ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report the Mayo Clinic experience with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related to patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between March 1, 2020, and July 31, 2020, at any of the Mayo Clinic sites. We abstracted pertinent comorbid conditions such as age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index variables, and treatments received. Factors associated with hospitalization and mortality were assessed in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: A total of 7891 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection with research authorization on file received care across the Mayo Clinic sites during the study period. Of these, 7217 patients were adults 18 years or older who were analyzed further. A total of 897 (11.4%) patients required hospitalization, and 354 (4.9%) received care in the intensive care unit (ICU). All hospitalized patients were reviewed by a COVID-19 Treatment Review Panel, and 77.5% (695 of 897) of inpatients received a COVID-19-directed therapy. Overall mortality was 1.2% (94 of 7891), with 7.1% (64 of 897) mortality in hospitalized patients and 11.3% (40 of 354) in patients requiring ICU care. CONCLUSION: Mayo Clinic outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection in the ICU, hospital, and community compare favorably with those reported nationally. This likely reflects the impact of interprofessional multidisciplinary team evaluation, effective leveraging of clinical trials and available treatments, deployment of remote monitoring tools, and maintenance of adequate operating capacity to not require surge adjustments. These best practices can help guide other health care systems with the continuing response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , COVID-19/therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recipients of lung transplants are at high risk of infectious complications. We investigated the epidemiology of infections after lung transplantation and determined their impact on survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent lung transplantation at Mayo Clinic (Rochester) during 1990-2005. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Sixty-nine lung transplants were performed during the 16-yr study period. The mean (+/-SD) patient age was 50.5 +/- 9.7 yr; 45% were male. During the mean (+/-SD) follow-up period of 1188 (+/-1288) d, the cumulative percentage of patients with infections were: bacteria (52%), cytomegalovirus (CMV) (49%), other viruses (32%), fungi (19%), mycobacteria (7%), and Pneumocystis jiroveci (1%). The median survival time after lung transplantation was 5.02 yr. Kaplan-Meier estimation of one-, three-, and five-yr survival was 80%, 61%, and 50%, respectively. Overall, 37 (54%) patients died due to graft rejection and failure (35%), invasive fungal diseases (16%), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and other malignancies (14%), cardiovascular diseases (5%), CMV disease (3%), bacterial infection (3%), or other causes (24%). Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier estimation showed that invasive fungal disease (Aspergillus sp., n = 9, Candida sp., n = 2, Alternaria sp., n = 1, Rhizopus sp., n = 1, and/or Mucor sp., n = 1) was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.0104). After adjusting for age and graft rejection, invasive fungal disease remains a significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.0262). CONCLUSION: Invasive fungal disease is significantly associated with all-cause mortality after lung transplantation. An aggressive antifungal preventive strategy may lead to improved survival after lung transplantation.
Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation/mortality , Mycoses/mortality , Opportunistic Infections/mortality , Cause of Death , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival RateABSTRACT
Blastomycosis can occasionally involve the central nervous system (CNS). Amphotericin B deoxycholate is considered the drug of choice for the treatment of CNS blastomycosis. Significant toxicity may be associated with its use. We describe a case of cerebral blastomycoma that was successfully treated with voriconazole.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Blastomycosis/drug therapy , Brain Diseases/drug therapy , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , VoriconazoleSubject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Health Information Exchange , Health Status , Pandemics/prevention & control , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
We developed a computerized medical informatics tool to identify patients who had a culture performed on a sterile body site specimen during their hospitalization that subsequently turned positive after hospital dismissal. During a 13-month period, 533 patients had a positive culture identified by our Computer-Based Antimicrobial Monitoring (CBAM) program after hospital dismissal, and 112 (21%) of these culture results necessitated an intervention and communication with the primary health care professional. Thirty-two (29%) of positive cultures were from the blood. Thirty-eight (34%) of the CBAM interventions with available outcome data resulted in initiation of, change in, or prolongation of outpatient antimicrobial therapy. The CBAM program serves an important role in optimizing patient care and communication with the health care professional during the transition from inpatient to outpatient management.