Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 92(9): 2305-2311, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35674397

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frailty predicts adverse perioperative outcomes and increased mortality in patients having vascular surgery. Frailty assessment is a potential tool to inform resource allocation, and shared decision-making about vascular surgery in the resource constrained COVID-19 pandemic environment. This cohort study describes the prevalence of frailty in patients having vascular surgery and the association between frailty, mortality and perioperative outcomes. METHODS: The COVID-19 Vascular Service in Australia (COVER-AU) prospective cohort study evaluates 30-day and six-month outcomes for consecutive patients having vascular surgery in 11 Australian vascular units, March-July 2020. The primary outcome was mortality, with secondary outcomes procedure-related outcomes and hospital utilization. Frailty was assessed using the nine-point visual Clinical Frailty Score, scores of 5 or more considered frail. RESULTS: Of the 917 patients enrolled, 203 were frail (22.1%). The 30 day and 6 month mortality was 2.0% (n = 20) and 5.9% (n = 35) respectively with no significant difference between frail and non-frail patients (OR 1.68, 95%CI 0.79-3.54). However, frail patients stayed longer in hospital, had more perioperative complications, and were more likely to be readmitted or have a reoperation when compared to non-frail patients. At 6 months, frail patients had twice the odds of major amputation compared to non-frail patients, after adjustment (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.17-3.78), driven by a high rate of amputation during the period of reduced surgical activity. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight that older, frail patients, experience potentially preventable adverse outcomes and there is a need for targeted interventions to optimize care, especially in times of healthcare stress.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Aged , Amputation, Surgical , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Frail Elderly , Frailty/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Length of Stay , Pandemics , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20182018 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29954765

ABSTRACT

Subclavian artery injury is a rare consequence of clavicle fracture. It most often results from penetrating trauma but can result from blunt trauma with adjacent bone fragments causing rupture, pseudoaneurysm, dissection or thrombosis of the artery. If flow through the subclavian artery is compromised there is a risk of ipsilateral upper limb ischaemia. Life-threatening haemorrhage may result in cases of laceration, and cerebral infarction may result from dissection. Vascular injury in association with clavicle fracture is typically regarded as an indication for internal fixation of the fracture. We present a case of subclavian artery thrombosis in association with a comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture causing limb ischaemia managed by carotid to brachial artery bypass without internal fracture fixation. The fracture united at 4 weeks and there was no sustained vascular or neurological impairment at follow-up. We advocate urgent vascular intervention in subclavian artery injury. There is little discussion in the literature regarding non-operative management of clavicle fractures with subclavian artery injury. We suggest that select clavicle fractures with subclavian artery injury can be safely managed non-operatively.


Subject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Clavicle/injuries , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Comminuted/diagnostic imaging , Saphenous Vein/transplantation , Subclavian Artery/injuries , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Accidental Falls , Aged , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/physiopathology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Fractures, Bone/complications , Fractures, Comminuted/complications , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
3.
ANZ J Surg ; 86(3): 179-83, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24456223

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The post-Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial era has seen a dramatic decline in the practice of carotid artery stenting (CAS). A retrospective review of prospectively collected CAS outcomes over a 10-year period by a single operator was undertaken to determine if this change in practice is justified and to identify the place of carotid stenting in current practice. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine carotid stent procedures were undertaken on 137 patients from 2002 to 2012. Cases were selected for CAS only if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the SAPPHIRE trial. Post-procedural outcomes were compared against those of a contemporaneous cohort of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by the same operator and against published meta-analyses. The measure of CAS durability was need for re-intervention, based on the presence of ultrasound-detected re-stenosis >70%. RESULTS: No significant difference was identified in 30-days' complication rates between patients undergoing CAS and those having CEA. Compared to published meta-analyses of CAS, our practice was accompanied by a significantly lower rate of peri-procedural stroke (1.26% versus 6%, P = 0.014) while carrying equivalent 30-days' death and myocardial infarction. Four stented arteries had re-intervention, due to asymptomatic in-stent stenosis of >70%. Further intervention was declined in a fifth case. This represents a re-stenosis rate of 3.1% over a mean follow-up of 40.2 ± 27.6 months. DISCUSSION: CAS can provide a safe and durable treatment option for selected patients with carotid artery disease, in the hands of appropriately trained proceduralists who meet accepted standards of practice.


Subject(s)
Carotid Arteries/surgery , Endarterectomy, Carotid/methods , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 80(4): 247-9, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20575950

ABSTRACT

Recurrent spontaneous haemarthrosis after knee arthroplasty occurs in less than 1% of cases, commonly thought to be the result of impingement of hypertrophic vascular synovium or fat pads, and exacerbated by anti-coagulation or anti-platelet therapy. Traditional treatment comprises an initial period of rest followed by open or arthroscopic washout, and by synovectomy if bleeding recurs or fails to settle. We present three cases of recurrent haemarthrosis following knee arthroplasty, which were successfully treated by angiography and feeding vessel coil embolization. An injury to one of the genicular arteries was identified as the cause of bleeding in all three cases; one manifest as a traumatic arteriovenous fistula. Bleeding ceased in all cases without recurrence (follow-up period 6 months-5 years, median of 2 years). Endovascular treatment offers a minimally invasive treatment option in selected cases of recurrent post-operative haemarthrosis.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Hemarthrosis/etiology , Hemarthrosis/therapy , Aged , Humans , Male , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL