Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Future Oncol ; 17(18): 2279-2289, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33736462

ABSTRACT

Lurbinectedin is a marine-derived drug that inhibits transcription, a process that is frequently dysregulated in small cell lung cancer. The activity of lurbinectedin has been studied in many solid tumors, showing not only promising results but also a favorable safety profile. In relapsed small cell lung cancer, the drug has shown encouraging activity both as a single agent and in combination with doxorubicin, paclitaxel or irinotecan. The USA FDA has recently granted accelerated approval to lurbinectedin monotherapy in this setting. This article provides an update on available data and ongoing studies of lurbinectedin in small cell lung cancer, including Phase I combination trials, the basket Phase II trial and the ATLANTIS Phase III trial.


Lay abstract Lung cancer is currently responsible for a large number of cancer deaths worldwide. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered the most aggressive subtype of lung cancer. When a patient presents with extensive SCLC, first-line treatment needs to be used. The most appropriate treatment option for the patient is selected; however, it is possible for the cancer to continue to get worse, even over a brief period of time. The patient will then be given another treatment; however, studies on the effectiveness of classical second-line drugs are scarce. For this reason, new therapies for SCLC are in development. One of these treatments is a marine-derived drug called lurbinectedin, which shows promising activity in some solid tumors, such as extensive SCLC, after failure of first-line treatment. Here the authors present the results of the main trials related to the activity of lurbinectedin either alone or in combination with other drugs for this type of cancer.


Subject(s)
Carbolines/therapeutic use , Drug Evaluation/statistics & numerical data , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prognosis , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 135: 242-250, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32586724

ABSTRACT

AIM: Previous studies have suggested a more frequent and severe course of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients undergoing active oncologic treatment. Our aim was to describe the characteristics of the disease in this population and to determine predictive factors for poor outcome in terms of severe respiratory distress (acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) or death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients consecutively admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection were prospectively collected, and retrospective statistical analysis was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess potential factors for poor outcomes defined as ARDS or death. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were analysed, and 34 of them developed respiratory failure (70% as ARDS). Lymphocytes/mm3 (412 versus 686; p = 0.001), serum albumin (2.84 versus 3.1); lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (670 versus 359; p < 0.001) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (25.8 versus 9.9; p < 0.001) discriminate those that developed respiratory failure. Mortality rate was 25%, significantly higher among ARDS, neutropenic patients (p = 0.01) and in those with bilateral infiltrates (44% versus 0%; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic analyses model confirmed the predictive value of severe neutropenia (odds ratio [OR] 16.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-190.9, p 0.025), bilateral infiltrates (OR 32.83, CI 95% 3.51-307, p 0.002) and tumour lung involvement (OR 4.34, CI 95% 1.2-14.95, p 0.02). CONCLUSION: Cancer patients under active treatment admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection have worse outcomes in terms of mortality and respiratory failure rates compared with COVID-19 global population. Lymphopenia, LDH, CRP and albumin discriminate illness severity, whereas neutropenia, bilateral infiltrates and tumour pulmonary involvement are predictive of higher mortality.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Neoplasms/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Respiratory Insufficiency/mortality , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Respiratory Insufficiency/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL