Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(9): 1379-1387, 2018 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29659753

ABSTRACT

Background: No study has used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to investigate risk factors for Clostridium difficile (CD) transmission between cases, or assessed the impact of recent acquisition on patient outcome. Methods: This 20 month retrospective cohort study included consecutive cytotoxin-positive diarrheal samples, which underwent culture, ribotyping, and WGS (Illumina). Sequenced isolates were compared using single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Independent predictors of acquisition from another case, onward transmission, 120-day recurrence, and 30-day mortality were identified using logistic regression with backwards elimination. Results: Of 660 CD cases, 640 (97%) were sequenced, of which 567 (89%) shared a ribotype with a prior case, but only 227 (35%) were ≤2 SNVs from a prior case, supporting recent acquisition. Plausible (<2 SNVs) recent ward-based acquisition from a symptomatic case was more frequent in certain ribotypes; 64% (67/105) for ribotype-027 cases, compared with 11% (6/57) for ribotype-078. Independent risk factors (adjusted P < .05) for CD acquisition included older age, longer inpatient duration, and ribotype; these factors, and male sex, increased onward transmission. Patients with a plausible donor had a greater risk of recurrence (adjusted P = .001) and trended towards greater 30-day mortality (adjusted P = .06). Ribotype had no additional mortality or recurrence impact after adjusting for acquisition (P > .1). Conclusions: Greater transmission of certain lineages suggests CD may have different reservoirs and modes of transmission. Acquiring CD from a recent case is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Clinical characteristics associated with increased healthcare-associated CD transmission could be used to target preventative interventions.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridium Infections/mortality , Clostridium Infections/transmission , Inpatients , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Diarrhea/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Ribotyping , Risk Factors , Whole Genome Sequencing
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(9): 1163-1170, 2017 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28158441

ABSTRACT

Background: The role of symptomatic patients who are toxigenic strain positive (TS+) but fecal toxin negative (FT-) in transmission of Clostridium difficile is currently unknown. Methods: We investigated the contribution of symptomatic TS+/FT- and TS+/FT+ patients in C. difficile transmission in 2 UK regions. From 2-step testing, all glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)-positive specimens, regardless of fecal toxin result, from Oxford (April 2012 through April 2013) and Leeds (July 2012 through April 2013) microbiology laboratories underwent culture and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), using WGS to identify toxigenic strains. Plausible sources for each TS+/FT+ case, including TS+/FT- and TS+/FT+ patients, were determined using WGS, with and without hospital admission data. Results: A total of 1447 of 12772 (11%) fecal samples were GDH positive, 866 of 1447 (60%) contained toxigenic C. difficile, and fecal toxin was detected in 511 of 866 (59%), representing 235 Leeds and 191 Oxford TS+/FT+ cases. TS+/FT+ cases were 3 times more likely to be plausibly acquired from a previous TS+/FT+ case than a TS+/FT- patient. Fifty-one of 265 (19%) TS+/FT+ cases diagnosed >3 months into the study were genetically related (≤2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms) to ≥1 previous TS+/FT+ case or TS+/FT- patient: 27 (10%) to only TS+/FT+ cases, 9 (3%) to only TS+/FT- patients, and 15 (6%) to both. Only 10 of 265 (4%) were genetically related to a previous TS+/FT+ or TS+/FT- patient and shared the same ward simultaneously or within 28 days. Conclusions: Symptomatic TS+/FT- patients were a source of C. difficile transmission, although they accounted for less onward transmission than TS+/FT+ cases. Although transmission from symptomatic patients with either fecal toxin status accounted for a low overall proportion of new cases, both groups should be infection control targets.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/analysis , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/transmission , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Feces/chemistry , Feces/microbiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteriological Techniques , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/pathology , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing , Sequence Analysis, DNA , United Kingdom/epidemiology
3.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 13(4): 206-16, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26956066

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) continues to affect patients in hospitals and communities worldwide. The spectrum of clinical disease ranges from mild diarrhoea to toxic megacolon, colonic perforation and death. However, this bacterium might also be carried asymptomatically in the gut, potentially leading to 'silent' onward transmission. Modern technologies, such as whole-genome sequencing and multi-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis, are helping to track C. difficile transmission across health-care facilities, countries and continents, offering the potential to illuminate previously under-recognized sources of infection. These typing strategies have also demonstrated heterogeneity in terms of CDI incidence and strain types reflecting different stages of epidemic spread. However, comparison of CDI epidemiology, particularly between countries, is challenging due to wide-ranging approaches to sampling and testing. Diagnostic strategies for C. difficile are complicated both by the wide range of bacterial targets and tests available and the need to differentiate between toxin-producing and non-toxigenic strains. Multistep diagnostic algorithms have been recommended to improve sensitivity and specificity. In this Review, we describe the latest advances in the understanding of C. difficile epidemiology, transmission and diagnosis, and discuss the effect of these developments on the clinical management of CDI.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Clostridium Infections/transmission , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/transmission , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/therapy , Cross Infection/transmission , Global Health , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL