Pearls of Wisdom: Expert Insights for Communicating With Aesthetic Patients.

Good communication with patients is essential in aesthetic surgery. In particular, the challenge of expectation management is crucial to optimise patient satisfaction, which may be irrespective of objective outcomes. Experienced plastic surgeons inevitably refine their consultation process and hone their communication skills throughout their years of practice. The invaluable "pearls" that expert surgeons develop would be beneficial to all surgeons and particularly those early in their practice. This concept prompted the authors to explore whether the communication skills acquired by a selected group of highly regarded plastic surgeons could be condensed and categorised in a way that others could benefit from. The purpose of this Special Topic is to demonstrate that there are a select number of core messages that many plastic surgeons desire to communicate, particularly during the pre-operative consultation process. Various phrases and aphorisms have been formulated within these sub-topics that we hope will be positively incorporated into colleagues' practices in order to improve the patient experience, and ultimately patients' understanding and satisfaction with their outcomes.

Patient Safety and Suitability for Primary Cleft Lip Repair as Day Case Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if day case cleft lip surgery has an impact on complications and 30-day readmission rate. DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Databases included; PubMed, Science Direct, Ovid and Cochrane. Search terms; "Day Case", "Day Care", "outpatient", "Ambulatory" AND "Cleft", "Cleft Lip". Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5. SETTING: Eligible study types included; randomised controlled trials, observational studies (prospective and retrospective) and case series. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Paediatric patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair. INTERVENTIONS: Day case surgery versus inpatient admission post-operative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measure: Primary cleft lip repair performed as a day case in paediatric patients. Secondary outcome measures: 1. Complication rates and 30-day re-admission to hospital rate. 2. Patient suitability for day case surgery. RESULTS: Ten papers with 13 804 patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair were included, 28% were discharged on the day of surgery (Range 17%-81%). There was no significant difference in complication rate between the inpatient and day case cohorts. There was a significant reduction in 30-day readmission rates in the day case cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicates there is no difference in complication rates for patients discharged on the day of surgery compared to those admitted overnight. Complications encountered were infrequent, non-life threatening and often occurred more than 24 h following discharge. There was an observed reduction in 30-day readmission rates for day-case patients. This is likely to represent a variation in baseline characteristics which deemed them suitable for day case surgery pre-operatively.

Reflective Foreign Bodies Mimicking Fistulae of the Hard Palate in the Paediatric Population.

Palatal foreign bodies remain relatively rare, consequently, delays in diagnosis and misdiagnosis can occur leading to unnecessary anxiety and invasive investigations. We report three children with a reflective disc from inside a confetti balloon masquerading as a fistula of the hard palate. Awareness of this foreign body phenomenon enabled timely diagnosis in subsequent patients; hence the need to highlight such cases to the global cleft community. Crucially, while the foreign body remains in the oral cavity, there is an ongoing risk of airway aspiration which could be life threatening. Removal can be easily facilitated in the outpatient setting.

Streamlining Universal Prenatal Screening for Risk for Adverse Birth Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Many of the medical risk factors for adverse birth outcomes (e.g., preeclampsia) are regularly monitored in prenatal care. However, many of the psychosocial risk factors associated with adverse birth outcomes (e.g., maternal stress, anxiety, depression, intimate partner violence) are not regularly addressed during routine prenatal care. Comprehensive prenatal screening for psychosocial risk factors for adverse birth outcomes can improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this study, we examine an existing tool for opportunities to streamline and improve screening. METHODS: We reviewed medical records for 528 mother-infant dyads, recording maternal responses to a 21-item prenatal risk screening tool, and gestational age/birth weight of infants. Multiple approaches to scoring were used to predict likelihood of adverse birth outcome. RESULTS: Women who answered yes to any of the top four interrelated items were 3.32 times more likely to have an adverse birth outcome. Sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION FOR PRACTICE: We identified a short surveillance tool to identify women who are at highest risk and require more in-depth screening, and to rule out women who are at very low risk of an adverse birth outcome.

Unusual wound with increasing prevalence caused by artificial fingernail glue.

Clinical introductionA healthy 17-year-old girl presents with a wound on her left medial thigh (figure 1). Two days earlier while applying acrylic nail tips, she spilled nail glue on her jeans in the area of concern. Despite noticing an immediate irritable sensation, she did not perform any first aid nor did she remove her clothing to check the underlying skin.emermed;39/3/185/F1F1F1Figure 1Wound left medial thigh. QUESTION: What is the pathological process of this wound?De-epithelialisation due to removal of clothing glued to skin.Chemical burn.Partial thickness thermal burn.Allergic reaction to nail glue. For answer see page 02.

Pharyngoplasty for Speech Disorders Following Brain Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Dysarthria is one of the commonest neurological speech disorders resulting from brain injury. However, hypernasality commonly co-exists in this subgroup of patients and is commonly overlooked. The authors aim to investigate the merit of surgery in improving hypernasality and speech intelligibility in patients with a mixed pattern of dysarthria and hypernasality secondary to brain injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was collected from the regional plastic surgery unit over a 10-year period. All patients who underwent a pharyngoplasty for speech improvement following total brain injury from either a traumatic injury or a cerebrovascular accident were included. Patients were followed up post-operatively to assess; improvement in speech rehabilitation, complications and the need for surgical revision. RESULTS: Six patients had a pharyngoplasty for speech improvement. Either a Hynes or Jackson pharyngoplasty was performed, with one patient requiring a hemi-pharyngoplasty. Post-operatively, 1 patient experienced self-limiting sleep apnea which resolved within 1 month. One patient developed obstructive symptoms and required revision. Overall, 83% of patients had clear improvement in speech intelligibility and articulation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have shown that surgical intervention, in the form of a pharyngoplasty, is an effective method of improving speech intelligibility and articulation, by improving hypernasality and restoring communication in this cohort of patients. The aim of this paper is to highlight this option to colleagues and to heighten the awareness that many patients with a total brain injury have a mixed pattern of speech disturbance and not solely the dysarthria that is attributed to this condition.

Tongue Reduction for Macroglossia.

INTRODUCTION: Macroglossia is a term used to describe a large tongue which protrudes outside of the mouth while in a resting position (Balaji, 2013). It is a cardinal sign in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and can also be found in children with Down syndrome and Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome. Macroglossia can lead to airway and feeding difficulties, as well as problems with speech, drooling, and cosmesis. We present a review of tongue reduction operations performed for macroglossia over a 10-year period in Northern Ireland. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the medical notes of those children identified to have undergone a tongue reduction procedure in the regional pediatric hospital. We reviewed the presenting symptoms and concerns, the operative technique used, postoperative outcomes, and follow up. Outcomes data included improvements in symptoms, complications, and the need for revision procedures. RESULTS: Six children underwent tongue reduction procedures over a 10-year period. Age range at time of surgery was between 4 months to 10 years 3 months. Five children had an underlying diagnosis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and 1 child had Down syndrome. One child underwent a second tongue reduction for mild tongue protrusion at the 5-year follow up. There were no complications in relation to tongue reduction surgery for any of the children and importantly, there were no airway complications in our series. All patients were found to have improved feeding, better tongue position in the oral cavity, reduced drooling, and better speech development following surgery. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic macroglossia requiring a tongue reduction procedure is relatively rare and these procedures are, therefore, uncommonly performed. Despite the rarity of this procedure, when it is required, it can be life saving for some infants and children, and life altering for the remainder. Improvements in airway, feeding, speech, and psychosocial wellbeing are the desired outcomes with this procedure. Throughout our 10-year series we have found it to be a relatively safe procedure but potentially anesthetically challenging. We have demonstrated both good short and long-term outcomes for these children.

Throat Packs in Cleft and Craniofacial Surgery.

ABSTRACT: Throat packs are used in a wide range of surgical and dental procedures. Indications for use include; airway stabilization, reducing the risk of aspiration, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Despite these perceived benefits, a retained throat pack can be fatal. This has been highlighted since the 1970s but as of yet no effective fail-safe mechanisms exist to prevent the potential tragic consequences of a retained throat pack.A multifaceted questionnaire was distributed at the annual Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2017 to identify current views and practices amongst cleft surgeons. The questionnaire contained seventeen questions related to throat pack use. The responses to the questions were collated and discussed in the context of the current literature.Twenty-four cleft surgeons completed the questionnaire; 67% always use a throat pack, with 84% not securing the throat pack in any way. Almost half (48%) had encountered a serious adverse incident secondary to the use of a throat pack.This survey and review of the literature highlight ongoing discrepancies and a lack of standardization on a national basis. Adverse incidents and fatalities are still occurring. Overwhelming evidence now confirms the lack of benefit regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting and the authors urge both surgeons and anesthetists to strongly consider the need for a throat pack in routine elective procedures.

Medical Tourism in Aesthetic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Medical tourism is expanding on a global basis, with patients seeking cosmetic surgery in countries abroad. Little information is known regarding the risks and outcomes of cosmetic tourism, in particular, for aesthetic breast surgery. The majority of the literature involves retrospective case series with no defined comparator. We aimed to amalgamate the published data to date to ascertain the risks involved and the outcomes of cosmetic tourism for aesthetic breast surgery on a global basis. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, the Cochrane library and OVID Medline was conducted using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Keywords such as "medical tourism", "cosmetic tourism", "tourism", "tourist", "surgery", "breast" and "outcomes" were used. Seven hundred and seventy-one titles were screened, and 86 abstracts were reviewed leaving 35 full texts. Twenty-four of these met the inclusion criteria and were used to extract data for this systematic review. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients partook in cosmetic tourism for aesthetic breast surgery. Forty-nine percent of patients had an implant-based procedure. Other procedures included: mastopexy (n=4), bilateral breast reduction (n=11) and silicone injections (n=2). Two-hundred and twenty-two complications were recorded, common complications included: wound infection in 39% (n=67), breast abscess/ collection in 12% (n=21), wound dehiscence in 12% (n= 20) and ruptured implant in 8% (n=13). Clavien-Dindo classification of the complications includes 88 (51%) IIIb complications with 103 returns to theatre, 2 class IV complications (ICU stay) and one class V death of a patient. Explantation occurred in 39% (n=32) of implant-based augmentation patients. CONCLUSIONS: Aesthetic breast surgery tourism is popular within the cosmetic tourism industry. However, with infective complications (39%) and return to theatre rates (51%) significantly higher than expected, it is clear that having these procedures abroad significantly increases the risks involved. The high complication rate not only impacts individual patients, but also the home country healthcare systems. Professional bodies for cosmetic surgery in each country must highlight and educate patients how to lower this risk if they do choose to have cosmetic surgery abroad. In this current era of an intra-pandemic world where health care is already stretched, the burden from cosmetic tourism complications must be minimised. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Cleft Nurse Specialist: A Key Building Block in the Cleft Multidisciplinary Team.

INTRODUCTION: The cleft nurse specialist (CNS) plays a key role in counselling and supporting parents from the diagnosis onward. The CNS started in 2012 and we aimed to perform a qualitative study to determine the benefits this brought to the cleft community from the parents' perspective. METHODS: The cleft database was used to locate babies born in 2010/2011 and 2013/2014. Parents were contacted by phone by 2 authors and completed a questionnaire on the care and support they received following the diagnosis, in the early days and around the time of surgery. RESULTS: Parents of 38 babies completed the survey. In 2010/2011, only 21% had an antenatal diagnosis compared to 47% in 2013/2014.2011/2012: 3 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), 3 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), 4 CLO, 9 cleft palate only (CPO).2013/2014: 5 UCLP, 7 BCLP, 7 CPO.2011/2012: 68% were counselled by a surgeon, 42% were seen >1 week after birth, with some over a month.2013/2014: 84% were counselled by the CNS, 53% were seen within 48 hours, and 100% within 7 days.Parents in 2013/2014 felt more supported by the cleft team throughout pregnancy and the early days, with home visits being particularly advantageous. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the CNS to the cleft multidisciplinary team has significantly improved the pathway for parents and is a key link with the wider cleft team. With the improvement in antenatal diagnosis, counselling occurs at an earlier stage and prepares parents for the difficulties commonly experienced in the early days. Key themes included; home visits and direct contact with the CNS.

Cosmetic Tourism in Northern Ireland.

AIM: Over the new year period, we recognized a high number of admissions with postoperative complications following cosmetic surgery abroad. We aimed to determine the driving forces behind this and financial impact on the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: Cases of all patients attending the regional plastic surgery unit with complications following surgery abroad were reviewed. Patients completed a survey on the perioperative period abroad and driving forces. In addition, the costing department was contacted to determine the financial burden associated with cosmetic tourism. RESULTS: Six patients were admitted to the regional unit after independently organizing surgery abroad. Countries visited included Turkey, Belgium, Poland, Estonia, and India. Reasons included cost and access to procedures not recommended by UK surgeon. Type of surgery included breast (5), abdominoplasty (2), liposuction (2), and labiaplasty (1), and 50% had multiple procedures. Complications included necrotic wounds (33%), infected breast implant (33%), venous thromboembolism investigated (33%), and wound infection (17%). Overall, 67% required surgery on the NHS. The total cost was £23,976.82, with an average of £4000/patient (range, £1294-£6291). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: This surge in cosmetic complications occurred in the New Year period. Complications were seen after a wide range of surgical procedures. All patients required an inpatient stay, and two-thirds required surgery with a significant cost burden to the NHS. Patients are unaware of the risks involved, highlighted by the lack of preoperative counseling and follow-up. In addition, this series has highlighted the risks associated with traveling in the perioperative period, with 2 patients investigated for pulmonary embolus.

Simultaneous Endovascular Repair of a Thoracic Aortic Injury during Posterior Pedicle Screw Removal: A Case Report.

Posterior spinal stabilization is a technically demanding procedure which is increasing in popularity. Since this increase in popularity, complications, including screws misplacement, are being highlighted. Accuracy rates are higher when imaging modalities are used intraoperatively. Vascular injuries following posterior spinal stabilization are rare and are usually discovered late on subsequent imaging. Immediate perioperative compromise is rare, but nonetheless, resultant vascular injuries can be life threatening. A 72-year-old woman had a posterior spinal stabilization for severe pain caused by discitis. Routine computed tomography scan, 2 weeks postoperatively, detected an incidental thoracic aortic injury due to a misplaced pedicle screw. Given the rarity of this complication, there is no guideline for the management of resultant aortic injuries. Options described in the literature include thoracotomy with open vascular repair and newer endovascular techniques. We describe a novel method of simultaneous endovascular repair of a thoracic aortic injury during posterior pedicle screw removal with the patient in the right decubitus position. Surgeons operating near high-risk vascular structures should use intraoperative imaging modalities to guide screw placement and reduce subsequent complication rates. During endovascular repair of resultant aortic injuries, several factors must be considered. In particular, the challenge of turning a patient with open groin access and an endovascular stent in place. This must be carried out with extreme care to avoid the following risks: loss of access, damage to the access vessels and bleeding, displacement of the stent or deployment wires, and loss of the sterile field.

An essential overview of orofacial clefting.

An appreciation of the embryologic development of the face is essential to understanding the anatomic variation observed in this phenotypically broad condition. Embryologically, the nose, lip and palate are separated into the primary and secondary palate, which are divided anatomically by the incisive foramen. The epidemiology of orofacial clefting is reviewed together with the contemporaneous cleft classification systems that enable comparisons to be made between international centres for audit and research purposes. A detailed examination of the clinical anatomy of the lip and palate informs the surgical priorities for the primary reconstruction of both form and function. The pathophysiology of the submucous cleft palate is also explored. The seismic impact of the 1998 Clinical Standards Advisory Group report on the organisation of UK cleft care provision is outlined. The importance of the Cleft Registry and Audit Network database in auditing UK cleft outcomes is highlighted. The potential for the Cleft Collective study to establish the causes of clefting, the optimal treatment protocols, and the impact of cleft on patients is tremendously exciting for all health care professionals involved in the management of this challenging congenital deformity.

An introduction to the UK care pathway for children born with a cleft of the lip and/or palate.

Cleft lip and/or palate includes a spectrum of congenital disorders affecting union on the lip, alveolus, hard and/or soft palate. The management of children born with an orofacial cleft requires a complex process from a multidisciplinary team (MDT) to restore form and function. Since the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) report in 1998, the UK has reformed and restructured cleft services to improve the outcomes for children born with a cleft.The spectrum of cleft conditions, the members of the MDT and a chronological description of the stages of cleft management from diagnosis to adulthood are described using a clinical example. This paper forms the introduction to a series of more detailed papers which span all major aspects of cleft management. The papers will cover the following topics: dental anomalies; associated medical conditions among children; orthodontic management of patients; speech assessment and intervention; role of the clinical psychologist; challenges for the paediatric dentist; genetics and orofacial clefts; surgery - primary and secondary; restorative dentistry; and global perspectives.

The role of primary surgery in the management of orofacial clefting.

Primary cleft surgery refers to the planned surgical procedure(s) necessary to reconstruct an orofacial defect according to a specified protocol; in the context of a unilateral cleft lip and palate, this would include lip repair (with vomer flap closure of the hard palate), subsequent repair of the residual soft palate cleft and finally, the alveolar bone graft. This paper will provide an overview of the goals of primary surgical reconstruction, including the utility of pre-surgical orthopaedic techniques, including nasoalveolar moulding. The surgical methods of primary lip repair in both unilateral and bilateral clefts will be outlined and the concept of a primary rhinoplasty will be introduced. The principal techniques of cleft palate reconstruction will be delineated for a variety of cleft phenotypes. The final element of the primary reconstructive sequence is the alveolar bone graft using cancellous bone harvested from the iliac crest at approximately 8-10 years of age. The role of optimising oral hygiene prior to bone grafting cannot be over-emphasised and the utility of pre-surgical orthodontic arch expansion is also discussed. In the UK, bone graft outcomes are audited using the Kindelan score, which is evaluated from the six-month postoperative upper standard occlusal radiograph.

Secondary surgery techniques to optimise functional and aesthetic outcomes in orofacial clefting.

Although the goal of primary surgery is to avoid the need for secondary surgery, in a proportion of patients this is not always possible. Secondary, or revisional, surgery is frequently undertaken in patients with orofacial clefts and may present a complex and challenging problem for the multidisciplinary team. There are a broad range of functional and aesthetic issues that secondary surgery might aim to address. These include palatal fistulae (that may be symptomatic for air, fluid or food), velopharyngeal insufficiency (typically manifesting with decreased intelligibility or nasal regurgitation), suboptimal cleft lip scars (that can significantly impact upon the psychosocial wellbeing of the patient), and nasal asymmetry (that is frequently accompanied by nasal airway concerns). Unilateral and bilateral clefts are each associated with a characteristic nasal deformity that requires a tailored surgical approach. Suboptimal maxillary growth in repaired orofacial clefts may impact negatively on both appearance and function; surgical correction through orthognathic surgery can be transformational for the patient. The general dental practitioner, cleft orthodontist and restorative dentist all play a critical role in this process.

Otoplasty: The Belfast Experience. A 10-Year Review of 2333 Ear Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: "Prominent ear" remains one of the most common referrals to pediatric plastic surgery. The perceived deformity has been corrected using a multitude of techniques for over a century, and significant variation in practice still exists. Recent studies suggesting that cartilage-scoring techniques are associated with more major complications than suture techniques may have led to an adverse international perception of the technique. Thus, waning use of anterior scoring prominent ear correction appears to be occurring. For appropriate cases, the authors have used anterior scoring for over 20 years, with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates. They present a review of all cases and outcomes from 2005 to 2015. The authors believe this is the largest case series of anterior scoring otoplasty published to date. METHODS: All pediatric cases undergoing prominent ear correction from 2005 to 2015 were included in this retrospective case note analysis and follow-up study. Patient demographics, operative details including early and late complications, and postoperative results were analyzed. METHODS: Over a 10-year period, 1199 otoplasties were performed (1134 bilateral, 65 unilateral), for a total of 2333 ear corrections. A total of 1575 ears were corrected using the anterior scoring technique. The remaining cases underwent correction by means of suture only, cartilage reduction, or combination techniques. There was a significantly lower all-cause reoperation rate for anterior scoring compared to suture-only techniques ( P = 0.0039; significant at P < 0.025). There were no reported cases of cartilage necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that in appropriately selected patients, anterior scoring otoplasty is a low-morbidity procedure. In the authors' institution, when compared to suture techniques, it was associated with a lower rate of complications and reoperation rate than suture-only techniques. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Complete transection of the sciatic nerve following closed femoral fracture.

Complete transection of the sciatic nerve following femoral fracture is extremely rare. In the setting of closed injury it has only been reported in two other cases. Here we present a teenage motorcyclist who sustained a closed left, mid-femoral fracture following a road traffic collision with complete transection of the sciatic nerve. Despite being a closed injury, the obvious limb deformity of the patient and extreme pain prompted immediate nerve block during the primary survey making formal neurological assessment difficult. This case highlights the possibility of complete major nerve transection in closed injuries, and the importance of careful clinical examination alongside repeat imaging.

The use of Liposuction to treat significant contour abnormalities associated with Lipomyeloeningocoele.

INTRODUCTION: Since 1972 when first pioneered, liposuction has developed and is now one of the commonest aesthetic procedures performed worldwide. Evidence of its application in aesthetic lipomodelling is widely known, but there are scant reports in the literature on the use of liposuction in more unusual cases. We report its use as a safe and successful method of contour correction in two cases of lipomyelomeningocoele (LMMC), a form of spina bifida. To our knowledge, this has never been reported before. METHOD: A prospective review was performed and both cases were followed up during the treatment period. Both patients were treated at the Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children. Patient charts were reviewed and magnetic resonance imaging was used. RESULTS: Two patients, aged 11 and 17 years, had a large LMMC over the lumbosacral area. Preoperative imaging was obtained in each case to ensure the procedure could safely avoid the underlying spinal cord structures. The use of the Microaire© suction device allowed precise fat extraction. Postoperative images demonstrate reduction of lipomatous bulk and improved contour. CONCLUSION: We have shown that when used with caution liposuction is a safe and effective technique for volume reduction of a LMMC in carefully selected cases.

The impact of COVID-19 on cleft services in Great Britain & Northern Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: Cleft lip and/or palate is the most common craniofacial anomaly and occurs in 1 in 650 to 700 live births in the United Kingdom (UK). The majority of cleft surgery is elective, and as a result, almost all cleft surgery was suspended across the UK in March 2020 during the first national lockdown. The UK has centralised regional Cleft Services which all use the same agreed target-age standards for primary surgery including lip and palate repairs. The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) response has caused a delay in carrying out procedures. The severity of this delay depends on the impact of COVID-19 on local trusts and R-value within that region. As the country goes through the second and third wave, the impact could be long lasting, and we aimed to quantify it so that the data could be used to guide service prioritisation in the NHS and help future workforce planning. METHODS: An online survey was designed based on the cleft quality dashboard indicators and circulated nationally to all nine cleft regions in the UK. The survey was divided into three main headings: • Duration of suspended cleft services • Quantification of the impact on delayed in surgery/services • Changes needed to restart surgery/services RESULTS: We obtained a 60% response rate with five completed surveys from five out of nine regions. All regions reported that they suspended their cleft services in March 2020 around the time of the first wave and the first national lockdown. There has been an impact on delayed surgical and clinical interventions for cleft patients. Regions were affected differently with some on an exponential waiting list growth projection, whereas other teams are on track to recover from the backlog within 7-22 weeks. There has been an impact on the allied health professionals' services within the cleft multidisciplinary team. The cleft nurses' 24-h reviews, Speech And Language Therapy (SALT), and psychology maintained service delivery in some format. Patient-facing services such as audiology and dentistry were significantly disrupted and continue to experience delays due to reduced capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Various regions have seen a varied impact from COVID-19 on their services, from all cleft regions there seems to be an impact on achieving surgery within the national target age. The adverse effect of the COVID-19 impact is unlikely to be known for a few years to come; however, the data are a useful guide when supporting the allocation of resources within the healthcare setting. A prospective long-term study is required to assess the impact of COVID-19 on cleft surgery, follow-up, assess access to allied health professional MDT clinics, and long-term complications.