Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 38(9): 638-644, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29956346

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate neonatal mortality and morbidity up to 6 months in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) with or without a hernia sac. METHODS: Seventy-two cases of isolated CDH were included in a retrospective single-center study between January 2010 and December 2016. Hernia sac was defined at the time of surgery or at postmortem examination if the neonate died before surgery. RESULTS: Seventeen newborns (23.6%) had a hernia sac. Survival at 6 months was significantly greater for isolated CDH with a hernia sac: 100% versus 63.6% (P = .003). High-frequency oscillatory ventilation was used significantly more in the no hernia sac group (P = .04). At surgery, the need for patch repair was significantly lower in the hernia sac group: 12% versus 50% (P = .005). The prenatal observed/expected lung-to-head ratio was significantly higher in the hernia sac group than in the no hernia sac group: 49.7% versus 38.6% (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The presence of a hernia sac in CDH is associated with better outcome, especially survival at 6 months. If the presence of a hernia sac is recognized as a particular entity, which carries a good prognosis, it is necessary to be able to diagnose it prenatally, especially in the era of prenatal fetal surgery.


Subject(s)
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/mortality , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/pathology , Female , France , Gestational Age , Head/diagnostic imaging , Head/embryology , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/surgery , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/embryology , Pregnancy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
2.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 12(5): 523-31, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020922

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cancer affects one in a thousand pregnant women and gynecological cancers are one of the most frequent malignancies. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone treatment for gynecological cancer. Although all chemotherapeutic agents can cross the placental barrier, the extent of placental transfer varies considerably. Furthermore, the significant physiological variations observed in pregnant women may have an impact on pharmacokinetic parameters. Given the complexity of predicting placental transfer, in vivo and ex vivo studies are essential in this context. In view of the paucity of data on chemotherapy during pregnancy, the objective of the present study was to summarize all the available data on the transplacental transfer of anticancer drugs used to treat gynecological cancers. AREAS COVERED: In order to evaluate the in vivo and ex vivo transplacental transfer of the anticancer drugs most frequently used in gynecological malignancies, we carried out a comprehensive review of the literature published from 1967 to 2015. Lastly, we summarized recent clinical guidelines on the treatment of gynecological cancers in pregnant patients. EXPERT OPINION: The preclinical and scarce clinical data must now be extrapolated to define the maternofetal toxicity/efficacy profile and thus guide the physicians to choose anticancer drugs more efficiently in this complex situation.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Genital Neoplasms, Female/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/drug therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/complications , Genital Neoplasms, Female/pathology , Humans , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Neoplasms , Placenta/metabolism , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL