Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg ; 272(2): 384-392, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675553

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the noninferiority of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum over current training paradigms and identify an ideal training platform. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is currently no validated, uniformly accepted curriculum for training in robotic surgery skills. METHODS: Single-blinded parallel-group randomized trial at 12 international American College of Surgeons (ACS) Accredited Education Institutes (AEI). Thirty-three robotic surgery experts and 123 inexperienced surgical trainees were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Benchmarks (proficiency levels) on the 7 FRS Dome tasks were established based on expert performance. Participants were then randomly assigned to 4 training groups: Dome (n = 29), dV-Trainer (n = 30), and DVSS (n = 32) that trained to benchmarks and control (n = 32) that trained using locally available robotic skills curricula. The primary outcome was participant performance after training based on task errors and duration on 5 basic robotic tasks (knot tying, continuous suturing, cutting, dissection, and vessel coagulation) using an avian tissue model (transfer-test). Secondary outcomes included cognitive test scores, GEARS ratings, and robot familiarity checklist scores. RESULTS: All groups demonstrated significant performance improvement after skills training (P < 0.01). Participating residents and fellows performed tasks faster (DOME and DVSS groups) and with fewer errors than controls (DOME group; P < 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was high for the checklist scores (0.82-0.97) but moderate for GEARS ratings (0.40-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence of effectiveness for the FRS curriculum by demonstrating better performance of those trained following FRS compared with controls on a transfer test. We therefore argue for its implementation across training programs before surgeons apply these skills clinically.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Robotic Surgical Procedures/education , Simulation Training/methods , Specialties, Surgical/education , Analysis of Variance , Curriculum , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Intensive Care Med ; 34(7): 544-549, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29216782

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess a novel silver-plated dressing (SD) for central venous catheters in comparison to chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge (CHGIS) dressings in preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tampa General Hospital, an academic medical tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All adult ICU patients of an academic medical tertiary care center from January 2009 to December 2010. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 3189 patient records were studied from 7 different ICUs during the 2-year period. Patients received either CHGIS dressings (January 2009-December 2009) or SDs (January 2010-December 2010). Primary outcomes measured were CLABSI rates per 1000 catheter days and ICU length of stay. There were 30 696 catheter days with CHGIS dressings and 31 319 catheter days with SDs. There was a statistically significant decrease in the rate of CLABSI per 1000 catheter days in the SD group, from 2.38 to 1.28 ( P = .001), with an absolute risk reduction of 1.1. There was a significantly lower incidence in the rate of CLABSI per 1000 catheter days in the SD group (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.80). The relative risk of CLABSI in the SD group was 0.502 (95% CI: 0.340-0.730; P < .001). If SDs are used on all catheters, the decreased rate of CLABSIs observed would calculate to a cost savings of US$4070 to US$39 600 per 1000 catheter days. After successful implementation of the SD, we observed significant reductions in CLABSI rates and a sustained reduction in the subsequent 6 years. CONCLUSION: Use of SDs is associated with a significant decrease in CLABSI rates in adult ICU patients compared to CHGIS dressings, with an estimated cost savings of US$4070 to US$39 600 per 1000 catheter days.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units , Silver Sulfadiazine/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 61(10): 1146-1155, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30192323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adding modified FOLFOX6 (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) after chemoradiotherapy and lengthening the chemoradiotherapy-to-surgery interval is associated with an increase in the proportion of rectal cancer patients with a pathological complete response. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze disease-free and overall survival. DESIGN: This was a nonrandomized phase II trial. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at multiple institutions. PATIENTS: Four sequential study groups with stage II or III rectal cancer were included. INTERVENTION: All of the patients received 50 Gy of radiation with concurrent continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 5 weeks. Patients in each group received 0, 2, 4, or 6 cycles of modified FOLFOX6 after chemoradiation and before total mesorectal excision. Patients were recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery to complete a total of 8 cycles of modified FOLFOX6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The trial was powered to detect differences in pathological complete response, which was reported previously. Disease-free and overall survival are the main outcomes for the current study. RESULTS: Of 259 patients, 211 had a complete follow-up. Median follow-up was 59 months (range, 9-125 mo). The mean number of total chemotherapy cycles differed among the 4 groups (p = 0.002), because one third of patients in the group assigned to no preoperative FOLFOX did not receive any adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease-free survival was significantly associated with study group, ypTNM stage, and pathological complete response (p = 0.004, <0.001, and 0.001). A secondary analysis including only patients who received ≥1 cycle of FOLFOX still showed differences in survival between study groups (p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS: The trial was not randomized and was not powered to show differences in survival. Survival data were not available for 19% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adding modified FOLFOX6 after chemoradiotherapy and before total mesorectal excision increases compliance with systemic chemotherapy and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy may have benefits beyond increasing pathological complete response rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A739.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Rectum/pathology , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/therapeutic use , Oxaliplatin , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Treatment Outcome
5.
Lancet Oncol ; 16(15): 1537-1546, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26474521

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Local excision is an organ-preserving treatment alternative to transabdominal resection for patients with stage I rectal cancer. However, local excision alone is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and inferior survival compared with transabdominal rectal resection. We investigated the oncological and functional outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision for patients with stage T2N0 rectal cancer. METHODS: We did a multi-institutional, single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 trial of patients with clinically staged T2N0 distal rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy at 26 American College of Surgeons Oncology Group institutions. Patients with clinical T2N0 rectal adenocarcinoma staged by endorectal ultrasound or endorectal coil MRI, measuring less than 4 cm in greatest diameter, involving less than 40% of the circumference of the rectum, located within 8 cm of the anal verge, and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of at least 2 were included in the study. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of capecitabine (original dose 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and 22-35), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5), and radiation (5 days a week at 1·8 Gy per day for 5 weeks to a dose of 45 Gy, followed by a boost of 9 Gy, for a total dose of 54 Gy) followed by local excision. Because of adverse events during chemoradiotherapy, the dose of capecitabine was reduced to 725 mg/m(2) twice-daily, 5 days per week, for 5 weeks, and the boost of radiation was reduced to 5·4 Gy, for a total dose of 50·4 Gy. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival for all eligible patients (intention-to-treat population) and for patients who completed chemotherapy and radiation, and had ypT0, ypT1, or ypT2 tumours, and negative resection margins (per-protocol group). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00114231. FINDINGS: Between May 25, 2006, and Oct 22, 2009, 79 eligible patients were recruited to the trial and started neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Two patients had no surgery and one had a total mesorectal excision. Four additional patients completed protocol treatment, but one had a positive margin and three had ypT3 tumours. Thus, the per-protocol population consisted of 72 patients. Median follow-up was 56 months (IQR 46-63) for all patients. The estimated 3-year disease-free survival for the intention-to-treat group was 88·2% (95% CI 81·3-95·8), and for the per-protocol group was 86·9% (79·3-95·3). Of 79 eligible patients, 23 (29%) had grade 3 gastrointestinal adverse events, 12 (15%) had grade 3-4 pain, and 12 (15%) had grade 3-4 haematological adverse events during chemoradiation. Of the 77 patients who had surgery, six (8%) had grade 3 pain, three (4%) had grade 3-4 haemorrhage, and three (4%) had gastrointestinal adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Although the observed 3-year disease free survival was not as high as anticipated, our data suggest that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision might be considered as an organ-preserving alternative in carefully selected patients with clinically staged T2N0 tumours who refuse, or are not candidates for, transabdominal resection. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute and Sanofi-Aventis.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Organ Sparing Treatments , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Lancet Oncol ; 16(8): 957-66, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26187751

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation have an improved prognosis. The need for surgery in these patients has been questioned, but the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response is small. We aimed to assess whether adding cycles of mFOLFOX6 between chemoradiation and surgery increased the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response. METHODS: We did a phase 2, non-randomised trial consisting of four sequential study groups of patients with stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer at 17 institutions in the USA and Canada. All patients received chemoradiation (fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion throughout radiotherapy, and 45·0 Gy in 25 fractions, 5 days per week for 5 weeks, followed by a minimum boost of 5·4 Gy). Patients in group 1 had total mesorectal excision 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Patients in groups 2-4 received two, four, or six cycles of mFOLFOX6, respectively, between chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Each cycle of mFOLFOX6 consisted of racemic leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) or 400 mg/m(2), according to the discretion of the treating investigator, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) in a 2-h infusion, bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, and a 46-h infusion of fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a pathological complete response, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00335816. FINDINGS: Between March 24, 2004, and Nov 16, 2012, 292 patients were registered, 259 of whom (60 in group 1, 67 in group 2, 67 in group 3, and 65 in group 4) met criteria for analysis. 11 (18%, 95% CI 10-30) of 60 patients in group 1, 17 (25%, 16-37) of 67 in group 2, 20 (30%, 19-42) of 67 in group 3, and 25 (38%, 27-51) of 65 in group 4 achieved a pathological complete response (p=0·0036). Study group was independently associated with pathological complete response (group 4 compared with group 1 odds ratio 3·49, 95% CI 1·39-8·75; p=0·011). In group 2, two (3%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 and one (1%) had a grade 4 adverse event; in group 3, 12 (18%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events; in group 4, 18 (28%) of 65 patients had grade 3 adverse events and five (8%) had grade 4 adverse events. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 across groups 2-4 were neutropenia (five in group 3 and six in group 4) and lymphopenia (three in group 3 and four in group 4). Across all study groups, 25 grade 3 or worse surgery-related complications occurred (ten in group 1, five in group 2, three in group 3, and seven in group 4); the most common were pelvic abscesses (seven patients) and anastomotic leaks (seven patients). INTERPRETATION: Delivery of mFOLFOX6 after chemoradiation and before total mesorectal excision has the potential to increase the proportion of patients eligible for less invasive treatment strategies; this strategy is being tested in phase 3 clinical trials. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Canada , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Intention to Treat Analysis , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Neoplasm Staging , Odds Ratio , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Oxaliplatin , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Remission Induction , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
7.
Int Urogynecol J ; 25(4): 553-5, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24292077

ABSTRACT

AIM: This video demonstrates a technique for robot-assisted combined rectopexy with colpopexy, but without the use of mesh for rectal prolapse. METHODS: This case features a 61-year-old woman who presents with complaints of tissue protruding through her rectum and fecal incontinence. On examination, she was found to have circumferential, full-thickness rectal prolapse and perineal descent. We present a technique that combines rectopexy with colpopexy without the use of mesh for repair of rectal prolapse. Postoperative examination revealed resolution of rectal prolapse and good perineal support. This video illustrates a technique that may serve as a useful adjunct to have in one's surgical armamentarium in circumstances when mesh should not or cannot be used, such as in cases that require resection of the sigmoid colon or for patients who simply prefer to avoid the use of mesh. CONCLUSION: Given that rectal prolapse and posthysterecomy vaginal vault prolapse often occur together, our institution routinely performs colpopexy with rectopexy for rectal prolapse to provide additional support to the pelvic floor as demonstrated in this video.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Rectal Prolapse/surgery , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Robotics
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(1): e2350903, 2024 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194231

ABSTRACT

Importance: Assessing clinical tumor response following completion of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is paramount to select patients for watch-and-wait treatment. Objective: To assess organ preservation (OP) and oncologic outcomes according to clinical tumor response grade. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was secondary analysis of the Organ Preservation in Patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma trial, a phase 2, nonblinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Randomization occurred between April 2014 and March 2020. Eligible participants included patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma. Data analysis occurred from March 2022 to July 2023. Intervention: Patients were randomized to induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy. Tumor response was assessed 8 (±4) weeks after TNT by digital rectal examination and endoscopy and categorized by clinical tumor response grade. A 3-tier grading schema that stratifies clinical tumor response into clinical complete response (CCR), near complete response (NCR), and incomplete clinical response (ICR) was devised to maximize patient eligibility for OP. Main Outcomes and Measures: OP and survival rates by clinical tumor response grade were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: There were 304 eligible patients, including 125 patients with a CCR (median [IQR] age, 60.6 [50.4-68.0] years; 76 male [60.8%]), 114 with an NCR (median [IQR] age, 57.6 [49.1-67.9] years; 80 male [70.2%]), and 65 with an ICR (median [IQR] age, 55.5 [47.7-64.2] years; 41 male [63.1%]) based on endoscopic imaging. Age, sex, tumor distance from the anal verge, pathological tumor classification, and clinical nodal classification were similar among the clinical tumor response grades. Median (IQR) follow-up for patients with OP was 4.09 (2.99-4.93) years. The 3-year probability of OP was 77% (95% CI, 70%-85%) for patients with a CCR and 40% (95% CI, 32%-51%) for patients with an NCR (P < .001). Clinical tumor response grade was associated with disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, most patients with a CCR after TNT achieved OP, with few developing tumor regrowth. Although the probability of tumor regrowth was higher for patients with an NCR compared with patients with a CCR, a significant proportion of patients achieved OP. These findings suggest the 3-tier grading schema can be used to estimate recurrence and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who receive TNT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02008656.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Organ Preservation , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/therapy
9.
N Engl J Med ; 363(11): 1038-49, 2010 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20825316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the routine use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics, surgical-site infection continues to be associated with significant morbidity and cost after colorectal surgery. The gentamicin-collagen sponge, an implantable topical antibiotic agent, is approved for surgical implantation in 54 countries. Since 1985, more than 1 million patients have been treated with the sponges. METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 602 patients undergoing open or laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery at 39 U.S. sites to undergo either the insertion of two gentamicin-collagen sponges above the fascia at the time of surgical closure (the sponge group) or no intervention (the control group). All patients received standard care, including prophylactic systemic antibiotics. The primary end point was surgical-site infection occurring within 60 days after surgery, as adjudicated by a clinical-events classification committee that was unaware of the study-group assignments. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical-site infection was higher in the sponge group (90 of 300 patients [30.0%]) than in the control group (63 of 302 patients [20.9%], P=0.01). Superficial surgical-site infection occurred in 20.3% of patients in the sponge group and 13.6% of patients in the control group (P=0.03), and deep surgical-site infection in 8.3% and 6.0% (P=0.26), respectively. Patients in the sponge group were more likely to visit an emergency room or surgeon's office owing to a wound-related sign or symptom (19.7%, vs. 11.0% in the control group; P=0.004) and to be rehospitalized for surgical-site infection (7.0% vs. 4.3%, P=0.15). The frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our large, multicenter trial shows that the gentamicin-collagen sponge is not effective at preventing surgical-site infection in patients who undergo colorectal surgery; paradoxically, it appears to result in significantly more surgical-site infections. (Funded by Innocoll Technologies; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00600925.)


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Colectomy , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Surgical Sponges , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Absorbable Implants , Aged , Collagen , Female , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Rectum/surgery , Surgical Sponges/adverse effects , Treatment Failure
10.
FEBS Lett ; 596(20): 2706-2716, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35920096

ABSTRACT

Previously, we reported that chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 (CCR2) heteromerizes with α1B -adrenoceptor (α1B -AR) in leukocytes, through which α1B -AR controls CCR2. Whether such heteromers are expressed in human vascular smooth muscle cells (hVSMCs) is unknown. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer confirmed formation of recombinant CCR2:α1b -AR heteromers. Proximity ligation assays detected CCR2:α1B -AR heteromers in hVSMCs and human mesenteric arteries. CCR2:α1B -AR heteromerization per se enhanced α1B -AR-mediated Gαq -coupling. Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) binding to CCR2 inhibited Gαq activation via α1B -AR, cross-recruited ß-arrestin to and induced internalization of α1B -AR in recombinant systems and in hVSMCs. Our findings suggest that CCR2 within CCR2:α1B -AR heteromers biases α1B -AR signaling and provide a mechanism for previous observations suggesting a role for CCL2/CCR2 in the regulation of cardiovascular function.


Subject(s)
Chemokine CCL2 , Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1 , Humans , Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1/genetics , Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1/metabolism , Chemokine CCL2/genetics , Chemokine CCL2/metabolism , beta-Arrestins/metabolism , Chemokines/metabolism , Bias
11.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 54(8): 1014-9, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21730792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo colorectal surgery have up to a 30% chance of developing a surgical site infection postoperatively. Silverlon is a silver nylon dressing designed to prevent surgical site infections, but only anecdotal evidence has previously supported its efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of silver nylon dressings in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. DESIGN: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing a silver nylon dressing with gauze dressings in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. SETTING: The study was performed at a university-based, tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: We studied patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with an abdominal skin incision of at least 3 cm. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a silver nylon or a gauze dressing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was surgical site infection occurring within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. After a 30-day follow-up period, the incidence of surgical site infection was lower in the silver nylon group compared with the control group (13% vs 33%, P = .011). Twenty-five patients in the study developed superficial surgical site infections, 5 in the silver nylon group and 14 in the control group (P = .021). Two patients in the study group developed deep wound infections compared with 4 in the control group (P = .438). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients in the control group had a 3-fold increase in risk of infection compared with patients in the silver nylon group (P = .013). LIMITATIONS: A limitation of this study is that the members of the surgical team were not blinded to the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Silver nylon is safe and effective in preventing surgical site infection following colorectal surgery.


Subject(s)
Colon/surgery , Occlusive Dressings , Rectum/surgery , Silver/therapeutic use , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
Pain Manag ; 11(1): 9-21, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33094682

ABSTRACT

Aim: Evaluate safety/efficacy of intravenous meloxicam in a colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Methods: Adults undergoing primary open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery with bowel resection and/or anastomosis received meloxicam IV 30 mg (n = 27) or placebo (n = 28) once daily beginning 30 min before surgery. Results: Adverse events: meloxicam IV, 85%; placebo, 93%. Adverse events commonly associated with opioids: 41 versus 61% - including nausea (33 vs 50%), vomiting (19 vs 18%) and ileus (4 vs 18%). Wound healing satisfaction scores (physician-rated), clinical laboratory findings and vital signs were similar in both groups. No anastomotic leaks were reported. Opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity, length of stay and times to first bowel sound, first flatus and first bowel movement were significantly lower with meloxicam IV versus placebo. Most subjects (>92%) were satisfied with postoperative pain medication. Conclusion: Meloxicam IV was generally well tolerated and associated with decreased opioid consumption, lower resource utilization and functional benefits. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03323385 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Colectomy , Meloxicam/pharmacology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Proctectomy , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colectomy/methods , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Meloxicam/administration & dosage , Meloxicam/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Proctectomy/methods
13.
Am Surg ; 75(8): 715-8, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19725296

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients treated with fecal diversion for perirectal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Thirty-nine patients were identified and followed for an average of 60 months. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical treatment: local surgical treatment only and fecal diversion in addition to local surgical therapy. Thirteen patients (33%) underwent fecal diversion due to the severity of their disease. Eleven of these patients (85%) had complete resolution of their fistulas and only two (15%) required proctectomy. In contrast, only five out of 26 patients (19%) who underwent local surgical procedures alone had complete perirectal disease resolution. Intestinal continuity was restored in six patients (46%) and three of these patients (50%) remained disease free. The remaining three patients had disease recurrence, which required additional local procedures in one patient (17%), but with eventual resolution; the other two patients (33%) necessitated rediversion. Our data suggest that fecal diversion is a viable treatment option for severe perirectal fistulizing Crohn's disease and may be associated with a higher rate of resolution than local surgical treatment alone. In addition, we demonstrate a higher rate of successful intestinal continuity restoration than is typically reported.


Subject(s)
Colostomy , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/surgery , Rectal Fistula/etiology , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Crohn Disease/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Rectal Fistula/pathology , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
14.
JSLS ; 13(2): 217-20, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19660219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection has been well described for multiple surgical indications. This typically requires an abdominal incision for specimen removal that is associated with the majority of postoperative pain. We describe the first laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal approach for sigmoidectomy and rectocolpopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. METHODS: Mobilization of the sigmoid colon was performed laparoscopically using a 12-mm vaginal port and 3 additional 5-mm abdominal ports. A laparoscopic stapler was used through the vaginal port to transect the distal sigmoid colon. The specimen was subsequently externalized through the colpotomy to complete the resection and prepare the remaining bowel for intracorporeal, end-to-end, stapled anastomosis. The colpotomy was then repaired, and the colorectal anastomosis and rectocolpopexy were completed laparoscopically. RESULTS: Sigmoidectomy and rectocolpopexy were successfully performed laparoscopically by using a transvaginal approach without the need for an abdominal incision for specimen removal. The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative course, complained of minimal pain, and was discharged home on postoperative day 3. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal sigmoidectomy and rectocolpopexy is a feasible option that appears to be associated with little incisional pain and rapid recovery.


Subject(s)
Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Rectal Prolapse/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Middle Aged , Surgical Stapling , Suture Techniques , Vagina
15.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev ; 8(8): 1062-1072, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30786162

ABSTRACT

An intravenous (IV) formulation of meloxicam is being studied for moderate to severe pain management. This phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety of once-daily meloxicam IV 30 mg in subjects following major elective surgery. Eligible subjects were randomized (3:1) to receive meloxicam IV 30 mg or placebo administered once daily. Safety was evaluated via adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, wound healing, and opioid consumption. The incidence of adverse events was similar between meloxicam IV- and placebo-treated subjects (63.0% versus 65.0%). Investigators assessed most adverse events as mild or moderate in intensity and unrelated to treatment. Adverse events of interest (injection-site reactions, bleeding, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, thrombotic, and wound-healing events) were similar between groups. Over the treatment period, meloxicam IV was associated with a 23.6% (P = .0531) reduction in total opioid use (9.2 mg morphine equivalent) compared to placebo-treated subjects. The results suggest that meloxicam IV had a safety profile similar to that of placebo with respect to numbers and frequencies of adverse events and reduced opioid consumption in subjects with moderate to severe postoperative pain following major elective surgery.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Meloxicam/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Meloxicam/administration & dosage , Meloxicam/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Young Adult
16.
Perioper Med (Lond) ; 5: 17, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27313846

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous interventions promulgated by the Surgical Care Improve Project (SCIP) and other organizations, surgical site infection (SSI) continues to be a significant medical problem. DFA-02 is a novel bioresorbable modified-release gel consisting of both gentamicin (16.8 mg/mL) and vancomycin (18.8 mg/mL) to be applied during surgical incision closure for the prevention of SSIs. The following double-blind phase 2a trial was designed to test the safety and tolerability of DFA-02. METHODS: At six US sites, the study planned to randomize 40 subjects undergoing colorectal surgery (30 with DFA-02, and eight with placebo gel) in four ascending dose cohorts (10-, 20-, 30-, and 40-mL study drug per wound). Safety was ascertained and serum pharmacokinetics (PK) was determined. RESULTS: Study enrollment was discontinued after the first three dose cohorts (10, 20, and 30 mL) as even very large incisions could not accommodate more than 20 mL of gel, leaving no scientific justification for the 40-mL cohort. DFA-02 was well tolerated and showed no evidence of local tissue reaction or impairment of wound healing. No serious AEs were deemed related to study drug. Systemic exposure to gentamicin and vancomycin remained well below levels considered to be at higher risk for oto- or nephrotoxicity. The maximal gentamicin and vancomycin levels observed were 2.36 and 0.684 µg/mL at 6 h, which were well below the prespecified stopping criteria of 12 and 20 µg/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this small phase 2a study, the study drug was well tolerated and appeared to be free of serious adverse effects. Consistent with these findings, the PK values were consistent with gradual release of the antibiotics from the gel in the surgical site. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01496352.

18.
Hum Pathol ; 35(5): 604-11, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15138936

ABSTRACT

"Flat" colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas are well documented in the Japanese literature but only sporadically reported in the English literature. The present study involved systematic morphological analysis of a large series of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) to determine the frequency of these "flat" CRCs (FCRCs) and analyze their pathological characteristics and associated patient survival. The study group comprised 47 patients (19 females and 28 males) with primary CRC who underwent colorectal resection at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center between 1997 and 2002. These cases were selected based on the gross appearance of the tumors and after review of all of the hematoxylin and eosin-stained tumor sections in a series of 190 consecutive colorectal resections for CRCs. Application of strict morphological criteria classified 22 tumors as FCRCs. For comparison, 25 "polypoid" CRCs (PCRCs) were also identified. Cases of ulcerative fungating annular CRCs and CRCs with mixed gross appearance were excluded from this analysis. Clinicopathologic data, including patient survival, were compared for FCRCS and PCRCs. Statistical analyses were carried out using the chi(2) or Fisher's exact test and log-rank tests. Overall, 22 of 190 CRCs (11%) were found to meet the morphological criteria of FCRCs. Mean patient age was 70.6 years (range, 55 to 87) for FCRCs versus 68.5 years (range, 54 to 91) for PCRCs, and mean tumor size was 4.7 cm (range, 1.6 to 9) for FCRCs versus 4.4 cm (range, 0.5 to 10) for PCRCs. None of the 22 FCRCs and only 1 of 25 (4%) PCRCs were well differentiated; 17 of 22 (77%) FCRCs and 23 of 25 (92%) PCRCs were moderately differentiated; and 5 of 22 (22%) FCRCs and 1 of 25 (4%) PCRCs were poorly differentiated (P = 0.0087). FCRC cases were staged as 0 stage T1, 3 (14%) stage T2, and 19 (86%) stage T3; PCRC cases, as 4 (16%) stage T1, 14 (56%) stage T2, and 7 (28%) stage 3 (P = 0.000031). Similarly, angiolymphatic invasion was identified in 12 of 22 (54%) FCRCs versus 4 of 25 (16%) PCRCs (P = 0.0123). Although some differences between FCRCs and PCRCs were observed on resection in terms of nodal status (N), presence of metastases (M), and perineural invasion, these differences were not statistically significant. In comparison with PCRCs, FCRCs were associated with significantly shorter postresection patient survival at 1 to 5 years (P = 0.028). We have demonstrated in this report that a proportion of primary CRCs resected at our institution were indeed "flat." Furthermore, these FCRCs exhibited higher histological grades, higher T stage, more frequent angiolymphatic invasion, and shorter patient survival compared with PCRCs. Based on these data, FCRC appears to be a worse subtype of colon cancer than PCRC. Further appraisal of FCRCs and additional studies to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying their morphogenesis are warranted.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenomatous Polyps/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenomatous Polyps/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis
19.
Adv Surg ; 36: 259-74, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12465554

ABSTRACT

Local excision of rectal cancer is done with the goal of cure or palliation with minimal morbidity. Careful patient selection is paramount to avoid local recurrence. Endorectal sonography has brought accuracy to the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Patients with ultrasound stage T1 carcinoma of the distal rectum and well-differentiated or moderately well-differentiated histology can be offered local excision, with expected low morbidity and a low risk of recurrence. Pathologic examination of the entire specimen determines favorable or unfavorable histologic features, and is the basis for final decisions made on therapy. The role of adjuvant therapy after local excision is still being defined. Preoperative chemoradiation followed by local excision appears promising for patients with more advanced or very distal tumors who have a complete pathologic response to the neoadjuvant therapy.


Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Electrocoagulation , Endosonography , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Risk Factors
20.
JSLS ; 18(1): 62-5, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24680145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rectal tumors can be excised through a number of minimally invasive transanal techniques including transanal excision, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Specialty training is often required to master the nuances of these approaches. This study aimed to create a reproducible transanal excision training model that is suited for laparoendoscopic techniques. METHODS: Frozen porcine rectum and anus with intact perianal skin were commercially obtained. Thawed specimens were then cut to approximately 20 cm in length. The proximal end of the rectum was then everted and suction applied to the mucosa to create pseudopolyps of various sizes (sessile and pedunculated). Larger pedunculated lesions were made by tying the base of the pseudopolyps with 5-0 monofilament sutures to gather more tissue. Methylene blue dye was injected submucosally into the lesions to simulate tattoos. The proximal rectum was then closed with sutures. The model was suspended in a trainer box by clamping the distal end in a ringed clamp and the proximal end to the box. Transanal excisions using TAMIS were then performed. The procedures were done by trained community colorectal surgeons attending courses on transanal minimally invasive surgery. RESULTS: Both partial- and full-thickness excisions of sessile and pedunculated rectal lesions were successfully performed during simulated TAMIS by trained community surgeons learning this laparoendoscopic technique. CONCLUSION: Transanal laparoendoscopic procedures to excise rectal tumors can be successfully and reproducibly performed in an ex vivo porcine anorectal model.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Laparoscopes , Laparoscopy/instrumentation , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Neoplasms, Experimental , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Anal Canal , Animals , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Laparoscopy/education , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/education , Reproducibility of Results , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL