Planning and Endograft Related Variables Predisposing to Late Distal Type I Endoleaks.

OBJECTIVE: Late distal type I endoleak (ELIB) hampers the outcome of endovascular repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA); however, only few dedicated experiences have been reported in the literature. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence, presentation and treatment of late ELIB and to identify possible anatomical and technical predictors. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective EVAR between 2008 and 2013 were collected prospectively. Follow up was by post-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed within 30 days and CTA and/or duplex ultrasound (DUS) at six or 12 months and yearly thereafter. Patients with late ELIB, defined as distal type I endoleak detected more than six months after the primary intervention without endoleak on the intra-operative completion angiogram and on the post-operative CTA, were retrospectively selected (G1) and compared with a control group with no ELIB (G2) homogeneous for clinical conditions, endograft implanted, and timing of follow up. The minimum follow up required for inclusion in the study was 24 months. Pre-operative morphological aorto-iliac features and EVAR implant details were evaluated, and measurements performed after centre lumen line reconstructions using dedicated software. The differences between G1 and G2 were analysed using the chi-square test, the Student t test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixteen patients were submitted to EVAR. ELIB was detected in 14 cases (2.3%) (G1) at a median follow up of 32.8 (IQR 48) months. In three of the 14 cases ELIB was symptomatic (AAA rupture, 2; pain, 1); in the remaining 11 cases it was asymptomatic and found incidentally at routine follow up. Treatment was by open repair in one case and by endovascular iliac leg extension in 13 cases. Hypogastric exclusion was necessary in two of 14 cases. Thirty patients were included in G2, with a median follow up of 41.2 (25) months. Common iliac artery length <4 cm (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.1-29.5, p = .05), diameter > 15 mm (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.9, p = .03), and severe thrombotic apposition (>50% of circumference) (OR 5, 95% CI 1.2-19.2, p = .02), at the iliac sealing zone were significant predictors of ELIB, on univariable analysis; oversizing of the iliac leg diameter < 10% and distal sealing > 1 cm above the hypogastric origin were independently associated with ELIB (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.3-21.5, p = .01 and OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.1-39.3, p = .03, respectively), on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: The present data underline that ELIB is a non-negligible occurrence during long term EVAR follow up and requires further interventions, most often by endovascular solutions. According to the ELIB risk factors identified in this study, an iliac leg diameter oversize >10% and extensive common iliac artery coverage (<1 cm above the hypogastric origin) would be suggested to prevent this complication.

Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm in High-Surgical Risk Patients: Fenestrated and Branched Endografts.

BACKGROUND: To report early and mid-term results of endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) by using Cook Zenith fenestrated/branched endografts (FB-EVAR) in high surgical risk patients unfit for open repair (OR). METHODS: Between January 2012 and April 2015, all the patients with TAAA, considered at high surgical risk for OR and treated by Cook Zenith FB-EVAR, were prospectively enrolled. Patients were studied using a thoracoabdominal computer tomography angiography (CTA) and dedicated software for advanced vessels analysis. Follow-up was performed by duplex ultrasound (DU), contrast-enhanced DU, and/or CTA. Early end points were the following: technical success (TS), spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and 30-day morbidity/mortality. Follow-up end points were the following: survival, TAAA-related mortality, target visceral vessels (TVV) patency, type I/III endoleaks, and freedom from reinterventions (FFRs). RESULTS: Thirty patients (male 77%, mean age 73 ± 7 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists 3/4 60%/40%) affected by TAAA type I (4%), II (21%), III (57%), and IV (18%) were enrolled. The mean aneurysm diameter was 66 ± 14 mm. The overall number of TVV was 107 (3.5 ± 0.9 vessels/patients). Custom-made and off-the-shelf endografts were used in 22 (73%) and 8 (23%) cases, respectively. The procedure was performed in multiple steps in 23 cases (77%). There were not intraoperative mortality and type I-III endoleaks, and the TVV patency was 97% (104/107). TS was 87%.There were 2 irreversible paraplegias (6.6%) and 1 reversible paraparesis (3.4%). Postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications occurred in 2 (6.6%) and 2 (6.6%) patients, respectively. Renal function worsening (≥30% of the baseline level) was detected in 4 cases (13%). The 30-day mortality was 6.6%. Survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 90%, 85%, and 68%, respectively. There was no TAAA-related mortality. The TVV patency at 3, 6, and 24 months was 95%, 90%, and 90%, respectively, and there were no type I-III endoleaks. FFRs at 6, 12, and 24 months was 88%. CONCLUSION: The endovascular repair of TAAA by using Cook Zenith fenestrated/branched endografts is feasible with acceptable technical and clinical results at early to mid-term results in patients at high surgical risk unfit for OR.