received from their midwives. Some women, however, believed the amount of verbal health information was insufficient; others that there was too much written information. Many women still had questions and expressed uncertainties regarding various health issues, such as weight gain, alcohol, and physical activity. They perceived their health education to be individualised according to their midwives' assessments of the extent of their knowledge, as well as by the questions they asked themselves. A few were concerned that midwives may make incorrect assumptions about the extent of their knowledge. Women also varied in how comfortable they felt about contacting their midwives for questions between antenatal visits. Women felt that important qualities for midwives underlying health education, were making them feel at ease and building a relationship of trust with them. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: health education was highly appreciated by women in general, suggesting that midwives should err on the side of providing too much verbal information, as opposed to too little. A more pro-active approach with information provision may be of value not only to those with a clear desire for more information, but also to those who are unsure of what information they may be missing. As midwives are the principal health care providers throughout pregnancy,they should ideally emphasise their availability for questions between antenatal visits.


Subject(s)
Health Education/standards , Midwifery/methods , Nurse-Patient Relations , Perception , Pregnant Women/psychology , Female , Humans , Midwifery/standards , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/methods , Primary Health Care/standards , Qualitative Research
17.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 27(8): 809-16, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16874640

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the number of surgical site infections (SSIs) registered after hospital discharge with respect to various surgical procedures and to identify the procedures for which postdischarge surveillance (PDS) is most important. DESIGN: Prospective SSI surveillance with voluntary PDS. Recommended methods for PDS in the Dutch national nosocomial surveillance network are addition of a special registration card to the outpatient medical record, on which the surgeon notes clinical symptoms and whether a patient developed an SSI according to the definitions; an alternative method is examination of the outpatient medical record. SETTING: Hospitals participating in the Dutch national nosocomial surveillance network between 1996 and 2004. RESULTS: We collected data on 131,798 surgical procedures performed in 64 of the 98 Dutch hospitals. PDS was performed according to one of the recommended methods for 31,134 operations (24%) and according to another active method for 32,589 operations (25%), and passive PDS was performed for 68,075 operations (52%). Relatively more SSIs were recorded after discharge for cases in which PDS was performed according to a recommended method (43%), compared with cases in which another active PDS method was used (30%) and cases in which passive PDS was used (25%). The highest rate of SSI after discharge was found for appendectomy (79% of operations), followed by knee prosthesis surgery (64%), mastectomy (61%), femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass (53%), and abdominal hysterectomy (53%). CONCLUSIONS: For certain surgical procedures, most SSIs develop after discharge. SSI rates will be underestimated if no PDS is performed. We believe we have found a feasible and sensitive method for PDS that, if patients routinely return to the hospital for a postdischarge follow-up visit, might be suitable for use internationally.


Subject(s)
Patient Discharge , Population Surveillance/methods , Postoperative Care/standards , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Community Networks , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
18.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 27(12): 1340-6, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17152032

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) before and after an intervention period in which an optimized policy for antibiotic prophylaxis was implemented. To demonstrate that a more prudent, restrictive policy would not have a detrimental effect on patient outcomes. DESIGN: Before-after trial with prospective SSI surveillance in the Dutch nosocomial surveillance network (Preventie Ziekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance [PREZIES]), using the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control, including postdischarge surveillance for up to 1 year. METHODS: During a preintervention period and a postintervention period (both 6-13 months), 12 Dutch hospitals collected data on antimicrobial prophylaxis and SSI rates. The study was limited to commonly performed surgical procedures in 4 specialties: vascular, intestinal, gynecological and orthopedic surgery. Selected risk factors for analysis were sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, wound contamination class, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay before surgery, and urgency of surgery (elective or acute). RESULTS: A total of 3,621 procedures were included in the study, of which 1,668 were performed before the intervention and 1,953 after. The overall SSI rate decreased from 5.4% to 4.5% (P=.22). Among the procedures included in the study, the largest proportion (55%) were total hip arthroplasty, and the smallest proportion (2%) were replacement of the head of the femur. SSI rates varied from 0% for vaginal hysterectomy to 21.1% for femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass surgery. Crude and adjusted odds ratios showed that there were no significant changes in procedure-specific SSI rates after the intervention (P>.1). CONCLUSIONS: An optimized and restrictive antibiotic prophylaxis policy had no detrimental effect on the outcome of clean and clean contaminated surgery, as measured by SSI rate.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Controlled Before-After Studies , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Population Surveillance/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , General Surgery , Humans , Prospective Studies , Risk
19.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0126266, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25961723

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that it is possible to select a group of low risk women who can start labour in midwife-led care without having increased rates of severe adverse maternal outcomes compared to women who start labour in secondary care. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands, using data from 223 739 women with a singleton pregnancy between 37 and 42 weeks gestation without a previous caesarean section, with spontaneous onset of labour and a child in cephalic presentation. Information on all cases of severe acute maternal morbidity collected by the national study into ethnic determinants of maternal morbidity in the Netherlands (LEMMoN study), 1 August 2004 to 1 August 2006, was merged with data from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry of all births occurring during the same period. Our primary outcome was severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM, i.e. admission to an intensive care unit, uterine rupture, eclampsia or severe HELLP, major obstetric haemorrhage, and other serious events). Secondary outcomes were postpartum haemorrhage and manual removal of placenta. RESULTS: Nulliparous and parous women who started labour in midwife-led care had lower rates of SAMM, postpartum haemorrhage and manual removal of placenta compared to women who started labour in secondary care. For SAMM the adjusted odds ratio's and 95% confidence intervals were for nulliparous women: 0.57 (0.45 to 0.71) and for parous women 0.47 (0.36 to 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that it is possible to identify a group of women at low risk of obstetric complications who may benefit from midwife-led care. Women can be reassured that we found no evidence that midwife-led care at the onset of labour is unsafe for women in a maternity care system with a well developed risk selection and referral system.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Labor, Obstetric , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Netherlands , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Young Adult
20.
Midwifery ; 31(3): e43-9, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25592301

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to extend the knowledge on Muslim women's approach of antenatal anomaly screening. DESIGN: qualitative interview study with pregnant Muslim women from Moroccan origin. SETTING: one midwifery practice in a medium-sized city near Amsterdam participated in the study. PARTICIPANTS: twelve pregnant Muslim women who live in a high density immigrant area and who attended primary midwives for antenatal care were included in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSES: we conducted open interviews with pregnant Moroccan Muslim women for the purpose of studying how they made decisions about antenatal anomaly screening. We used a thematic analysis approach. FINDINGS: women experienced the combined test as 'a test' that could identify potentially anomalous infants, and could result in being offered termination of the pregnancy; a fact that resulted in their extensive deliberations and hesitation about the test uptake. Only two women had the combined test. Conversely, women opted for the Fetal Anomaly Scan and saw it as 'only an ultrasound to see the baby'. Above all, women emphasised that whether or not to participate in antenatal anomaly tests was their own, individual decision as ultimately they were accountable for their choices. All women, including nulliparous women, viewed becoming pregnant as the point of becoming a mother - and considered antenatal screening through the lens of motherhood. KEY CONCLUSIONS: motherhood was the lens through which the decision to participate in antenatal anomaly screening was approached. Religious beliefs influenced values on termination and disability and were influential in the deliberations for antenatal testing. Combined test but not Fetal Anomaly Scan was considered to be a antenatal screening test. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: counsellors should have knowledge of the different Islamic beliefs about - the latest possible day for - termination and an awareness that Muslim women make their own conscious choices, also beyond Islamic rulings.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Islam/psychology , Mothers/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Prenatal Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Female , Humans , Morocco , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL