Who has to act? A qualitative exploration of emerging adults' critical consciousness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic and violence against people of Color during 2020 brought troubling racial inequities to the forefront of American discourse. In line with the Critical Consciousness (CC) and Social Justice Youth Development (SJYD) frameworks, emerging adults may have developed their capacity for critical reflection, motivation, and action against systemic inequities. We drew from interviews with 27 emerging adults (ages 18-23) across the US, and used thematic analysis to explore differences in their reflections, motivations to act, and actions based on their racial/ethnic identification. We found nuanced variability in their critical reflections based on self, social, or global awareness and experiences of marginalization. White and Asian emerging adults used vague language or expressed feeling their reflections were insufficient. Black and Latinx emerging adults emphasized the importance of education and raising awareness. Although all emerging adults took action based on a sense of duty, few engaged in critical action; decisions to take in-person action varied based on whether they viewed racism or COVID-19 as a greater threat. Findings demonstrate that emerging adults' experiences of racialization may have related to their CC development. We share implications for community psychologists conducting antiracist research addressing White fragility and dismantling racial hierarchy.

Effects of chemotherapy on operant responding for palatable food in male and female mice.

Patients treated with cancer chemotherapeutics frequently report chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), changes in mood (depression and anxiety) and functional impairments. Rodent models of CIPN elicit limited alterations in functional behaviors, which pose challenges in developing preclinical models of chemotherapy-induced behavioral depression. The study examined the consequences of chemotherapy-induced mechanical hypersensitivity (paclitaxel: 32 or 64 mg/kg, cumulative; oxaliplatin: 30 mg/kg, cumulative) on behavioral depression, as measured with operant responding for palatable food during periods of food restriction and ad libitum chow, consumption of noncontingently available palatable food in the presence of ad libitum chow, and voluntary wheel running. The study employed two inbred mouse strains (C57BL/6J and Balb/cJ) and examined potential sex differences. All chemotherapeutic regimens caused profound mechanical hypersensitivity for the duration of the observation periods (up to 7 months), but no treatments changed voluntary wheel running or consumption of noncontingent palatable food. The high dose of paclitaxel temporarily reduced operant responding for palatable food in male C57BL/6J mice undergoing food restriction or maintained on ad libitum chow. However, paclitaxel failed to decrease operant responding for palatable food in free-feeding female C57BL/6J mice or Balb/cJ mice of either sex. Moreover, oxaliplatin did not significantly alter operant responding for palatable food in male or female C57BL/6J mice maintained on ad libitum chow. These findings demonstrate a dissociation between chemotherapy-induced mechanical hypersensitivity and behavioral depression. The transient effects of paclitaxel on operant responding in male C57BL/6J mice may represent a fleeting behavioral correlate of chemotherapy-associated pain-like behaviors.