Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 60
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Lifetime Data Anal ; 26(3): 573-602, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31732833

ABSTRACT

Motivated by a breast cancer research program, this paper is concerned with the joint survivor function of multiple event times when their observations are subject to informative censoring caused by a terminating event. We formulate the correlation of the multiple event times together with the time to the terminating event by an Archimedean copula to account for the informative censoring. Adapting the widely used two-stage procedure under a copula model, we propose an easy-to-implement pseudo-likelihood based procedure for estimating the model parameters. The approach yields a new estimator for the marginal distribution of a single event time with semicompeting-risks data. We conduct both asymptotics and simulation studies to examine the proposed approach in consistency, efficiency, and robustness. Data from the breast cancer program are employed to illustrate this research.


Subject(s)
Likelihood Functions , Multivariate Analysis , Survival Analysis , Algorithms , Bias , Breast Neoplasms , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 30(9): 931-941, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31280456

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Improving the understanding of co-existing chronic diseases prior to and after the diagnosis of cancer may help to facilitate therapeutic decision making in clinical practice. This study aims to examine patterns of comorbidities in Canadian women with breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using provincial linked administrative health datasets from British Columbia, Canada, between 2000 and 2013. Women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2005 and 2009 were identified. The index date was defined as the date of diagnosis of breast cancer. Subsets of the breast cancer cohort were identified based on the absence of individual type of comorbidity of interest within 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis. For each subset, cases were then individually matched by year of birth at 1:2 ratios with controls without a history of cancer and the individual type of comorbidity of interest within 5 years prior to the assigned index year, matching with the year of breast cancer diagnosis of the corresponding case. Baseline comorbidities were measured over a 1-year period prior to the index date using two comorbidity indices, Rx-Risk-V and Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADG). Cox regression model was used to assess the development of seven specific comorbidities after the index date between women with breast cancer and non-cancer women. RESULTS: The most prevalent baseline comorbidity in the breast cancer cohort measured using the Rx-Risk-V model was cardiovascular conditions (39.0%), followed by pain/pain-inflammation (34.8%). The most prevalent category measured using the ADG model was major signs or symptoms (71.8%), followed by stable chronic medical conditions (52.2%). The risks of developing ischemic heart disease, heart failure, depression, diabetes, osteoporosis, and hypothyroidism were higher in women with breast cancer compared to women without cancer, with the hazard ratios ranging from 1.09 (95 CI% 1.03-1.16) for ischemic heart disease to 2.10 (95% CI 1.99-2.21) for osteoporosis in the model adjusted for baseline comorbidity measured using Rx-Risk-V score. CONCLUSION: Women with breast cancer had a higher risk of developing new comorbidities than women without cancer. Development of coordinated care models to manage multiple chronic diseases among breast cancer patients is warranted.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , British Columbia/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Depression/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypothyroidism/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies
3.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 659, 2019 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272420

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In order to maximize later health, there are established components and guidelines for quality follow-up care of breast cancer survivors. However, adherence to quality follow-up in Canada may not be optimal, and may vary by province. We determined and compared the proportion of patients in each province who received adherent and non-adherent surveillance for recurrence, new cancers and late effects, recommended preventive care, and recommended physician visits for comorbidities. METHODS: Cohorts consisted of all adult women diagnosed with incident invasive breast cancer between 2007 and 2010/2012 in four Canadian provinces (British Columbia (BC) N = 9338; Manitoba N = 2688; Ontario N = 23,700; Nova Scotia (NS) N = 2735), identified from provincial cancer registries, alive and cancer-free at 30 months post-diagnosis. Their healthcare utilization was determined from one to 5 years post-treatment, using linked administrative databases. Adherence, underuse, and overuse of recommended services were evaluated yearly and compared using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In all provinces and follow-up years, the majority of survivors had more than the recommended number of visits to either an oncologist or primary care physician (range 53.8% NS Year 3; 85.8% Ontario Year 4). The proportion of patients with the guideline-recommended number of oncologist visits varied by province (range 29.8% BC Year 5; 74.8% Ontario Year 5), and the proportion of patients with less than the recommended number of specified breast cancer-related visits with either an oncologist or primary care physician ranged from 32.6% (Ontario Year 2) to 84.4% (NS Year 3). Underuse of surveillance breast imaging was identified in NS and BC. The proportion of patients receiving imaging for metastatic disease (not recommended in the guidelines) in BC, Manitoba, and Ontario (not reported in NS) ranged from 20.3% (BC Year 5) to 53.3% (Ontario Year 2). Compliance with recommended physician visits for patients with several chronic conditions was high in Ontario and NS. Preventive care was less than optimal in all provinces with available data. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of breast cancer survivor follow-up care varies among provinces. Results point to exploration of factors affecting differences, province-specific opportunities for care improvement, and the value of administrative datasets for health system assessment.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Survivorship , Aftercare , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Cancer Survivors , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Comorbidity , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Oncologists , Physicians, Primary Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preventive Medicine , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Adherence and Compliance
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 826, 2018 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30382843

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The patterns and determinants of long-term income among young people surviving cancer, and differences compared to peers, have not yet been fully explored. The objectives of this paper are to describe long-term income among young survivors of cancer, the impact of socio-demographic, disease, and treatment factors on long-term income, and income relative to the general population. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with comparison group from the general population, using linked population-based registries, clinical data, and tax-records. Multivariate random effects regression models were used to determine survivor income, compare long-term income between survivors and comparators, and assess income determinants. Subjects included all residents of British Columbia (BC), Canada, diagnosed with cancer before 25 years of age and surviving 5 years or more. Comparators were selected from the BC general population matched by gender and birth year. RESULTS: Young cancer survivors earned significantly less than the general population. In addition, survivors of central nervous system tumors have significantly lower incomes than lymphoma survivors. Survivors who received radiation therapy have significantly lower income. Results should be interpreted with caution as the comparator group was matched by gender and date of birth. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on original diagnosis, treatment, and other characteristics, survivors face significantly lower income than peers and may require supports to gain and retain paid employment. Lower income will affect their opportunity for independent living, and will reduce productivity in the labour force.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Income , Neoplasms/economics , Adolescent , Adult , British Columbia/epidemiology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/economics , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Child , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Lymphoma/economics , Lymphoma/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/therapy , Population Groups , Research Design , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
5.
Value Health ; 20(3): 345-356, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28292479

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Childhood and adolescent cancers are uncommon, but they have important economic and health impacts on patients, families, and health care systems. Few studies have measured the economic burden of care for childhood and adolescent cancers. OBJECTIVES: To estimate costs of cancer care in population-based cohorts of children and adolescents from the public payer perspective. METHODS: We identified patients with cancer, aged 91 days to 19 years, diagnosed from 1995 to 2009 using cancer registry data, and matched each to three noncancer controls. Using linked administrative health care records, we estimated total and net resource-specific costs (in 2012 Canadian dollars) during 90 days prediagnosis and 1 year postdiagnosis. RESULTS: Children (≤14 years old) numbered 4,396: 36% had leukemia, 21% central nervous system tumors, 10% lymphoma, and 33% other cancers. Adolescents (15-19 years old) numbered 2,329: 28.9% had lymphoma. Bone and soft tissue sarcoma, germ cell tumor, and thyroid carcinoma each comprised 12% to 13%. Mean net prediagnosis costs were $5,810 and $1,127 and mean net postdiagnosis costs were $136,413 and $62,326 for children and adolescents, respectively; the highest were for leukemia ($157,764 for children and $172,034 for adolescents). In both cohorts, costs were much higher for patients who died within 1 year of diagnosis. Inpatient hospitalization represented 69% to 74% of postdiagnosis costs. CONCLUSIONS: Treating children with cancer is costly, more costly than treating adolescents or adults. Substantial survival gains in children mean that treatment may still be very cost-effective. Comprehensive age-specific population-based cost estimates are essential to reliably assess the cost-effectiveness of cancer care for children and adolescents, and measure health system performance.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Health/economics , Child Health/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/economics , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Infant , Leukemia/diagnosis , Leukemia/economics , Leukemia/epidemiology , Lymphoma/diagnosis , Lymphoma/economics , Lymphoma/epidemiology , Male , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ontario/epidemiology , Registries , Survival , Young Adult
6.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 64(11)2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28500732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer in children and adolescents presents unique issues regarding treatment and survivorship, but few studies have measured economic burden. We estimated health care costs by phase of cancer care, from the public payer perspective, in population-based cohorts. METHODS: Children newly diagnosed at ages 0 days-14.9 years and adolescents newly diagnosed at 15-19.9 years, from January 1, 1995 to June 30, 2010, were identified from Ontario cancer registries, and each matched to three noncancer controls. Data were linked with administrative records describing resource use for cancer and other health care. Total and net (patients minus controls) resource-specific costs ($CAD2012) were estimated using generalized estimating equations for four phases of care: prediagnosis (60 days), initial (360 days), continuing (variable), final (360 days). RESULTS: Mean ages at diagnosis were 6 years for children (N = 4,606) and 17 years for adolescents (N = 2,443). Mean net prediagnosis phase 60-day costs were $6,177 for children and $1,018 for adolescents. Costs for initial, continuing, and final phases were $138,161, $15,756, and $316,303 per 360 days for children, and $62,919, $7,071, and $242,008 for adolescents. The highest initial phase costs were for leukemia patients ($156,225 per 360 days for children and $171,275 for adolescents). The final phase was the most costly ($316,303 per 360 days for children and $242,008 for adolescents). CONCLUSIONS: Costs for children with cancer are much higher than for adolescents and much higher than those reported in adults. Comprehensive population-based long-term estimates of cancer costs are useful for health services planning and cost-effectiveness analysis.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Neoplasms/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neoplasms/therapy , Ontario , Prognosis , Registries , Young Adult
7.
Am J Epidemiol ; 184(11): 818-828, 2016 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27810856

ABSTRACT

When investigating the association between brain tumors and use of mobile telephones, accurate data on tumor position are essential, due to the highly localized absorption of energy in the human brain from the radio-frequency fields emitted. We used a point process model to investigate this association using information that included tumor localization data from the INTERPHONE Study (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom). Our main analysis included 792 regular mobile phone users diagnosed with a glioma between 2000 and 2004. Similar to earlier results, we found a statistically significant association between the intracranial distribution of gliomas and the self-reported location of the phone. When we accounted for the preferred side of the head not being exclusively used for all mobile phone calls, the results were similar. The association was independent of the cumulative call time and cumulative number of calls. However, our model used reported side of mobile phone use, which is potentially influenced by recall bias. The point process method provides an alternative to previously used epidemiologic research designs when one is including localization in the investigation of brain tumors and mobile phone use.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Phone/statistics & numerical data , Glioma/pathology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/pathology , Adult , Epidemiologic Research Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tumor Burden
8.
Br J Haematol ; 172(5): 757-68, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26727959

ABSTRACT

Late complications affecting Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors are well described in paediatric and adult-based publications. This study determined the late morbidity and mortality risk for 442 teenage and young adult (TYAs) 5-year HL survivors, diagnosed at 15-24 years of age between 1970 and 1999, identified from the British Columbia Cancer Registry. Treatment details were abstracted from charts. Survivors and a matched comparison cohort were linked to provincial administrative health datasets until December 2006 and regression analysis was performed, providing risk ratios regarding mortality, secondary malignancy and morbidity causing hospitalisation. Sixty (13·6%) survivors experienced late mortality with excess deaths from secondary cancer [standardised mortality ratio (SMR) 18·6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11-29·4] and non-malignant disease (SMR 3·6; 95% CI 2·2-5·5). Excess secondary cancers (standardised incidence ratio 7·8; 95% CI 5·6-10·5) were associated with radiotherapy [Hazard ratio (HR) 2·7; 95% CI 1-7·7] and female gender (HR 1·8; 95% CI 1-3·4). Of 281 survivors treated between 1981 and 1999, 143 (51%) had morbidity resulting in hospitalisation (relative risk 1·45; 95% CI 1·22-1·73). Hospitalisation significantly increased with combined modality therapy, chemotherapy alone and recent treatment era. TYA HL survivors have excess risk of mortality and secondary malignancy continuing 30 years from diagnosis. Radiotherapy is associated with secondary malignancy and current response-adapted protocols attempt to minimise exposure, but late morbidity causing hospitalisation remains significant.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Adolescent , British Columbia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Registries , Risk Factors , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
9.
Psychooncology ; 25(12): 1470-1476, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26387559

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior survivorship research has largely focused on issues faced by survivors of childhood tumors, breast cancers, or hematologic malignancies. Relatively little is known about the needs of other prevalent survivor groups. Our aim was to identify the specific concerns of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors in the key domains of physical functioning, psychological wellbeing, and social relationships. METHODS: We conducted focus groups with stage II and III CRC survivors who had completed their primary active anti-cancer treatments. Patients were asked to describe how their diagnosis and treatment impacted their lives, to outline deficiencies in the care that they received, and to suggest ways of addressing any unmet needs. A content analysis was subsequently conducted to identify major themes. RESULTS: Thirty CRC survivors participated in six focus groups. Individuals reported some degree of dissatisfaction with the amount and type of diagnostic and treatment information they received at their initial clinic visit. Distress from toxicities, such as peripheral neuropathy, was also common among the survivors. Similarly, the majority faced challenges adjusting to their lives and daily activities, especially in caring for their colostomy. Having survived CRC, many survivors expressed an interest in advocacy and health promotion of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: CRC survivors face many barriers after their cancer treatment. Issues with colostomy are unique to this survivor group. Interventions to improve CRC survivorship care should also incorporate opportunities for patient advocacy. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/psychology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Focus Groups , Health Services Needs and Demand , Quality of Life/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colostomy/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Patient Satisfaction , Qualitative Research , Social Support
10.
BMC Fam Pract ; 17: 60, 2016 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27245448

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children diagnosed with cancer often require extensive care for medical, psychosocial and educational problems during and after therapy. Part of this care is provided by family physicians and non-cancer specialists, but their involvement in the first years after diagnosis has barely been studied. Studying non-oncology physician visits may provide insight into the roles of different health care providers. METHODS: We included 757 children diagnosed with cancer under age 15 between 1991 and 2001 from a Canadian provincial registry, and matched each to 10 controls of the same birth year and sex. We determined the number of family physician and non-cancer specialist visits in the 5 years after diagnosis (for patients) or inclusion (for controls) using data from the provincial health insurance plan. RESULTS: In the first year after diagnosis, almost all patients visited both a family physician and non-cancer specialist. Although after 5 years percentages decreased to 85 and 76 %, respectively, these were still significantly higher than in controls. In the first year after diagnosis, both family physicians and non-cancer specialists were often consulted for neoplasms (62 and 90 %, respectively) and to discuss results of lab tests. In addition, family physicians were often consulted for general symptoms and non-cancer specialists for nervous system problems and complications of medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians and non-cancer specialists are highly involved in the care for children with cancer in the first years after diagnosis, including for health problems related to cancer or its treatment. This necessitates good communication among all physicians.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Physician's Role , Adolescent , British Columbia , Cardiology/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , General Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neoplasms/therapy , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Office Visits/trends , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Tract Infections/therapy , Symptom Assessment , Time Factors
11.
Can Fam Physician ; 62(10): e589-e598, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27737994

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care physician (PCP) use and continuity of PCP care across the breast cancer care continuum. DESIGN: Population-based, retrospective cohort study using provincial cancer registries linked to health administrative databases. SETTING: British Columbia, Manitoba, and Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: All women with incident invasive breast cancer from 2007 to 2012 in Manitoba and Ontario and from 2007 to 2011 in British Columbia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number and proportions of visits to PCPs were determined. Continuity of care was measured using the Usual Provider of Care index calculated as the proportion of visits to the most-often-visited PCP in the 6 to 30 months before a breast cancer diagnosis (baseline) and from 1 to 3 years following a breast cancer diagnosis (survivorship). RESULTS: More than three-quarters of patients visited their PCPs 2 or more times during the breast cancer diagnostic period, and more than 80% of patients had at least 1 PCP visit during breast cancer adjuvant treatment. Contact with the PCP decreased over time during breast cancer survivorship. Of the 3 phases, women appeared to be most likely to not have PCP contact during adjuvant treatment, with 10.7% (Ontario) to 18.7% (British Columbia) of women having no PCP visits during this phase. However, a sizable minority of women had at least monthly visits during the treatment phase, particularly in Manitoba and Ontario, where approximately a quarter of women saw a PCP at least monthly. We observed higher continuity of care with PCPs in survivorship (compared with baseline) in all provinces. CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians were generally involved throughout the breast cancer care continuum, but the level of involvement varied across care phases and by province. Future interventions will aim to further integrate primary and oncology care.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Primary Care , Adult , Aged , British Columbia/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Manitoba/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
12.
Biostatistics ; 15(2): 384-97, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24297607

ABSTRACT

Motivated by a cancer survivorship program, this paper explores event counts from two categories of individuals with unobservable membership. We formulate the counts using a latent class model and consider two likelihood-based inference procedures, the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and a pseudo-MLE procedure. The pseudo-MLE utilizes additional information on one of the latent classes. It yields reduced computational intensity and potentially increased estimation efficiency. We establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed pseudo-MLE, and we present an extended Huber sandwich estimator as a robust variance estimator for the pseudo-MLE. The finite-sample properties of the two-parameter estimators along with their variance estimators are examined by simulation. The proposed methodology is illustrated by physician-claim data from the cancer program.


Subject(s)
Data Interpretation, Statistical , Models, Statistical , Humans , Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , Likelihood Functions , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Poisson Distribution , Risk Assessment , Survivors/statistics & numerical data
13.
Int J Cancer ; 134(5): 1174-82, 2014 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24037993

ABSTRACT

To estimate the risk of late morbidity leading to hospitalization among young adult cancer 5-year survivors compared to the general population and to examine the long-term effects of demographic and disease-related factors on late morbidity, a retrospective cohort of 902 five-year survivors of young adult cancer diagnosed between 1981 and 1999 was identified from British Columbia (BC) Cancer Registry. A matched comparison group (N = 9020) was randomly selected from the provincial health insurance plan. All hospitalizations until the end of 2006 were determined from the BC health insurance plan hospitalization records. The Poisson regression model was used to estimate the rate ratios for late morbidity leading to hospitalization except pregnancy after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical risk factors. Overall, 455 (50.4%) survivors and 3,419 (37.9%) individuals in the comparison group had at least one type of late morbidity leading to hospitalization. The adjusted risk of this morbidity for survivors was 1.4 times higher than for the comparison group (95% CI = 1.22-1.54). The highest risks were found for hospitalization due to blood disease (RR = 4.2; 95% CI = 1.98-8.78) and neoplasm (RR = 4.3; 95% CI = 3.41-5.33). Survivors with three treatment modalities had three-fold higher risk of having any type of late morbidity (RR = 3.22; 95% CI = 2.09-4.94) than the comparators. These findings emphasize that young adult cancer survivors still have high risks of a wide range of late morbidities.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Poisson Distribution , Survivors , Young Adult
14.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(5): 949-60, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23443320

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A history of allergy has been inversely associated with several types of cancer although the evidence is not entirely consistent. We examined the association between allergy history and risk of glioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors using data on a large number of cases and controls from five INTERPHONE study countries (Australia, Canada, France, Israel, New Zealand), to better understand potential sources of bias in brain tumor case-control studies and to examine associations between allergy and tumor sites where few studies exist. METHODS: A total of 793 glioma, 832 meningioma, 394 acoustic neuroma, and 84 parotid gland tumor cases were analyzed with 2,520 controls recruited during 2000-2004. Conditional logistic regression models were used to obtain odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between self-reported allergy and tumor risk. RESULTS: A significant inverse association was observed between a history of any allergy and glioma (OR = 0.73, 95 % CI 0.60-0.88), meningioma (OR = 0.77, 95 % CI 0.63-0.93), and acoustic neuroma (OR = 0.64, 95 % CI 0.49-0.83). Inverse associations were also observed with specific allergic conditions. However, inverse associations with asthma and hay fever strengthened with increasing age of allergy onset and weakened with longer time since onset. No overall association was observed for parotid gland tumors (OR = 1.21, 95 % CI 0.73-2.02). CONCLUSIONS: While allergy history might influence glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma risk, the observed associations could be due to information or selection bias or reverse causality.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/complications , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/etiology , Brain Neoplasms/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Odds Ratio
15.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 60(5): 816-22, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23281214

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) cancer are at risk for late psychological sequelae, it is unclear if they are more likely to be prescription antidepressant users than their peers. PROCEDURE: All 5-year survivors of childhood or AYA cancer diagnosed before age 25 years in British Columbia from 1970 to 1995 were identified. Those with complete follow-up in the provincial health insurance registry from 2001 to 2004 were included (n = 2,389). A birth-cohort and gender-matched set of population controls 10 times the size of the survivor group was randomly selected (n = 23,890). All prescriptions filled between 2001 and 2004 were identified through linkage to the provincial prescription drug administrative database. Logistic regression analyses determined the impact of cancer survivorship on the likelihood of ever filling an antidepressant prescription. RESULTS: After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, survivors of childhood and AYA cancer were more likely to have filled an antidepressant prescription compared to controls (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.35). Cancer survivors had an increased likelihood of using all categories of antidepressants, and of using drugs from two or more antidepressant categories, compared to peers (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.55 [≥2 antidepressant categories]). Treatment was not a significant predictor of antidepressant use. Female survivors, those in young adulthood and those more than 20 years post-treatment had increased antidepressant use. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of childhood and AYA cancer are more likely to fill antidepressant prescriptions compared to peer controls. This may indirectly reflect an increased underlying prevalence of mental health conditions among survivors.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Survivors/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , British Columbia/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(2)2023 Jan 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36672357

ABSTRACT

The cancer diagnostic process can be protracted, and it is a time of great anxiety for patients. The objective of this study was to examine inter- and intra-provincial variation in diagnostic intervals and explore factors related to the variation. This was a multi-province retrospective cohort study using linked administrative health databases. All females with a diagnosis of histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer in British Columbia (2007-2010), Manitoba (2007-2011), Ontario (2007-2010), Nova Scotia (2007-2012), and Alberta (2004-2010) were included. The start of the diagnostic interval was determined using algorithms specific to whether the patient's cancer was detected through screening. We used multivariable quantile regression analyses to assess the association between demographic, clinical and healthcare utilization factors with the diagnostic interval outcome. We found significant inter- and intra-provincial variation in the breast cancer diagnostic interval and by screen-detection status; patients who presented symptomatically had longer intervals than screen-detected patients. Interprovincial diagnostic interval variation was 17 and 16 days for screen- and symptom-detected patients, respectively, at the median, and 14 and 41 days, respectively, at the 90th percentile. There was an association of longer diagnostic intervals with increasing comorbid disease in all provinces in non-screen-detected patients but not screen-detected. Longer intervals were observed across most provinces in screen-detected patients living in rural areas. Having a regular primary care provider was not associated with a shorter diagnostic interval. Our results highlight important findings regarding the length of the breast cancer diagnostic interval, its variation within and across provinces, and its association with comorbid disease and rurality. We conclude that diagnostic processes can be context specific, and more attention should be paid to developing tailored processes so that equitable access to a timely diagnosis can be achieved.

17.
Int J Cancer ; 128(7): 1624-31, 2011 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21280033

ABSTRACT

Our study examines inpatient, hospital-related morbidity in a geographically-defined cohort of long-term cancer survivors diagnosed before age 20 years in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada. A total of 1374 survivors diagnosed from 1981 to 1995 surviving at least 5-years postdiagnosis, and a matched sample of 13,740 BC residents, were identified from population registers, and linked to provincial hospitalization records from 1986 to 2000. Logistic regression was used to assess relative risk and effect of sociodemographic, clinical, and temporal factors on risk. Approximately 41% of survivors vs. 17% of the population sample had at least one type of hospitalization-related late morbidity in the observation period (adjusted RR 4.1, 95% CI 3.7-4.5). Those at highest risk were survivors of leukemia (RR 4.8, 95% CI 4.0-5.8), central nervous system tumors (RR 4.8, 95% CI 4.0-5.8), bone and soft tissue sarcomas (RR 4.9, 95% CI 3.8-6.2), and kidney cancer (RR 4.9, 95% CI 3.4-7.0). Adjusted relative risk was elevated for all types of morbidity except pregnancy and birth complications, and highest for neoplasms (including second primary cancers) (RR 21.7, 95% CI 16.3-28.7). Morbidity was elevated for all combinations of primary treatment and highest for those with previous radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery (RR 7.1, 95% CI 5.5-9.0). Over time, morbidity for late effects other than neoplasms became more prevalent. These results suggest that survivors are at increased ongoing risk of many types of hospital-related late morbidity, implying that long-term monitoring for multiple health problems is warranted.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , British Columbia , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk , Survivors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
18.
Can Fam Physician ; 57(12): e482-90, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22170210

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and pattern of physician visits in 1998 to 2000 among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors in British Columbia (BC), to compare their use of physician services with use in the general population, and to examine the effects of clinical and sociodemographic factors on care. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, population-based cohort study, with a comparison group. Cohort records from population registries were linked to physician claim data and oncology visit records for 1998 to 2000. SETTING: Outpatient physician care in BC. PARTICIPANTS: All (N = 1157) survivors of cancer diagnosed before age 20 years in BC between 1970 and 1992 who survived at least 5 years after diagnosis, and an age-sex frequency-matched population sample of 11 570 individuals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Probability of a physician visit and frequency of physician visits. RESULTS: Approximately 97% of survivors saw at least 1 physician in the 3-year period, compared with 50% of the general population sample. The probability of a GP visit was 96% higher (adjusted 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8 to 2.1), and the likelihood of a specialist visit was 157% higher (adjusted 95% CI 2.4 to 2.8) than for the general population. Survivors were more than twice as likely to see GPs at least 10 times (adjusted relative risk 2.23, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.4) and had 49% more visits than the general population. Cancer diagnosis and treatment affected visit patterns, but socioeconomic status and rural residency did not significantly affect the probability of a visit. CONCLUSION: Demand for physician care among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors is considerably greater than for the general population, and this need persists many years after diagnosis. Physicians need information on the unique health care requirements of this patient group in order to provide appropriate care.


Subject(s)
Health Services Needs and Demand , Neoplasms/therapy , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , British Columbia , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Male , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Poisson Distribution , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Specialization/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
19.
Lifetime Data Anal ; 17(2): 215-33, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20730625

ABSTRACT

In an attempt to provide tools for assessing hospital utilization, this paper extends well-known models for recurrent events to address non-negligible event duration and presents a procedure for estimating the model parameters. The model extension is natural and easy to understand. Asymptotic properties of the associated inferences are derived adapting the well-developed methods based on the counting process formulation. Several specifications of the proposed modeling are illustrated with the hospitalization records of childhood cancer survivors from a health care insurance system that motivated this research. The usefulness and robustness of the proposed approach is demonstrated numerically via simulation.


Subject(s)
Data Interpretation, Statistical , Hospitalization , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Proportional Hazards Models , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Leukemia/epidemiology , Male , Young Adult
20.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 55(2): 324-30, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20582971

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors Research Program (CAYACS) has been established in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, to carry out research into late effects and survivor care in multiple domains, and to inform policy and practice. PROCEDURE: This program identifies a survivor cohort and comparison groups from population-based registries and links their records to population-based files of outcomes and outcome determinants, to create a research database and conduct studies of long-term outcomes and care. RESULTS: The initial cohort consisted of all 5-year survivors of cancer or a tumor diagnosed under age 25 years from 1970 to 1995, who were residents in BC at the time of diagnosis, and followed till 2000 (3,841 subjects). Seven percent have died, and 77% have treatment information available. Data on death and second cancer occurring in BC are available. Late morbidity and healthcare utilization information is available for 68% of survivors (79% of those diagnosed from 1981). Education outcomes are available for 71% of those born during 1978-1995 and diagnosed under age 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Use of registries, administrative databases, and record linkage methodologies is a cost-effective and comprehensive means to conduct survivorship research. This program should add to knowledge of risks of late effects and impacts on care, inform development of strategies to manage risks, evaluate the effects of surveillance and interventions, and assess new risks as the cohort ages, more recent survivors enter the cohort, and treatments change.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Adolescent , British Columbia , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Medical Record Linkage , Population Groups , Registries , Research Design , Survivors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL