Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis: a rare complication of varicella infection in a 12-year-old girl.

Varicella infection can present with a variety of neurological manifestations, the most common of which are cerebellitis and encephalitis. A 12-year-old girl presented with headache, altered sensorium, blurring of vision and status epilepticus 2 weeks after she developed varicella lesions. Imaging demonstrated cerebral venous sinus thrombosis involving the left transverse sinus, sigmoid sinus and internal jugular vein with a haemorrhagic infarct in the left parieto-occipital region. Measures were taken to decrease the intracranial pressure, and she was commenced on anti-convulsants (phenytoin) and heparin infusion, following which she improved and was discharged after 2 weeks. Repeat imaging undertaken 3 months later demonstrated a resolving thrombus, and a pro-coagulant work-up at follow-up did not show any underlying pro-thrombotic state. Neurological complications post varicella are rare, with encephalitis and ataxia being the most common. Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis secondary to varicella is very rare with only one case reported in a child.

Epinephrine Plus Vasopressin vs Epinephrine Plus Placebo in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of epinephrine plus vasopressin vs epinephrine plus placebo in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial. SETTING: PICU in a tertiary care institute from February, 2019 to May, 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged one month to 13 years who required CPR during PICU stay. Patients in whom vascular access was not available or return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved by defibrillation without epinephrine were excluded. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive vasopressin 0.1 mL per kg (=0.8 unit per kg) or placebo (0.1 mL per kg normal saline) in addition to epinephrine (1:10000) 0.1 mL per kg. The drugs were given as bolus doses every three minutes until the ROSC or up to a maximum of five doses, whichever was earlier. OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved ROSC. The secondary outcomes were survival rate and functional status (at 24-hour, PICU, hospital, and 90-day post-discharge), need for organ supports, length of stay (PICU and hospital), and adverse effect(s) of the study drugs. RESULTS: 90 patients (epinephrine plus vasopressin group, n=45 and epinephrine plus placebo group, n=45) were analyzed on intention-to-treat basis. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between epinephrine plus vasopressin (n=25, 55.5%) and epinephrine plus placebo groups (n=24, 53.3%) (Relative risk 1.04, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.52). There was no significant difference in survival rate at 24-hour (n=7, 15.6% vs. n=8, 17.8%), at PICU, hospital, and 90-day post-discharge (n=1, 2.2% vs n=1, 2.2%). There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. No trial drug-related serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of epinephrine plus vasopressin did not improve the rate of return of spontaneous circulation in the pediatric intensive care unit cardiopulmonary resuscitation as compared with epinephrine plus placebo.

Trial of Furosemide to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Children: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether furosemide infusion in early-onset acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill children would be associated with a reduced proportion of patients progressing to the higher stage (Injury or Failure) as compared to placebo. METHOD: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot trial was conducted. The authors enrolled children aged 1-mo (corrected) to 12-y, who were diagnosed with AKI ("risk" stage) using pediatric-Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End stage kidney disease (p-RIFLE) criteria, and achieved immediate resuscitation goals within 24 h of admission. Participants received either furosemide (0.05 to 0.4 mg/kg/h) or placebo (5%-dextrose) infusion. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients progressing to a higher stage (injury or failure). Secondary outcomes were (i) need for renal replacement therapy, (ii) the effect on neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (urine and blood), (iii) fluid balance, (iv) adverse effects, (v) time to achieve renal recovery, (vi) duration of hospital stay and mechanical ventilation, and (vii) all-cause 28-d mortality. RESULTS: The trial was stopped for futility, and data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis (furosemide-group: n = 38; placebo-group: n = 37). No significant difference was noted in the progression of AKI to a higher stage between furosemide and placebo groups (10.5% vs. 21.6%; relative risk = 0.49, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.48) (p = 0.22). There were no differences in the secondary outcomes between the study groups. All-cause 28-d mortality was similar between the groups (10.5% vs. 10.8%). No trial-related severe adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Furosemide infusion in early-onset AKI did not reduce the progression to a higher stage of AKI. A future trial with large sample size is warranted.